The development of monumental architecture began in the Neolithic period with megaliths, large stone structures used for religious and social purposes. Examples include Stonehenge in England and the Carnac Stones in France.
In Mesopotamia, the Sumerians constructed ziggurats, terraced step pyramids, exemplified by the Great Ziggurat of Ur. In Egypt, Imhotep, a polymath and architect, designed the Step Pyramid of Djoser, marking the transition from mastabas to pyramids. Imhotep's innovation laid the foundation for the iconic Great Pyramids of Giza.
Early Greek society contributed to monumental architecture with temples, like the Parthenon, dedicated to deities and showcasing the classical orders (Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian). These developments reflect human advancement in engineering, technology, and the desire to express cultural identity and beliefs through grand structures.
To know more about Great Pyramids of Giza visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13604549
#SPJ11
Why did Rev. Jesse Jackson call Emmet Till’s murder the big bang of the Civil Rights Movement
Rev. Jesse Jackson called Emmet Till's murder the big bang of the Civil Rights Movement because it was a pivotal moment that brought widespread attention and outrage to the brutal reality of racism and violence in the South.
Till's murder and the subsequent acquittal of his white murderers highlighted the injustices of the Jim Crow era and galvanized civil rights activists and organizations to push for change. It also drew national attention to the efforts of the NAACP and other groups working to combat racial discrimination and segregation.
Till's death served as a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement, inspiring a generation of activists to fight for racial justice and equality.
To know more about Civil Rights Movement , refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/31897973#
#SPJ11
You can find basic information about the Battle of Britain and the Blitz, the Holocaust, and Japanese internment camps at the following resources: The Battle of Britain e The Blitz The Holocaust Japanese American Internment Once you have chosen your topic, you will write to conduct some research and gather information. Your paper should reference at least two sources. Part A Once you have chosen your topic, you should write up an initial research question that will drive your paper. The answer to this question will form your thesis. Learn more about writing strong thesis statements e. In the space provided, write down your research question and your thesis statement.
The Holocaust was a systematic genocide of six million Jews perpetrated by the Nazi regime during World War II, utilizing concentration and extermination camps, mass shootings, and other forms of violence.
Topic: The Holocaust
Research Question: How did the Nazi regime systematically perpetrate the genocide of six million Jews during the Holocaust?
Thesis Statement: The Holocaust was a meticulously planned and executed genocide of six million Jews, orchestrated by the Nazi regime in Germany during World War II. The regime implemented a system of concentration and extermination camps, as well as mass shootings and other forms of violence, to systematically eliminate European Jewry.
The Nazi ideology of racial purity and anti-Semitism provided the justification for this heinous crime against humanity. Understanding the methods used by the Nazi regime to perpetrate the Holocaust is crucial in order to prevent similar atrocities from occurring in the future. In this paper, I will explore the mechanisms of the Holocaust and its devastating impact on the Jewish people.
To learn more about Holocaust
https://brainly.com/question/14407250
#SPJ4
SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
What mistake did American radar operators make at 7:20 a. M. ?
Hi! At 7:20 a.m. on December 7, 1941, American radar operators mistakenly identified incoming Japanese aircraft as a group of American B-17 bombers during the attack on Pearl Harbor.
This error led to a lack of preparedness and allowed the Japanese forces to carry out a surprise attack on the U.S. naval base.
With relevant examples discuss the import
ance of memory for academic excellence
Memory plays a crucial role in achieving academic excellence. It enables us to recall previously learned information and build upon it. For example, in mathematics, students need to remember the formulas and concepts they have learned to solve complex problems.
Similarly, in science, students need to remember the various theories and experiments they have studied to understand the subject better. In language studies, memory helps us recall grammar rules and vocabulary. Moreover, memory aids in exam preparation and retention of information learned.
Therefore, memory is a vital component of academic success, and developing memory techniques and strategies can enhance learning and academic performance.
To know more about memory,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14789503#
#SPJ11
Who formed the first billion dollar company in the us?.
The first billion dollar company in the US was formed by Charles Schwab.
