The experimental and theoretical probability of the name Fred being chosen is 0.11 and 0.167 respectively.
The question is asking for the experimental and theoretical probabilities of choosing the name Fred when six different names are put into a hat and a name is chosen 100 times.
To find the experimental probability of choosing the name Fred, divide the number of times Fred is chosen by the total number of trials (100 times). In this case, Fred is chosen 11 times.
Experimental probability of choosing Fred = (number of times Fred is chosen) / (total number of trials)
= 11 / 100
= 0.11 or 11%
For the theoretical probability, since there are six different names in the hat and each name has an equal chance of being chosen, the probability of choosing Fred is:
Theoretical probability of choosing Fred = 1 / 6
≈ 0.167 or 16.67%
If the number of names in the hat were different, the theoretical probability would change because the denominator (total number of names) would be different. For example, if there were 5 names instead of 6, the theoretical probability of choosing Fred would be 1/5 or 20%.
The experimental probability would also likely change since the outcomes of the trials would be different with a different number of names.
To know more about probability refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780?#
#SPJ11
2 1/7 x 4.3 (repeating the three)
write as a mixed number in simplest form
2 1/7 x 4.3 (repeating the three) as a mixed number in simplest form is 9 2/7.
First, we can simplify the mixed number 4.3 (repeating the three) as follows:
Let x = 4.3 (repeating the three)
Then 10x = 43.33333...
Subtracting x from 10x, we get:
10x - x = 43.33333... - 4.33333...
9x = 39
x = 4.33333... / 9
x = 4 1/3
Now, we can multiply 2 1/7 by 4 1/3:
2 1/7 x 4 1/3 = (15/7) x (13/3)
= (15 x 13) / (7 x 3)
= 195 / 21
To write this as a mixed number in simplest form, we can divide 195 by 21 and write the quotient as a mixed number:
195 ÷ 21 = 9 with a remainder of 6
So, 195 / 21 = 9 6/21, which can be simplified to 9 2/7.
Therefore, 2 1/7 x 4.3 (repeating the three) as a mixed number in simplest form is 9 2/7.
To know more about mixed number refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/24137171
#SPJ11
Let f(x)= -2x+4 and g(x)= 3x^2. Find (f+g)(x) and (f-g)(x)
State the domain of each.
Evaluate the following: (f+g)(-3) and (f-g)(-3)
The scope of both functions is all real numbers.
How to solveTo compute the values of (f+g)(x) and (f-g)(x), we apply the addition and subtraction of two distinct functions, respectively:
(f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) = [tex](-2x + 4) + (3x^2) = 3x^2 - 2x + 4[/tex]
(f-g)(x) = f(x) - g(x) = [tex](-2x + 4) - (3x^2) = -3x^2 - 2x + 4[/tex]
The scope of both functions is all real numbers.
Subsequently, we evaluate the expressions for x = -3:
(f+g)(-3) = [tex]3(-3)^2 - 2(-3) + 4[/tex] = 3(9) + 6 + 4 = 27 +6 +4 = 37
(f-g)(-3) = [tex]-3(-3)^2 - 2(-3) + 4[/tex]= -3(9) + 6 + 4 = -27 + 6 + 4 = -17
Read more about domain here:
https://brainly.com/question/26098895
#SPJ1
Determine the boundedness and monotonicity of the following sequences. If possible, find the GLB and LUB, (n) {) 1-2 3n+1) 3
The sequence (n){(1-2)/(3^n+1) + 3} is bounded and decreasing. The GLB is 3 and the LUB is 1.
To determine the boundedness and monotonicity of the sequence, we can look at the limit as n approaches infinity.
Taking the limit of the sequence, we have:
lim(n→∞) [(1-2)/(3^n+1) + 3] = 3
This means that the sequence approaches a finite value as n gets larger, so the sequence is bounded.
