The quote you have provided above is from Bertrand Russell, a British philosopher, and mathematician.
In this quote, Russell is questioning the certainty of knowledge based on personal experience and memory. He asserts that the present momentary experience is the only sure knowledge one can have, but even that is uncertain because it will soon be in the past. Therefore, any knowledge based on personal experience or memory is subject to doubt or deception. Descartes' famous phrase,
"I think, therefore I am," suggests that we can only know that we exist if we are thinking. However, Russell argues that by the time Descartes reached the conclusion that he exists, he was already relying on memory and may have been deceived. Therefore, Russell questions whether Descartes' conclusion can be considered certain.In summary, Russell is arguing that personal experience and memory are uncertain and that even our most fundamental knowledge, such as our own existence, is subject to doubt and deception.
To know more about philosophy
https://brainly.com/question/16999698
#SPJ11
Expand on at least three types of Racism and give an
example of each form.
Racism manifests in various forms, including individual, systemic, and cultural racism. Individual racism refers to personal beliefs and actions that discriminate against individuals based on their race.
Individual racism occurs when individuals hold prejudiced beliefs or engage in discriminatory actions towards people of a different race. An example of individual racism is when a person refuses to befriend someone solely based on their race or uses racial slurs to demean and belittle others.
Systemic racism refers to the institutionalized and systemic discrimination that disproportionately affects certain racial groups. For example, if a school system consistently allocates fewer resources and opportunities to students from marginalized racial backgrounds compared to their privileged counterparts, it demonstrates systemic racism.
Cultural racism involves the perpetuation of stereotypes and biases through cultural norms and practices. An example of cultural racism is when a particular racial group is consistently portrayed in the media as criminals or inferior, reinforcing negative stereotypes and biases among the general population.
Learn more about stereotypes here:
https://brainly.com/question/32332524
#SPJ11
What is personal and organizational leadership and how can leaders create change and provide value for the company and society?
Answer should based on Textbooks, internet data is not reliable. So, use only textbook to answer it. Please, also site the source (e.g. Lecture 12_1, Kim, Yang & Hwang 2006, Chapter 2) Long answers only!
Personal and organizational leadership refers to the ability of individuals within an organization to influence and guide others toward achieving common goals. Leaders can create change and provide value for the company and society by effectively leveraging their leadership abilities.
Personal leadership encompasses the individual's self-awareness, values, and behaviors that enable them to effectively lead themselves and others. It involves skills such as self-motivation, goal-setting, communication, and emotional intelligence. Organizational leadership, on the other hand, focuses on leading within the context of a specific organization. It involves setting a clear vision, developing strategies, building and managing teams, and influencing organizational culture.
Leaders create change by setting a compelling vision and direction for the company and inspiring others to work towards it. They develop strategies and plans to drive innovation, adapt to market changes, and improve organizational performance. By effectively communicating the vision and goals, leaders create a shared sense of purpose and alignment among employees.
To provide value for the company and society, leaders need to understand the broader societal context in which the organization operates. They should align organizational goals with societal needs and expectations, considering factors such as environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and ethical practices. By integrating these considerations into the decision-making process, leaders can create a positive social impact and enhance the reputation and value of the company.
Furthermore, leaders can provide value by fostering a culture of innovation and continuous improvement. They encourage creativity and provide the necessary resources and support for employees to generate and implement new ideas. This promotes innovation and drives organizational growth and competitiveness.
In conclusion, personal and organizational leadership involves the ability to influence and guide others toward common goals. Leaders can create change and provide value by effectively leveraging their leadership abilities, aligning organizational goals with societal needs, fostering a culture of innovation, and making ethical decisions. By doing so, they contribute to the success of the company and positively impact society. (Source: Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.)
To know more about organizational leadership click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32673991
#SPJ11
Which treatment has been found to be most effective for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder?
Group of answer choices
Relaxation Training
Exposure and Response Prevention
Anxiety Management Training
Placebo Medication
Exposure and Response Prevention has been found to be the most effective treatment for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD).
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a mental health condition characterized by compulsive, unwanted, and disturbing thoughts or obsessions that trigger anxiety or distress.
Individuals with OCD frequently feel compelled to perform compulsions or repetitive behaviors to alleviate the anxiety or distress caused by their obsessions.
Exposure and Response Prevention: Exposure and Response Prevention is a form of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) that involves gradually exposing the individual to their fears or triggers, allowing them to experience anxiety without performing their compulsions or repetitive behaviors.
