A 15 kg box is moving to the right while being pushed down and to the left as shown in the picture. Force Push is 100 N and = 40°. The coefficient of static friction µS = 0.6 and the coefficient of kinetic friction µK = 0.5

What is the magnitude of Force Normal?
What is the magnitude of Force Friction?
What is the acceleration rate of the box in the x direction?

The amount of heat transferred to the cast-iron skillet is approximately 351,450 J.

To calculate the amount of heat transferred to the cast-iron skillet, we can use the formula:

Q = m * c * ΔT

where:

Q is the heat transferred,

m is the mass of the skillet,

c is the specific heat capacity of iron, and

ΔT is the change in temperature.

Given:

m = 5.10 kg (mass of the skillet)

c = 450 J/(kg*K) (specific heat capacity of iron)

ΔT = 450 K - 295 K (change in temperature)

Let's calculate the heat transferred:

Q = (5.10 kg) * (450 J/(kg*K)) * (450 K - 295 K)

Q = 5.10 kg * 450 J/(kg*K) * 155 K

Q ≈ 351,450 J

To know more about heat refer here

https://brainly.com/question/1429452#

#SPJ11

Yes, the presence of water on top of the glass block will affect the apparent position of the object.

Total apparent depth of the block and water is 8 cm.

This is because the light rays passing through the water will refract or bend as they enter the glass block, and then bend again as they exit the glass and enter the air above.

To determine the apparent position of the object, you will need to know the refractive indices of water and glass. The refractive index of water is 1.33, and the refractive index of glass is typically around 1.5.

Assuming the light rays are traveling perpendicular to the surfaces of the block, the apparent depth of the block as seen from above the water line will be:

apparent depth = actual depth / refractive index

For the water, the apparent depth is simply its actual depth, since the light rays are not refracted when passing from air to water.

So, for the glass block:

apparent depth = 6 cm / 1.5 = 4 cm

And for the water:

apparent depth = 4 cm

Therefore, the total apparent depth of the block and water is 4 + 4 = 8 cm. If an object is placed below the water line but above the top surface of the block, its apparent position will appear to be shifted upward by this amount.

Find out more on apparent position here: https://brainly.com/question/30354612

#SPJ1

At point A, the interference between the two sources is constructive. This is because the two waves are in phase at this point, meaning the peaks and troughs of the two waves line up.

When this happens, the amplitude of the combined wave is greater than the amplitude of either individual wave. This increased amplitude results in a stronger wave, which is an example of constructive interference.

Constructive interference can also be caused when two waves have a phase difference of 0, 180, or multiples of 180. In this case, the two waves have a phase difference of 0, resulting in constructive interference.

Know more about amplitude  here

https://brainly.com/question/8662436#

#SPJ11

The vertical position of the cannonball at the time tg/2 is 87.5 meters above ground level.

The horizontal motion of the cannonball is independent of its vertical motion. Since the cannonball is fired horizontally, its initial vertical velocity is zero, and it only experiences a downward acceleration due to gravity.

We can use the following kinematic equation to determine the time it takes for the cannonball to hit the ground:

h = v₀_y * t + (1/2) * g * t²,

where;

Solving for t, we get:

t = √(2*h/g)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

t = √(2*70/9.8) = 3.78 s

Therefore, the cannonball hits the ground at time t = 3.78 s.

Now, let's consider the vertical motion of the cannonball. At the time tg/2, the time elapsed since the cannon was fired is tg/2.

The vertical position of the cannonball at this time can be calculated using the following kinematic equation:

y = h + v₀_y * t + (1/2) * g * t²,

Since v₀_y is zero, we have:

y = h + (1/2) * g * (tg/2)²

Plugging in the given values, we get:

y = 70 + (1/2) * 9.8 * (3.78/2)² = 87.5 m (rounded to one decimal place)

Learn more about vertical position here: https://brainly.com/question/21026296

#SPJ1

The landscaper uses 75.00 joules of work to move the lawn mower.

Work is the product of force and displacement, in the direction of the force.

Given that the landscaper uses a force of 15.00 N to push a lawn mower, the amount of work done depends on the distance the mower is pushed.