Next, to check the monotonicity of the sequence, we can take the first derivative of the sequence with respect to n:
d/dn [(1-2)/(3^n+1) + 3] = [(2-1)(-ln3)(3^n+1)]/[(3^n+1)^2]
Simplifying, we get:
d/dn [(1-2)/(3^n+1) + 3] = (-ln3)/(3^n+1)^2
Since the derivative is negative for all n, the sequence is decreasing.
To find the GLB and LUB, we can use the fact that the sequence is decreasing and bounded. Since the sequence approaches 3 as n approaches infinity, 3 is the lower bound.
To find the upper bound, we can use the fact that the sequence is decreasing and start with the second term, which is 2. Therefore, the upper bound is 2. Since 1 < 2, we can conclude that the LUB is 1.
For more questions like Monotonicity click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29732217
#SPJ11
Use the properties of limits to help decide whether the limit exists. If the limit exists, find its value. x? lim -9 X-3 X+3 Simplify the rational expression. x²-9 x+3 Evaluate the limit or determine that it does not exist. Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice. ОА, 9 lim X-3X+3 (Simplify your answer.) B. The limit does not exist and is neither co nor - 00.
Answer: B.
Given expression: (-9x) / (x^2 - 9)
Simplify the rational expression by factoring the denominator:
(x^2 - 9) = (x + 3)(x - 3)
= (-9x) / [(x + 3)(x - 3)]
Now, we can evaluate the limit as x approaches 3:
lim (x -> 3) [(-9x) / ((x + 3)(x - 3))]
Since the expression is defined and continuous at x = 3, we can directly substitute the value of x:
((-9 * 3) / ((3 + 3)(3 - 3))) = (-27) / (6 * 0)
The denominator becomes zero, which means the limit does not exist, and is neither ∞ nor -∞. So, the correct choice is B. The limit does not exist and is neither ∞ nor -∞.
Select all of the statements that are true.
Previous question
The 9.7-9.7 because the distance from -9.7 to 0 on the number line is 9.7 units.
Numbers with the same absolute value are opposites because they are the same distance from each other.
The 7.1 7.1 because the distance from 7.1 to 0 on the number line is 7.1 units.
The -8.4 8.4 because the distance from -8.4 to 8.4 on the number line is 0 units.
=
Numbers with the same absolute value are opposites because they are the same distance from 0 on the number line.
The -12.5 12.5 because the distance from 12.5 to 0 on the number line is -12.5 units.
N
The true statements are Numbers with same absolute value are opposites because they are same distance from each other and from 0 on the number line. The |7.1| = 7.1. So, correct options are B, C and E.
b) Numbers with the same absolute value are opposites because they are the same distance from each other. This is true because absolute value is the distance from a number to zero on the number line, and if two numbers have the same distance from zero, then they must be equidistant from zero and therefore, they are opposite in sign.
c) The |7.1| = 7.1 because the distance from 7.1 to 0 on the number line is 7.1 units. This is true because the absolute value of a number is always positive, and it represents the distance of that number from zero on the number line.
d) The |-8.4| = 8.4 because the distance from -8.4 to 8.4 on the number line is 0 units. This is false, as the distance between -8.4 and 8.4 on the number line is 16.8 units. The correct value of the absolute value of -8.4 is 8.4.
e) Numbers with the same absolute value are opposites because they are the same distance from 0 on the number line. This is true because 0 is the midpoint of the number line, and if two numbers have the same distance from 0, then they must be equidistant from zero and therefore, they are opposite in sign.
Therefore, the correct statements are b, c, and e.