Charles Schwab was an American steel magnate who was instrumental in the growth of the United States Steel Corporation. In 1901, Schwab was recruited by the famous industrialist Andrew Carnegie to become the first president of the newly formed United States Steel Corporation.
Schwab's success in building the United States Steel Corporation made him a prominent figure in the business world, and he went on to serve as president of the Bethlehem Steel Corporation and as chairman of the board of the New York Stock Exchange. He was also a well-known philanthropist, and his charitable contributions helped to support education, health care, and other important causes.
To know more about company , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30631931
#SPJ4
Describe the content of the letter that had the greatest emotional effect on you. What was it about this letter that made you react respond the way you did emotionally, physically, pychologically.
The content of a letter that has the greatest emotional effect on someone can vary greatly. It could be a love letter from someone special, a goodbye letter from a loved one who has passed away, a letter of forgiveness or apology, or a letter that brings unexpected news.
The emotional impact of the letter can depend on the recipient's personal experiences and current emotional state. The way someone responds emotionally, physically, and psychologically to a letter can also vary depending on the content and the individual's coping mechanisms. Some may cry, feel overwhelmed with emotion, or even experience physical symptoms such as shaking or sweating. Others may feel numb, in shock, or go through a range of complex emotions and thoughts. Ultimately, the way someone reacts to a letter is deeply personal and can reveal a lot about their inner world and current state of mind.
Know more about a letter:
https://brainly.com/question/28059759
#SPJ11
missionary jeff woodke was released after being held hostage for more than six years in which country?
Answer:
Niger
Explanation:
American aid worker held captive for more than 6 years in West Africa released, officials say. Jeff Woodke had been an aid worker in Niger before his kidnapping in 2016.
Missionary Jeff Woodke was released after being held hostage for more than six years in the country of Niger.
Jeff Woodke, an American aid worker and missionary, was kidnapped on October 14, 2016, by armed men from his home in Abalak, Niger. He was held hostage for more than six years by an Al Qaeda-affiliated group, the Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM). Woodke's release was announced by the government of Niger in April 2023, after negotiations with the kidnappers.
Woodke's family had been working tirelessly to secure his release, and his wife had even moved to Niger to be closer to the search effort. Woodke's release has been hailed as a rare piece of good news in a region that has been plagued by extremist violence and instability.
Learn more about missionary: https://brainly.com/question/31578814
#SPJ11
In what ways was the outlook and agenda of Progressives in tension with the Founders’ approach to the proper role of government?
Answer:
The outlook and agenda of Progressives in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were in tension with the Founders’ approach to the proper role of government in several ways. Here are some examples:
Limited government: The Founders believed in a limited government with enumerated powers, meaning that the federal government should only have the authority to do what the Constitution explicitly allows. Progressives, on the other hand, believed in a more expansive role for the federal government, including the power to regulate the economy, oversee social welfare, and protect consumers.
Individual rights: The Founders placed a strong emphasis on individual rights, including the right to free speech, assembly, and the press. Progressives were more concerned with collective rights and social justice, including workplace safety regulations, minimum wage laws, and the regulation of monopolies.
Popular sovereignty: The Founders believed in popular sovereignty, meaning that the people have the ultimate authority over the government. Progressives, on the other hand, believed in a more technocratic approach to governance, with experts and bureaucrats making decisions in the public interest.
States' rights: The Founders believed in a federal system of government, with power divided between the national government and the states. Progressives were more focused on national problems and believed in a stronger central government that could address issues that were beyond the scope of individual states.
Overall, the Progressive agenda represented a departure from the Founders’ approach to limited government and individual rights and instead embraced a more expansive role for government in regulating the economy and promoting social welfare. While both the Founders and the Progressives were committed to the idea of American exceptionalism and the principles of liberty and equality, they had different ideas about how best to achieve these goals.
The relationship between Native Americans, American Citizens, and the US Government
( FLVS )
Answer:American Indians and Alaska Natives have the same rights as all citizens to hold public office. In this century, American Indian and Alaska Native men and women have held elected and appointed offices at all levels of state, local, and federal government.
