Electricity during the Second Industrial Revolution transformed cities, making them safer, brighter, and more convenient places to live and work with increased productivity, transportation, and use of electric appliances.
The development of electricity during the Second Industrial Revolution significantly transformed life in cities. Prior to electricity, cities were primarily lit by gas lamps, which were expensive and produced poor lighting. With the introduction of electric lighting, cities became brighter and safer, allowing for increased productivity and activity at night. Streetlights and illuminated signs became a common sight, leading to increased commercial activity and entertainment options in urban areas.
Electricity also revolutionized transportation in cities. Electric streetcars and subways became popular, providing an efficient and reliable means of transportation for city-dwellers. This led to the development of suburbs and the growth of urban areas, as people could now live further away from their workplace and commute easily.
The development of electric appliances also had a significant impact on city life. Electric fans, air conditioners, and refrigerators made living conditions more comfortable and convenient. This allowed for more diverse food options and improved health standards, leading to a decrease in illness and disease in urban areas.
Overall, the development of electricity during the Second Industrial Revolution transformed cities, making them safer, brighter, and more convenient places to live and work.
To learn more about Second Industrial Revolution refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/7154211
#SPJ11
Heroes of the Wild
Study the interactive in the lesson to describe the background and contributions of these key historical figures. Then respond to the reflection question. Your answers should be written in complete sentences.
Lewis Clark Sacajawea York
Describe each
individual’s background.
Describe the
contributions he/she made to the expedition.
Reflection Question
Why was it important to send explorers into the new territory of the United States?
The three most significant members of the Lewis and Clark Expedition were Sacajawea, York, and Lewis because they were "Heroes of the Wild."
What are your thoughts on Heroes of the Wild?Nat Levine wrote the screenplay for Harry S. Webb's American silent Western series Heroes of the Wild, which was distributed by Mascot Pictures in 1927.
In this research, Lewis and Clark were one of the four renowned American men regarded as the "heroes of the wild." York was Clark's slave, and Sacajawea helped them when they needed to communicate with the people.
William Clark and Meriwether Lewis were given the responsibility of leading the Lewis and Clark Expedition across the recently conquered Louisiana Territory by President Thomas Jefferson in 1804.
At the mouth of the Columbia River in present-day Washington state, the first transcontinental voyage across the western United States of America, which went to the Pacific Ocean's coast, came to an end.
The two-year trip laid the foundation for American westward migration. Research has been done extensively on the unexplored interior of North America.
By doing this, they increase public knowledge of the excursions to the Pacific Ocean.
Why was it so crucial to send explorers to the newest part of the US?North America's colonization. To search for wealth and stake out new territories, European nations sent out further explorers. In North America, the struggle for more territory quickly descended into conflict.
Learn more about American westward expansion: https://brainly.com/question/30752907
#SPJ1
What was one important reason so many immigrants chose to live in Washington?
A.) The federal government gave immigrants money to settle in the Northwest.
B.)They were interested in becoming fishermen and needed to live near the ocean.
C.)They were interested in becoming rich from the gold and silver located in the mountains.
D.)The climate, location, and landforms of various regions of Washington reminded them of home.
One important reason so many immigrants chose to live in Washington
D.) The climate, location, and landforms of various regions of Washington reminded them of home.
Why immigrant chose to live in WashingtonOne important reason why many immigrants chose to live in Washington was because the climate, location and landforms of various regions in Washington reminded them of their home countries.
Washington State offers diverse geographical features, including mountains, forests and coastal areas which may have resembled the natural landscapes that immigrants were familiar with in their home countries. the familiarity and resemblance to their homeland likely played a significant role in attracting immigrants to settle in Washington.
Learn more about Washington at
https://brainly.com/question/30553062
#SPJ1
after world war i, senators in the united states objected to foreign policy decisions being made by international organizations rather than u.s. leaders. this led to –
Answer:
After World War I, senators in the United States objected to foreign policy decisions being made by international organizations rather than US leaders. This led to the rejection of the Treaty of Versailles and the US not joining the League of Nations. The rejection of the Treaty of Versailles and the failure of the US to join the League of Nations had significant consequences, as it weakened the international cooperation and collective security envisioned by the League, and contributed to the rise of isolationist sentiment in the US. This isolationist sentiment was a major factor in shaping US foreign policy in the interwar period, and it ultimately influenced the country's response to the rise of fascist regimes in Europe in the 1930s. The US's decision to pursue a policy of neutrality in the early years of World War II was influenced in part by the desire to avoid being drawn into another costly and deadly war, a sentiment that was rooted in the rejection of internationalism and the League of Nations after World War I.