To learn more about distance/absolute value click on,
https://brainly.com/question/16901376
#SPJ1
As survey found that women's heights are normally distributed with am mean 62.1 in. and standard deviation 2.9. the survey also found that men's heights are normally distributed with mean 67.8 and standard deviation 3.1 in. consider an executive jet that seats six with a doorway height of 55.8 in.
a) what percentage of adult men can fit through the door without bending?
b) does the door design with a height of 55.8 in. appear to be adequate? why didn't the engineers design a larger door?
a. the door design is inadequate, but because the jet is relatively small and seats only six people, a much higher door would require major changes in the design and cost of the jet, making a larger height not practical.
b. the door design is adequate, because although many men will not be able to fit without bending, most women will be able to fit without bending. thus, a larger door is not needed.
c. the door design is inadequate, because every person needs to be able to get into the aircraft without bending. there is no reason why this should not be implemented.
d. the door design is adequate, because the majority of people will be able to fit without bending. thus, a larger door is not needed.
a) The percentage of men with a height less than or equal to 55.8 inches is approximately 0.00007 or 0.007%.
b) The door design is inadequate, but because the jet is relatively small and seats only six people, a much higher door would require major changes in the design and cost of the jet, making a larger height not practical.
Option (a) is correct.
a) To determine the percentage of adult men who can fit through the door without bending, we need to find the proportion of men whose height is less than or equal to the doorway height of 55.8 inches. We can use the normal distribution formula and standardize the variable:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
Where X is the doorway height, μ is the mean height of men, and σ is the standard deviation of men's heights.
Z = (55.8 - 67.8) / 3.1 = -3.87
Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find that the percentage of men with a height less than or equal to 55.8 inches is approximately 0.00007 or 0.007%.
Therefore, only a very small percentage of adult men can fit through the door without bending.
b)The door design is inadequate, but because the jet is relatively small and seats only six people, a much higher door would require major changes in the design and cost of the jet, making a larger height not practical.
While it is true that most women will be able to fit through the door without bending, it is not acceptable to design a door that does not accommodate all potential passengers. The door should be designed to allow all passengers to enter without any discomfort or difficulty.
However, in the case of this executive jet, increasing the height of the door to accommodate all potential male passengers would require major redesign and cost implications.
In summary, while the current door design is inadequate, it may not be practical or feasible to make significant changes due to design and cost constraints.
Therefore, the correct option is a.
To learn more about standard deviation here
https://brainly.com/question/13905583
#SPJ4
Does anyone have the answer
Answer:does anyone have the image
Step-by-step explanation:
50 POINTS ASAP Polygon ABCD with vertices at A(−4, 6), B(−2, 2), C(4, −2), and D(4, 4) is dilated using a scale factor of five eighths to create polygon A′B′C′D′. If the dilation is centered at the origin, determine the vertices of polygon A′B′C′D′.
A′(5.8, −3), B′(1.6, −1.5), C′(−1.6, 3), D′(2.5, 3)
A′(−16, 24), B′(−8, 8), C′(16, −24), D′(16, 16)
A′(2.5, −3.75), B′(1.25, −1.25), C′(−2.5, 1.25), D′(−2.5, −2.5)
A′(−2.5, 3.75), B′(−1.25, 1.25), C′(2.5, −1.25), D′(2.5, 2.5)
Answer:
A′(−2.5, 3.75), B′(−1.25, 1.25), C′(2.5, −1.25), D′(2.5, 2.5)
Step-by-step explanation:
in the described situation you only need to multiply the coordinates by the scale factor (in our case the given 5/8)
A (-4, 6) turns into
A' (-4×5/8, 6×5/8) = A' (-2.4, 3.75)
and therefore we know already here that all the other answer options are wrong.
Find the missing dimension for the triangle. The area is 256. 5 cm sq and the base is 27 cm
The missing dimension of the triangle is the height, which is 19 cm.
To find the missing dimension of the triangle, we can use the formula for the area of a triangle:
Area = (1/2) x base x height
We know that the area is 256.5 cm^2 and the base is 27 cm. Therefore, we can plug in these values into the formula and solve for the height:
256.5 = (1/2) x 27 x height
256.5 = 13.5 x height
height = 256.5 / 13.5
height = 19
Therefore, the missing dimension of the triangle is the height, which is 19 cm.
To know more about triangle refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2773823
#SPJ11
we need to know the relationship between two variables. we are looking at ci and student satisfaction. the variables include a likert scale 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and is non-parametric data. what kind of analysis should we do?
