A two digit number is 11 times its units digit. The sum of the digits is 12. Find the number

Answer:

A regular n-gon with one interior angle of 150° has 12 sides.

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for the measure of each interior angle of a regular n-gon is:

where:

We are given that one interior angle measures 150°, so we can set up the equation:

Multiplying both sides by n, we get:

Distributing, we get:

Subtracting 150n from both sides, we get:

Adding 360 to both sides, we get:

Dividing both sides by 30, we get:

Therefore, a regular n-gon with one interior angle of 150° has 12 sides.

i hope this helps you.

The measure of angle PQR is 20 degrees.

We have,

The measure of angle PQR can be found by using the property that the measure of an inscribed angle is half the measure of its intercepted arc.

Given that the measure of arc QR is 40 degrees, we can conclude that the measure of angle PQR is half of that, which is:

The measure of angle PQR = 1/2 x Measure of arc QR

= 1/2 x 40 degrees

= 20 degrees

Therefore,

The measure of angle PQR is 20 degrees.

Learn more about angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/31904496

#SPJ12

To get 51 using the numbers 8, 5, 6, and 7 exactly once each, you can use the following mathematical expression:

(8 x 6) - 7 + 5 = 51

How it works:

1. Multiply 8 by 6 to get 48: (8 x 6) = 48

2. Subtract 7 from 48 to get 41: 48 - 7 = 41

3. Add 5 to 41 to get 51: 41 + 5 = 51

Therefore, (8 x 6) - 7 + 5 = 51.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

8 x (7 - 5) + 6 = 51

The ratio table shows the costs for different amounts of birdseed. So, the unit rate is $2 per pound in this example.

To find the unit rate in dollars per pound, follow these steps:
1. Look at the given ratio table, which shows the costs for different amounts of bird seed.
2. Identify the cost and the corresponding amount (in pounds) of bird seed for any one row in the table.
3. Divide the cost (in dollars) by the amount (in pounds) to calculate the unit rate.

For example, if the table shows that the cost is $6 for 3 pounds of bird seed, the unit rate would be calculated as follows:

Unit rate = Cost / Amount
Unit rate = $6 / 3 pounds
Unit rate = $2 per pound
So, the unit rate is $2 per pound in this example

To learn more about “unit rate” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/19493296

#SPJ11

If the triangle is isosceles, then the measure of the third angle could be 42 degrees

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees

If the triangle is isosceles, then we have the following possible sum of angles

Sum 1 = 42 + 96 + 96 = 234 -- false

Sum 1 = 42 + 96 + 42 = 180 -- true

Hence, if the triangle is isosceles, then the measure of the third angle could be 42 degrees

Read mroe about triangles at

https://brainly.com/question/14386546

#SPJ1

The area of the whole figure is 31.5 sq. units.

The area of a given figure connotes its expanse in a 2 dimensional plane. The shape and size of a given figure determines how to calculate its area.

From the given question, the figure given can be likened to a rhombus. So that;

area of a rhombus = (diagonal 1 * diagonal 2)/ 2

Then,

area of the figure = (diagonal 1 * diagonal 2)/ 2

where: diagonal 1 = 7.5, and diagonal 2 = 8.4

So that;

area of the figure = (7.5*8.4)/ 2

                             = 63/ 2

                             = 31.5

The area of the whole figure is 31.5 sq. units.

Learn more about area of a figure at https://brainly.com/question/30944216

#SPJ1

We get that the plane is about 2193.0 feet from the airport, Rounding to the nearest tenth

To solve the problem, we will use trigonometry and the tangent function, which relates the other facet of a right triangle to the adjoining aspect:

tan(theta) = opposite / adjacent

wherein theta is the angle of descent, opposite is the change in height, and adjacent is the space from the airplane to the airport.

Rearranging the formula, we get:

adjacent = contrary / tan(theta)

because the angle of descent is 13 ranges and the alternate in height is from 500 ft, we've got:

contrary = 500 ft

theta = 13 stages

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

adjacent = 500 ft / tan(13 ranges)

using a calculator, we find that tan(13 stages) is about 0.228, so:

adjacent = 500 feet / 0.228 = 2192.98 feet

Therefore, we get that the plane is about 2193.0 feet from the airport.

Learn more about tangent function:-

https://brainly.com/question/1533811

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the total volume of the container "V".

We know that the container was originally 15% full, so the amount of water in the container was 0.15V.

When 48 litres of water was added, the new volume of water in the container became 0.15V + 48.

We also know that the container is now 75% full, so the new volume of water in the container must be 0.75V.