Samuel Swartwout was able to steal from the U. S. Treasury by _____.
maintaining a fleet of ships that sailed between New York and England and failing to collect import fees when they docked in New York
keeping the revenue he collected as the Collector of the Port of New York and failing to deliver it to the U. S. Treasury
using his position as the Collector of the Port of New York to require all sailors arriving in port to pay a tariff
using his office as Collector of the Port of New York to write checks to himself drawn on the U. S. Treasury’s bank
Samuel Swartwout was able to steal from the U.S. Treasury by keeping the revenue he collected as the Collector of the Port of New York and failing to deliver it to the U.S. Treasury.
Samuel Swartwout was a prominent American politician who served as the Collector of the Port of New York from 1829 to 1838. In this position, he was responsible for collecting import duties and other revenues on behalf of the U.S. government. However, instead of delivering these funds to the U.S. Treasury as required, Swartwout began to embezzle large sums of money for his own personal gain.
Over the course of his tenure as Collector, Swartwout managed to steal an estimated $1.2 million from the U.S. Treasury, an astronomical sum of money at the time. He was able to do this by exploiting weaknesses in the government's accounting systems, and by using his position of authority to cover up his illegal activities.
To know more about Samuel Swartwout, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/31552856
#SPJ4
What was one immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation?
A. Slavery was abolished everywhere in the United States effective January 1, 1864.
B. Slaves in the Southern states were immediately declared free men and relocated to the North.
C. Britain and France did not support the Southern cause as much as they had before the Proclamation.
D. All African Americans would be declared free if the Union won the war.
The immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it declared slaves in the Southern states to be free and helped to shift international opinion in favor of the Union cause. Option B.
The Emancipation Proclamation was a significant moment in American history, and it had several immediate results. One of the most important outcomes of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it declared slaves in the Southern states to be free.
Although the proclamation did not end slavery entirely, it did provide a powerful statement of support for the abolitionist cause.
However, the immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation was not a total end to slavery. The proclamation did not apply to states that had already seceded from the Union, which meant that slavery was still legal in some parts of the South. It also did not apply to states that were loyal to the Union, where slavery was still legal.
Another immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it helped to shift international opinion in favor of the Union cause. Before the proclamation, many European countries were sympathetic to the Confederacy, but the Emancipation Proclamation helped to change their minds.
By declaring that the Union was fighting for freedom and against slavery, the Emancipation Proclamation made it more difficult for European nations to support the Confederacy.
While the proclamation did not end slavery entirely, it was a significant step towards that goal, and it helped to change the course of the Civil War. So Option B is correct.
For more question on Proclamation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2776713
#SPJ11
Imagine you are a trader in a Berber caravan describe the preparations you must make and thoughts about your journey
As a Berber merchant, I would arrange provisions like food and drink, think about the path, and prepare for difficulties as I anxiously anticipated the voyage ahead.
I would need to make elaborate preparations for the voyage as I would be a trader in a Berber caravan. This would entail planning for necessities like food, water, and shelter as well as making sure of my safety and the protection of my fellow travellers.
I would need to give considerable thought to the path we will travel, the weather we may experience, and any potential hazards we may run across. Despite these difficulties, I would be eager to embark on the trip, eager to discover new places and peoples, and eager to participate in the dynamic trade networks that crisscross the Sahara.
Learn more about the voyage:
https://brainly.com/question/23394597
#SPJ4
1 p
During the Peloponnesian War, what other disaster did Athens face,
besides attacks from Sparta? *
*
drought
famine
internal revolt
plague
During the Peloponnesian War, the other disaster that Athens faced, besides attacks from Sparta, was a plague.
This devastating plague significantly weakened Athens and contributed to its eventual defeat in the war.
During the Peloponnesian War, Athens faced a devastating disaster besides the attacks from Sparta, which was a plague. The plague, also known as the Athenian Plague, broke out in Athens in 430 BCE and lasted for around five years, causing a significant impact on the city.
It is estimated that the plague killed up to one-third of the Athenian population, including their leader, Pericles.
