A 3.00 kg toy falls from a height of 10.0 m. Just before hitting the ground, what will its kinetic energy be? (Disregard air resistance; g = 9.81 m/s2.)

This question involves the concepts of the law of conservation of energy and kinetic energy.

The correct option is "A. Yes, the total KE the tires need to transfer out of the system is less than 5,000 J".

According to the law of conservation of energy:

Loss in Kinetic Energy = Work done by the tires

[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2=W[/tex]

where,

W = work done by tires = ?

m = mass of the truck = 1000 kg

v = speed of the truck = 3 m/s

Therefore,

[tex]W=\frac{1}{2}(1000\ kg)(3\ m/s)^2[/tex]

W = 4500 J

Since the failure limit of work done by the tire is 5000 J, which is greater than the actual work done by the tire in this scenario. Hence, the tire will not fail in this case.

Learn more about the law of conservation of energy here:

brainly.com/question/20971995?referrer=searchResults

The attached picture explains the law of conservation of energy.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Since acceleration is inversely proportional to mass, decreasing mass will make the object lighter, and thus easier to speed up. So acceleration increases as mass decreases and vice versa

Answer: TRUE                                                                        Explanation:Newton's second law of motion can be formally stated as follows: The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the net force, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.

Answer: Relative to the bus, you are stationary. Relative to a point on the ground, you are walking forward with velocity  equal to the velocity of the bus.

As a person walks toward the back of a bus, they are walking towards a stationary object according to their own perspective. However, from an outside perspective, the bus is moving forward with a constant velocity and so relative to that point in motion, you are actually walking backwards with respect to it. This difference in motion means you would not be able have the same experience as the person on the bus when getting off because when you get off you would stop while they continue going forward. The last sentence could be considered a footnote because it only applies if this was an actual situation rather than just an analogy question in a physics test.

Relative to the bus, you move at walking speed. The motion relative to the ground is in the direction same as the bus and equal to the difference between the speed of the bus and walking speed.

When an object has a certain velocity, then this velocity is w.r.t. some frame that is called the reference frame. When we measure the velocity of an object, the ground or the earth is taken as the reference frame.

The motion of an object observed by the observer depends on the frame of the observer and this type of motion is known as relative motion.

For example, if you are traveling in a train and the train is moving at a speed of 80 km/hr, then your speed according to another passenger sitting on the same train is equal to zero.

Similarly, if you are walking toward the back of a bus, then your motion relative to the bus is walking speed. Relative to the ground, it is the difference between the speed of the bus and walking speed.

Learn more about relative motion, here:

https://brainly.com/question/776045

#SPJ2

Answer:

So this is just a ratio/proportion problem

so lets say its in boys:minutes

so in the first scenario

20:8

and we want to find

x:10

So proportion really

20/8=x/10

cross multiply

25

25 boys can sweep it in 10 minutes

Answer:

this is an example of Newton's Second Law, acceleration happens when a force acts on a mass.

the force that makes the bicycle move is your foot pushing against the pedal

Explanation:

Uhhhh here is an example

a=vt. =27 m/s10 s. =2.7 m/s2.

[tex]▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪  {\huge\mathfrak{Answer}}▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪[/tex]

Acceleration of the car is ~

[tex] \boxed{1.5 \: \: m/s}[/tex]

[tex] \large \boxed{ \mathfrak{Step\:\: By\:\:Step\:\:Explanation}}[/tex]

We know that,

Acceleration = rate of change in velocity ~

that is ~

where,

now, let's solve ~

Answer:

65km/h

Explanation:

Here,

Relative velocity of car moving in different directions with different velocities =Va + Vb

=25+40

=65 km/h

Please find attached photograph for your answer.

Hope it helps.

Do comment if you have any query.

Answer:

I can give you a list of noncontact forces off of my head, if that is what you need.

Explanation:

First, gravity. It acts everywhere and pulls down every object that is in the air towards the ground, unless they have an equal and opposite force that counters it.

Second, wind. I don't think this will count because wind is a physical thing, but it can be used in the same way as we did with gravity. If the force counteracting it is larger, equal, and opposite of the force it is countering, then it will move forward, through the wind.

Can i ask u a question

Brainliest me please

At the top of the building, the speed of the ball is zero.

The speed increases steadily as the ball falls.

When it hits the street, its speed is 39.6 m/s.

[tex] \: \: \: \: \: [/tex]

hope it helps

[tex] \: \: \: \: \: [/tex]

Answer:

15J

Explanation:

Let's assume force and motion have the same direction, so the dot product between the two reduces to the product of magnitudes.

If you studied calculus:  [tex]w= \int \limits^3_0 6x-4dx[/tex], by definition. Some "easy" math, that's [tex](3x^2-4x)\limits^3_0=27-12 - 0 = 15 J[/tex]

Else. we have to take the long way.  if the force was constant, and you plotted magnitude of the force vs position in a graph, you would get an horizontal line, and your work would be the area between the line and the x axis. And there is no reason why it shouldn't be the same for a variable force - if you think about it, it's the same way they justify the position formula for an accelerated motion. Let's graph it and start debating - sorry for my paint skills. We can easily say that in the green triangle the force is opposing the motion, so its work is negative, while in the blue area force and displacement go in the same direction, thus work is positive. Now it's just to calculate the area of two triangles

For the green one, it's a right triangle with side lengths 4 and 2/3, whose area is [tex]\frac12(4)(\frac23) = \frac43[/tex].

For the blue triangle, it's again a right triangle with side lengths 14 and 3-2/3= 7/3, whose area is [tex]\frac12(14)(\frac73) = \frac{49}3[/tex]

Our total work is the difference between the two, or [tex]w= \frac{49}3-\frac43 = \frac{45}3 = 15[/tex]

Answer:

3,900m³

Explanation:

If the kinetic energy of an object changes, then the collision is considered inelastic. This is regardless of whether the objects sticks together or not.

My best answer for this question would be D) inelastic, because kinetic energy is not conserved.

We can tell from the collision that it is not elastic.

Momentum is is conserved, it transfers to the other player.

Kinetic energy is not conserved, at it turns into internal friction.

I hope this helps! :)

A football tackle is an inelastic collision , because kinetic energy is not conserved.

When two bodies or particles move towards enough to interact with each other it is called the particles or the bodies are colliding.

So, when the football tackles it's kinetic energy changes.

Thus, A football tackle is an inelastic collision , because kinetic energy is not conserved.

Learn more examples about an Inelastic collision here -

https://brainly.com/question/24915434

#SPJ2

Answer:

101.937 kg

Explanation:

The force needed to get the box moving must just cancel the static friction force:

F = µsmg  =  0.35•m•9.81 = 350 --->   m = 350 / (0.35•9.81) = 101.937 kg

Again, with units shown, and using 1 N = 1 kg•m/s2:

0.35•m•9.81(m/s2) = 350 N

solving for m:

m = 350 N / (0.35•9.81 m/s2)  =  (350 kg•m/s2) / (3.434 m/s2 ) = 101.937 kg

______________________

(Hope this helps can I pls have brainlist (crown)☺️