The variables of interest are both non-parametric and measured on an ordinal scale, a suitable analysis for determining the relationship between them would be the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
The Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric measure of the strength and direction of association between two variables.
It is based on the rank order of observations for each variable, rather than their actual numerical values.
The coefficient can range from -1 perfect negative correlation to +1 perfect positive correlation.
And with a value of 0 indicating no correlation.
Use the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between CI and student satisfaction.
The coefficient would tell us if there is a significant correlation between the two variables, and whether the correlation is positive or negative.
Perform the analysis, first rank the observations for both variables and calculate the difference in ranks between each pair of observations.
Calculate the Spearman rank correlation coefficient using the formula,
ρ = 1 - (6Σd² / n(n² - 1))
where ρ is the Spearman rank correlation coefficient,
d is the difference in ranks for each pair of observations,
n is the sample size,
and n² is the sum of the squares of the ranks.
A value of ρ close to +1 would indicate a strong positive correlation between the two variables.
A value close to -1 would indicate a strong negative correlation.
A value close to 0 would indicate no significant correlation between the two variables.
Learn more about variables here
brainly.com/question/6501410
#SPJ4
How many neutrons are there in the ion 18^O^2-?
A. 8
B. 10
C. 16
D. 20
Ryan went shopping and purchased two shirts for $16 each, and a pair of sneakers that cost 2 1/2 times as much as a shirt. How much money did Ryan spend?
Answer:
Ryan spent $72 on his shopping trip.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find out how much money Ryan spent, we need to add up the cost of the shirts and the sneakers.
First, we know that Ryan purchased two shirts for $16 each. So we can find the total cost of the shirts by multiplying the cost per shirt by the number of shirts:
$16 per shirt x 2 shirts = $32So the total cost of the shirts is $32.
Next, we know that Ryan purchased a pair of sneakers that cost 2 1/2 times as much as a shirt. We can use this information to find the cost of the sneakers.
If the cost of a shirt is $16, then we can find the cost of the sneakers by multiplying $16 by 2 1/2:
$16 x 2 1/2 = $16 x 2.5 = $40So the cost of the sneakers is $40.
Finally, we can find the total cost of Ryan's shopping trip by adding up the cost of the shirts and the sneakers:
$32 + $40 = $72Therefore, Ryan spent $72 on his shopping trip.
In the addition problem shown, each letter represents a different digit. If GOD=605, what number does MOVED represent?
The number does MOVED represent 1110.
How determine what number does MOVED represent?Since GOD=605, we know that D=5. We can now substitute this value of D into the addition problem to get:
GOD+ DOG = MOVED
605+ 506 = 1111
Since M cannot be 0 (otherwise it wouldn't be a 4-digit number), we know that M=1.
We can now subtract 1 from both sides of the equation to get:
604+ 506 = 1110
Now we can see that E+4=10, so E=6. We can also see that O+0=0, so O=0. Finally, we can see that G+D=1, so G=6 and D=5.
Therefore, MOVED = 1110.
Learn more about word problems at https://brainly.com/question/21405634
#SPJ1
the measure of an angle is 156°. what is the measure of its supplementary angle
Answer:
24°
Step-by-step explanation:
Supplementary angles: 2 angles that add up to 180°.
We are given that one angle is 156°, so we can write an equation:
180=156+x
subtract both sides by 156
24=x
So, the measure of the supplementary angle is 24°.
Hope this helps!
write a paragraph about importance of english language using simple present tense.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The English language is an art that I am using to convey this message to you. Without this form of communication, we would be unable to talk or write without using another language. We think everyday with this awesome language, and don't think much about the language we think in. English is an amazing language, and I am proud to be able to verbalize it to you today.
A cylindrical water tank has a diameter of 60 feet and a water level of 10 feet. If the water level increases by 2 inches, how many more cubic feet of water will be in the tank, to the nearest cubic foot?
After formula for the volume of a cylinder, the increase in water level results in approximately 260 more cubic feet of water in the tank.