The exact cause of the plague is still unknown, but many scholars believe that it might have been caused by typhus or ebola virus. The disease quickly spread through Athens, and its crowded and unsanitary living conditions worsened the situation. The disease was highly contagious and spread rapidly, with people dying within a week of being infected.
The plague had a significant impact on the outcome of the Peloponnesian War. It weakened the Athenian army and destroyed the morale of the people. The plague outbreak also led to a shortage of food and resources, causing a significant decline in the Athenian economy.
Overall, the Athenian Plague was a severe disaster that Athens faced during the Peloponnesian War, which weakened the city and contributed to its eventual defeat by Sparta.
To know more about Peloponnesian War refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28840690#
#SPJ11
U. S. Presidents in the 80’s and 90’s and their contributions
During the 1980s, the U.S. had Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.
Reagan is known for his conservative economic policies, including tax cuts and deregulation, as well as his efforts to end the Cold War with the Soviet Union. Bush continued many of Reagan's policies and oversaw the U.S. victory in the Gulf War.
In the 1990s, the U.S. had Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Bush's contributions during his one term included signing the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Clean Air Act amendments.
Clinton is known for his economic policies, including the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and welfare reform, as well as his foreign policy accomplishments such as brokering peace in Northern Ireland and overseeing NATO air strikes in Bosnia.
To know more about North American Free Trade Agreement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29791604#
#SPJ11
1. how does suffering after wwii make the atmosphere favorable for communism in eastern europe?
2. why was harry truman concerned about stalin's military power and influence?
Suffering after WWII made the atmosphere favorable for communism in Eastern Europe because the region experienced significant destruction and economic hardship.
People were disillusioned with the traditional systems and desperate for change. Communism, with its promise of social equality, redistribution of wealth, and state control over industries, appealed to many as a solution to their problems.
Additionally, the Soviet Union's influence grew in Eastern Europe due to its role in liberating these countries from Nazi occupation, which further facilitated the spread of communism.
Harry Truman was concerned about Stalin's military power and influence for several reasons. First, the Soviet Union had emerged as a superpower after WWII, possessing a strong army and rapidly expanding its sphere of influence in Eastern Europe.
Second, Stalin's intentions were unclear, and his aggressive actions, such as the blockade of West Berlin, fueled suspicions about Soviet expansionism.
Finally, Truman was worried about the spread of communism and its potential threat to democracy and capitalism. These concerns led to the adoption of the Truman Doctrine, which aimed to contain communism and promote democracy around the world.
To know more about Stalin's military power refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/10583833#
#SPJ11
In 1972 the equal rights amendment was formed and was ratified by 38 states. please select the best answer from the choices provided t f
The statement "In 1972 the Equal Rights Amendment was formed and was ratified by 38 states" is true as Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was passed by Congress in 1972 and aimed to guarantee equal rights for all citizens regardless of sex.
It was ratified by 35 states by 1977, but it did not reach the necessary 38 states for ratification until 2020.
The ERA's main purpose was to ensure that discrimination on the basis of sex would be unconstitutional, thus promoting gender equality in various aspects of life, including the workplace, education, and legal rights.
Despite the recent ratification by 38 states, its legal status remains uncertain due to the expired deadline initially set by Congress.
To know more about Equal Rights Amendment click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29761971#
#SPJ11
HELP PLEASE, Maj. Gen. Curtis LeMay said after the March 9-10 Tokyo bombing, "There are no innocent civilians. . . . The entire population got into the act and worked to make those airplanes or munitions. . . Men, women, and children. " Do you agree or disagree with LeMay?
LeMay claims there are no innocent civilians, but I disagree. The vast majority of Tokyo residents on March 9–10 were not directly engaged in the production of Aeroplanes or weapons.
They weren't actively participating in the war effort; they were just going about their daily lives, going to work, going to school, etc. In addition, the bombing of Tokyo was a senseless act of violence against civilians that resulted in a great deal of suffering.
Around 100,000 people are thought to have died as a result of the bombing, and many more were hurt or forced to flee their homes. LeMay's claim that there are no innocent people is false and ethically repugnant, and it is impossible to justify targeting civilians in this fashion.
To learn more about Tokyo bombing link is here
brainly.com/question/14893579
#SPJ4
Heroes of the Wild
Study the interactive in the lesson to describe the background and contributions of these key historical figures. Then respond to the reflection question. Your answers should be written in complete sentences.