We can set up an equation to solve for V:

0.15V + 48 = 0.75V

Subtracting 0.15V from both sides:

48 = 0.6V

Dividing both sides by 0.6:

V = 80

So the container can hold 80 litres of water when it is full.

Mato will pay about $700 more in interest than Kika ($625 - $1,300 = $675, which rounds to $700). The answer is C: Mato; $700

Mato will pay more in interest because he has a higher interest rate and a shorter repayment period. To calculate the amount of interest each will pay, we can use the formula:

Interest = (Loan amount) x (Interest rate) x (Time in years)

For Kika:
Interest = $5,000 x 0.052 x 5
Interest = $1,300

For Mato:
Interest = $5,000 x 0.075 x (2/12)
Interest = $625

Therefore, Mato will pay about $700 more in interest than Kika ($625 - $1,300 = $675, which rounds to $700). The answer is C: Mato; $700.

To know more about  events refer here

https://brainly.com/question/12961938#

#SPJ11

The constant of proportionality between y and x in the graph is 3

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

On the graph, we have the following readings

(x, y) = (1, 3)

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

The constant of proportionality between y and x in the graph is

k = y/x

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

k = 3/1

Evaluate

k = 3

Hence, the constant of proportionality between y and x in the graph is 3

Read more about proportional relationship at

https://brainly.com/question/28651666

#SPJ1

The solutions to the system of nonlinear equations are

x = 9 and x =[tex]3^2[/tex]= 9.

To determine the solution to the system of nonlinear equations:

f(x) = g(x)

We can substitute the given expressions for f(x) and g(x) and simplify:

log3(x) + 3 =[tex]log3(x^3) - 1[/tex]

Using the properties of logarithms, we can simplify this equation as follows:

log3(x) + 3 = 3*log3(x) - 1

4 = 2*log3(x)

2 = log3(x)

x =[tex]3^2[/tex]

Therefore, the solutions to the system of nonlinear equations are x = 9 and [tex]x = 3^2 = 9.[/tex]

Learn more about logarithms,

brainly.com/question/20785664

#SPJ11

Answer:

x=2

Step-by-step explanation:

2x+y=10

3x=y

2x+3x=10

5x=10

x=2

The payback period for the auto is approximately 8 years.

Buy-Rite Pharmacy has purchased an auto for delivering prescriptions. The auto was purchased for $26,000, and it has a useful life of 6 years with a $5,500 salvage value. By delivering prescriptions, the pharmacy aims to increase gross revenues by at least $33,500 per year. The pharmacy will incur a cost of $28,000 per year for these prescriptions.

Using the straight-line method, the annual depreciation of the auto is ($26,000 - $5,500) / 6 = $3,917. This means that the total cost of the auto over 6 years will be $26,000 - $5,500 + ($3,917 x 6) = $43,502.

To calculate the payback period, we need to determine how long it will take for the increased gross revenues to cover the cost of the auto.

The net increase in revenues will be $33,500 - $28,000 = $5,500 per year. Therefore, the payback period is $43,502 / $5,500 = 7.9 years, which is rounded to 8 years.

To know more about payback period, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/13978071#

#SPJ11

The area k of the triangle a = 3, c = 2, b = 135 degrees is approximately 1.06125 square units.

The area k of the triangle, we can use the formula:
k = (1/2) * b * c * sin(A)
where A is the angle opposite side a.
Find A, we can use the fact that the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees:
A + B + C = 180
Substituting in the given values, we get:
A + 135 + 180 = 360
A = 45 degrees
Now we can plug in all the values into the area formula:
k = (1/2) * 2 * 3 * sin(45)
k = 1.5 * 0.707
k = 1.06125
Therefore, the area k of the triangle is approximately 1.06125 square units.

Read more about triangle.

https://brainly.com/question/22964077

#SPJ11

The p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.04. This means that if the null hypothesis is true

To find the p-value, we need to conduct a hypothesis test.

The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication:

H0: μd = 0

The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication:

Ha: μd ≠ 0

where μd is the population mean difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication.

We are given that the sample size is n = 36, the sample mean difference is ¯d = 2.4, and the sample standard deviation is s = 4.5.

We can calculate the t-statistic as:

t = (¯d - 0) / (s / sqrt(n)) = (2.4 - 0) / (4.5 / sqrt(36)) = 2.13

Using a t-distribution table with 35 degrees of freedom (df = n - 1), we find that the two-tailed p-value for t = 2.13 is approximately 0.04.

Therefore, the p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.04. This means that if the null hypothesis is true (i.e., if there is really no difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication), there is a 4% chance of observing a sample mean difference as extreme or more extreme than 2.4. Since this p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence that the drug affects blood pressure.

