Between criollos, or those born in the Americas, and peninsulares, or people born in Spain, there were classes in Spanish colonial society.
Which social classes existed in Spanish colonial society?The Peninsulares, Creoles, Mestizos, Mulattoes, Native American Indians, and Slaves were the first social groups in the Spanish colonies, followed by Mestizos, Mestizos, Mulattoes, and Slaves. Due to the fact that they were born on the Spanish peninsula, they were known as peninsulares. Just 2% of people were members of this strong elite. The Creoles came next.
The Spanish colonial society had what name?From 1492 and 1976, Spain and its forerunner nations ruled a colonial empire known as the Spanish Empire, sometimes known as the Hispanic Monarchy or the Catholic Monarchy.
To know more about colonial society visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29770773
#SPJ9
1. How did the expansion of the Third Reich impact the Nazis' decision to annihilate
the Jews?
2. What were the two primary killing methods the Nazis developed in the early years
of World War II?
3. What was the purpose of the Wannsee Conference? Who participated?
4. According to historian Michael Berenbaum, what is the most important thing to
understand about Wannsee?
Answer:
he war did not come as a surprise. Hitler was not secretive about his aggressive expansion policies.
But again and again, says Klaus Hesse from the Topography of Terror Documentation Center in Berliner, he maintained publicly that he was taking the peaceful route.
"Everything Hitler did was geared toward war ever since he came to power in 1933. From the very beginning, his aim was to revise the post-war order ordained in the Treaty of Versailles - to regain hegemony in Europe through an enlarged Germany. Everything was aimed at creating a large-scale economy that would allow Germany to wage a vast and long-term war in Europe."
Domestic war
The Treaty of Versailles in 1919 forced Germany and its allies to accept sole responsibility for causing the First World War and committed it to making territorial concessions, disarming and paying reparations. As Hitler saw it, this was a great humiliation, and he made it his mission to rectify it.
The so-called "stab-in-the-back" conspiracy theory was particularly convenient for Hitler's plans. And it wasn't very difficult to convince the public that the Social Democrats and the Jews had "stabbed the Reich in the back." And so a new war began within the country's own boundaries.
Deutschland Geschichte Bildergalerie Juden in Berlin SA Hetze 1938Deutschland Geschichte Bildergalerie Juden in Berlin SA Hetze 1938
The extent of Nazi brutality became obvious after the progrom of 1938Image: picture-alliance/dpa
Just a few days after he gained power, Hitler called for a country-wide boycott of Jewish shops on April 1, 1933. After that he passed the "Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service," which forced all non-"Aryans" and those not loyal to the National Socialist (NS) Party to retire from civil service.
From the very beginning, it was also about securing the financial means to wage war. Before the Nazis created a legal framework to regulate the pillaging of Jewish property and possessions, Jewish businesspeople were put under pressure to make profits off others fleeing the country. Emigrants had to pay 25 percent of their taxable assets to the German government, which in the first two years of NS rule alone earned the government 153 million reichsmark. On all bank transfers abroad, there was a fee that had to be paid to a state banking institution, the "Deutsche Golddiskontbank."
By September 1939, that fee had risen to 96 percent of the transfer sum.
Berlin 1936 - Olympic Games and war plans
Up to 1939, the majority of Germans saw Hitler as someone who could fix the country. His dictatorship brought about a positive change in the economic situation for many people. Unemployment sank, consumerism increased.
"So in this sense, Hitler was quite a populist - he knew you had to give the people butter along with guns," Hesse told DW.
But weapons were, in fact, more important for the government.
While Berlin was hosting the Olympic Games, Hitler was busy solidifying his war plans. In four years, the Nazi armed forces, the Wehrmacht, were to be fit to carry out the war in the east. Hitler's plan as noted in his classified "Four-Year Plan" was to make Germany self-sufficient in many areas so it could isolate itself from the world market and invest all its resources in arms and military buildup. Soon, half of the state's expenditures were going towards weapons.
