Answer:
Explanation:
There are several factors that can influence which committee a member of Congress joins, including:
The member's personal interests and expertise: Members of Congress may join committees that align with their personal interests or areas of expertise, allowing them to have a greater impact on issues that they care about.
The member's constituency: Members of Congress may also join committees that are particularly relevant to the needs and interests of their constituents. For example, a member representing a district with a significant agricultural sector may join the Agriculture Committee.
The member's seniority: Seniority is often an important factor in committee assignments, particularly in the House of Representatives. Members who have been in Congress longer may have greater opportunities to join high-profile committees.
The needs of the party leadership: The party leadership may also play a role in committee assignments, particularly for members who are seen as potential leaders within the party. Party leaders may try to place members on committees that align with the party's priorities and where they can have the greatest impact on policy.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The four factors that determine what committee a member of Congress joins are party affiliation, seniority, personal interests, and constituent needs.
Party affiliation is often the most important factor, as committee assignments are usually controlled by the majority party in each chamber. Seniority is also a significant factor, as more experienced members often receive priority in committee assignments. Personal interests can also play a role, as members may seek out committees that align with their expertise or policy goals.
Finally, constituent needs may influence committee assignments, as members may prioritize committees that address issues important to their constituents. Overall, committee assignments are a key way that members of Congress can shape policy and influence the legislative process.
Learn more about Congress: https://brainly.com/question/779570
#SPJ11
What are some financial stressors in your life?
what statute of limitations falsifying business records?
The statute of limitations for falsifying business records varies depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the offense.
In general, it can range from one to seven years. It is important to note that falsifying business records is a serious crime and can result in significant penalties, including fines and imprisonment. It is always best to consult with a legal professional for specific guidance on the statute of limitations and other legal matters related to falsifying business records.For example, in New York State, falsifying business records is a Class A misdemeanor, and the statute of limitations is two years from the commission of the offense (New York Penal Law § 30.10(2)(c)).
In California, falsifying business records is a wobbler offense that can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor, and the statute of limitations for both is three years from the date of the offense (California Penal Code § 802).It's important to note that the statute of limitations may be extended in certain circumstances, such as if the defendant is absent from the jurisdiction or if new evidence comes to light. It's best to consult with a lawyer familiar with the relevant laws in your jurisdiction for specific guidance on this matter.
Learn more about limitations falsifying here:https://brainly.com/question/28435088
#SPJ11
According to Philippine Constitution of 1973, what are the duties and obligations of a Filipino citizen? List down the duties and obligations and write your interpretation. 3-5 sentences each. Section 1. It shall be the duty of the citizen to be loyal to the Republic and to honor the Philippine flag, to defend the State and contribute to its development and welfare, to uphold the Constitution and obey the laws, and to cooperate with the duly constituted authorities in the attainment and preservation of a just and orderly society. Section 2. The rights of the individual impose upon him the correlative duty to exercise them responsibly and with due regard for the rights of others. Section 3. It shall be the duty of every citizen to engage in gainful work to assure himself and his family a life worthy of human dignity. Section 4. It shall be the obligation of every citizen qualified to vote to register and cast his vote
According to the Philippine Constitution of 1973, Filipino citizens have various duties and obligations. It is their duty to be loyal to the Republic, respect and honor the Philippine flag, and defend the State.
Additionally, they are expected to contribute to the country's development and welfare, comply with the Constitution and laws, and collaborate with the authorities to ensure a fair and organized society. Secondly, individual rights come with the responsibility to exercise them responsibly while respecting others' rights.
Citizens must engage in gainful work to guarantee their family a life with human dignity. Lastly, it is the obligation of every qualified citizen to register and cast their vote during elections.
In summary, the Filipino citizen's duties and obligations are geared towards promoting loyalty, responsibility, and respect for the rule of law, a productive and stable life, and active participation in the country's governance.
To know more about Philippine flag visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24411261
#SPJ11
Describe the American judicial systems (civil, criminal, and juvenile), their jurisdiction, development and structure.
Analyze the function and dynamics of the courtroom work group.
Identify judicial processes from pretrial to appeal.
Describe the significant Constitutional Amendments, doctrines, and other sources of law in the American judicial system.
