Answer:Emperors attempted to solve these problems through internal reforms.
Explanation: For example, the emperor Diocletian split control of the Roman Empire into two halves, a western and an eastern portion. Diocletian believed the territories throughout the empire would be easier to control and support if they were overseen by two administrations.
Answer:
They couldn't gain full political control
Explanation:
with all of the competing royalty making up the empire they would have to make complicated alliances to stay in control
Which ideas from the Renaissance contributed to the Reformation of the Catholic Church? Give examples and explain how exactly they influenced the complaints by people such as Martin Luther.
Answer: The Renaissance was a period of great intellectual and cultural revival in Europe that spanned from the 14th to the 17th century. Many ideas that emerged during this time contributed to the Reformation of the Catholic Church, which was a religious movement in the 16th century that sought to reform some of the practices and doctrines of the Catholic Church.
One of the key ideas of the Renaissance that influenced the Reformation was humanism, which emphasized the importance of the individual and the study of classical literature, philosophy, and art. This led to a renewed interest in studying the Bible and other religious texts, and many scholars began to question some of the teachings and practices of the Catholic Church.
Another important idea of the Renaissance that contributed to the Reformation was the concept of individualism, which emphasized the importance of personal freedom and choice. This led many people to question the authority of the Catholic Church, which had long held a monopoly on religious authority in Europe.
One example of how these ideas influenced the complaints by people such as Martin Luther was the sale of indulgences. Indulgences were certificates sold by the Catholic Church that supposedly granted forgiveness of sins, and they were often marketed as a way to reduce the time a person would spend in purgatory after death. Luther, who was a German priest and theologian, became increasingly critical of this practice and other abuses of power by the Catholic Church.
Luther's criticisms were rooted in the Renaissance ideas of individualism and humanism. He argued that salvation could not be bought or sold, and that it was the responsibility of each individual to seek forgiveness and salvation through personal faith and devotion. He also believed that the Bible should be accessible to everyone and translated into the vernacular language of each country, rather than being reserved for the clergy and scholars who could read Latin.
Overall, the Renaissance ideas of individualism and humanism contributed to the Reformation of the Catholic Church by challenging the traditional authority and practices of the Church and emphasizing the importance of personal faith and individual freedom.
Explanation:
Why did rich families, or even cities, would choose to become patrons and sponsor various artists and inventors?
Answer:
Well it is to support what they consider a good investment or I can get them the most money back.That's what some rich families would do but others out of the kindness of Their Own Heart now entire city would support sponsor various artists and inventors to get the supplies they need for everything need most of the city people are doing out kindness others might be doing good because they're thinking they're going to get money back for most people it's about getting money back.
Explanation:
Explain the 3 threats to British security leading to the expulsion of the Acadians?
I know one of the threats is
The Acadians presented a military risk since they had refused to take a loyalty oath to the British.
but i don't know the other 2
PLEASE HELP!!! due at tonight!!
The Acadians posed three types of threats to British Security which were Military Threats, Economic Threats, and Cultural Threats.
Military Threat
The British believed that the Acadians posed a military threat due to their close proximity to the French settlements in Nova Scotia, as well as their unwillingness to swear loyalty to the British Crown.
This fear was exacerbated by the ongoing war between Britain and France, which had been ongoing for nearly a century. As a result, the British felt that the Acadians could potentially provide military aid to their French allies, and therefore posed a threat to British security.
Economic Threat
The British also felt that the Acadians posed an economic threat to their colonies in Nova Scotia. The British had been attempting to establish a strong economy in the area, based on fishing and agriculture, and were concerned that the Acadians would undermine this effort.
The British also feared that the Acadians would be able to monopolize the trade in the area, thus depriving the British of the economic benefits that they had hoped to gain by settling the region.
Cultural Threat
Finally, the British were concerned that the Acadian culture would undermine the British culture in Nova Scotia. The British were staunchly Protestant, while the Acadians were Catholic, and the British feared that the Acadians would be resistant to assimilation into British culture.