Lewis Clark Sacajawea York
Describe each
individual’s background.
Describe the
contributions he/she made to the expedition.
Reflection Question
Why was it important to send explorers into the new territory of the United States?
Answer: c
Explanation:
dont use this I need points dont risk your grades on me
In what order did these events in the buddha's life happen? a. becomes an ascetic b. has a son c. reaches enlightenment d. leaves the palace *
b, d, a, c
d, c, b, a
d, a, b, c
a, b, d, c
The correct order of events in the Buddha's life is d. leaves the palace, a. becomes an ascetic, b. has a son, c. reaches enlightenment. The correct option is d, a, b, c.
The correct order of events in the Buddha's life is an important aspect of understanding his teachings and the development of Buddhism. The sequence of events highlights the Buddha's path from a life of privilege and luxury to a spiritual quest for enlightenment and the eventual founding of one of the world's major religions.
The first step in this journey was the Buddha's decision to begin teaching his philosophy and doctrine, which he did after reaching enlightenment. This teaching was focused on the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, which provide guidance for followers seeking to live a life of mindfulness, compassion, and wisdom.
The Buddha's decision to become an ascetic was a key step in his spiritual journey, as it allowed him to confront and overcome his own attachments and desires. This period of his life was marked by intense meditation and self-denial, but ultimately he rejected this path as insufficient for achieving enlightenment.
The Buddha's decision to leave the palace and seek enlightenment was the catalyst for his spiritual journey. This decision was motivated by his realization that material wealth and luxury could not provide lasting happiness or fulfilment. It was only by confronting the suffering and impermanence of life that he could begin to understand the true nature of existence.
Finally, the Buddha's enlightenment marked the culmination of his spiritual journey and the beginning of his teaching mission. The Buddha's teachings and example have had a profound impact on the world, and continue to inspire people seeking to live a life of compassion, wisdom, and inner peace.
To know more about Buddha refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28321803#
#SPJ11
identify the elements of islamic architecture that became important features in western architecture after the moors were expelled from spain.
The elements of Islamic architecture became important features in Western architecture after the Moors were expelled from Spain.
The Moorish design was created in Spain under the Middle Easterner control of the Iberian Landmass, between the eighth and fifteenth hundred years. Among the principal qualities of this design, we see the utilization of less fine materials, for the most part, block, which then, at that point, was covered with plaster, wood, or beautifying tiles.
Arabic strategies for making stained glass windows, designing advancements, and brightening components additionally propelled Western engineering. A second flood of developments that came to us from the Middle Easterner world (undoubtedly somewhat) happened years and years after the fact.
Learn more about Islamic architecture:
https://brainly.com/question/19567277
#SPJ4
Who was the first person to die in the battle of yorktown?
Answer:
The first person to die in the Battle of Yorktown was probably a French soldier named Lieutenant de Gimat. He was killed during the initial bombardment of the British fortifications on October 9, 1781.
Explanation:
The first person to die in the Battle of Yorktown was an unknown soldier, as specific details about individual casualties are not recorded.
It's challenging to determine the identity of the first person to die in the Battle of Yorktown (1781), as casualty records from that time often lack comprehensive information about individual soldiers.
The battle was a significant event during the American Revolutionary War, involving American and French forces against the British Army. Led by General George Washington and French General Jean-Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur, the allied forces successfully besieged the British, ultimately leading to their surrender.
Unfortunately, the name of the first soldier to die during the battle remains unknown due to limited historical records.
To know more about Battle of Yorktown click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/28573713#
#SPJ11
The most famous break up letter of all times. highlight the letter by parts that most resemble the 5 sections of the declaration of independence
The most famous break up letter of all times is the letter written by Thomas Jefferson to King George III on July 4, 1776, known as the Declaration of Independence.
The letter can be highlighted by parts that most resemble the five sections of the Declaration of Independence, which are the introduction, preamble, grievances, denunciation, and conclusion.
The introduction of the Declaration of Independence introduces the purpose of the letter, while the preamble explains the principles upon which the break up is based. The grievances section lists the specific reasons for the separation, and the denunciation section declares the colonies' independence from Britain.
The conclusion of the Declaration of Independence affirms the decision and calls for the support of fellow Americans.
In the same vein, Jefferson's letter to King George III highlights the same five sections as the Declaration of Independence, making it a well-structured and persuasive argument for the American colonies' independence.