Discuss constitutional freedoms and rights of citizens and explain how an ethical criminal justice system and participatory citizenship protects those freedoms and rights
Demonstrate knowledge of the three major areas of America’s criminal justice system (Police, Courts, & Corrections)
Analyze a criminal case and understand its relevance to protected freedoms and rights.
Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental elements of criminal law.
The concept of the courtroom workgroup was introduced in 1977. It was a radical departure from the public’s view of justice in the courts. In this project, students will complete a 5-page research paper that analyzes the effects of the courtroom work group on the criminal justice system.
The structure of your paper should have a good introduction that presents the topic of the paper and a good thesis statement.
The paper will describe and identify the American judicial system and specifically identify the participants and their roles.
The paper will discuss the traditional role of the courts in light of the Constitutional amendments and laws that grant power to the courts and the traditional theory of justice through the courts.
The paper will define the courtroom workgroup, its participants, and analyze the goals of the group.
The paper will compare and contrast the workgroup goals to the traditional goals of justice through the courts and discuss whether justice is truly being served through the machinations of the workgroup.
The paper has a strong conclusion, summarizing the paper and giving an opinion regarding the overall theme.
The American judicial system is divided into three main categories: civil, criminal, and juvenile.
How does the American judicial system work?The civil judicial system deals primarily with legal disputes arising between several persons, groups, or companies. These controversies could embody contracts, assets, torts, as well as other qualified issues.
Conversely, the criminal judicial system encompasses offenses against the state or community. This might include activities such as robbery, homicide, aggression, and even narcotics peddling. Both federal and state tribunals fall under the rubric of criminal courts.
Additionally, the juvenile judicial system is specially tailored to manage cases that connect to juveniles being charged with a crime or in need of guidance and security. Faculties of the juvenile justice arena vary from state to state; yet normally cover individuals younger than 18 years of age.
Countless leading principles, historically and juridically, have epitomized the maturation of the United States' judiciary. A structure for government courthouses was ingrained within the US Constitution whereas state constitutions established what became known as state tribunals.
Find out more on the juvenile judicial system at https://brainly.com/question/28945484
#SPJ1
Analysis of legal signs of genocide. distinguish between genocide and crimes against humanity
The legal signs of genocide, as defined by the United Nations Genocide Convention, include the intentional and systematic destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. This can manifest in a variety of ways, including killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, refer to a broader category of atrocities committed against a civilian population. This can include acts such as murder, enslavement, torture, sexual violence, and forced displacement. Unlike genocide, crimes against humanity do not require an intent to destroy a specific group but rather are defined by the widespread and systematic nature of the attacks.
In summary, while both genocide and crimes against humanity involve serious violations of human rights and international law, genocide is distinguished by its specific targeting of a particular group for destruction, whereas crimes against humanity are defined by their widespread and systematic nature.
To know more about What is genocide- https://brainly.com/question/23582099
#SPJ11
The legal signs of genocide involve intentionally and systematically destroying a particular racial, ethnic, religious, or national group. According to the United Nations Genocide Convention, genocide includes acts such as killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions designed to bring about the group's physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births, and forcibly transferring children to another group.
Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, encompass a broader range of acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. These acts include murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution, enforced disappearances, and other inhumane acts. While genocide targets explicitly a particular group intending to destroy it, crimes against humanity can be committed against any civilian population without the requirement of a specific intent to annihilate a particular group.
To distinguish between genocide and crimes against humanity, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the acts committed and the targeted population.
2. Determine if there is a specific intent to destroy a particular group (genocide) or if the acts are part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population (crimes against humanity).
3. Analyze the legal signs of genocide, such as the systematic nature of the acts and the specific methods used to destroy the group.
4. Compare the acts and intentions to the definitions of genocide and crimes against humanity under international law.
In conclusion, the main difference between genocide and crimes against humanity lies in the specific intent to destroy a particular group in the case of genocide. In contrast, crimes against humanity involve a broader range of acts against any civilian population. By analyzing the legal signs and the intentions behind the actions, it is possible to distinguish between these two grave international crimes.