The current water level is 10 feet, which is 120 inches. When the water level increases by 2 inches, the new water level will be 122 inches.
The radius of the tank is half of the diameter, which is 30 feet or 360 inches.
The current volume of water in the tank can be calculated using the formula for the volume of a cylinder: V = πr²h, where r is the radius and h is the height of the water level.
V = π(360²)(120) ≈ 15,465,920 cubic inches
When the water level increases by 2 inches, the new height of the water level is 122 inches.
The new volume of water in the tank can be calculated using the same formula:
V = π(360²)(122) ≈ 15,914,693 cubic inches
The difference in volume between the two levels is:
15,914,693 - 15,465,920 = 448,773 cubic inches
To convert cubic inches to cubic feet, we divide by 1728:
448,773 ÷ 1728 ≈ 259.6 cubic feet
Rounding to the nearest cubic foot, we get:
260 cubic feet
Therefore, the increase in water level results in approximately 260 more cubic feet of water in the tank.
To know more about volume of a cylinder, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27033747#
#SPJ11
1. Use the given data to estimate the rate of change of atmospheric pressure with respect to altitude at different heights over the range covered by the data. Include a table in your response.
2. Create two plots, one that illustrates the pressure depending on altitude, and another that illustrates the estimated rate of change depending on altitude.
3. Construct a function that models the pressure-altitude data. Create a plot that includes the model function and the data together. Explain briefly how you chose your model function, including the values of any parameters.
4. Use your model function (from Part 3) to estimate the rate of change of atmospheric pressure with respect to altitude at different heights over the range from sea level to 10,000 ft. Include a Table in your response.
5. Together on the same plot, show the rate of change of atmospheric pressure with respect to altitude at different altitudes within the range covered by the data both (i) estimated directly from the data (Part 1) and (ii) computed with the model function (Part 4). Compare the rate of change information you computed from the model function with the rate of change information you estimated directly from the data. Use this comparison to assess your model function.
rate:
0. 0004
Altitude
101. 2
499. 9
997. 6
1498. 1
1993. 4
2493. 8
3007. 2
4006. 4
5009. 4
6006. 5
7005. 4
7990. 4
9000. 2
10009. 1
Pressure
743. 6
629. 6
498. 3
407. 4
345. 3
286. 6
223. 8
152. 9
100. 8
68. 4
45. 4
30. 8
21. 0
13. 7
The task requires estimating the rate of change of atmospheric pressure with respect to altitude using the given data.
First, a table needs to be created to estimate the rate of change of pressure with respect to altitude. The rate of change will be the difference in pressure divided by the difference in altitude between two consecutive data points.
Second, two plots should be created: one illustrating the pressure depending on altitude, and another illustrating the estimated rate of change depending on altitude.
Third, a function should be constructed to model the pressure-altitude data. The function should be selected based on how well it fits the data points.
Fourth, the model function should be used to estimate the rate of change of atmospheric pressure with respect to altitude at different heights over the range from sea level to 10,000 ft.
Fifth, a comparison should be made between the rate of change information computed from the model function and the rate of change information estimated directly from the data. This comparison will be used to assess the accuracy of the model function.
To learn more about “altitude” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/1159693
#SPJ11
A telephone pole has a wire attached to its top that is anchored to the ground. the distance from the bottom of the pole to the anchor point is
69 feet less than the height of the pole. if the wire is to be
6 feet longer than the height of the pole, what is the height of the pole?
A telephone pole has a wire attached to its top that is anchored to the ground then conclude the height of the pole is approximately 51.53 feet.
Let h be the height of the pole. The equation h = (h - 69) + 6 represents the given information. Solving it gives h = 75.
Let's denote the height of the pole as "h". Then, according to the problem, the distance from the bottom of the pole to the anchor point is 69 feet less than the height of the pole, which means it is h - 69. Additionally, the wire is to be 6 feet longer than the height of the pole, so its length is h + 6.