To know more about Declaration of Independence click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14578050#
#SPJ11
Redacte tres propuestas de solución apoyados en las enseñanzas que nos da Jesús sobre la tolerancia, el respeto y la verdad
Explain THREE reasons the Gunpowder Empires were able to conquer other empires and
expand their territories.
Answer:
The Gunpowder Empires, which included the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires, were able to conquer other empires and expand their territories for a variety of reasons. Here are three key factors that contributed to their success:
1. Military Technology: One of the main reasons that the Gunpowder Empires were able to conquer other empires was their advanced military technology. With the use of gunpowder weapons such as muskets and cannons, they were able to overpower their opponents and gain a significant military advantage. Additionally, the empires invested heavily in their military infrastructure and tactics, which allowed them to conduct large-scale military campaigns and conquer vast territories.
2. Centralized Government: Another factor that contributed to the success of the Gunpowder Empires was their highly centralized government structures. Unlike many of their opponents, they had strong and centralized governments with powerful rulers who were able to effectively manage their vast territories and maintain a strong military presence. This allowed them to quickly respond to threats and maintain control over their conquered territories.
3. Economic Resources: The Gunpowder Empires were also able to conquer other empires because of their abundant economic resources. They had access to rich agricultural lands, which allowed them to support large armies and maintain a strong economy. Additionally, they controlled key trade routes and ports, which allowed them to expand their trade and wealth. This economic strength allowed them to fund their military campaigns and maintain their dominance over conquered territories.
Overall, the Gunpowder Empires were able to conquer other empires and expand their territories due to their advanced military technology, centralized government structures, and abundant economic resources. These factors allowed them to gain a significant military advantage over their opponents and maintain control over vast territories.
Explanation:
Which of these research questions is much too narrow?
1. Who invented basketball
2. How do clocks work
3. Why do birds migrate
4. What are the rules of soccer
The research question which is much too narrow is option 1. Who invented basketball.
A "Yes" or "No" response is usually the norm for narrow questions. "Are you coming with us next week?" is an example. "Can you envision how (your product or service) can assist you in achieving (the prospect's desired outcome)?
A research question shows in detail about what one wishes to understand by our hard work. Your research paper, dissertation, or thesis must be guided by a strong research question. Multiple research questions or problem statements might be required for a larger research project, like a thesis or dissertation. However, they must all be distinctly related to one another and concentrated on a single research issue.
To learn more about research question here
brainly.com/question/30299267
#SPJ4
You are a Soviet government official. You are to draft a letter to a Soviet hockey player explaining why the Soviet communist government cannot allow them to leave the Soviet Union to sign a professional contract with an NHL hockey team. In the letter you will present multiple reasons and arguments for why the Soviet communist government cannot allow the hockey players to leave the Soviet Union and sign a professional contract with an NHL hockey team.
Use the template on page two to construct your letter. Delete the information provided in the template and replace it with your own. When finished, submit your document. Dear (Soviet Minister of Defense or Hockey Player),
Paragraph 1- Introduction. Context and purpose.
Paragraph 2- First argument and supporting evidence/reason.
Paragraph 3- Second argument and supporting evidence/reason.
Paragraph 4- Address a counterclaim.
Paragraph 5- Closing
Sincerely,
Dear (Soviet hockey players),
I am writing today on behalf of the Soviet Government to explain why I cannot allow you to leave the Soviet Union and sign a professional contract with an NHL hockey team.
What constitutes the letter?As you know, our government is committed to communist ideals and believes that your talents will be put to good use if you remain in the Soviet Union.
First, you must remember that you represent a large nation, not an individual player. Playing for the Soviet team will demonstrate the strengths and abilities of our country's hockey program. The beginning of the NHL team seems to be a traitor to this national originality and we will break the progress of hockey.
In addition, we ignore the designated features of the situation. The United States and Canada are not our allies, and sending the best hockey players to their leagues is seen as a concession to their influence. We need to stay strong and show the world that we are a force to be reckoned with both on the ice and in international business. We can understand that you may feel frustrated or limited by the limitations of your ability to play professionally. However, we must not forget that our society is based on collective action and solidarity, not on individual ambition. Your contribution to our national team is invaluable and appreciated and please continue to serve the Soviet Union in this way.