To learn more about genocide, visit: https://brainly.com/question/4266491
#SPJ11
Nakoya, a college student, stops to shop at a local ?yard sale? and sees a very nice mountain bike priced at $600. Needing a cheap form of transportation, Nakoya begins negotiating with the bike?s owner, Monica. After a few minutes of bargaining, Monica agrees to sell her bike to Nakoya for $520. They shake hands, and Nakoya leaves the yard sale, promising to return with her checkbook to pay for and pick up the bike. Nakoya never returns. Monica sues Nakoya in small claims court for breach of contract
Nakoya, a college student, encountered a mountain bike at a local yard sale, which was priced at $600. As she needed an affordable mode of transportation, she negotiated with Monica, the bike's owner.
They agreed on a final price of $520, shook hands, and Nakoya left, assuring she would return with her checkbook to complete the transaction. However, Nakoya failed to return, prompting Monica to sue her in small claims court for breach of contract.
This case involves an oral agreement, which can be legally binding, but the lack of a written contract might complicate matters. In small claims court, Monica will need to provide evidence that the agreement took place and demonstrate Nakoya's breach to pursue damages.
To know more about oral agreement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23877329
#SPJ11
malicious shrinkers referes to losses that occur while companies
Malicious shrinkers refers to losses that occur while companies are in the process of shipping products to customers, and the products shrink in size or weight due to deliberate tampering or theft.
What is malicious shrinkers?This can result in the company delivering less product than was originally intended, leading to financial losses and potential harm to customer relationships. The term "malicious shrinkage" is often used to distinguish this type of loss from other forms of shrinkage, such as accidental damage or spoilage.
Malicious shrinkage is a common problem in industries where high-value or easily sellable products are shipped, such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, or luxury goods.
Learn more about malicious shrinkers at https://brainly.com/question/31579800
#SPJ1
Based on your reading of the following statement from the Department of Defense, what steps do you suppose the government is taking to make certain private contractors do not exceed their authority?
Top officials from the Defense and State departments today signed a joint memorandum that will increase coordination between American military forces, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and private security contractors in Iraq. The document broadly defines how future use of force, movement, and reporting of incidents by security contractors in Iraq will be more closely coordinated with U.S. government entities. “We think this is a very good and strong memorandum of agreement between our two departments and should vastly improve the coordination and control of private security contractors operating in Iraq,” Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said today.
With regard to legal accountability of private contractors, Whitman said, the memo reaffirms the departments’ commitment to work with Congress toward legislation that will “facilitate legal accountability” under U.S. law. Whitman said many of the provisions outlined in the memorandum already are in practice, but they will be further “operationalized” by officials at Multinational Force Iraq.
A. The Department of Defense recognizes the need to establish legal boundaries that assure private contractors do not exceed their authority.
B. With a few years, it is likely that private contractors will replace enlisted soldiers on the battlefield.
C. Corporate security forces are taking on an increasingly significant and legally appropriate role in modern warfare.
D. Contractors will not be used following the cessation of hostilities in Iraq.
Answer: It’s A
Explanation: I had it for edge.
Explain the responsibility of a principal who aids another in taking drugs as described in People v. Hopkins
In People v. Hopkins, the responsibility of a principal who aids another in taking drugs is outlined. A principal is someone who directly participates in or aids and abets the commission of a crime. In this case, the principal who assists another individual in taking drugs is held responsible for the consequences and actions associated with drug use.
The principal can be held liable if they knowingly provide, encourage, or facilitate drug use, even if they do not actively take the drugs themselves. This can include providing the drugs, supplying a location for drug use, or giving advice on how to take the drugs. The principal's liability is based on their involvement and intention to contribute to the criminal act.
In summary, a principal who aids another in taking drugs, as described in People v. Hopkins, holds significant responsibility for the crime. They can be held accountable for any harm or consequences that arise from drug use based on their knowledge, involvement, and intention to contribute to the criminal act.
To learn more about drugs, visit: https://brainly.com/question/30392650
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true about the Patients' Bill of Rights?
The Patients' Bill of Rights is the fifteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
No one universal government statute exists.
The Patients' Bill of Rights is part of HITECH.
The American Hospital Association has a Patients' Bill of Rights that became federal law.