Explanation:
Which president's response to the iranian crisis was considered a failure, and why?
the response of president
ford
nixon
carter
to the iranian hostage crisis was considered a failure because
five hostages were executed due to his negligence
only a few of the hostages were released while he was in office
he was unable to secure the hostages’ release during his time in office
The president whose response to the Iranian hostage crisis was considered a failure was President Jimmy Carter.
The Iranian hostage crisis began in November 1979 when a group of Iranian militants seized the US embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages. President Carter's administration attempted several diplomatic solutions to secure the hostages' release, including economic sanctions and negotiations, but these efforts were unsuccessful. The failure of the US government to secure the release of the hostages during President Carter's time in office was a significant blow to his presidency.
In addition to the failure to secure the hostages' release, there were several other factors that contributed to the perception of Carter's response as a failure. First, the crisis dragged on for 444 days, which created a sense of frustration and helplessness among the American public. Second, the failed military rescue attempt, known as Operation Eagle Claw, was seen as a humiliating setback for the US military and the Carter administration.
Finally, the hostage crisis was a significant factor in Carter's loss in the 1980 presidential election to Ronald Reagan. Reagan portrayed Carter as a weak and ineffectual leader who was unable to protect American interests abroad. In contrast, Reagan promised a strong and assertive foreign policy that would restore American power and prestige.
In conclusion, President Jimmy Carter's response to the Iranian hostage crisis was considered a failure because he was unable to secure the hostages' release during his time in office. The crisis lasted for over a year, and a failed military rescue attempt contributed to the sense of frustration and helplessness among the American public. The crisis also contributed to Carter's loss in the 1980 presidential election to Ronald Reagan.
To learn more about the Iranian hostage crisis, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12402036
#SPJ11
Why did germany have a geographic disadvantage at the start of world war i?.
Germany had a geographic disadvantage at the start of World War I due to its location in the center of Europe, which meant it was surrounded by potential enemies on all sides.
Germany's geographic location made it vulnerable to attack from several directions, with France to the west, Russia to the east, and potential enemies in the Balkans to the south. This strategic vulnerability was known as the "Central Powers Dilemma," and it placed Germany in a difficult position when war broke out in 1914.
To counteract this disadvantage, Germany developed a strategy known as the Schlieffen Plan, which called for a swift invasion of France through Belgium before turning to face Russia in the east. The plan was designed to quickly defeat France and then move the bulk of German forces to the east to face the Russian threat.
To know more about World War I , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ4
What general features, according to the author, are associated with being or becoming "modern"? What factors help account for why the Gebusi so willingly accepted modernizing influences between 1982 and 1998? How much of this acceptance was based in culture or cultural belief rather than possible economic improvement?
The Gebusi people's acceptance of modernizing influences in the 1980s and 1990s was based on a combination of economic, cultural, and social factors, with the promise of economic improvement playing a significant role.
In his book "The Gebusi: Lives Transformed in a Rainforest World," Bruce Knauft explores the process of modernization and its impact on the Gebusi people, a small-scale society living in Papua New Guinea. According to the author, modernization is associated with a number of general features, including industrialization, urbanization, technological innovation, rationalization, and secularization. These features are often accompanied by changes in social organization, values, beliefs, and practices.
The Gebusi people were initially reluctant to accept modernizing influences, but they became more willing to do so in the 1980s and 1990s. Knauft identifies several factors that help account for this shift, including increased exposure to outside influences, the desire for new forms of social organization, the promise of economic improvement, and the appeal of new technologies and material goods.
However, the Gebusi's acceptance of modernizing influences was not solely based on economic factors. The Gebusi also valued the new forms of social organization, values, beliefs, and practices that came with modernization. They were attracted to the sense of progress and advancement that these changes represented, as well as the new technologies and material goods that were becoming available.
Overall, the Gebusi's acceptance of modernizing influences reflects a complex interplay between economic, cultural, and social factors that transformed their lives in significant ways.