Finally, the question of monetary compensation must be raised. While signing a lucrative contract with an NHL team may seem tempting, it's important to remember that the money isn't just for personal gain. When you play for the Soviet team, you are rewarded for supporting not only yourself, but also your family and countrymen. Leaving the NHL represents a rejection of this social contract and is seen as a betrayal of the collective good.
Lastly, we understand that the idea of playing for an NHL team can be exciting, but we encourage you to consider the greater good of our country and our hockey program. Your talents will be of great use if they remain in the Soviet Union. We ask that you represent our country with pride and integrity.
To be honest,
(Soviet government employee)
learn more about Soviet Governme: https://brainly.com/question/29410363
#SPJ1
Hello could you please help me to write an introduction to a commentary on this text
( presentation of the nature of the text, the author(s), the main point of the text; a few sentences on the context; and an outline of a possible commentary on this text)
Here is the text:
An Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery, passed by the Pennsylvania legislature in 1780
1. WHEN we contemplate our abhorrence of that condition to which the arms and tyranny of Great Britain were exerted to reduce us (...), we are unavoidably led to a serious and grateful sense of the manifold blessings which we have undeservedly received from the hand of that Being from whom every good and perfect gift comes. Impressed with these ideas, we conceive that it is our duty, and we rejoice that it is in our power to extend a portion of that freedom to others, which has been extended to us; (...) It is not for us to enquire why, in the creation of mankind, the inhabitants of the several parts of the earth were distinguished by a difference in feature or complexion. It is sufficient to know that all are the work of an Almighty Hand. We find in the distribution of the human species, that the most fertile as well as the most barren parts of the earth are inhabited by men of complexions different from ours, and from each other; from whence we may reasonably, as well as religiously, infer, that He who placed them in their various situations, has extended equally his care and protection to all, and that it becomes not us to counteract his mercies. (...)
2. And whereas the condition of those persons who have heretofore been denominated Negro and Mulatto slaves, has been attended with circumstances which not only deprived them of the common blessings that they were by nature entitled to, but has cast them into the deepest afflictions, by an unnatural separation and sale of husband and wife from each other and from their children; (...) In justice therefore to persons so unhappily circumstanced, and who, having no prospect before them whereon they may rest their sorrows and their hopes, have no reasonable inducement to render their service to society, which they otherwise might; and also in grateful commemoration of our own happy deliverance from that state of unconditional submission to which we were doomed by the tyranny of Britain, (...)
3. Be it enacted, and it is hereby enacted, by the representatives of the freeman of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in general assembly met, and by the authority of the same, That all persons, as well Negroes and Mulattoes as others, who shall be born within this state from and after the passing of this act, shall not be deemed and considered as servants for life, or slaves; and that all servitude for life, or slavery of children, in consequence of the slavery of their mothers, in the case of all children born within this state, from and after the passing of this act (...), shall be, and hereby is utterly taken away, extinguished and for ever abolished. (...)
11. Provided always; And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, That this act or any thing in it contained shall not give any relief or shelter to any absconding or runaway Negro or Mulatto slave or servant, who has absented himself or shall absent himself from his or her owner, master or mistress residing in any other state or country, but such owner, master or mistress shall have like right and aid to demand, claim and take away his slave or servant, as he might have had in case this act had not been made.
Thank you!
Answer:
This text is an excerpt from the Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery, passed by the Pennsylvania legislature in 1780. The Act was a significant step towards the abolition of slavery in the United States, and it played a pivotal role in the fight for the freedom of enslaved African Americans. The main point of the text is the gradual abolition of slavery in Pennsylvania and the extension of freedom to all individuals, regardless of their race or color.
The context of this Act is important to understand the significance of the text. At the time of its passing, slavery was legal in many parts of the United States, and the fight for abolition was gaining momentum. This Act was the first to provide a legal framework for the gradual abolition of slavery, making it an essential document in the history of the abolitionist movement.
A possible commentary on this text could explore the Act's significance in the history of slavery in the United States and its impact on the abolitionist movement. The commentary could also discuss the Act's limitations, such as its failure to provide immediate freedom for enslaved individuals and its exclusion of runaway slaves. Additionally, the commentary could examine the Act's language and rhetoric, particularly the references to God and religious morality, which were commonly used by abolitionists to argue against the immorality of slavery.
Who wrote taps for what purpose was it originally sounded.
The origins of "Taps" are unclear, but it is traditionally credited to Union Army General Daniel Butterfield during the American Civil War. It was originally sounded by Union Army buglers as a signal to end the day's activities and to indicate lights out.