If we assume that the mower is pushed a distance of 5 meters, the work done can be calculated as follows:

Work = force x distance x cos(theta)

where theta is the angle between the force and the direction of displacement, which we assume to be zero degrees in this case. Therefore, the work done can be calculated as:

Work = 15.00 N x 5 m x cos(0) = 75.00 J

Therefore, the landscaper uses 75.00 joules of work to move the lawn mower.

To know more about joules, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/25947916#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Thermal Energy

Explanation:

Answer:

To solve this problem, we can use the equation:

distance = initial velocity x time + 1/2 x acceleration x time^2

First, we need to find the initial distance between the two cars. The speeding car travels for 1 second before the police car begins pursuit, so its initial distance from the parked police car is:

initial distance = 41 m/s x 1 s = 41 m

Now we can use the equation to find the time it takes for the police car to catch up to the speeding car:

distance = initial velocity x time + 1/2 x acceleration x time^2

527 m = 0 m/s x t + 1/2 x 7.5 m/s^2 x t^2

Simplifying:

t = sqrt((2 x 527 m) / 7.5 m/s^2) = 12.92 s

So the police car catches up to the speeding car after 12.92 seconds. Now we can use the equation:

final velocity = initial velocity + acceleration x time

to find the velocity of the police car when it catches up to the speeding car:

final velocity = 0 m/s + 7.5 m/s^2 x 12.92 s = 96.9 m/s

Therefore, the velocity of the police car when it catches up to the speeding car is 96.9 m/s.

Explanation:

In the process of making pancakes, the three steps that best show that new substances are created are: Steps 3, 4, and 5. The correct option is B.

These steps involve seeing bubbles form as the pancake starts to harden, waiting until the bubbles stop forming, and flipping the pancake so the other side can darken and harden.

During Step 3, the formation of bubbles indicates a chemical reaction taking place, as the heat causes the pancake batter to release carbon dioxide gas. This leads to the creation of a new substance: the cooked pancake. Step 4, waiting for the bubbles to stop forming, further demonstrates the chemical changes occurring as the batter continues to cook and transform.

Lastly, in Step 5, flipping the pancake allows the other side to darken and harden, completing the cooking process and solidifying the new substance: a fully cooked pancake. The correct option is B.

To know more about substances, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30667005#

#SPJ11

The mechanical energy of the system decreases by 12% (152.70 J/751.98 J x 100%) when the ball reaches its destination. Therefore, the correct answer is C. Decreases by 12%.

What is Energy?

Energy is a fundamental physical quantity that describes the ability of a system to do work. In other words, energy is the capacity of a system to produce changes in itself or in its environment. It is a scalar quantity, which means that it is characterized only by its magnitude and not by its direction.

When the ball reaches the bottom of the incline, it will have a velocity v given by v = [tex]\sqrt{2gh}[/tex], where h is the height of the incline. Substituting the values, we get v = [tex]\sqrt{29.817.66}[/tex] = 10.99 m/s.

The final kinetic energy of the ball is given by (1/2)m[tex]v^{2}[/tex] = (1/2)[tex]1010.99^{2}[/tex] = 599.28 J.

The final potential energy of the ball is 0, since it is at ground level. Therefore, the total mechanical energy of the system at the bottom of the incline is the sum of the final kinetic and potential energies, which is 599.28 J.

The initial mechanical energy of the system is the potential energy of the ball at the top of the incline, which is 751.98 J.

Therefore, the change in mechanical energy is:

Delta E = 599.28 - 751.98 = -152.70 J

To know more about Energy visit;

https://brainly.com/question/8101588

#SPJ4

The electrostatic force between the electrons is approximately 2.31 x 10⁻²⁸ N, acting in a repulsive manner.