To learn more about the Gebusi, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/10438779
#SPJ11
COMMUNIST
PARADISE
"I CAN'T BELIEVE MY EYES!"
A. Who is the man at the front of the line? (2 points)
B. What is happening below the clouds? (5 points)
C. How do the men in the clouds feel about what is happening on the ground! (3
points)
13. What is the overall message of the political cartoon? (10 points)
t. In your opinion was the fall of the Soviet Union a good thing or bad thing/ Use
what you have learned in class to explain your reasoning,. (10 points)
Cartoon depicts Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Joseph Stalin, who are resting on a cloud labelled "Communist Paradise," looking down in dismay at Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev, who is leading a funeral procession carrying a coffin labelled "Communism."
What does it imply?Between 1985 and 1990, Gorbachev steered his country's foreign relations in a new conciliatory direction, signing a series of arms control treaties with Presidents Reagan and Bush, withdrawing Soviet troops from Afghanistan, and improving relations with China. In Russia's union republics, he also devolved power from the Communist Party to elected legislatures. These events, along with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the unification of East and West Germany, heralded the end of the Cold War.
To know about Soviet troops visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10580626
#SPJ1
2 ANALYZING What is meant by, "Resolved, that it is our duty to peril life, liberty, and property, in behalf of the fugitive slave, to as great an extent as we would peril them in behalf of ourselves"?
The statement expresses the moral duty to risk one's own safety to aid fugitive slaves and peril life, emphasizing fundamental rights for all.
The assertion "Settled, that it is our obligation to danger life, freedom, and property, for benefit of the outlaw slave, to as extraordinary a degree as we would risk them for sake of ourselves" communicates areas of strength for an in the ethical constraint to safeguard the privileges of criminal slaves.
It proposes that people have an obligation to gamble with their own security and prosperity to help the individuals who are looking for independence from bondage.
The expression "risk life, freedom, and property" shows the seriousness of the circumstance looked by criminal slaves, who were frequently pursued down and rebuffed for endeavoring to get away from bondage.
By proposing that one ought to risk their own wellbeing to safeguard the opportunity of others, the assertion features the desperation and significance of the main thing in need of attention.
The correlation between taking a chance with one's security for sake of an outlaw slave versus for benefit of oneself underlines that all people have similar inborn freedoms, no matter what their race or status as a slave.
It proposes that opportunity and freedom are not honors to be delighted in by some and denied to other people, yet rather key privileges that should be safeguarded for all.
Generally speaking, this explanation mirrors the moral and moral contemplations that drove numerous people to become abolitionists and work towards the finish of subjugation. It features that giving up of one's own priorities is important to accomplish civil rights and that the freedoms, all things considered, ought to be safeguarded, no matter what the conditions.
To learn more about peril, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29887420
#SPJ4
Which people believes in the divine right of king in the reformation and state consolation
Protestant rulers believes in the divine right of king in the reformation and state consolation.
During the Protestant Reformation, the concept of the divine right of kings remained relevant in British Christianity. Throughout this period, belief in divine right enabled Protestant rulers to redefine and maintain authority.
The frontispiece of The Great Bible (1540) depicts God whispering to King Henry VIII and the king relaying God's message to the English people. The monarch has become the conduit through which God's authority flows.
Dr. Munro then introduced the pupils to Divine Command Theory, which our A Level religion and philosophy students study. She also introduced the girls to arguments that contradict Divine Command Theory, which is a vital skill to have while studying religion and philosophy.
To know more about divine right to king:
https://brainly.com/question/30341091
#SPJ4
What desegregated the United States Armed Forces?
Answer:
On July 26, 1948, President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 9981, creating the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and Opportunity in the Armed Services. The order mandated the desegregation of the U.S. military.
Explanation:
3. 3. 8 Practice: Comparing the French and American Revolutions
The French and American Revolutions sought to depose monarchs in favour of democracy. The American strategy was effective, but the French strategy was chaotic and ultimately to Napoleon.