By avoiding engaging in compulsions, the individual gradually becomes desensitized to their triggers, allowing them to gain greater control over their obsessions and compulsions.
Know more about Response Prevention here:
https://brainly.com/question/14366325
#SPJ11
Explain, briefly, what your research study plans to investigate and why this is important.
Articulate the cultural biases that may surface in your research and how you will manage or avoid them.
Explain how will you recruit participants.
Discern the types of research biases you will want to avoid in the study.
Research is a careful and systematic examination of data and information to explore and establish facts, principles, and theories.
A research study is a study undertaken to investigate a particular subject matter and develop a new theory or principle. The research study plans to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on students' academic performance and mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the education system and students' lives in general.
The study will explore the reasons for the decline in academic performance and mental health issues. The research will be essential to address the challenges facing students and the education sector in general.
Cultural biases refer to preconceived notions and beliefs that individuals and groups hold toward others with different cultures. In this research study, the researcher may encounter cultural biases in participants, which may affect the accuracy of the study's findings. The researcher will manage these biases by engaging in cultural sensitivity training and promoting cultural competence among participants.
Participants for the study will be recruited using online surveys. The researcher will distribute the survey through social media platforms and academic websites. The survey will be open to all students across the United States.
The research study will avoid several types of biases, including selection bias, confirmation bias, and observer bias. The researcher will ensure that the study's design is free from biases and that the data collected is accurate and reliable.
Read more about the systematic examination of data here:
https://brainly.com/question/28272313
#SPJ11
Which statement is false re: George HW Bush (the elder Bush)?
Group of answer choices
He was president when the USSR was dissolved.
He pushed Iraq out of Kuwait without allies or UN approval.
He was defeated by Bill Clinton when he ran for re-election.
He suggested that Michael Dukakis was soft on crime in their presidential race.
The false statement re:
George HW Bush (the elder Bush) is "He pushed Iraq out of Kuwait without allies or UN approval."
Explanation:George HW Bush was the 41st President of the United States of America and served in that position from 1989-1993.
The following statements are true about George HW Bush:
-He was president when the USSR was dissolved.
- He suggested that Michael Dukakis was soft on crime in their presidential race.
- He was defeated by Bill clinton when he ran for re-election.
However, the statement "He pushed Iraq out of Kuwait without allies or UN approval" is false.
In 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait, prompting the UN to pass a resolution condemning the invasion and authorizing the use of force to remove Iraqi troops. President Bush built an international coalition of allies and received UN approval before launching Operation Desert Storm, which successfully pushed Iraq out of Kuwait.
To know about George Bush: https://brainly.com/question/12537725
#SPJ11
Describe a verified truth you arrived at based on an insight derived from experience. I.e., how you used the operations of consciousness. Show your work. How did this affect your judgment and decision making? Additionally, describe a decision you made derived from an unverified judgment about an insight into experience. ( I seen a person asking for money and thought they were homeless)
Example 1: I have encountered a problem (experience). I am nearsighted and flatfooted. Most people have neither problem. Why/how did this come about (seeking insight/understanding). One insight is the following: Ah ha! I watched too much TV as a child and wore shoes from infancy on. Is this true? Well, yes. But are these the cause of myopia and flat feet? I now need to verify the insight by doing a little research (judgment). I discover the theory of "mismatch diseases" by a Harvard professor and read his book (Story of the Human Body). He confirms my insight. But he is only one researcher. I find other research in his bibliography and discover there is an emerging consensus about the theory. So I tentatively accept the veracity of my insight. Having accepted this I see the ethical implications and I decide (decision) to let my kids run around barefoot and have them spend a lot of time outside looking at things far away.
Example 2: Your phone has gone missing. "Who stole it?" you ask. Jaymie was in your room last night and she was accused last year of theft by one of your friends (data from experience). Jaymie has your phone (insight). You approach her and accuse her of the theft and demand your phone back (an unverified judgment that leads to a hasty decision). She denies stealing it and is angry at being accused. You return to your room and find the phone under your pillow. This is an example of asking a series of bad questions ("who stole my phone?" rather than "where is my phone?") and of refusing to disconfirm the initial insight ("Jaymie took it" rather than "I might have fallen asleep with it," or "Might I have used my phone after Jayme left my room?") resulting in poor judgment and irresponsible decision making ("Jaymie, you thief!" rather than "Jaymie, do you know where my phone might be?"). I wish I could say I've never done something similar!