According to legend, General Butterfield was unhappy with the traditional French bugle call that was used to signal the end of the day and asked his brigade bugler, Oliver Norton, to create a new tune. Norton is said to have borrowed some notes from an earlier bugle call known as "Scott Tattoo," and the resulting tune became known as "Taps."
After its creation, "Taps" quickly gained popularity and was used during military funerals and other solemn occasions. Over time, it became a tradition to play "Taps" at the end of the day on military bases and at ceremonies honoring fallen soldiers.
To know more about civil war, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ4
most of latin america and sub-saharan africa: group of answer choices did not industrialize and depended on exporting primary products. was industrialized by the early twentieth century. was industrialized by the mid-nineteenth century. remained part of the british empire. industrialized on a model completely different from that of the western europeans.
Most of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa did not industrialize and depended on exporting primary products.
Most of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa did not industrialize in the same way as Western Europe and North America during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Instead, these regions were heavily dependent on the export of primary products such as agricultural goods, minerals, and raw materials, which were often produced on large plantations or extracted through mining.
This export-oriented model of development contributed to the growth of the global economy but also led to the marginalization of these regions, as they were often subject to exploitation by more developed nations. It was not until later in the 20th century that some Latin American and African nations began to develop their own industrial sectors, often with the support of government policies and international aid.
Learn more about export-oriented model at:
brainly.com/question/27951781
#SPJ4
An observer of World War II once said, "In a strange twist of irony, the Axis Power simply did to Europeans what Europeans have done to people of color. " Do you agree with this statement? Please consider both the rise of the Axis powers, especially Germany and Japan, and the rise of imperialism discussed earlier in class. In what ways were they similar? In what ways were they different?
The statement draws parallels between the actions of the Axis powers in World War II and European imperialism towards people of color.
The statement "In a strange twist of irony, the Axis Power simply did to Europeans what Europeans have done to people of color" has some truth to it. Both the rise of the Axis powers and European imperialism were characterized by a sense of racial and cultural superiority, a desire for expansion and domination, and the use of violence and coercion to achieve their goals.
In the case of the Axis powers, Germany and Japan believed in the superiority of their respective races and cultures, and sought to expand their territories and influence at the expense of others. Germany's invasion of Poland, for example, was driven by the belief in the need for Lebensraum or "living space" for the German people, while Japan's invasion of China was driven by the belief in the superiority of Japanese culture and the need to create a "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere."
Similarly, European imperialism was driven by a belief in the superiority of European culture and a desire to dominate and exploit the people and resources of other regions. European powers like Britain, France, and Spain colonized much of Africa, Asia, and the Americas, often using violence and coercion to subjugate indigenous peoples and extract resources for their own benefit.
However, there are also important differences between the two. One major difference is that while European imperialism was driven by economic interests and a desire for resources and markets, the Axis powers were driven by a combination of racial ideology, territorial expansion, and militarism. Another difference is that while European imperialism lasted for centuries, the Axis powers were defeated and dismantled after only a few years of intense warfare.
In conclusion, while there are similarities between the rise of the Axis powers and European imperialism, there are also important differences. Both were characterized by a sense of racial and cultural superiority, a desire for expansion and domination, and the use of violence and coercion to achieve their goals. However, the motivations and methods of the two were different, and the impact of European imperialism was much longer-lasting and more far-reaching.
To learn more about World War II refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/8605481
#SPJ11
Who wrote the classic Kopantay Ay Langit, a movie theme song, as well as Child, the English-Language version of Freddie Aguilar's signature song Anak
George Canseco wrote "Kapantay Ay Langit" and the English song version of "Anak" titled "Child."
The exemplary Filipino melody "Kapantay Ay Langit" was composed by Public Craftsman for Music George Canseco. It was promoted during the 1950s by vocalists like Sylvia la Torre and Pilita Corrales. The melody has since been covered by various specialists and is viewed as an immortal exemplary in the Philippine music industry.
The English-language rendition of Freddie Aguilar's unique tune "Anak" was likewise composed by George Canseco, with the title "Youngster." The melody recounts the tale of a parent's adoration and worry for a delinquent kid. It turned into a hit in the Philippines as well as in different nations and dialects all over the planet, establishing Aguilar's status as a global music symbol.