To find the electrostatic force between the two electrons, we will use Coulomb's Law, which states that the electrostatic force (F) between two charged particles is directly proportional to the product of their charges (q1 and q2) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r) between them. Mathematically, this is represented as:

F = (k * q1 * q2) / r²

Where k is Coulomb's constant, approximately equal to 8.99 x 10⁹ Nm²/C². In this problem, both electrons have a charge of -1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C, and they are separated by a distance of 3.4 x 10⁻¹¹ m. Plugging these values into the equation, we get:

F = (8.99 x 10⁹ Nm²/C² * (-1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C) * (-1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C)) / (3.4 x 10⁻¹¹ m)²

Calculating the force:

F ≈ 2.31 x 10⁻²⁸ N

Since both electrons have negative charges, the electrostatic force between them is repulsive. This is because like charges repel each other, while opposite charges attract. In this case, the two electrons have the same negative charge, which causes them to repel one another.

For more about electrostatic force:

https://brainly.com/question/9774180

#SPJ11

The recommended RPM for turning a 1.00" diameter mild steel workpiece using an HSS cutting tool would be approximately 400 RPM.

To calculate the RPM for turning a 1.00" diameter workpiece made of mild steel using an HSS (high-speed steel) cutting tool, you can use the following formula:

RPM = (Cutting Speed x 4) / Workpiece Diameter

For mild steel, the recommended cutting speed with HSS tools is approximately 100 surface feet per minute (SFM). Using this value and the given workpiece diameter, we can calculate the RPM:

RPM = (100 SFM x 4) / 1.00" Diameter

RPM = 400 / 1.00

RPM ≈ 400

So, the recommended RPM for turning a 1.00" diameter mild steel workpiece using an HSS cutting tool would be approximately 400 RPM.

To learn more about speed, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/28224010

#SPJ11

No, it is not possible to play the lowest string with your finger on any of the frets shown and hear the same frequency as the highest string.

The frets on a stringed instrument, such as a guitar, are placed in specific positions along the neck to produce different pitches or frequencies when the strings are pressed against them.

Each fret represents a specific note, and when you press a string against a particular fret, you effectively shorten the vibrating length of the string, which increases the frequency and raises the pitch of the sound produced.

As you move your finger along the fretboard, the pitch of the note played changes.

The lowest string on a guitar, typically the thickest string, has the lowest pitch or frequency when played open (without pressing any frets). As you press down on higher frets, you increase the pitch of the note.

The highest string on a guitar, typically the thinnest string, has the highest pitch or frequency when played open.

Therefore, pressing a fret on the lowest string will never produce the same frequency as the open (unfretted) highest string because the length and tension of the strings are different, resulting in different natural frequencies for each string.

To know more about string refer here

https://brainly.com/question/946868#

#SPJ11

Answer:

EK = 440 Joule

Explanation:

Known:

m = 55 kg

v = 4 m/s

Ek = ?

Equation to solve this is:

Ek = 1/2 m [tex]v^{2}[/tex]

Ek = 1/2 . (55) . [tex](4)^{2}[/tex]

Ek = 440 J

Answer:When a wind-up toy is set in motion, elastic potential energy that was stored in a compressed spring is converted into the kinetic energy of the toy's moving parts.

Explanation:

(a) Using a_rad = [tex]\omega^{2r[/tex]: Approximately 100.53 m/s²

(b) Using a_rad = [tex]v^{2/r[/tex]: Approximately 31.42 m/s²

To solve the problem, let's first convert the angular acceleration from revolutions per minute (rpm) to radians per second squared (rad/s²):

Given:

Diameter of the wheel (D) = 40.0 cm

Radius of the wheel (r) = D/2 = 20.0 cm = 0.20 m

Angular acceleration (α) = 4 rpm

(a) Using the relationship a_rad = [tex]\omega^{2r[/tex]:

The angular acceleration (α) can be converted to angular velocity (ω) using the formula:

ω = αt, where t is the time taken to complete two revolutions.

Since the wheel starts from rest, the time taken to complete two revolutions is given by:

t = (2 rev) / (4 rpm) = 0.5 min = 30 s

Now we can calculate the angular velocity (ω):

ω = αt = (4 rpm) × (2π rad/1 min) × (1 min/60 s) × (30 s) = 4π rad/s

Using the relationship a_rad = [tex]\omega^{2r[/tex], we can calculate the radial acceleration:

a_rad = [tex]\omega^{2r[/tex] = (4π rad/s)² × 0.20 m

a_rad = 16π² × 0.20 m ≈ 100.53 m/s²

Therefore, the radial acceleration of a point on the rim, calculated using a_rad = [tex]\omega^{2r[/tex], is approximately 100.53 m/s².