Answer:
The American Hospital Association has a Patients' Bill of Rights that became federal law.
Explanation:
To protect your private information and medical information
Joe, 17 year old teen, dented someone's parked car on accident. He sees cameras on the owners car and possible house and out of gulit left a note with his name and number on it apologizing. The owner of the car finally called and was nice about the situation but wants to discuss how it should be fixed. Joe discussed this with his parents next. They were furious, saying that it was a bad idea and that he should've driven off and left nothing. They don't think they can afford the dent as they don’t have collision insurance. His parents said to never contact the owner of the car again. Joe, not knowing this parents didn't have that type of insurance nor not knowing what to do, he just sits in frustration and confusion.
What should he do?
What should his parents do?
How could this situation in general be solved?
What would happen if Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again?
(PLEASE ANSWER IN FULL DETAIL)
Answer:
Joe did the right thing by leaving a note with his name and number on it to take responsibility for the accident. It shows maturity and responsibility, and it is the ethical thing to do. Even though his parents may have been angry about the situation, leaving the scene of the accident without taking responsibility could have resulted in legal consequences and could have caused more problems in the future.
In this situation, Joe should communicate with the car owner and discuss how the dent can be fixed. He can offer to pay for the damages out of his own pocket, or suggest getting a few quotes from different body shops to compare prices. If the owner agrees to accept payment from Joe, he should get a written agreement or receipt of payment to avoid any legal disputes in the future.
Joe's parents should support him in taking responsibility for his actions and help him find a solution to the problem. They can work together with Joe to find a solution that works for everyone involved, and help him negotiate with the car owner to reach a fair resolution.
In general, situations like this can be solved through open communication and taking responsibility for one's actions. By communicating honestly and openly with the other party involved, it is often possible to find a solution that works for everyone.
If Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again, it could result in legal consequences. Leaving the scene of an accident without taking responsibility is a serious offense, and could result in criminal charges or a civil lawsuit. It is always best to take responsibility for one's actions and try to find a solution to the problem.
What branch of government do regulatory agencies fall under?.
1. Review the following quote and summarize the meaning into your own words using concepts and details from the lesson. Make sure to include why environmental laws and protections are needed and what they aim to accomplish.
Man’s attitude toward nature is today critically important simply because we have now acquired a fateful power to alter and destroy nature. But man is a part of nature, and his war against nature is inevitably a war against himself.
- Rachel Carson (1907-1964)
2. Choose and research three federal laws or environmental events from the list below.
Rank your choices in order of importance using your research and opinion.
Explain each event or law chosen for your list.
For your #1 choice also include an explanation of why you chose it for the top of your list. Selected Modern Environmental Events
1962: Silent Spring published by Rachel Carson
1964: Wilderness Act
1969: Cuyahoga River in Ohio caught fire
1970: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
1970: First Earth Day (April 22)
1970: Environmental Protection Agency founded
1970: Clean Air Act
1972: Clean Water Act
1973: Endangered Species Act
1979: Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident
1980: CERCLA (Superfund)
1989: The Montreal Protocol
1989: Exxon Valdez Disaster
2010: BP oil spill in the Gulf (Deepwater Horizon)
Rachel Carson’s quote highlights the importance of environmental protection. Environmental laws and protections are needed because humans have acquired the power to alter and destroy nature. However, humans are a part of nature, and their war against nature is inevitably a war against themselves.
Some important federal laws or environmental events related to environmental protection include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, and Superfund.
The NEPA was enacted in 1970 and requires federal agencies to consider the environmental impact of their actions before making decisions. The Clean Air Act was enacted in 1970 and regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. The Clean Water Act was enacted in 1972 and regulates discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States. The Endangered Species Act was enacted in 1973 and provides for the conservation of threatened and endangered species. The Superfund was enacted in 1980 and provides for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites.
Learn more about NEPA: https://brainly.com/question/28564221.
#SPJ11
--Game Riddle--
DETECTIVE TIME!