The British also feared that the Acadians would be able to spread their culture throughout the region, thus undermining the British presence and potentially leading to the creation of a separate French-speaking enclave within the British colonies.
To know more about Acadians:
https://brainly.com/question/31345253
W.E.B Du Bois important events
Answer:W.E.B. Du Bois was the first African American to receive a Ph.D. from Harvard University (1895).
The first case study of an African American community was conducted by W.E.B. Du Bois, published as The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study (1899).
W.E.B. Du Bois co-founded the NAACP in 1909.
Explanation:
np
Elizabeth I was a great Queen? How far do you agree?
(complete a PEEL for 2 contrasting opinions)
PEEL=Point, evidence, explanation, link
PEEL for agreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:
Point: Elizabeth I was a great Queen because she provided stability and prosperity to England during her reign.
Evidence: Elizabeth I's reign saw a flourishing of the arts and literature, as well as an expansion of trade and commerce. She also successfully navigated religious tensions and prevented foreign invasion, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588.
Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies and leadership provided stability and growth to England, which led to an increase in wealth and prestige both domestically and internationally. Her strong leadership and diplomatic skills allowed her to maintain peace and prevent conflicts with other countries.
Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was a great Queen due to her successful reign and contributions to England's prosperity and stability.
PEEL for disagreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:
Point: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen because of her treatment of Catholics and her failure to produce an heir.
Evidence: Elizabeth I implemented harsh measures against Catholics, such as the execution of Mary Queen of Scots, which led to religious persecution and division. Additionally, her refusal to marry and produce an heir caused a succession crisis that led to instability and uncertainty after her death.
Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies towards Catholics and her lack of an heir ultimately had negative consequences for England. Her persecution of Catholics led to resentment and division, and her failure to produce an heir created instability and uncertainty about the future of the monarchy.
Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was not a great Queen due to her policies and decisions that had negative consequences for England's stability and unity.
I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide you with two contrasting opinions on whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen.
Opinion 1: Elizabeth I was a great Queen.
- Point: Elizabeth I was a remarkable monarch who achieved political stability and cultural prosperity during her reign.
- Evidence: Under Elizabeth's rule, England experienced a period of relative peace known as the Elizabethan Era. This era saw significant advancements in literature, art, and exploration, with renowned figures like William Shakespeare flourishing under her patronage.
- Explanation: Elizabeth's astute political decisions, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada and the establishment of the Church of England, contributed to England's rise as a global power. Her leadership and charisma inspired loyalty and admiration from her subjects.
- Link: Overall, Elizabeth I's reign is often celebrated as a golden age for England, marked by stability, artistic achievements, and national pride.
Opinion 2: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen.
- Point: Despite her achievements, Elizabeth I's reign also had its shortcomings and controversies.
- Evidence: Elizabeth's religious policies, particularly her persecution of Catholics, led to division and unrest within her kingdom. Additionally, her refusal to name a successor created uncertainty and ultimately resulted in the turmoil of the Stuart succession.
- Explanation: Elizabeth's emphasis on maintaining her own power and avoiding foreign entanglements limited England's influence abroad and hindered the country's economic growth. Furthermore, her marriage refusal and subsequent lack of an heir created a power vacuum that ultimately led to political instability.
- Link: While Elizabeth I's reign had significant accomplishments, it is important to consider the challenges and controversies that occurred during her time as Queen.
It is important to note that the assessment of whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen can vary depending on the criteria and perspective used.
How did Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin impact not only the economy of the South, but also the lives of people living there in the 19th century? (2-3 sentence explanation)
Which other Supreme Court case besides McCulloch v. Maryland gave more power to the federal government?
PLEASE GIVE ANSWER ASAP!!!
Based on information in the article, which best describes the difference between the child labor rates in Nepal and Mongolia?
A.Child labor rates have increased in Mongolia since 1990, but decreased in Nepal since 1990.