(b) Using the relationship a_rad = [tex]v^{2/r[/tex]:

The wheel starts from rest, so its initial linear velocity (v) is zero.

The final linear velocity (v) can be calculated using the formula:

v = ωr

The time taken to complete two revolutions is already calculated as 30 seconds, so we can find the final angular velocity (ω) as follows:

ω = αt = 4π rad/s (same as before)

Now we can calculate the final linear velocity (v):

v = ωr = (4π rad/s) × 0.20 m ≈ 2.513 m/s

Using the relationship a_rad = [tex]v^{2/r[/tex], we can calculate the radial acceleration:

a_rad = [tex]v^{2/r[/tex] = (2.513 m/s)² / 0.20 m

a_rad ≈ 31.42 m/s²

Therefore, the radial acceleration of a point on the rim, calculated using a_rad = [tex]v^{2/r[/tex], is approximately 31.42 m/s².

To know more about angular acceleration refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30237820#

#SPJ11

Answer:

class b

Explanation:

flamabal liquids , gas alcohol or oil

The latitude that receives the most direct rays of the sun year-round is the equator, which has a latitude of 0 degrees.

Due to the Earth's axial tilt, the sun's rays strike the Earth at different angles at various latitudes throughout the year. Near the equator, the sun's rays are nearly perpendicular to the Earth's surface, resulting in a more direct and intense sunlight.

At the equator, the sun is positioned directly overhead at least once a year during the equinoxes (around March 21st and September 21st). This means that the equator receives the most direct and concentrated sunlight throughout the year compared to other latitudes.

As one moves away from the equator towards higher latitudes, the angle at which the sun's rays hit the Earth becomes progressively steeper, resulting in less direct and more diffuse sunlight. This is why regions closer to the poles experience more significant variations in daylight and seasonal changes in sunlight intensity.

To know more about latitude refer here

https://brainly.com/question/121970#

#SPJ11

The Lazarus mission was mentioned to be around 10 years ago in the movie Interstellar. It takes approximately 6 years to travel from Earth to Saturn. Copper and Dr. Brand were on Miller's planet for approximately 23 years. This means that the total time Dr. Mann went without human contact is estimated to be around 33 years.

It is stated in the movie that it takes approximately 6 years to travel from Earth to Saturn, where the wormhole that leads to other galaxies was located. This indicates that the Lazarus mission likely took 6 years to reach Saturn from Earth.

During the Lazarus mission, two of its members, Dr. Mann and Dr. Brand, were sent to explore separate planets that were potentially suitable for human colonization. Dr. Mann was sent to a planet named Mann's planet, while Dr. Brand was sent to Miller's planet.

On Miller's planet, time was significantly dilated due to its proximity to a massive black hole, known as Gargantua. For every hour that passed on the planet, approximately 7 years passed outside the planet's gravitational influence.

This means that the time Dr. Brand and the other crew members spent on Miller's planet felt like 23 years had passed for the rest of the universe.

Considering the 6-year journey to Saturn, the time spent on Miller's planet, and the 10 years that had already passed since the Lazarus mission, the total time that Dr. Mann went without human contact can be estimated to be around 33 years.

This is derived from adding the 6-year journey, the 23 years on Miller's planet, and the 10 years prior to the Lazarus mission.

To learn more about planets, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/14581221

#SPJ11

The weight of the astronaut 6.37 × 106 meters above the surface of the Earth would be 160 N.

The weight of an object depends on its mass and the gravitational field it is in. Near the surface of the Earth, the acceleration due to gravity is approximately 9.81 m/s².