> Do not cheating and Do not lookup/searching in any website <
> u can use/say ( "use the hint" ) <
how to play:
3 question to answer and u got a scores. I'm gonna count the scores if ur answer right, but if ur answer carelessly I'm not gonna count ur scores and disqualified ( perm-report ), I hope u enjoyed! :>
(warning: may contain offensive language)
1. Accused of stealing the farmer’s chickens, Jack is locked up in an empty room in the local jail. His cell has a dirt floor and is completely void of any accessories except for a shovel. There is a window overlooking the hills outside. Jack is determined to break out and prove his innocence, but the window is too high to reach.
How can he escape?
Note: that digging a tunnel is not a feasible option because the ground beneath the dirt is rock hard. Jack doesn’t have the energy to dig through it as he is deprived of food and water.
2. An elderly woman lived alone in her house by the suburbs. She rarely left the house and knew only a few people. One Friday morning, the mailman called out for the woman but didn’t receive a prompt answer as usual. Upon peeking in through the window, the mailman realized that the woman was murdered. The police investigated the house and found Tuesday’s newspaper by the dead body. Also, by the door outside, there were three unopened bottles of milk, one of which had gone bad.
The police arrested the killer the very next day. How did they figure out so quickly?
3. A renowned chemist is found dead in his lab. There is no clear evidence except a piece of paper lying by the body. The paper is blank other than the name of five elements scrawled across it hastily:
• Nickel
• Carbon
• Oxygen
• Lanthanum
• Sulfur
The guard reported that three people visited the chemist that day – his sister, Lanaya, his colleague, Nicolas, and his wife, Teresa.
The criminal was arrested immediately. Who was it?
I hope u enjoyed! :>
Questions by imaginationYTB ( Me :> )
Jack can use the shovel to create a pile of dirt underneath the window, allowing him to climb up and escape through the window.
The police realized that since the newspaper found near the woman's body was from Tuesday, and the milk bottles outside were unopened except for one, which had gone bad, it must mean that the woman was already dead on Tuesday and the killer had been entering the house to take the milk bottles each day. This narrowed down the list of suspects to the people who knew the woman's routine.
The killer was Lanaya, the chemist's sister. The first letter of each element on the paper spells out "NicolAS", indicating that Nicolas was involved in some way. But since sulfur is spelled with a U in the US, and "Sulphur" with a PH in the UK, it is clear that the paper was written by someone from the UK - which Lanaya was. Additionally, the other elements are related to cosmetics, which Lanaya was known to work in.
To know more about shovel visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2614468
#SPJ11
To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
The quote "To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" suggests that those who prohibit criticism hold power and authority over society, emphasizing the importance of free speech for promoting accountability.
The quote "To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" implies that the people or institutions that prohibit criticism or dissent are the ones who hold power and authority over society. In other words, those who have the ability to silence opposing views and maintain control over the narrative are the ones in charge, rather than those who hold official titles or positions.
This quote highlights the importance of free speech and the need for open discourse in order to challenge authority and promote accountability. It is often attributed to Voltaire, but the origin of the quote is actually unclear.
To know more about rules, here
https://brainly.com/question/14452856
#SPJ4
--The complete question is, What is the meaning behind the quote "To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"?--
Real estate salespersons' business cards must clearly indicate that they are:
Real estate salespersons' business cards must clearly indicate that they are licensed real estate salespersons.
Why is this done ?This is typically done by including the phrase "Licensed Real Estate Salesperson" or a similar designation on the card, along with the individual's name, contact information, and brokerage affiliation.
In some states or countries, there may be specific regulations regarding the exact language or format that must be used on a real estate salesperson's business card. It is important for real estate salespersons to follow these regulations to ensure that they are in compliance with local laws and regulations.
Find out more on real estate at https://brainly.com/question/14775665
#SPJ1
Explain the substantive and procedural protections afforded by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments for defendants charged with crimes today
The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments provide substantive and procedural protections for defendants charged with crimes today.
Explanation:The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution provide substantive and procedural protections for defendants charged with crimes today.
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that law enforcement must have a warrant based on probable cause in order to search a person, their property, or their belongings.
The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination and double jeopardy. It guarantees the right to remain silent and protects individuals from being tried for the same crime twice.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees several rights for defendants, including the right to a fair trial, the right to confront witnesses, the right to have a lawyer present, and the right to a speedy and public trial.
