Andre ran a 100 meter race in 12 seconds. What was his average speed as he ran?

Step-by-step explanation:

1=56⁰

2=56⁰

3=68⁰

4=68⁰

5=56⁰

6=112⁰

7=180-124 Ans=56⁰

8=68+56 Ans=124⁰

9=68⁰

10=112⁰

11=124⁰

12=56⁰

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is B, The elevation is a nonlinear function because it does not have a constant rate of change.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D  [tex]\sqrt{x+4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

so the answer is bar graph..

Answer:

To Decrease an amount in a given Ratio, we need to multiply by a fraction that is less than one. For example, in scaling down a recipe for four people into a recipe for 3 people, we would use the ratio of 3 : 4 which means we would multiply all our recipe amounts.

Answer:

18 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

9 miles : 45 minutes

? miles : 90 minutes

45 x 2 = 90 minutes

9 x 2 = 18 miles

Answer:

90081???

Step-by-step explanation:

Using a system of equations, the height of the tree would be 12.80 meters.

Equating the height and shadows of the tree and pole :

Height of pole / shadow of pole = height of tree / shadow of tree

Representing the equation thus :

Let the height of the tree = h

3/4 = h/17

Cross multiply

4h = 17 × 3

4h = 51

Divide both sides by 4

h = 51/4

h = 12.75.

Hence, the height of the tree to the nearest tenth of a meter is 12.80 meters.

Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/25562438

Answer:

f(g(- 3) ) = - 5115

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluate g(- 3) then substitute the value obtained into f(x)

g(- 3) = (- 3)² + 6(- 3) - 7 = 9 - 18 - 7 = - 16 , then

f(- 16) = (- 16)³ - 4(- 16)² + 5

        = - 4096 - 4(256) + 5

        = - 4096 - 1024 + 5

        = - 5115

Using error concepts for hypothesis tests, it is found that there is a Type I error.

A Type I error happens when a true null hypothesis is rejected.

A Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis is not-rejected.

In this problem, the null hypothesis is:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 24[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 24[/tex]

He concludes that the mean age is over 24 when it is not, that is, a true null hypothesis is rejected, hence there is a Type I error.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/25225353

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

3.45x+2*1.65+5>=20

3.45x+8.3>=20

3.45x>=11.7

after rounding

x>=3

Answer:

14.87

Step-by-step explanation:

Para conocer cual es la fuerza que necesita el cuerpo para aumentar su velocidad de 5 m/s a 12 m/s en 8 m

Necesitamos conocer la aceleración y para conocer la aceleración debemos saber cuanto tiempo tarda en recorrer los 8m

Vf = Vo +a(t)

12 = 5 +a(t) -------> Vamos a despejar el tiempo.

t = 7/a

X= Vo(t) +1/2a(t²)

X= 5(7/a)+1/2a( 7/a )²

8 = 35/a+49/2a

a = 7.43 m/s²  

Ahora que conocemos la aceleración podemos calcular la fuerza como:

F = m*a

F = 7.43 * 2 kg.

F = 14.87

Answer:

6 candies

Step-by-step explanation:

(find unit rate, cost / quantity)

35/10 = 3.5

20/3.5 = = 5.7142857142857

candies cannot be in decimal so you must round to the nearest whole

==========================================

Explanation:

A) This is true because there are 4 cups of green and 2 cups of white. Each box represents 1 cup.

B) This is false. The ratio 4:2 reduces to 2:1 when describing the ratio of green to white. We have twice as many green compared to white. Choice B describes the other way around. The order is important.

C) This is true. We have 2 cups of white and 4 cups of green.

D) False. There are 6 cups total, but only 2 white (not 4).

E) True. This is a verbal way of describing the ratio 4:2, of green to white.

F) False. The ratio is the other way around. See choice E.

G) False. There are 4 cups of green, not 6. There are 6 cups total, not 4. The ratio of green to total is 4:6.

H) True. We have 2 cups of white and 2+4 = 6 cups total.