We can use the formula F = mg to calculate the weight of the astronaut at the surface of the Earth:

The gravitational field weakens as the distance from the center of the Earth increases, thus, we can use the formula for gravitational acceleration at a distance r from the center of the Earth:

Now we can calculate the weight of the astronaut at this height:

We don't know the mass of the astronaut, but we can use the weight at the surface of the Earth to find it:

         = 8.00 × 102 N / 9.81 m/s²

        = 81.63 kg

F' = (81.63 kg) x (1.96 m/s²)

F' = 160 N

Therefore, the weight of the astronaut 6.37 × 106 meters above the surface of the Earth is approximately 160 N.

More on the weight of Astronauts can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/11244838

#SPJ1

The combined mass of the package and the sled can be found to be 62.4 kg.

We can use Newton's second law of motion, which states that the net force acting on an object is equal to the product of its mass and acceleration (F net = ma), to solve this problem.

F net = ma

46.8 N = (m sled + m package) × 0.75 m/s²

To find the combined mass of the sled and package, we need to add their individual masses together. Therefore, we can rewrite the equation as:

46.8 N = (m sled + m package) × 0.75 m/s²

46.8 N / 0.75 m/s² = m sled + m package

62.4 kg = m sled + m package

Find out more on combined mass at https://brainly.com/question/19190348

#SPJ1

The true velocity of the wind is approximately 43.10 km/h.

To find the true velocity of the wind when a motorcyclist is traveling due north at 50 km/h, and the wind appears to come from the northwest at 60 km/h, we can use vector addition.

Step 1: Break the wind's apparent velocity into its north and west components. Since the wind is coming from the northwest, the north and west components will be equal.

Using the Pythagorean theorem (a² + b² = c²) to find the components:

North component:

a = 60 * cos(45°)

  = 60 * 0.707

   = 42.43 km/h

West component:

b = 60 * sin(45°)

  = 60 * 0.707

  = 42.43 km/h

Step 2: Subtract the motorcyclist's northward velocity from the north component of the wind's apparent velocity:

True north component of the wind:

42.43 - 50 = -7.57 km/h (southward)

Step 3: Combine the true north and west components of the wind's velocity using the Pythagorean theorem:

True wind velocity = √((-7.57)² + (42.43)²)

                               = √(57.36 + 1800.06)

                                = √1857.42

                                ≈ 43.10 km/h

The true velocity of the wind is approximately 43.10 km/h.

To know more about velocity refer here

brainly.com/question/17127206#

#SPJ11

When one of the charges is moved 3 times farther away, the force between the two charges will be 200 N.

The force between two charges is described by Coulomb's Law, which states that the force (F) is proportional to the product of the charges (q1 and q2) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r) between them:

F = k × (q1 × q2) / r²

Here, k is Coulomb's constant.

Initially, the force between the two charges is 1800 N. Let's assume the initial distance between the charges is r. Now, one of the charges is moved 3 times farther away, making the new distance between the charges 3r.

To find the new force, we can apply Coulomb's Law again:

F_new = k × (q1 × q2) / (3r)²

Notice that k × (q1 × q2) / r² = 1800 N (initial force). To make calculations easier, we can replace the expression with 1800 N:

F_new = 1800 N / 3²

F_new = 1800 N / 9

F_new = 200 N

So, when one of the charges is moved 3 times farther away, the force between the two charges will be 200 N. This demonstrates the inverse-square relationship between the force and the distance in Coulomb's Law.

For more about force:

https://brainly.com/question/13191643

#SPJ4

The acceleration of the bar just after the switch is closed is [tex]6.91 m/s^2[/tex]. When the bar's speed is 2.0 m/s, its acceleration is zero. The terminal speed of the bar is 1.49 m/s.

To solve this problem, we will use the equation of motion for an object under the influence of a force and the equation for the current in a circuit under the influence of an emf and resistance.

a) Just after the switch is closed, the current in the circuit will be given by Ohm's Law:

I = emf / R = 12 V / 5.0 Ω = 2.4 A

The bar will experience a magnetic force due to the magnetic field that is perpendicular to its motion. The magnetic force can be calculated using the formula:

F = BIL

where B is the magnetic field, I is the current, and L is the length of the bar. The bar will experience a force in the direction opposite to its motion. Therefore, the acceleration of the bar can be calculated using Newton's second law:

a = F / m = (BIL) / m

Substituting the given values, we get:

a = (2.4 T)(2.4 A)(0.36 m) / 0.90 kg = [tex]6.91 m/s^2[/tex]

Therefore, the acceleration of the bar just after the switch is closed is [tex]6.91 m/s^2[/tex].

b) To calculate the acceleration of the bar when its speed is 2.0 m/s, we need to use the equation of motion:

v = u + at

where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity (which is zero in this case), a is the acceleration, and t is the time.