B.Child labor rates have increased in Mongolia since 1990, but stayed the same in Nepal since 1990.
C.Child labor rates have increased in Nepal since 1990, but decreased in Mongolia since 1990.
D.Child labor rates have increased in Nepal since 1990, but stayed the same in Mongolia since 1990.
In 2000, there were 127 million children working in Asia. By 2004, that number had fallen to 122 million. Officials are pleased that child labor rates have dropped, but they say the decline isn't happening fast enough.
Those numbers came from a recent report from the International Labor Organization (ILO). The report focused on South Asia, which includes Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and other nations. It concluded that despite the decrease in the number of working children ages five to 14, South Asia remains a child labor hot spot.
The report discussed child labor in several nations and identified Nepal as one of the worst offenders. As of 2004, almost 40 percent of Nepalese children aged 10 to 14 were working. Many continue to do strenuous physical labor in mines, quarries, and carpet factories. Still, even in Nepal, child labor rates are declining; they had been near 50 percent in 1990.
The Philippines has improved, but problems remain in some industries. Many Filipino children still work in fireworks production, deep-sea fishing, and mining. The country has a national action plan to change this.
"The [anti-child labor] laws are all there," said Filipino Undersecretary of Labor and Employment Manuel G. Imson. Imson says that the government is working with the police to enforce these laws.
In some cases, child labor has emerged where it was previously nonexistent. There were few or no child laborers in Mongolia until 1990; today, up to 10,000 children there work in gold, coal, and mineral mines. Kh. Ganbaatar, executive director of the Mongolian Employers' Federation, blames the problem on economic changes as well as on natural disasters. Several years ago, winter storms killed millions of livestock. This made it harder for families to maintain their traditional herding way of life. Many of these families were forced to send their children to work.
In fact, child labor often develops because area families cannot make ends meet and need extra income. In other cases, parents want to send their children to school but cannot afford the related fees.
"A large number of working poor means that we have a large number of people who are unable to support children [going] to school," said Panudda Boonpala, senior child labor specialist at the ILO.
In August, government representatives from nearly 40 countries as well as workers' and employers' organizations attended an ILO conference. Topics on their agenda included migration, competitiveness, productivity, and youth employment (child labor). At a session on youth employment, participants watched a video that showed children working at a gold mine in Mongolia.
The ILO says that it will try to end some of the worst forms of child labor within 10 years. Its officials point out that attitudes about working children have changed in Asia. This is contributing to the reduction in child labor rates.
"I think 10 years ago there was lots of denial," Panudda said. Still, she said, nations will not be able to end child labor unless they are willing to put a lot of effort and funding into the fight against it.
answer:
B
Explanation:
which statement describes early greek city-states?
A: They each devolped there own system of government.
B: They each experimented with different forms of a monarchy.
C: They each identified as Greek.
D: They each had there own language and cultural traditions.
Answer and Explanation:
Option (D) They each had there own language and cultural traditions.
Before You Begin
Part One: Imagine that you have just voted in a local election. As you are walking out of the polling station, you notice a van of mentally disabled people out in front. As you walk past, you see the van driver give each of the people in the van a $20 bill and hear him tell the people to go inside and vote for the candidate that you want to win. He asks them to chant the name of the candidate over and over, until they understand what they are to do. What do you do?
Write a paragraph describing what you saw and what you should do next. Explore your feelings, and defend your actions. Remember to include what your responsibilities are as a citizen.
Part Two: It is brought to the attention of local authorities that, in the last election, someone paid a van full of mentally disabled people to vote for a candidate who won the election by just ten votes. The case has come to trial as a case of voter fraud. You are selected to serve on the jury. Write a brief summary of the case, then argue for each side of the case using 1-2 paragraphs per side.
Part Three: Now, imagine yourself in a room with the other jurors trying to decide the verdict in the case described in Part Two. Is this a criminal case or a civil case? Imagine yourself in the courtroom. What does the defendant look like? Does that make you think the defendant is guilty or not guilty? What are the lawyers saying? Is there any evidence that turns the tide, or is it just a steady stream of evidence that seems to favor one side?