The same year, the Wehrmacht occupied the demilitarized Rheinland in the west of the country - in clear violation of the Treaty of Versailles. In November 1937, Hitler told his secret plans to a select circle of the Wehrmacht's top generals: Germany needs more space, or "Lebensraum," for the "preservation and growth of the German people."
Explanation: Sorry For Long Answer
What major Union strategy was completed at the end of the siege of Vicksburg and why?
Answer:
capture of the Mississippi River, splitting the Confederacy in two
Explanation:
May 1863
Confederate General Pemberton:
held the high ground & had a strong defensive position:
July 4, 1863
after several failures & long siege, Grant captured Vicksburg
major turning point : Union controlled entire Mississippi River : cut the Confederacy in half & denied them a vital supply route.
boosted Union morale
gave President Abraham Lincoln a much-needed victory,
war had not been going well for the Union up to that point.
key part of the Union's overall strategy
What choices did Americans face in the elections of 1920 and 1924, and what directions did they choose?
The elections of 1920 and 1924 were significant events in American political history, as they marked a shift in political ideology and the direction of the country.
Why is it so?In the election of 1920, Americans faced a choice between Republican candidate Warren G. Harding and Democratic candidate James M. Cox. Harding campaigned on a platform of "normalcy," which promised a return to pre-war American values and a focus on domestic issues. Cox, on the other hand, campaigned on a platform of progressive reform and internationalism.
The American people chose Warren G. Harding in a landslide victory, with 60% of the popular vote. Harding's victory was seen as a rejection of progressive reform and international involvement, and a desire to return to more traditional American values.
Other factors -candidate Calvin Coolidge, Democratic candidate John W. Davis, and Progressive candidate Robert M. La Follette. Coolidge campaigned on a platform of limited government and free enterprise, while Davis advocated for progressive reform and international cooperation. La Follette, meanwhile, campaigned on a platform of progressive reform and opposition to big business.
The American people chose Calvin Coolidge in a landslide victory, with 54% of the popular vote. Coolidge's victory was seen as a reaffirmation of Harding's policies and a continuation of a return to traditional American values and limited government.
To know more about challenges faced by America in 1920s -
https://brainly.com/question/1014849
#SPJ9
related literature that discussed the difference and effect of educational level on the price of purchased primary vehicle and with citation
Answer:
One study conducted by Turrentine and Kurani (2007) found that individuals with higher educational levels tend to purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles, which may be attributed to their greater awareness of environmental issues and the long-term cost savings associated with fuel efficiency. Another study by Gillingham and Palmer (2014) also found that higher education levels are positively correlated with the likelihood of purchasing a hybrid or electric vehicle.
Explanation:
Why were colonies considered so important to the nations of Europe? Think about: the philosophy of mercantilism and the notion of a favorable balance of trade.
The colonies were prized highly by the countries of Europe during the colonial era for both economic and geopolitical reasons. Why was mercantilism, one major theory that underpinned European colonialism.
so vital to the idea of colonies?Colonies were crucial under mercantilism because they produced raw materials for the mother country, products that it would otherwise have to import (things like grain, sugar, or tobacco).
What does trade balance mean in terms of mercantilism?The mercantilist economic theory, which predominated in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century, claimed that maintaining a favorable trade balance was essential to funding a nation's import of goods and sustaining its export industry.
To know more about colonies visit:-
brainly.com/question/928103
#SPJ1
What was an effect of the House of Wisdom?
A. Libraries became more common .
B. Ancient Greek knowledge was preserved .
C. Illiteracy took hold in Europe .
D. The Quran became widely available .
Answer:
A. Libraries became more common .
Explanation:
The House of Wisdom influenced the establishment of other libraries in the later century that were used for personal purposes (Durant, 1942). The House of Wisdom also contributed significantly to the flourishing of authors and writers. The established of other libraries such as the Royal Library led to the creation of employment opportunities.