We can rearrange this equation to solve for time:

t = (v - u) / a = v / a

Substituting the given values, we get:

t = 2.0/ 6.91 = 0.289 s

Now we can use the equation of motion again to calculate the distance traveled by the bar during this time:

[tex]$s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2 = \frac{1}{2}at^2$[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]$s = \frac{1}{2}(6.91 , \mathrm{m/s^2})(0.289 , \mathrm{s})^2 = 0.115 , \mathrm{m}$[/tex]

Therefore, the distance traveled by the bar when its speed is 2.0 m/s is 0.115 m. To calculate the acceleration, we can use the formula:

a = F / m = (BIL) / m

Substituting the given values and using the fact that the bar is now moving at a constant speed (i.e., the net force on the bar is zero), we get:

a = 0

Therefore, the acceleration of the bar when its speed is 2.0 m/s is zero.

c) The terminal speed of the bar can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]$v_{\text{terminal}} = \frac{\text{emf}}{\text{BRL}} \cdot \left(1 - e^{-\frac{\text{BRL}}{\text{m}}}\right)$[/tex]

where emf is the emf of the battery, B is the magnetic field, R is the resistance of the bar, L is the length of the bar, and m is the mass of the bar.

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]$v_{\text{terminal}} = \frac{12 , \mathrm{V}}{(2.4 , \mathrm{T})(5.0 , \Omega)(0.36 , \mathrm{m})} \cdot \left(1 - e^{-\frac{(2.4 , \mathrm{T})(5.0 , \Omega)(0.36 , \mathrm{m})}{0.90 , \mathrm{kg}}}\right)$[/tex]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

v_terminal = 1.49 m/s

Therefore, the terminal speed of the bar is 1.49 m/s.

To learn more about acceleration

https://brainly.com/question/12550364

#SPJ4

The electrical force is approximately [tex]10^{43}[/tex] times larger than the gravitational force. This is because the electrical force is much stronger than the gravitational force, due to the large difference in the strength of the fundamental forces involved.

To calculate the gravitational force between two protons, we use the equation:

[tex]F_g = G * (m_p)^2 / r^2[/tex]

where

G is the gravitational constant,

[tex]m_p[/tex] is the mass of a proton, and

r is the distance between the centers of the two protons.

Plugging in the values given, we get:

[tex]F_g = 6.67 * 10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2 * (1.67 * 10^-27 kg)^2 / (4.25 * 10^-15 m)^2[/tex]

[tex]= 1.72 x 10^{-51} N[/tex]

To calculate the electrical force between the protons, we use the equation:

[tex]F_e = k * (q_p)^2 / r^2[/tex]

where

k is the Coulomb constant,

[tex]q_p[/tex] is the charge of a proton, and

r is the distance between the centers of the two protons.

Plugging in the values given, we get:

[tex]F_e = 9 *10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (1.6 * 10^-19 C)^2 / (4.25 * 10^-15 m)^2[/tex]

= 2.32 x [tex]10^{-8}[/tex] N

Comparing the two forces, we see that the electrical force is much larger than the gravitational force. The electrical force is approximately [tex]10^{43[/tex]times larger than the gravitational force.

This is because the electrical force is much stronger than the gravitational force, due to the large difference in the strength of the fundamental forces involved.

To know more about gravitational force refer here

brainly.com/question/12528243#

#SPJ11

You have to lift the 10kg bag of salt approximately 2.55 meters to do 250J of work.