Write an essay that sets the scene of the courtroom and the jurors' deliberations and decision on the case.
Begin by making an outline of the essay. Decide the details of the case, the courtroom and the jury's deliberations. Flesh out your topic paragraph and overall thesis for the essay. In a paragraph or two, thoroughly describe the key evidence, evidence that turns the tide or seems to weight the argument toward one direction. Explore the adjournment and how the jury deliberates. Offer differing viewpoints of the jury based on the different evidence. What do you think? How does the jury come to a unanimous decision? Write persuasively and clearly, taking into account how your emotions and perception may influence your decision about the case, the defendant, and the other jurors.
Use the Internet, newspapers, and other media outlets to learn about similar cases. Be sure to begin writing with an outline, and develop your arguments using correct grammar and sentence structure in order to make your point.
Part One:
As a citizen, my responsibility is to ensure that every vote is cast fairly and without coercion. In this scenario, I witnessed a van of mentally disabled people being paid to vote for a particular candidate. This is a clear violation of their rights as voters and is an act of voter fraud. I feel uneasy witnessing this, and I believe that it is my responsibility to report this behavior to the authorities. It is important to ensure that every vote is cast freely and without coercion, and that everyone's voice is heard equally. By reporting this, I am upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the integrity of the election is maintained.
Part Two:
The case of voter fraud involves the payment of a van full of mentally disabled people to vote for a specific candidate in the previous election. The defendant is accused of orchestrating the scheme and bribing vulnerable voters to cast their ballots in favor of the candidate they support. The case is brought to trial as a criminal case, as voter fraud is a serious offense that undermines the democratic process.
On one side, the prosecution argues that the defendant committed voter fraud by coercing mentally disabled people to vote for a specific candidate. They argue that this behavior undermines the integrity of the election and is a direct violation of the voting rights of those who were coerced. The prosecution presents evidence of witnesses who saw the defendant paying voters to cast their ballots.
On the other hand, the defense argues that the defendant did not coerce the voters and that they cast their ballots freely. They argue that there is no evidence to suggest that the defendant bribed voters, and that the accusations are based on hearsay. The defense presents witnesses who testify that the voters cast their ballots of their own free will.
Part Three:
As a member of the jury, I find myself in a room with my fellow jurors trying to determine the verdict of the case. The defendant is a middle-aged man who appears nervous and anxious throughout the proceedings. His lawyers argue that there is no concrete evidence to prove that the defendant committed voter fraud and that the accusations are based on hearsay.
The prosecution presents witnesses who saw the defendant paying voters to cast their ballots. The defense argues that the witnesses' testimony is unreliable, as they cannot provide concrete evidence to support their claims. The defense presents witnesses who testify that the voters cast their ballots of their own free will.
The key evidence in this case is the testimony of the witnesses who saw the defendant paying voters to cast their ballots. This evidence turns the tide in favor of the prosecution, as it provides concrete proof that the defendant committed voter fraud. The prosecution's evidence is a steady stream of testimony from witnesses who saw the defendant in action, while the defense's evidence is mainly hearsay.
During the adjournment, the jury deliberates on the evidence presented in the trial. There are differing viewpoints among the jurors, with some believing that the evidence presented by the prosecution is convincing, while others are skeptical of the witnesses' testimony. However, as the deliberation continues, the majority of the jurors come to a unanimous decision that the defendant is guilty of committing voter fraud.
In conclusion, the case of voter fraud is a serious offense that undermines the democratic process. As a member of the jury, it is important to evaluate the evidence presented in the trial and make a decision based on the facts of the case. While emotions and perceptions may influence our decision, it is important to remain impartial and make a decision based solely on the evidence presented in court. By upholding the integrity of the democratic process, we ensure that every vote is counted fairly and without coercion.
Why was having strong leaders especially important for the Byzantine Empire?