To know more about p-value, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30078820#

#SPJ11

It appears to be setting up a proportion between the central angle of the sector and the ratio of arc length to the circumference of the circle, rather than the ratio of the central angle to the full angle of the circle. Then the area should equal  to 126.9 [tex]ft^2.[/tex]

To find the area of sector XZY, we need to know the measure of angle XYZ. However, the given equation n/360 = 115/225 is incorrect, as it appears to be setting up a proportion between the central angle of the sector and the ratio of arc length to the circumference of the circle, rather than the ratio of the central angle to the full angle of the circle.

To find the correct measure of angle XYZ, we need to use the formula:

Area of sector XZY = (n/360) x π[tex]r^2[/tex]

where r is the radius of circle Z.

We know that the area of circle Z is 255 square feet, so we can find the radius as follows:

Area of circle Z = π[tex]r^2[/tex]

255 = π[tex]r^2[/tex]

[tex]r^2[/tex] = 81

r = 9

Now we can solve for n using the given ratio of 115/225:

n/360 = 115/225

n = (115/225) x 360

n = 184.32

Rounding to the nearest tenth, we get:

n ≈ 184.3

Finally, we can find the area of sector XZY as:

Area of sector XZY = (n/360) x π[tex]r^2[/tex]

Area of sector XZY = (184.3/360) x π[tex](9)^2[/tex]

Area of sector XZY ≈ 126.9 [tex]ft^2[/tex]

To know more about circumference refer to

https://brainly.com/question/27447563

#SPJ11

The variance of the data set is 0.318652.

To find the variance of this data set, we need to use the formula:
variance = Σ(x - μ)² / n
Where Σ represents the sum, x is the value of each data point, μ is the mean value, and n is the number of data points.

Using this formula, we can calculate the variance as follows:

Variance = [(5.07 - 4.312)² + (3.57 - 4.312)² + (5.32 - 4.312)² + (3.19 - 4.312)² + (3.49 - 4.312)² + (4.25 - 4.312)² + (4.76 - 4.312)² + (5.19 - 4.312)² + (3.94 - 4.312)² + (4.34 - 4.312)²] / 10

Variance = [0.225769 + 0.449769 + 0.370656 + 1.323856 + 0.716164 + 0.006544 + 0.175684 + 0.382884 + 0.135556 + 0.000484] / 10

Variance = 3.18652 / 10

Variance = 0.318652

Therefore, the variance of the data set is 0.318652.

Learn more about "variance": https://brainly.com/question/9304306

#SPJ11

1. The statement "Each exterior angle of a regular hexagon is acute" is True.

2. The statement "The sum of the interior angles of a polygon is always a multiple of 180" is False.

3. The statement "In any polygon, the larger the number of vertices, the smaller the measure of an exterior angle" is True.

1. TRUE: Each exterior angle of a regular hexagon is acute.
A regular hexagon has six equal sides and six equal interior angles. The sum of the interior angles of a hexagon is (6-2) * 180 = 720 degrees. Since it's a regular hexagon, each interior angle is 720/6 = 120 degrees. The exterior angles are supplementary to the interior angles, so each exterior angle is 180 - 120 = 60 degrees. Since 60 degrees is less than 90 degrees, each exterior angle is acute.

2. FALSE: The sum of the interior angles of a polygon is always a multiple of 180.
The formula for the sum of the interior angles of a polygon is (n-2) * 180, where n is the number of vertices (or sides). As you can see, the result is always a multiple of 180.

3. TRUE: In any polygon, the larger the number of vertices, the smaller the measure of an exterior angle.
For a regular polygon, the measure of an exterior angle can be calculated as 360/n, where n is the number of vertices (or sides). As the number of vertices increases, the measure of an exterior angle decreases, since they are inversely proportional.

Learn more about "angle": https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ11

Triangle PQR is not a right triangle.

To determine whether triangle PQR is a right triangle, we need to check if any of its angles is a right angle (90 degrees). We can use the slope formula to find the slopes of the sides of the triangle and check if any of the slopes are negative reciprocals (perpendicular) to each other.

Let's calculate the slopes of the sides PQ, QR, and RP:

Slope of PQ = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

= (2 - 1) / (3 - 0)

= 1 / 3

Slope of QR = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

= (-4 - 2) / (5 - 3)

= -6 / 2

= -3

Slope of RP = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

= (1 - (-4)) / (0 - 5)

= 5 / (-5)

= -1

Now, let's check if any of the slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. We can compare the products of the slopes:

Product of PQ slope and QR slope = (1/3) * (-3) = -1

Product of QR slope and RP slope = (-3) * (-1) = 3

Product of RP slope and PQ slope = (-1) * (1/3) = -1/3

Since the product of the slopes of QR and RP is not equal to -1, triangle PQR is not a right triangle.