Both the French and American Revolutions were attempts to depose monarchs and create democratic democracies. They did, however, use different approaches and achieve different results. The American Revolution was started by a desire for representation and taxation without permission, resulting in a successful independence movement and the foundation of a democratic government.
In contrast, the French Revolution was powered by a complex combination of political, social, and economic causes, resulting in a time of turbulence, bloodshed, and, finally, the emergence of Napoleon Bonaparte. While both revolutions had a significant impact on world history, their paths and outcomes diverged significantly.
Learn more about American Revolutions:
https://brainly.com/question/29648454
#SPJ4
(Being Timed) Which was a result of the Rebellion of 1641?
A. The power of the English grew.
B. The Irish converted to Catholicism.
C. The Irish won the respect of the English.
D. Calls for Irish independence was no longer heard.
This is on Edge
The result of the Rebellion of 1641 was A. The power of the English grew. The rebellion, led by Irish Catholic nobility, aimed to gain greater autonomy and religious freedom from English rule. However, it ultimately failed and led to an increased presence of English forces in Ireland, further consolidating their control over the region.
What is Rebellion?
Rebellion is a term used to describe a movement or action that seeks to challenge or overthrow established authority, often through the use of force or violence. Rebellion can take many forms, from small-scale protests to full-scale revolutions.
Rebellion can arise for a variety of reasons, including political, economic, social, and cultural factors. In some cases, people may rebel against a government that they perceive as oppressive or corrupt, or against social and cultural norms that they believe are unjust or restrictive. Other times, rebellion may be sparked by economic factors, such as poverty or inequality, or by environmental factors, such as resource scarcity or climate change.
To know more about Rebellion:
https://brainly.com/question/13938004
#SPJ11
The black hawk war multiple choice occurred because black hawk and his followers refused to recognize a treaty by which they ceded their lands to the united states. cleared the way for the settlement of chicago. saw the sauk and foxes temporarily regain control of part of western illinois. was over before jackson entered the white house. was notable for the cruel treatment of white settlers by indians.
The Black Hawk War erupted when Black Hawk and his supporters refused to recognise a treaty relinquishing their territory to the United States, resulting in violence and Native American relocation.
The Black Hawk War erupted when Black Hawk and his supporters, predominantly Sauk and Fox Indians, refused to recognise a treaty that granted the United States control over their territory. The struggle lasted from 1832 to 1833, and while Native Americans originally succeeded in restoring control of sections of western Illinois, they were eventually defeated by American soldiers.
Hundreds of Native Americans and settlers were killed during the fight, and the Sauk and Fox were permanently removed from their native grounds. The clash was a watershed moment in the history of American westward expansion and Native American displacement.
Learn more about Black Hawk War:
https://brainly.com/question/29237449
#SPJ4
majority opinion oral arguments petition for a Orville was arrested for protesting on a public sidewalk about the need to stop global warming. His lawyer argued that the arrest was unconstitutional because the First Amendment gives Orville the right to speak freely and petition the government. A jury found Orville guilty and sentenced him to twenty years in prison. The appeals court affirmed (agreed with) the jury's decision. Orville's attorneys filed a appellate Jurisdictio with the Supreme Court, asking them to hear Orville's case under its authority. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, beginning its 6 STOP GLOBAL WARMING process. As attorneys for the Orville's attorneys had to file their first. At the Orville's attorneys argued forcefully that Orville's rights had been violated and the Supreme Court justices asked many questions. After discussing the case in a conference, the Supreme Court decided unanimously that Orville's First Amendment rights had been violated. Later that month, the Supreme Court issued its overturning the lower court decisions and IVICS 2019 iCivics, Inc. setting Orville free! Activity-Side
Orville was detained and given a punishment for demonstrating against global warming on a pavement. His attorneys filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, which unanimously reversed the judgement of the lower court and freed Orville on the grounds of First Amendment rights.
What criteria define a Supreme Court oral argument?The Court hears oral arguments in about 70–80 cases each year.. The Justices can directly question the lawyers defending the parties to the case throughout the arguments, and the lawyers can draw attention to any points they believe to be particularly crucial.
