The ways in in which the U.S. Constitution reflects a concern with promotion of the public good was
Anything that might endanger the public or have a negative impact on their general wellness is forbidden. In this sense, the Constitution has reached balance.If the US government prioritized individual rights over the interests of the general people, there would be fewer situations in which the law may deem specific activity to be criminal.What makes individual rights crucial?
They stand for core social values including fairness, dignity, equality, and respect. They are an essential safety net for all of us, but particularly for those who could suffer abuse, neglect, or isolation.To Learn more about U.S. Constitution, Click the links.
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
https://brainly.com/question/1172241
#SPJ9
Defendants who are given the option to deposit bail _____.
What 3 places will you find information about child care laws, rules and regulations?
Which of the following is a step in the Graduated Licensing program?
A. Full privileges.
B. Skilled.
C. Graduated.
Answer:Full privilege is the answer of this question
Match each vocabulary word with its definition
Name the main mock trial/federal objections in court with explanations (evidence and witness objections)
Answer:
Explanation:
There are two broad categories of mock trial objections: (1) objections to the form of the question and (2) objections to testimony. A. Objections to the Form of Questions Questions have to be asked in a proper form or way. The following 6 objections can be made to the way a question is asked. :)
Name the main mock trial/federal objections in court while explaining each one (evidence and witness objections)
Answer:
An act or imitation trial is a mimic trial. It is comparable to a moot court, except moot courts model proceedings in appellate courts, whereas mock trials replicate trials in lower courts.
Explanation:
The Three Most Frequently Made Objections to Trial Testimony
Hearsay. Hearsay is a frequent, if not the most frequent, trial objection to a witness objection. Leading inquiries are a close second objection, followed by relevance. Relevance is the third and last of the top three criticisms.
The diffrences between warren court and Burger court explained in simple terms
Answer:
BELOW
Explanation:
The Burger Court had a less generous interpretation of the protections offered by the Fourth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment than those of the Warren Court, but the Burger Court did not overrule any of the major precedents set by the Warren Court.
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville what constitutional rights are at issue?
The court decided that a vagrancy statute in Jacksonville was unconstitutionally vague due to the fact that it did not offer fair notice of behaviors that were prohibited and that it fostered arbitrary arrests and convictions.
This is further explained below.
What is Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville?Generally, In the case of Papachristou v. Jacksonville, which was heard by the United States Supreme Court and resulted in 405 U.S. 156, a Jacksonville vagrancy law was found to violate the Constitution due to its vagueness.
In conclusion, The argument for the case took place on December 8, 1971, and the verdict was rendered on February 24, 1972. The city of Jacksonville, which is located in Florida, was the one that responded.
Read more about Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville
https://brainly.com/question/25345052
#SPJ1