Therefore, triangle PQR is not a right triangle.

Learn more about right triangle,

https://brainly.com/question/2217700

#SPJ11

Each plant should produce 576.92 units and 384.61 units respectively to maximize the company's profit.

To maximize the company's profit, we need to find the quantity that maximizes the difference between the total revenue and the total cost. The total revenue is given by:

TR = pq

= (40 - 0.04q)(q1 + q2)

= 40q1 + 40q2 - 0.04[tex]q1^2[/tex]- 0.04[tex]q2^2[/tex] - 0.04q1q2

The total cost is given by:

TC = C1 + C2

[tex]= 6.7 + 0.03q1^2 + 7.9 + 0.04q2^2= 14.6 + 0.03q1^2 + 0.04q2^2[/tex]

The profit is given by:

π = TR - TC

= [tex]40q1 + 40q2 - 0.04q1^2 - 0.04q2^2 - 0.04q1q2 - 14.6 - 0.03q1^2 - 0.04q2^2[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

π = [tex]40q1 + 40q2 - 0.04q1^2 - 0.04q2^2 - 0.04q1q2 - 14.6 - 0.03q1^2 - 0.04q2^2[/tex]

= [tex]-0.03q1^2 - 0.04q2^2 - 0.04q1q2 + 40q1 + 40q2 - 14.6[/tex]

To maximize profit, we need to take the partial derivatives of the profit function with respect to q1 and q2 and set them equal to zero:

∂π/∂q1 = -0.06q1 - 0.04q2 + 40 = 0

∂π/∂q2 = -0.08q2 - 0.04q1 + 40 = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get:

q1 = 576.92

q2 = 384.61

For more such questions on Profits.

https://brainly.com/question/30547853#

#SPJ11

The answer is option C) 30,700

The problem involves using linear interpolation to estimate the population of Little Elm in 2020 based on the given data from 2010 and 2015.

To start, we need to calculate the annual growth rate of the population between 2010 and 2015. This can be done by taking the difference between the population in 2015 and the population in 2010, and then dividing that difference by the number of years in that time period:

Annual growth rate = (17,150 - 3,646) / 5 = 2,700

This means that, on average, the population of Little Elm grew by 2,700 people per year between 2010 and 2015.

Next, we can use this annual growth rate to estimate the population of Little Elm in 2020. To do this, we need to add 10 years of growth to the initial population of 3,646 (since we want to estimate the population in 2020, which is 10 years after 2010):

Estimated population in 2020 = 3,646 + (2,700 x 10) = 30,646

Therefore, the estimated population of Little Elm in 2020 is approximately 30,700, which corresponds to answer choice C.

Learn more about population

brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11

If Holly cuts 6 ribbons into fifths for her craft project, after cutting, she has a total of 30 one-fifth-size ribbons (6 ribbons x 5 cuts each).

Holly has cut 6 ribbons into fifths for her craft project. This means that she has a total of 30 ribbons, each with a size of one-fifth. To understand this better, we can break it down into fractions. Each ribbon is one-fifth of a whole ribbon, and since Holly has cut 6 ribbons, she has 6 times one-fifth, which equals 30. So, to answer the question, Holly has 30 ribbons, each with a size of one-fifth. These ribbons can be used for various crafts, such as creating bows, wrapping presents, or decorating cards. The possibilities are endless, and with 30 ribbons, Holly can get creative and make a lot of beautiful crafts.

More on ribbons: https://brainly.com/question/30145956

#SPJ11

The calculated two double inequalities that define shaded region are 1 ≤ y < 5 and -3 < x ≤ 2

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

On the graph, we have the following properties

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

1 ≤ y < 5

-3 < x ≤ 2

Hence, the two double inequalities that define shaded region are 1 ≤ y < 5 and -3 < x ≤ 2

Read more about inequalities at

https://brainly.com/question/30390162

#SPJ1

The current scores of both Jenna and Kera in the game they were playing are

Jenny's current score is -15.

Kera's current score is 8.

In the given problem, we are given two players, Jenny and Kera, playing the game.

Jenny has -10 points, which means she already has negative points. He has since lost 5 more points. So his current score would be:

-10 - 5 = -15

So now Jenny has a score of -15.

Kera, meanwhile, has 22 points and 14 points to lose. So his current score would be:

22 - 14 = 8

So now Kera has 8 points.