What serves as the basis for oral argument?You have the opportunity to further develop your brief's arguments before the appellate court during the oral argument. You may. Clarify the points you made in your brief, highlight your arguments those you believe are most crucial to the court's consideration, and respond to inquiries from the judges.
To know more about Amendment rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13163035
#SPJ1
Which statement describes a reason why some US leaders disagree with the policy of containment.
Do any of you consistently vote for one party at the national level and another party at the state level? Why or why not? How prevalent do you think this practice is?
Some individuals vote for one party at the national level and another at the state level. This may occur due to differences in policies and priorities between the levels of government.
The practice of voting for different parties at the national and state levels can be attributed to various factors.
Some individuals may align with a particular party's national policies, such as foreign relations, defense, or economic management, but prefer the state-level policies of another party on issues like education, healthcare, or infrastructure. Additionally, local issues and candidates can play a significant role in voters' decisions at the state level.
The prevalence of this practice varies among regions and demographics, and it is difficult to provide an exact percentage.
However, it's worth noting that split-ticket voting, which refers to voting for candidates from different parties on the same ballot, has declined in recent years as political polarization has increased. Nonetheless, some voters still choose to vote for different parties at different levels of government based on their specific priorities and concerns.
To know more about demographics click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13146758#
#SPJ11
Highlight the word(s) modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
nelson muntz tried to scrub the invisible ink out of the woven
carpet.
Word 'scrub' modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
The term "modified" can apply to any form of modification or change done to something. It can relate to adjustments made to real-world things, procedures, and even concepts. For instance, a modified car is one that has undergone some sort of modification, such receiving new components or getting a new coat of paint.
A modified process is one that has undergone some sort of change or adaptation, such as a new technique of production or a different approach to handling customer service. Last but not least, modified concepts are those that have undergone some kind of transformation or adaptation, like a fresh interpretation of an old notion.
To learn more about modification link is here
brainly.com/question/15051675
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Highlight the word(s) modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
"Nelson Muntz tried to scrub the invisible ink out of the woven carpet."
The Nuremberg Laws can be seen a a step toward the Holocaust because they
gave Hitler absolute power
resulted in the building of labor camps
deprived Jews of citizenship
described the Nazi policy of genocide
Answer:
C. Deprived Jews of citizenship.
Explanation:
The Nuremberg Laws were a series of anti-Semitic laws introduced by the Nazi government in Germany in 1935. These laws deprived Jews of their citizenship and rights, and aimed to isolate and segregate them from the rest of German society. They prohibited marriage or sexual relations between Jews and non-Jews, and also defined who was considered to be a "Jew" based on racial criteria.
The Nuremberg Laws can be seen as a significant step towards the Holocaust, as they laid the legal groundwork for the persecution of Jews and other minority groups. They created a legal framework that allowed for the systematic discrimination and marginalization of Jews, which ultimately culminated in their deportation to concentration camps and the mass murder of millions during the Holocaust.
In what year did the french initiate their second assault on mexican troops?.
Answer:late 1862
Explanation:
Answer: Late 1862
Explanation:
The second French intervention in Mexico, also known as the 2nd franco-mexican war (1861-1867), was an invasion of the 2nd federal republic of mexico, launched in late 1862 by the 2nd french empire of napoleon III at the invitation of mexican conservatives.
What was the House of Wisdom?
What was the House of Wisdom?
Responses
a hospital where brain surgery was performed
a hospital where brain surgery was performed
a place where Muslim philosophers met to contemplate life
a place where Muslim philosophers met to contemplate life
a research library in Baghdad
a research library in Baghdad
a meeting place for the advisors to the caliphs
The House of Wisdom was C. a research library in Baghdad
What was the House of Wisdom ?In Iraq's Baghdad during the lasting Islamic Golden Age from 9th to 10th century, the House of Wisdom was a centrality that stood out as a beacon of intellectualism.