Now we can use the Pythagorean theorem, which states that in a right triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (in this case, the wire) is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides (in this case, the height of the pole and the distance from the bottom of the pole to the anchor point). So we have:
(h - 69)^2 + h^2 = (h + 6)^2
Expanding and simplifying, we get:h^2 - 138h + 4761 + h^2 = h^2 + 12h + 36
Rearranging and simplifying, we get:h^2 - 75h - 1602 = 0
We can solve for h using the quadratic formula:h = (-b ± sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a
where a = 1, b = -75, and c = -1602.
Plugging in these values, we get:h = (75 ± sqrt(75^2 - 4(1)(-1602))) / 2(1)
h ≈ 51.53 or h ≈ -31.53
Since the height of the pole cannot be negative, we can ignore the negative solution and conclude that the height of the pole is approximately 51.53 feet.
To learn more about “The Pythagorean theorem” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/343682
#SPJ11
Helppppp this is hard. i will give brainiest to the answer. i need it by 30 mins. please help
Of course! Please let me know what you need help with and I'll do my best to assist you within the given time frame.
To know more about assist refer here
https://brainly.com/question/12153891#
#SPJ11
I NEED HELP ON THIS ASAP!! PLEASE, IT'S DUE TODAY!!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
Step-by-step explanation:
A, 7^(x+3) = 823, 543
7^(x+3) = 823, 543
7^(x+3) = 7^7 ....... write in the power form which it's base must be 7 in order to equalify the power
x+3 = 7
x = 4
B, 4^ -4x = 4^-8
4 ^ -4x = 1/65, 536
4^ -4x = 1/4^8 ........ write in the power form
4^ -4x = 4^-8
-4x = -8 ..... write equality among the power cause it's base is same
x=2
C, 1/(6^(x-5) ) = 1296
1/(6^(x-5) ) = 1296
6^-(x-5) = 1296
6^-(x-5) = 6^4........ write in the power form
-(x-5) = 4
-x + 5 = 4
-x = -11
x = 1
D, 1/3^x+7 = 1/243
1/3^x+7 = 1/243
3 ^ -(x+7) = 3^-5 .... write in the power form
-(x+7) = -5
-x-7 = -5
-x = 2
x= -2
Abby and her mom are driving on a road trip, and Abby is watching the milepost signs go by. Each hour she writes down which mile marker they
pass and records her results in the table given.
Hours
Milepost
62
1
2
3
4
62 + 50 = 112
112 + 50 = 162
162 + 50 = 212
If Abby wants to write an equation to find the milepost they will pass, y, after driving for x hours, which type of equation would be
most appropriate?
A linear
OB. Quadratic
OĆ exponential
Dabsolute value
This is a linear equation in slope-intercept form, where the slope (m) is 50 and the y-intercept (b) is 62.
Since the milepost increases by a fixed amount of 50 for every hour that they drive, the most appropriate type of equation to describe this relationship is a linear equation.
A linear equation has the form y = mx + b, where m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept. In this case, the slope is 50, since the milepost increases by 50 for every hour of driving, and the y-intercept is 62, since they start at milepost 62.
Therefore, the equation that represents Abby's relationship between the milepost they pass, y, and the number of hours they drive, x, is:
y = 50x + 62
This is a linear equation in slope-intercept form, where the slope (m) is 50 and the y-intercept (b) is 62.
To know more about linear equation refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29739212
#SPJ11
What’s the value of y intercept of the graphs of h(x) =29)5.2)^x
The y intercept based on the information will be (0,29)
How to calculate the interceptWe want to find the value of the y-intercept for the given function.
The y-intercept is (0,29)
First, we define the y-intercept as the value of the function when evaluated in x = 0.