Learn more about equations for playing games at

https://brainly.com/question/29617368

#SPJ4

The estimate from direct proportionality is higher than the prediction from KLEIBER's law.

a. For a 180 kilogram lion, we can use KLEIBER's law: R = 73.3*(180^0.75) = 6136.5 Calories per day. For an 80 kilogram human, we can use the same formula: R = 73.3*(80^0.75) = 1537.6 Calories per day.

b. If metabolic rate and mass were directly proportional, we could use the ratio of the masses to find the basal metabolic rate for an 80 kilogram human.

The ratio of the masses is 80/180 = 0.44. We can multiply this by the basal metabolic rate for the lion to get an estimate for the human: 0.44*6136.5 = 2701.26 Calories per day.

This estimate is higher than the prediction from Kleiber's law for an 80 kilogram human (1537.6 Calories per day). KLEIBER's law indicates that smaller organisms have a higher metabolic rate per kilogram of mass than do larger organisms.

Therefore, the estimate from direct proportionality is higher than the prediction from KLEIBER's law.

To know more about  KLEIBER's law refer here

https://brainly.com/question/14620525#

#SPJ11

The measure of angle JML is 180 degrees because in a circle, an angle formed by two chords intersecting inside the circle.

In a circle, the measurement of angle formed by two chords intersecting inside the circle is half the sum of the arcs intercepted by the angle. Using this property, we can find the measure of angle JML.

Since angle JKL is a right angle, its intercepted arc is the diameter of the circle. Therefore, its measure is 180 degrees.

By the same property, we know that angle JML is half the sum of the arcs intercepted by it. The arcs intercepted by angle JML are arcs JL and KM.

Since angle JKL is a right angle, arc JL is also 180 degrees.

Since J, K, L, and M are concyclic, we know that angle JKM is supplementary to angle JLM. Therefore, arc KM is the supplement of arc JL and has measure 360 - 180 = 180 degrees.

Thus, the sum of the intercepted arcs is 180 + 180 = 360 degrees, and angle JML is half of this, so its measure is 180 degrees.

Learn more about  measurement

brainly.com/question/2107310

#SPJ11

The instantaneous rate of change of cost with respect to x when x = 100 is 4.

We can begin by calculating C(100+h) and C(100):

C(100+h) = 0.000002(100+h)^3 + 4(100+h) + 300

C(100+h) = 0.000002(1,000,000 + 300h^2 + 30h^2 + h^3) + 400 + 4h + 300

C(100+h) = 0.000002h^3 + 0.0006h^2 + 4h + 700

C(100) = 0.000002(100)^3 + 4(100) + 300

C(100) = 2 + 400 + 300

C(100) = 702

Therefore,

C(100+h) - C(100) = (0.000002h^3 + 0.0006h^2 + 4h + 700) - 702

C(100+h) - C(100) = 0.000002h^3 + 0.0006h^2 + 4h - 2

Now, we can find the rate of change of cost with respect to x by dividing this expression by h and taking the limit as h approaches 0:

(C(100+h) - C(100))/h = (0.000002h^3 + 0.0006h^2 + 4h - 2)/h

(C(100+h) - C(100))/h = 0.000002h^2 + 0.0006h + 4 - (2/h)

As h approaches 0, the term 2/h approaches infinity, which means the rate of change of cost with respect to x is undefined. However, we can calculate the limit of the expression as h approaches 0 from the left and from the right to see if it has a finite value:

limit (h->0+) ((C(100+h) - C(100))/h) = 4

limit (h->0-) ((C(100+h) - C(100))/h) = 4

Since the left and right limits are equal, the overall limit exists and equals 4. Therefore, the instantaneous rate of change of cost with respect to x when x = 100 is 4.

To learn more about  instantaneous rate visit:https://brainly.com/question/28837697

#SPJ11

A plane flying just above the equator around the world 3 1/2 times would cover a distance of 4.375 x 10⁴ miles.

If an airplane travels around the world just above the equator once, it covers a distance of 1.25 x 10⁴ miles. To find how many miles it would cover if it flew around the world 3 1/2 times, we need to multiply this distance by 3.5:

1.25 x 10⁴ miles x 3.5 = 4.375 x 10⁴ miles

To understand this calculation, we need to know that 3 1/2 times means 3.5 times. So, we multiply the distance covered in one round of the world by 3.5 to find the total distance covered in 3 1/2 times around the world.

We use standard form to express the answer in a more compact and convenient way, where 4.375 x 10⁴ represents the number 43,750 in scientific notation.

To learn more about distance click on,

https://brainly.com/question/28852916

#SPJ1