Created and established by Abbasid Calpih Harun al-Rashid in the 8th Century to help collect, translate, and upkeep both Greek, Persian, and other cultures' knowledge; Housed not only an archive, but also existing as a foundation for research and education where specialists from broad fields like astronomy, mathematics, medicine, logic reasoning, poetry, and more contributed their part in uplifting knowledge combinations toward enlightenment and learning proactively.
Find out more on the House of Wisdom at https://brainly.com/question/3118989
#SPJ1
what is the meaning of the phrase "separation of church and state"? What part of the constitution guarantees this separation?
The meaning of the phrase "separation of church and state" is that there would be no governmental establishment or preference of a religion which is a free exercise clause .
What is separation of church and state?The separation of religion and government mandated can be described as the act of separation of church and state" .
It should be noted that this stressed that as regards the establishment clause as well as free exercise clause of the U.S. Constitution the forbids governmental establishment should notcome out to support or carry out a particular religion, which implies that there would be freedom from governmental intrusion with religion.
Learn more about separation of church and state at:
https://brainly.com/question/9639261
#SPJ1
1 drag each intended purpose to the correct location on the box. not all intended purposes will be used. what were three intended purposes of the indian relocation act of 1956? provide job training for native americans, primarily in industry remove native americans from the poverty of the reservations provide new reservations for native americans in better locations help native americans settle in urban areas ensure government-funded housing for native americans in urban areas
The three intended purposes of the Indian relocation act of 1956 are to provide job training for Native Americans, primarily in industry, To help Native Americans settle in urban areas, and To provide new reservations for Native Americans in better locations.
The Indian relocation act of 1956 is also known as Adult Vocational Training Program or Public Law 959. This law was based on providing training to native americans.
This was famous for being a paid moving expense. These were set-ups for the people who were willing to move off the reservation into urban areas.
The US law aims to encourage native americans to leave Indian reservations and adopt the population of urban areas.
Learn more about the Act from:
https://brainly.com/question/714974
#SPJ4
what were european explorers searching for when they sailed to the americas?
Answer:
Along with the idea of looking for new trade routes (to India), they also hoped to find new sources of gold, silver, and other valuables.
Additionally, Europeans saw exploration as a way to bring Christianity to
other cultures that lived in other lands.
While some explorers sailed around Africa to Asia, others thought they could find a quicker route by sailing west.
These voyages led to the unexpected discovery of new lands, as sailors bound for Asia came to the Caribbean islands and the continents of North America and South America.
European explorers were searching for new trade routes, resources, and opportunities for wealth and power when they sailed to the Americas.
Beginning in the late 15th century, European explorers, such as Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand Magellan, and Francis Drake, set out to find new trade routes to Asia and the East Indies, hoping to bypass the costly and dangerous land routes that were controlled by Islamic empires. Along the way, they discovered the Americas and encountered new resources such as gold, silver, tobacco, and potatoes.
European nations saw these resources as opportunities for wealth and power, leading to the colonization and exploitation of indigenous populations. The search for new territories and resources ultimately led to the establishment of European colonies in the Americas and the transatlantic slave trade.
Learn more about European explorers: https://brainly.com/question/13335713
#SPJ11
why was congressional passage and ratification of the bill of rights so politically important to securing americans confidence in the new national government created by the constitution?
The Bill of Rights was politically important to securing Americans' confidence in the new national government created by the Constitution because it addressed concerns about individual rights and limited government power that were not explicitly stated in the original Constitution. Some Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the Constitution, argued that it did not provide adequate protections for individual liberties and that the federal government would become too powerful.
By adding the Bill of Rights as the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the government addressed these concerns and demonstrated its commitment to protecting individual liberties while also limiting its own power. The Bill of Rights includes important protections such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as the right to bear arms and the right to a fair trial.
The ratification of the Bill of Rights helped to alleviate the fears of those who were skeptical of the new government and brought them into the fold of the broader American political community. This helped to strengthen the legitimacy of the government and paved the way for future cooperation and support. Additionally, the Bill of Rights has stood the test of time and remains a cornerstone of American democracy, ensuring that individual liberties are protected and that the government remains accountable to the people.