Here the given function is:
h(x) = 29*(5.2)ˣ
It should be noted that too get the y-intercept we just need to evaluate this at x = 0, then we get:
h(0) = 29*(5.2)⁰ = 29
The y-intercept is (0 29)
Learn more about intercept on
https://brainly.com/question/14930354
#SPJ1
solve the equation
i will give brainliest
Answer:
5.09
Step-by-step explanation:
You eliminate the decimal by multiplying both sides by 10:
10(.25x+0.5)=10(0.61+0.14x)
Then you get your new equation and combine like terms:
25x+5=61+14x
-14x -14x
11x+5=61
11x+5=61
-5 -5
11x=61
Then finally you do 61/11 which gets you around 5.09 if you round to 2 decimal places.
A pharmaceutical company needs to know if its new cholesterol drug, Praxor, is effective at lowering cholesterol levels. It believes that
people who take Praxor will average a greater decrease in cholesterol level than people taking a placebo. After the experiment is complete,
the researchers find that the 32 participants in the treatment group lowered their cholesterol levels by a mean of 19. 9 points with a
standard deviation of 3. 9 points. The 36 participants in the control group lowered their cholesterol levels by a mean of 19. 3 points with a
standard deviation of 1. 3 points. Assume that the population variances are not equal and test the company's claim at the 0. 01 level. Let
the treatment group be Population 1 and let the control group be Population 2
Step 2 of 3: Compute the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.
The critical value is approximately 2.681. Since the absolute value of the test statistic (4.114) is greater than the critical value (2.681), we can reject the null hypothesis at the 0.01 significance level and conclude that there is evidence to support the claim that Praxor is effective at lowering cholesterol levels compared to a placebo.
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine whether there is enough evidence to support a claim about a population.
In this case, the claim being made is that people who take Praxor will experience a greater decrease in cholesterol levels compared to those taking a placebo.
The first step in hypothesis testing is to state the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis, denoted as H₀, is the assumption that there is no difference between the two populations being compared. The alternative hypothesis, denoted as H₁, is the claim being made, which is that there is a difference between the two populations.
In this case, the null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in the mean cholesterol level decrease between the two groups, while the alternative hypothesis would be that the mean cholesterol level decrease in the treatment group is greater than that in the control group.
Next, a significance level, denoted as α, is chosen. This represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In this case, a significance level of 0.01 is chosen.
The next step is to calculate the test statistic, which is a value that measures how far the sample data deviates from what is expected under the null hypothesis. The test statistic used in this case is the two-sample t-test. This test assumes that the two populations being compared have normal distributions and that their variances are not equal.
The formula for the two-sample t-test is:
t = (x₁ - x₂) / √√(s₁²/n1 + s₂²/n₂)
Where x₁ and x₂ are the sample means, s₁ and s₂ are the sample standard deviations, and n₁ and n₂ are the sample sizes for the two groups being compared.
Substituting the values in the formula we get,
= (19.9 - 19.3) / √((3.9²/32) + (1.3²/36))
t ≈ 4.114
Finally, we compare the test statistic to a critical value from a t-distribution table with degrees of freedom equal to n₁ + n₂ - 2 and a significance level of 0.01. If the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
In this case, the critical value is approximately 2.681. Since the absolute value of the test statistic (4.114) is greater than the critical value (2.681), we can reject the null hypothesis at the 0.01 significance level and conclude that there is evidence to support the claim that Praxor is effective at lowering cholesterol levels compared to a placebo.
To know more about Hypothesis here
https://brainly.com/question/29576929
#SPJ4
how do you know when to use the Rule of Sum or Fundamental Counting Principle for probability problems?
If the events are exclusive, use the Rule of Sum. If the events are independent, use the Fundamental Counting Principle.
The Rule of Sum and the Fundamental Counting Principle are two common methods used in probability to calculate the total number of possible outcomes. Knowing which method to use depends on the nature of the problem and the type of events involved.
The Rule of Sum is used when we have two or more exclusive events. This means that only one of the events can happen at a time. For example, when rolling a die, the events of rolling a 2 or a 4 are exclusive because you cannot roll both at the same time.
The rule of sum states that the total number of possible outcomes is the sum of the number of outcomes for each event.