Learn more about Protections under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments here:https://brainly.com/question/31534315
#SPJ2
Which of the following is
true about the structure of
state governments?
A. State law can go against the federal government.
B. State law cannot override federal law.
C. State law will never affect the people.
B. State law cannot override federal law is true about structure of state governments.
State governments in the United States are institutional bodies that perform government tasks at a lower level than the federal government. Each government in the United States has legislative, executive, and judicial jurisdiction over a specific geographic territory.
The United States consists of 50 states: nine of the Thirteen Colonies that were already part of the United States when the Constitution went into effect in 1789, four that ratified the Constitution after its inception, and 37 that have been admitted since by Congress as authorized by Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution.
State governments, which are structured in accordance with state legislation (including state constitutions and state statutes), follow the same structural paradigm as the federal government, with three branches of government—executive, legislative, and judiciary.
To know more about state government :
https://brainly.com/question/12299619
#SPJ1
On Halloween night, John and several of his friends decided to pull some pranks at their high school and damaged some of the classrooms. The next morning, school security officers reviewed the security videotapes to see who had done the damage. What will the students be charged with?
Answer:
The students may be charged with vandalism or malicious mischief, which involves damaging or defacing property without the owner's consent. Depending on the severity of the damage, the charges could be a misdemeanor or a felony. In addition to criminal charges, the students could also face disciplinary action from their school, including suspension or expulsion. It is important to note that vandalism is a serious crime and can have long-lasting consequences for the individuals involved.
Explanation:
What is methodology in research paper
Explain how the New York State Pension System Work
Your pension is determined by your years of credited service, retirement age, and final average salary (FAS).
FAS is the average of your earnings throughout the last 36 months of service when you earned the most. Typically, this is the last three years of employment.
The New York State Common Retirement Fund is a public pension plan for New York State government employees. It is the third largest public pension plan in the country, with $207.4 billion in assets as of 2018.
The New York State Comptroller's office oversees these assets, which are held on behalf of nearly one million members of the New York State and Local Retirement Systems (NYSLRS). Its one-year return was 11.35% as of March 31, 2018, however its 10-year return was 6.4%.
To know more about pension:
https://brainly.com/question/31215595
#SPJ1
I need help with thus test on driving
The correct answer to the question about distracted driving is: d. Other drivers must react more quickly.
How to explain the informationWhen a driver is distracted, they may react slower to changes in traffic conditions, such as a car suddenly stopping or a pedestrian crossing the road. This can require other drivers on the road to react more quickly in order to avoid a collision.
Regarding the question about the drop in traffic fatalities per mile traveled in the US between 1970 and 1990, the generally accepted reason is: c. Seat belt use increased.
Learn more about driving on
https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT one of the types of sanctions traditionally (i.e. commonly, imposed at least a few times annually) imposed upon individuals convicted of a criminal offense in the U.S. criminal justice system.
Question 8 options:
Imprisonment
Capital Punishment
Monetary Fines
Corporal punishment
How is poverty related to other social problems, such as discrimination, immigration and crime?
Answer:
Explanation:
Children growing up in poverty are less likely to graduate high school or go to college, and they are more likely to commit street crime. People living in poverty might also migrate in hopes for a better life, some people even do it illegally. They also might be discriminated to ,since they don't have the privilege to wear the best clothes or be the most hygienic. They are also more likely to have several kinds of family problems, including divorce and family conflict
The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through which of the following means?
A. Stating incorrect facts and observing the subject's reaction.
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
C. Making the subject feel relaxed and comfortable.
D. Creating a situation in which the subject perceives that they may be in danger.
Answer:
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
Explanation:
The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through asking a series of indirect questions.
Option A refers to a technique called deception, where incorrect facts are stated to observe the subject's reaction. Option C refers to building rapport, which can help to establish trust and encourage the subject to share information voluntarily. Option D refers to the use of intimidation or coercion, which is not a recommended or ethical method for obtaining information.
A person is driving and hears a Police siren behind them. They do not know what they have done wrong. What should they do?