Answer:ancient greek knowledge was preserved
CAN SOMEONEE HELP ME PLEASE
(Q001) What aspect of Missouri’s new state constitution threatened to derail its admittance to the Union and the entire Missouri Compromise?
a.
Free blacks were prevented from entering the state.
b.
Women were given the right to vote.
c.
Slaves could not be transported into the state of Missouri.
d.
African-Americans were to be granted full citizenship rights and privileges.
The white ethnic revival of the 1970s meant that many European Americans began embracing ______.
a. the Black freedom movement
b. their distinct cultural heritage
c. a shared identity as white Americans
d. the cause of immigration reform
For this discussion forum, begin by reading the following statement and decide whether you agree or disagree with the statement:
“The Bill of Rights does not really affect me in my daily life.”
And why
I respectfully disagree with statement that the Bill of Rights does not affect individuals in their daily lives.
What was the Bill of Rights?The Bill of Rights refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which were adopted in 1791. It was created to protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government. The amendments guarantee various rights, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as the right to bear arms and a fair trial. They also prohibit the government from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, and protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. Additionally, the Bill of Rights reserves certain powers to the states and the people and establishes limits on the federal government's ability to interfere in the governance of the states.
To learn more about Bill of Rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30191600
#SPJ1
This 1912 cartoon depicts *
Efforts to contain the boxer rebellion
Tension in pre World War One Europe
Reaction to the Bolshevik revolution
Responses to the rise of the Weimar Republic
Answer: Boxer Rebellion
Explanation:
Compromise of 1850
1. Why was this compromise needed?
2. What was the burning issue that divided the north and
south?
3. What were the five bills passed under the Compromise
of 1850?
The Compromise of 1850 was package of five bills that aimed to resolve the issues related to slavery and territorial expansion in the United States.
What was the Compromise of 1850?The Compromise of 1850 was a set of legislative measures passed by the United States Congress in an attempt to resolve various disputes related to slavery and territorial expansion. The compromise included several provisions, such as the admission of California as a free state, the establishment of the territories of New Mexico and Utah, the abolition of the slave trade in Washington D.C., and the implementation of a more stringent Fugitive Slave Act. The Compromise of 1850 was controversial and did not fully resolve the issue of slavery, but it temporarily defused tensions between Northern and Southern states. It also helped delay the onset of the American Civil War for a few years.
To learn more about Compromise of 1850, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29761975
#SPJ1
How is the value of currency determined?
please help me, ty!
I will give brainlyist!
Currency value is determined by total supply and demand. A variety of factors, including interest rates, inflation, capital flow, and the money supply, have an impact on supply and demand.
How Does Currency Work?The majority of our daily transactions involve the use of currency, whether we use credit cards or paper bills. Indeed, money is the engine that drives economies worldwide. Paper money or coins that are in circulation are referred to as currency. However, when looking at the total amount of money in circulation, currency is only one aspect of the economy.
Without a doubt, most cash today exists as acknowledge cash or as electronic records put away in data sets in banks or monetary establishments. Still, currency is the mainstay of every day business, and that's what we'll examine in greater detail here.
To learn more about currency visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14372075
#SPJ1
Event: The Renaissance began in Italy in the 15th century.Combined Context
Expansion
Sentence
The shift from the Middle Ages to modernity was marked by the Renaissance, which began in Italy in the late 14th century and expanded throughout Europe.
How did the fifteenth-century Italian Renaissance get its start?The Renaissance was started in the Italian city of Florence, where wealthy citizens could afford to support ambitious artists. The Medici family members, who ruled Florence for more than 60 years, were among the movement's prominent backers.
What was the catalyst for the Renaissance in the 15th century?The Renaissance was influenced by numerous things. Trade and commerce expansion led to the development of rich cities and social classes that could afford to support the arts and education. Renaissance concepts were popularised by Italian city-states. The modern humanist school of thought declared a desire to learn new things and think creatively.
To know more about The Renaissance visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/798091
#SPJ1
What government or governments were the Reconstruction Amendments primarily intended to restrain and why?