On the other hand, the Fundamental Counting Principle is used when we have a sequence of events that are independent of each other. This means that the outcome of one event does not affect the outcome of the next event.
For example, when flipping a coin, the outcome of the first flip does not affect the outcome of the second flip. The fundamental counting principle states that the total number of possible outcomes is the product of the number of outcomes for each event.
To learn more about fundamental counting click on,
https://brainly.com/question/28384306
#SPJ1
So far you have completed 816 miles
which is 48% of the trail.
Assuming that the trail is a total of "x" miles, we can set up the following equation to solve for "x":
816 = 0.48x
To solve for "x", we can divide both sides by 0.48:
x = 1700
Therefore, the total length of the trail is 1700 miles.
Emily brought some homemade cookies for the school bake sale. The ingredients cost her $1.50 per cookie, but she sells them for a higher price at $3.00 per cookie. What is the percent markup per cookie?
The value of the calculated percent markup of the cookie is 100%
Finding the the percent markup per cookieFrom the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
The ingredients cost her $1.50 per cookieShe sells them for a higher price at $3.00 per cookieThe percent markup of the cookie is then calculated as
Percentage = (Selling price - cost price)/cost price
substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation
Percentage = (3 - 1.5)/1.5
Evaluate
Percentage = 100%
Hence, the percent markup of the cookie is 100%
Read more about percentage at
https://brainly.com/question/24877689
#SPJ1
To find the quotient of 4. 082 and 10,000, move the decimal point 4. 082_places to the_
The quotient of the given division is 0.4082, under the condition that dividend is 4.082 and divisor is 10,000.
The count of zeros in 10,000 is 4, then we have to transfer the decimal point four places to the left to divide by 10,000. Here, we have to relie on the basic principles involved in division.
Then, in order to find the quotient of 4.082 and 10,000, we have to divide 4.082 by 10,000. To perform this, we expand the number by moving the decimal point forward of 4.082.
That is,
[tex] \frac{4.082 }{10000} [/tex]
= 0.4082
The quotient is 0.4082
To learn more about decimal:
brainly.com/question/30958821
#SPJ4
This diagram shows an equilateral triangle and three lines, p, q, and r, that meet at the
triangle's center, T.
Select all of the transformations that map the triangle onto itself.
reflection across line q followed by 90° clockwise rotation about point T
reflection across line p followed by 240 clockwise rotation about point T
reflection across liner
270 clockwise rotation about point T
120 counterclockwise rotation about point 7
180 counterclockwise rotation about point 7 followed by reflection across
sine q
Answer:
-Reflection across line p followed by 240 clockwise rotation about point T.
-Reflection across line r.
-120 counterclockwise rotation about point T.
Step-by-step explanation:
All these transformations map the triangle onto itself.
23- Find unit vectors that satisfy the stated conditions (a) Oppositely directed to v = (3,-4 ) and half the length of v.
The unit vector that is oppositely directed to v = (3, -4) and half its length is approximately u = (-0.5547, 0.8321).
How to find a unit vector that satisfies the given conditions?To find a unit vector that is oppositely directed to v = (3, -4) and half its length, we can follow these steps:
Find the length of vector v:
|v| = sqrt(3^2 + (-4)^2) = 5
Divide vector v by 2 to get a vector with half its length:
v/2 = (3/2, -2)
To get a vector that is oppositely directed to v, we can reverse the direction of v/2:
-(3/2, -2) = (-3/2, 2)
Finally, we can find the unit vector in the direction of (-3/2, 2) by dividing it by its length:
|(-3/2, 2)| = sqrt((-3/2)^2 + 2^2) = sqrt(13/4)
u = (-3/2, 2) / sqrt(13/4) = (-3/2) * (2/sqrt(13))/2 + (2/sqrt(13)) * (1/2)
Therefore, the unit vector that is oppositely directed to v = (3, -4) and half its length is approximately u = (-0.5547, 0.8321).
Learn more about vectors.
brainly.com/question/20491131
#SPJ11