If a person is driving and hears a police siren behind them, they should pull over to the right side of the road and stop the vehicle as soon as it is safe to do so. They should remain calm and wait for the police officer to approach them. It is important to follow the officer's instructions and be respectful. If the person is unsure why they were pulled over, they can ask the officer for clarification. It is important to remember that the police officer is there to ensure everyone's safety, and cooperation can help resolve the situation quickly and smoothly.
Identify the functions of court systems related to sancturary cities in the resources provided?
senate bill 4 was all that was provided.
Senate Bill 4 (SB4) is a state-wide law in Texas that is designed to bar sanctuary cities from existing.
This law seeks to do this by requiring local law enforcement officials to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts and to allow the federal government to enforce immigration laws in local jurisdictions. It also requires local officials to act on behalf of federal immigration agents when asked.
This law is intended to deter illegal immigration and punish local governments that choose to ignore federal immigration laws. By including stiff penalties for noncompliance and by allowing the state to pursue legal action against local officials who fail to comply, SB4 is intended to serve as a deterrent to sanctuary city policies. In addition, SB4 also provides a mechanism for the state to monitor and enforce compliance with the law. This includes the ability to take legal action against sanctuary cities if they fail to comply.
To know more about Senate Bill , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11494587
#SPJ4
neil broke his leg and spent several days in the hospital. his insurance provider paid his hospital bills directly rather than paying neil. what principle of insurance does this demonstrate?
The principle of insurance demonstrated by Neil's insurance provider paying his hospital bills directly, rather than paying Neil, is known as "Indemnity." The principle of indemnity is one of the fundamental principles in insurance, which ensures that the insured is restored to the same financial position they were in before the loss occurred without gaining profit or suffering a loss.
In Neil's case, when he broke his leg and spent several days in the hospital, he incurred medical expenses. His insurance provider, following the principle of indemnity, paid the hospital bills directly to ensure that Neil was not financially burdened by the cost of his medical treatment. This direct payment helps maintain the integrity of the insurance system, prevents any possibility of fraud or misuse of funds, and ensures that Neil is compensated only for the actual loss he suffered.
To summarize, the principle of indemnity is demonstrated by Neil's insurance provider paying his hospital bills directly, which helps maintain the fairness and effectiveness of the insurance system by ensuring that the insured party is restored to their original financial position without gaining or losing money.
To learn more about the principle of indemnity, visit: https://brainly.com/question/11431424
#SPJ11
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (October 11, 2018) decision and reasoning for the decision.
The celebrated Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido was a momentous United States Supreme Court case which was determined on October 11th, 2018 regarding the comprehension of the venerable Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (October 11, 2018) decision and reasoning for the decision.Two firefighters, John Guido and Dennis Rankin, who were both more than 40-years old, formalized an action against this particular governmental division of the state of Arizona asserting that they had been dismissed due to their age unlawfully in negation of the established ADEA.
However, the District ardently contended that it ought not be subject to the ADEA's edicts since it employed fewer than 20 personnel.
Read more on Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido here https://brainly.com/question/26174453
#SPJ1
Michael Devereux v. United Parcel Service, Inc. - 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 19 (Tenn. Sup. Ct.)
Facts:
Michael Devereux, who is the employee, was a “shifter” for United Parcel Service, Inc., who is the employer. His job involved moving semi-trailers to and from the loading dock of Employer’s package-sorting facility in Whites Creek, Tennessee. He began working for Employer on a part-time basis in 1977, while still in high school. He was terminated in 2006. Mr. Devereux sustained a compensable injury to his left knee in March 2005.
Decision and reasoning
Devereux's termination was not wrongful as he failed to provide adequate medical evidence showing he could perform job duties with reasonable accommodations.
The Tennessee Supreme Court concluded in Michael Devereux v. United Parcel Service, Inc. that when the employer fired Devereux from his job, neither the Americans with Disabilities Act nor the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Act was broken. Despite having a compensable left knee injury in March 2005, Devereux failed to offer sufficient medical proof that he could carry out his job obligations with acceptable modifications.
As a consequence, it was determined that the employer's choice to terminate his employment was legal. Devereux's lengthy work with the company, which began on a part-time basis in 1977, was insufficient to trump the decision to let him go in this instance.
Learn more about accommodations:
https://brainly.com/question/30793782
#SPJ1