THEO: How does Bishop Barron describe the Trinity and how is the Trinity a part of our lives?
Video Name: Bishop Barron on the meaning of the Trinity
According to Bishop Barron in his video on the meaning of the Trinity, the Trinity is described as a communion of persons - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit - in a relationship of self-giving love.
He emphasizes that the Trinity is not just a theological concept but a way of life, as it is a invitation to participate in God's love and to love others in the same way.
Bishop Barron explains that the Father is the source of all being, the Son is the Word made flesh who reveals God's love to humanity, and the Holy Spirit is the bond of love between the Father and the Son. He also points out that the Trinity is a mystery that cannot be fully comprehended by human reason but can be experienced through prayer and contemplation.
In terms of its relevance to our lives, Bishop Barron explains that the Trinity provides a model for how we can live in relationship with others.
learn more about Holy Spirit here
https://brainly.com/question/28707900
#SPJ1
How does the Third Amendment protect Americans with regard to their
homes?
O A. The government can't take people's homes without paying them a
fair market price.
• B. The government can't force people to accommodate soldiers in
their homes.
C. The government can't regulate what people say in the privacy of
their own homes.
• D. The government can't enter people's homes without permission.
SUBMIT
Answer:
B. The government can't force people to accommodate soldiers in
their homes.
Explanation:
This was created to protect homeowners from having to let soldiers live with them. The British passed the Quartering Act that made colonist have to share their homes with British soldiers and that angered the colonists.
What were conditions like in workhouses?
Answer:
Conditions inside the workhouse were deliberately harsh so that only those who desperately needed help would ask for it. Families were split up and housed in different parts of the workhouse. The poor were made to wear a uniform and the diet was monotonous. There were also strict rules and regulations to follow.
IM DOING CANADA
3. In early 2022, the GDP per capita of the United States was $59,312. How does this
compare with your selected country? What does it tell you about standard of living
in your selected country versus the United States? Respond to these questions
using at least three to five sentences.
4. Examine the information you have researched. Decide whether you recommend
this country for your family's new home. Write down the reasons you do or do not
recommend it.
5. Save your worksheet in one file to turn in. Use the name
"Country Recommendation your name" for your file to turn in.
Answer:
GDP is determined by the average income
Explanation:
Answer GDP is determined by the average income
earned per person in a given area in a specified year. The Jamaica GDP per capita is around 4800.00 USD. Hence, the standard of living in Jamaica is very low when compared.
What is the effect of low GDP?
When GDP slows down, the effects are as
follows:
1. lead to fears of a recession
2. layoffs and unemployment 3. declining business revenues and
4. consumer spending.
The GDP is a means to determine the economic growth and where is challenging.
Therefore, the standard of living of Jamaica when compared to America is very low and this means that, Jamaica will be experiencing poor healthcare, unemployment, and even poverty.
Why did Marie Antoinette, King Louis XVI, and Robespierre sent to guillotine? Why did the guillotine appeal to revolutionaries?
Marie Antoinette, King Louis XVI, and Robespierre were all sent to the guillotine during the French Revolution. Each of them had different reasons for being executed.
Marie Antoinette was the wife of King Louis XVI and was accused of being a traitor to the revolution. She was seen as a symbol of the corrupt monarchy that the revolutionaries were trying to overthrow. Additionally, her extravagant lifestyle and rumored affair with a Swedish count also contributed to her unpopularity.
King Louis XVI was seen as the ultimate symbol of the old regime and was accused of being a traitor to the revolution. His attempts to resist the changes demanded by the revolutionaries, as well as his failed escape attempt, led to his downfall and execution.
Robespierre, on the other hand, was a prominent figure in the revolution and one of its leaders. He was known for his radical views and his role in the Reign of Terror, a period of violence during which thousands of people were executed. However, Robespierre's popularity waned, and he was eventually arrested and executed by the same system he had helped to establish.