To determine how far you have to lift a 10kg bag of salt to do 250J of work, we need to use the work-energy theorem and the formula for gravitational potential energy. The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its potential energy. The formula for gravitational potential energy is:

PE = m * g * h

where PE is the potential energy, m is the mass (10kg), g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²), and h is the height the object is lifted.

Since the work done is 250J, we can set the potential energy equal to the work done:

250J = 10kg * 9.8 m/s² * h

Now, we need to solve for h:

250J = 98 kg*m/s² * h
h = 250J / 98 kg*m/s²
h ≈ 2.55 meters

For more about work:

https://brainly.com/question/18094932

#SPJ11

The power dissipated in the light bulb if it carries a current of 3i is 9p.

The power dissipated by a light bulb is given by the equation P = I²R, where I is the current flowing through the bulb and R is its resistance. Since the same light bulb is being used, its resistance remains constant.

When the current flowing through the bulb is increased to 3i, the power dissipated is given by P' = (3i)²R = 9i²R = 9P,

where P is the power dissipated when the current was i.

Therefore, the power dissipated in the light bulb is multiplied by a factor of 9 when the current is increased to 3i.

Assuming the resistance of the light bulb remains constant, we can use Ohm's law to find the new current when the current is tripled. Ohm's law states that the current flowing through a conductor is directly proportional to the voltage applied across it and inversely proportional to its resistance. Therefore, when the current is tripled, the voltage across the bulb will also triple since the resistance remains constant.

To know more about the Light bulb, here

https://brainly.com/question/2288858

#SPJ4

The row that links both the photoelectric effect and electron diffraction to the properties of waves and particles is the first row, which includes the terms "Particle property" and "Wave property".

The photoelectric effect refers to the phenomenon where electrons are emitted from a material when light shines on it, while electron diffraction refers to the scattering of electrons by a crystal lattice.

Both of these phenomena can be explained using the wave-particle duality of matter, which suggests that matter can exhibit both particle-like and wave-like properties. The photoelectric effect can be explained by treating light as a particle (photon) that transfers energy to an electron, while electron diffraction can be explained by treating electrons as waves that interfere with each other.

Understanding the properties of waves and particles is essential in understanding these phenomena and many other fundamental concepts in physics. The study of wave-particle duality has also led to the development of quantum mechanics, which is a cornerstone of modern physics. The correct option is "Particle property" and "Wave property".

For more about Particle property:

https://brainly.com/question/16550892

#SPJ11

The ball takes about 3.06 seconds to reach the top of its path.

When a ball is thrown or hit straight up, it will reach its maximum height at the point where its vertical velocity becomes zero.

At this point, the ball's acceleration will be equal to the acceleration due to gravity, which is -9.8 m/s².

Using the equation of motion for an object with constant acceleration, we can find the time it takes for the ball to reach the top of its path:

vf = vi + at

where vf is the final velocity (which is zero when the ball reaches its maximum height), vi is the initial velocity (30 m/s), a is the acceleration (-9.8 m/s²), and t is the time we're looking for.

Rearranging the equation, we get:

t = (vf - vi) / a

Since the final velocity is zero, we have:

t = -vi / a

Substituting the values, we get:

t = -30 m/s / (-9.8 m/s²)

t = 3.06 seconds

To know more about equation of motion refer here

https://brainly.com/question/15080570#

#SPJ11

The distance of the galaxy from Earth is approximately 34 Mpc or 111 million light-years away.

The distance of the galaxy from Earth can be calculated using Hubble's law, which states that the recessional velocity of a galaxy is proportional to its distance from Earth.

The proportionality constant is known as the Hubble constant, denoted by H. The current estimated value of the Hubble constant is approximately 73.3 km/s/Mpc.

To convert the given velocity from miles per hour to kilometers per second, we need to divide it by 2.237 × 10^5. Thus, the recessional velocity of the galaxy in km/s is approximately 2510 km/s.

Using Hubble's law, we can calculate the distance of the galaxy from Earth by dividing its velocity by the Hubble constant.

Therefore, the distance of the galaxy from Earth is approximately 34 Mpc or 111 million light-years away.

To know more about  Hubble's law, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13705068#

#SPJ11

Answer: yes

Explanation: good luck