Answer:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 5}f(x)=-5\\\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x)=3\\\lim_{x \to 1^+} f(x)=3\\\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)=4\\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 5}f(x)[/tex]

This means "the limit of f(x) as x approaches 5"

In this case, f(x) is a basic linear function while x > 1, so a limit is not necessary but it can still be used as it is here. For this one, you can just calculate f(5), and that is:

[tex]f(x)=5-2x[/tex]

[tex]f(5)=5-2(5)=5-10=-5[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{x \to 5}f(x)=-5[/tex]

===================

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x)[/tex]

This one is a little different. It means "the limit of f(x) as x approaches 1 from the negative (left) direction"

The negative direction of course means x will be less than 1, so we'll use this function:

[tex]f(x)=4-x[/tex]

It's easier if you graph it, but you can also do it like this:

[tex]f(0)=4+0=4\\f(0.5)=4-0.5=3.5\\f(0.75)=4-0.75=3.25\\f(0.9)=4-0.9=3.1\\f(0.99)=4-0.99=3.01[/tex]

There's a clear pattern there. You can see that f(1) should be 3, but this function only applies while x is less than 1 so it can never reach 3. It will get infinitely close, and that can be shown with the limit:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x)=3[/tex]

===================

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^+} f(x)[/tex]

This one works the same way, but from the positive (right) direction.

[tex]f(2)=5-4=1\\f(1.5)=5-3=2\\f(1.25)=5-2.5=2.5\\f(1.1)=5-2.2=2.8\\f(1.01)=5-2.02=2.98\\f(1.001)=5-2.002=2.998[/tex]

It will also get infinitely close to 3 when x = 1, but won't ever reach it because this function only applies when x is greater than 1.

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^+} f(x)=3[/tex]

===================

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)[/tex]

Here, the function for x=1 is just:

[tex]f(x)=4[/tex]

It's given already, so the limit is just:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)=4[/tex]

Answer:

363/20,000

.................................................................................

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number be " x ".

11 % of x = 4

( 11 / 100 ) * x = 4

x = 4 * ( 100 / 11 )

x = 400 / 11

66 % of that number

= 66 % of x.

= 66 % of 400 / 11

= ( 66 / 100 ) x ( 400 / 11 )

= ( 66 x 400 ) / ( 100 x 11 )

= 6 x 4

= 24

Step-by-step explanation:

To multiply fractions:

Multiply numerator to numerator and multiply denominator to denominator. Simplify the answer.

To multiply mixed numbers:

Change mixed numbers into improper fraction. Then multiply numerator and denominator just like how you multiply the fractions. Simplify.

Check the picture below.

Here according to angle sum property all angles sum u up 180°

So,

[tex]8x + 2 + 60 + 70 = 180 \\ 8x + 132 = 180 \\ 8x = 180 - 132 \\ 8x = 48 \\ x = \frac{48}{8} \\ x = 6[/tex]

- BRAINLIEST answerer

Answer:

g = he - 10h

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1 / 3^2 = 1/9

Step-by-step explanation:

3^-5 = 1/3^5

(1/3^5) * (3^3) = 3^3 / 1/3^5 = 3^3 / 3^5 = 1/3^2

The value of the given expression is 1/9 .

Given,

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{3} )[/tex]

According to the power rule,

[tex](a^{m}) (a^{n} ) = a^{m + n}[/tex]

Now,

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{2}) = 3^{-5 + 3}\\ \\ (3^{-5}) (3^{2}) = 3^{-2}[/tex]

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{2}) = 1/3^{2}[/tex]

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{2} ) = 1/9[/tex]

Thus with the power rule answer will be 1/9.

Learn more about power rule,

https://brainly.com/question/23418174

#SPJ6

Answer:

Well I’m not sure what Answers do you want

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]Hiya![/tex]

Sokka is here to help!

I believe it is A..

Hopefully, this helps you!!!

[tex]Sokka[/tex]

Answer:

Option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question said "Opposite numbers and the sum of those numbers is 0". Let's see if Option B has these abilities.

=> Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.

Answer:

5.72

Step-by-step explanation:

(-16.75 + 16.75) = 0

0 + 5.72= 5.72

Therefore, the answer is 5.72

Answer:

37

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know if this is totally correct

ATQ,

★⤿ 8(x+9) ≥ 224

★⤿ x+9 ≥ 224/8

★⤿ x +9 ≥ 28

★⤿ x ≥ 28-9

★⤿ x ≥ 19

Hence , option A is correct ✓

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

45 minutes is 3/4 hr.

(3/4)(12 + b) = 9 + 3b/4 miles