The guillotine appealed to the revolutionaries for several reasons. First, it was seen as a more humane method of execution compared to other methods used in the past, such as hanging, burning at the stake, or beheading with an axe or sword. The guillotine allowed for a swift and relatively painless death.
Second, the guillotine was also seen as a symbol of equality and justice, as it was used to execute people from all walks of life, including members of the nobility and clergy. This was in contrast to the old regime, where the rich and powerful often received lenient treatment compared to the poor and powerless.
Finally, the guillotine was also a powerful symbol of the revolution itself. Its use demonstrated the power of the revolutionary government and its commitment to justice and equality. It also served as a warning to anyone who opposed the revolution that they too could face the same fate.
How did Franklin Roosevelt's presidency change the U.S. government?
Answer:
The way that Franklin Roosevelt's presidency changed the U.S. government was by making it more active in the economy.
Explanation:
When Franklin Roosevelt became the president, the United States had an economy that was suffering heavily from the Great Depression which had made millions unemployed and caused poverty rates to spike.
The government at the time believed in limited interference in the economy because they believed the economy would eventually adjust.
Franklin Roosevelt went against that and invested heavily in the economy as well as passing regulations to control the economy more. This set the stage for current U.S. government interference in the economy.
Learn more at https://brainly.com/question/28376656
Answer:
Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency had a significant impact on the U.S. government, particularly in the following ways:
1. The New Deal: FDR's New Deal programs, which were a series of social and economic reforms aimed at lifting the country out of the Great Depression, greatly expanded the role of the federal government in American life. The New Deal initiatives included the creation of Social Security, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), and the Works Progress Administration (WPA).
2. Expansion of Executive Power: Through his leadership during World War II, Roosevelt greatly expanded the power of the executive branch. He also used his executive power to issue numerous executive orders, which helped shape the U.S. government's response to various national and international crises.
3. Judicial Reform: Roosevelt's efforts to reform the U.S. Supreme Court, through the introduction of the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, sparked intense controversy and public debate. Although the bill ultimately failed to pass, it helped shift the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches of the U.S. government.
In summary, Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency had a significant impact on the U.S. government by expanding the role of the federal government through the New Deal, increasing the power of the executive branch, and sparking important public debates about the role of the judiciary.
Which three statements are correct about the Pendleton Act?
-It covered 15 percent of civil service appointments.
-There was strong support for it in Congress.
-It required people to pass a test proving their competence.
-It is an early example of government reform.
-Most Gilded Age presidents supported its goals.
In the case at hand, the final three options are entirely accurate that is It required people to pass a test proving their competence. It is an early example of government reform. Most Gilded Age presidents supported its goals
The Pendleton Act is what?When a young job seeker assassinated President James A. Garfield in January 1883, the Pendleton Act was passed.
Jobs were previously assigned based on acquaintances and friendships. The system was referred to as "spoils." Numerous deserving people lost their jobs as a result.
By enacting this law, merit-based hiring was guaranteed. They were required to sit for competitive exams from which the top applicants were picked and hired.
Chester Arthur, the president who succeeded Garfield, promoted it as a type of reform movement. The Pendleton Act was enhanced by the presidents who succeeded Chester.
To know about Pendleton Act visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ1
Choose an historical or personal event that you know something about. In an essay style of your choice, write about this event from a different perspective than your own. How would this person tell the story?
The past tense is frequently used by authors of personal tales since they typically describe personal events. This aids in division.
What format should a personal essay follow?A personal essay is a concise work of autobiographical nonfiction that is written with intimacy and in a conversational tone. is sometimes referred to as a personal statement. According to author Annie Dillard, the personal essay is a type of creative nonfiction that is "all over the map" and "there's nothing you can't do with it."
A short narrative can be a personal essay, right?Essays are nonfiction, it's true, but they resemble short stories more than they do academic writing. Simply said, a personal essay is a true short tale. Essayists must use color they must work within the bounds of reality, but they must also employ many of the same tools as a short story writer: Don't tell, just show.