Canseco was a productive lyricist who contributed enormously to the improvement of OPM or Unique Pilipino Music. He died in 2004, however his tunes proceed to rouse and reverberate with Filipino music darlings right up to the present day.
To learn more about songs, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/7350260
#SPJ4
Smith’s ideas did not attract opposition from those in power. Why do you think the official response to Smith’s thinking was not negative?
Smith's ideas didn't attract negative reaction as they perhaps didn't challenge the power structures or principles of those in power. Alternatively, these ideas might have been seen as beneficial. Precise reasoning, however, depends on more specific information about Smith.
Explanation:Possibly, Smith's ideas did not attract negative opposition from those in power primarily because these ideas did not threaten the established power structures or contradict any fundamental principles shared by those in power. Often, ideas that maintain the status quo or propose beneficial changes are welcomed and not met with negative reactions. Alternatively, it's possible that those in power may have seen some potential advantages to employing Smith's ideas, thus leading to the lack of negative response.
However, without specific information about Smith, his ideas, and the context in which he operated, it is difficult to provide a more precise answer.
Learn more about Power here:https://brainly.com/question/34796857
#SPJ2
According to Thomas Hobbes in the "state of nature" without government there would be peace. True
False
Answer:
The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) famously leaned in the latter direction. He argued in his book Leviathan that, without government, life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
Explanation:
I double checked it.
The statement " according to Thomas Hobbes in the "state of nature" without government, there would not be peace." is false as Hobbes argued that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order, provide security, and prevent the state of nature from descending into anarchy.
Hobbes believed that without government, humans would live in a state of nature characterized by chaos, violence, and constant competition. In this state, people would act purely out of self-interest and would do whatever necessary to survive.
This view is often referred to as Hobbesian pessimism and is a central tenet of his political philosophy outlined in his work "Leviathan."
To know more about self-interest click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12972879#
#SPJ11
Fill in the table below by providing a date and meaningful description of each of the events listed. Be sure to identify the importance of each event to the history if immigration in the United States. Note that the events are not in the chronological order. You will organize these events in the next step.
To complete the table, review information from the course and gather additional sources online or elsewhere. As you conduct your research, please use the resources table below to provide the citation information for any sources you rely on.
EVENTS:
1. Cuban Revolution
2. “Salad Bowl” term introduced
3. Great depression
4. September 11, 2001
5. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
6. Executive order initiatives parts of DREAM Act
7. Japanese internment
8. Nativism
9. Comprehensive Reform Act of 2007
10. Great Irish Famine
11. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965
12. Arizona v. United States
13. Chinese Exclusion Act
14. illegal immigration Reform and immigrant Responsibility Act
15. “Melting Pot” term comes into general usage
16. Emergency Quota Act
17. Ellis island opens
18. Anti-German sentiment during World War l
How would Abraham Lincoln most likely respond to this statement?
Only state governments should be able to make decisions about slavery. The federal government should not interfere with this issue.
A. Only the federal government is powerful enough to completely end slavery.
B. No states will outlaw slavery if they are given a choice.
C. The Constitution states that slavery must not spread into any new territories.
D. States do not have the constitutional right to pass laws related to slavery.
Answer:
A: Only the federal government is powerful enough to completely end slavery.
Explanation:
Based on Abraham Lincoln's historical stance on slavery, he would likely not agree with the statement that only state governments should be able to make decisions about slavery and that the federal government should not interfere. In fact, Lincoln believed that slavery was morally wrong and sought to end it entirely. He believed that the federal government had the power and responsibility to take action against slavery, as evidenced by his Emancipation Proclamation and other measures he took during his presidency. Therefore, his response to this statement would likely be option A: Only the federal government is powerful enough to completely end slavery.
What claims does President Truman make about why the aid to Greece is necessary
President Truman claims that aid to Greece is necessary because the country is facing a communist insurgency that threatens to overthrow its democratic government.
In his speech to Congress on March 12, 1947, Truman argued that the United States had a moral obligation to support Greece and other nations facing similar threats to their freedom and independence. He also emphasized the strategic importance of Greece as a bulwark against Soviet expansion in the Eastern Mediterranean.
By providing economic and military aid to Greece, Truman hoped to strengthen its ability to resist communist subversion and maintain stability in the region.
Ultimately, Truman's policy of containment aimed to contain Soviet influence and prevent the spread of communism around the world.
To know more about democratic government click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/2849514#
#SPJ11