To know more about personal event visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/18153047
#SPJ1
How were early American Indian groups able to meet their needs prior to European arrival in North America?
Answer: hunting, fishing, and gathering.
Explanation:
What are the characteristics of limited government?
Answer:
A limited government is one where legalized force is restricted through delegated and enumerated authorities. Countries with limited governments have fewer laws about what individuals and businesses can and cannot do.
Explanation:
If you convinced your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political
concern, what would this situation be an example of?
If you convinced your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political concern, this situation would be an example of exercising your freedom of speech and political expression.
What is freedom of speech?Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to express their opinions, thoughts, and ideas without censorship or fear of retribution from the government or other powerful entities. It is protected by many constitutions and international human rights agreements, and is essential for the functioning of a democratic society. Freedom of speech includes the right to express controversial, unpopular, or even offensive opinions, as long as they do not directly harm others or incite violence. However, limitations may be placed on freedom of speech in certain circumstances, such as to protect national security or public safety, or to prevent hate speech or defamation.
To know more about freedom of speech, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31030676
#SPJ9
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(05.03 LC)
Which statement is true regarding the structure of the U.S. government?
The president has the most power in the country.
States have more power than the national government.
Each state has an executive branch that works together as the central government.
The central government is divided into three separate branches.
The statements which are true regarding the structure of the U.S. government are-
a. The president has the most power in the country.c. Each state has an executive branch that works together as the central government.d. The central government is divided into three separate branches.Therefore, the correct answers are option a, c and d.
Government?The officials that make up the governing body of a political unit and who make up the organization as a whole are examples of the body of people who compose government.
How is the American government constrained?The separation of powers in the U.S. Constitution led to limited government: "horizontal" separation of powers divided authority across the three institutions of government (legislature, executive, and judiciary), each of which serves as a check on the other; and "vertical" separation of powers (federalism)
To know more about Government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
is imperialism is consistent with ideals of American democracy.
Answer:
Yes, it is.
Explanation:
American imperialism refers to the expansion of American political, economic, cultural, media, and military influence beyond the boundaries of the United States.
Answer:
This group believed that imperialist countries often govern people against their will. The empire established by Spain was a good example of this situation. For example, the people of the Philippines didn’t want to be ruled by Spain.
The United States was a country that established its government and its reputation by fighting against Great Britain, which ruled the people and didn’t follow the will of the people it ruled. The Anti-Imperialist League felt that if the United States was going to pursue an imperialist policy, it would be violating one of its founding principles: that government should be based on the consent of the governed. For example, when the United States took over the Philippines after the Spanish-American War, the people of the Philippines didn’t want the United States to rule them. As a result, American imperialist policy was inconsistent with the ideals of democracy and inconsistent with the concept of a government based on democratic principles. It was also inconsistent with the ideals of the American Revolution. The British colonists fought for their freedom because the British government didn’t listen to their wishes and concerns. If the United States became imperialist, it would be viewed as a country that was not any different than Spain or Great Britain.
A new kind of democracy
The founding generation of American statesmen was an exclusive class: with the exception of John Adams, every US president until 1824 was an elite slaveholder from Virginia. Born into wealth and raised to be masters of others, they saw themselves as belonging to a better class of people that were naturally suited to leadership. Many of them were alarmed by how eagerly ordinary Americans embraced the democratic spirit of the Revolution. They even sought to rein in the political influence of the masses when framing the US Constitution.
But the revolutionary ideals of equality and democracy had captured the imagination of the American people, who embraced the notion that political participation should be for everyone, not just property-owning elites. During the first half of the nineteenth century, barriers preventing white men from participating in politics fell across the United States. None of the new states entering the Union required white men to own property in order to vote, and by the Civil War, all but one of the original thirteen states had eliminated property requirements. Voters, not state legislatures, began to choose presidential electors.
This expansion of the franchise has been dubbed Jacksonian Democracy, as the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 became symbolic of the new “politics of the common man.” The older generation of politicians looked on in horror when Jackson’s inauguration turned into a stampede, breaking china and furniture in the White House.
1.) What was Richeza’s family background? Why was it important?
2.) How did the German and Polish rulers resolve their war?
3.) What was the significance of the names Casimir and Gertrude in eleventh century Poland?
4.) How is Richeza portrayed in medieval Polish sources? What is the significance of this?
5.) What sort of charitable works was Richeza involved in?
6.) What is the significance of Richeza’s seal? What does this reveal about her position as queen?
7.) What is your overall opinion of Richeza? What strategies did she employ to advertise her authority as queen?
1)Ans:- Rachel was the ancestress of the Northern Kingdom, which was called Ephraim after Joseph's son. After Ephraim and Benjamin were exiled by the Assyrians, Rachel was remembered as the classic mother who mourns and intercedes for her children.
2)Ans:- World War II or the Second World War, often abbreviated as WWII or WW2, was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945. The vast majority of the world's countries, including all of the great powers, fought as part of two opposing military alliances: the Allies and the Axis.
3)Ans:- Gertrude-Olisava (c. 1025 – 4 January 1108), was Grand Princess consort of Rus' by marriage ... returning when Casimir I the Restorer, Gertrude's brother established ...
4)Ans:- She subsequently played an important role in mediating a peace settlement between Poland and the Holy Roman Empire.
5)Ans:- She founded the order of Missionaries of Charity, which became noted for building homes for orphans, nursing homes for lepers and hospices for the terminally ill in Calcutta. Mother Teresa's organization also engaged in aid work in other parts of the world. Asasira Caroline and 614 others like this.
6)Ans:- Tradition describes her as unusually beautiful.
7)Ans:- The first act passed by the House of Commons in February 1559 joined together a bill of supremacy, establishing Queen Elizabeth I as head of the church, with one of uniformity, dealing with the type of faith and service.
HELP!! In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
the fictional case of United States v. Fields. Remember, you are serving as a Supreme
Court justice. Your opinion must summarize the facts of the case, state your decision,
and cite precedent to support your ideas.
Abel Fields was a 39-year-old resident of a city in California. In 2011, he attended a city meeting about public safety. He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him the knowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues. During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had received the Purple Heart, a prestigious medal.
Each of Fields’s claims was false. He had never served in the military, and he had never received a medal.
He was prosecuted and convicted under the Stolen Valor Act. Because he was found guilty, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000.
The Court ruled in this case that states must demonstrate that a person made a false statement with malice. A deliberate decision to cause harm is called malice.
What was the opinion of the Supreme Court in the fictitious case United States v. Fields?The following is stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court, which describes your decision in the United States sector:
The fictional Supreme Court of the United States v. Fields
Keep in mind that you are a judge at the High Court.
The facts of the case, your decision, and a quote from the presentation should all be included in your opinion.
The decision was upheld on Fields' appeal to the Ninth Regional Court of Appeal.
He contended that the Taken Courage Act was unlawful and that his right to opportunity of articulation had been abused.
His case was upheld by the Ninth Regional Court of Appeal.
Under Section 6 of the 1891 Court of Appeals Act, 26 Stat. 828, the certiorari will not be granted because the error book will not lie, and it can only be granted where the error book does not exist.
But only in serious cases, when there is a conflict between state courts' decisions or those of state courts in different circuits, or when something affects this country's relations with other countries or is in the public interest.
To learn more about Supreme Court visit :
https://brainly.com/question/3570835
#SPJ1
How did Saddam Hussein’s aggressive actions lead to American involvement in Iraq?
Answer:
Saddam Hussein's aggressive actions, such as invading Kuwait in 1990 and refusing to comply with UN weapons inspections, led to American involvement in Iraq. The US and its allies believed that Hussein posed a threat to regional stability and global security, particularly with regard to his weapons of mass destruction program. In 2003, the US led a coalition to invade Iraq and overthrow Hussein's regime, which ultimately resulted in his capture and execution.
he is king