Example 1: Verified Truth Based on Insight Derived from Experience
Insight: Watching too much TV as a child and wearing shoes from infancy might be the cause of myopia (nearsightedness) and flat feet.
Operations of Consciousness:
Problem encountered: Being nearsighted and flatfooted.
Seeking insight/understanding: Reflecting on possible causes of these conditions.
Forming the insight: Considering the relationship between excessive TV watching and wearing shoes from infancy.
Verification: Conducting research, reading books (e.g., "Story of the Human Body") by experts in the field.
Confirmation: Finding support for the insight in the research and emerging consensus.
Ethical implications: Understanding the implications of the insight on future actions and decisions.
Decision made: Allowing children to run barefoot and spend more time outside to potentially mitigate myopia and flat feet.
Impact on Judgment and Decision Making:
The verified truth resulting from the insight derived from experience influences judgment and decision making in the following ways:
Informed decision: The understanding of the possible causes of myopia and flat feet allows for an informed decision on promoting healthier habits for children.
Research-based approach: Relying on scientific research and consensus helps to make decisions based on reliable information.
Long-term thinking: Recognizing the long-term implications of the insight leads to decisions that prioritize prevention and well-being.
Example 2: Unverified Judgment About an Insight into Experience
Insight: Jaymie stole your missing phone based on past accusations and her presence in your room.
Operations of Consciousness:
Problem encountered: Phone goes missing.
Past experience: Previous accusation of theft by Jaymie.
Insight formed: Associating Jaymie's presence with the possibility of theft.
Unverified judgment: Accusing Jaymie of stealing the phone based on the insight.
Decision made: Confronting Jaymie and demanding the phone back.
Impact on Judgment and Decision Making:
The unverified judgment about the insight derived from experience affects judgment and decision making in the following ways:
Hasty accusation: Making an assumption without solid evidence led to accusing Jaymie without considering alternative possibilities.
Failure to consider other explanations: Not exploring other potential scenarios or questioning personal actions led to a narrow focus on Jaymie as the only suspect.
Poor questioning: Asking a question framed around accusation ("Who stole my phone?") rather than a neutral question ("Where is my phone?") limited the scope of investigation.
Irresponsible decision making: Accusing Jaymie without thorough investigation and being wrong resulted in strained relationships and unnecessary conflict.
Overall, this example highlights the importance of questioning assumptions, considering alternative explanations, and gathering evidence before making judgments and decisions based on unverified insights derived from past experiences.
Learn more about a Insight Derived here:
https://brainly.com/question/31721140
#SPJ4
Natural law ethics would say the purpose of the human is something more than mere life.
As for God's very existence.....
Reason says we can prove God's existence using logic alone.
Take for example this argument from definition:
God is defined as the most perfect being--all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good, etc.
If a perfect being did not exist, this would be an imperfection.
Therefore, God, the perfect being, must exist.
Does this proof work?
Is the meaning of God the same in all contexts?
Does this argument presuppose the truth of what is defining or ?
The argument from definition can be used to prove the existence of God using logic alone.
The perfect being is defined as God who is all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good, etc. If a perfect being did not exist, this would be an imperfection. Therefore, God, the perfect being, must exist. This proof works. However, the meaning of God may not be the same in all contexts. Different religions and belief systems have different concepts of God. So, depending on the context, the definition of God may vary.
The argument does presuppose the truth of what is defining. The definition of God as a perfect being with certain attributes is already established and accepted as true. This definition is used to prove the existence of God through logic alone. Therefore, the argument presupposes the truth of the definition of God.
To know more about existence of God refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/20433359
#SPJ11
The difference between SDs and occasion setters (AKA contextual stimuli, modulators).
Explain what a conditional relationship is, give an example using an SD and contextual stimulus as an indicator of conditional control
State the procedure and results that shows the difference between contextual stimuli and SDs.
Contextual stimuli are constant in the environment. SDs take on different meanings depending on the contextual stimulus.
IV – context
DV – behavior towards each SD (dependent on the context)
A stimulus that controls behavior and evokes a response is called a discriminative stimulus (SD). Contextual stimuli or occasion setters, modulators, and other similar terms are all used to describe stimuli that impact how an SD influences behavior.
In behavioral psychology, a conditional relationship occurs when a discriminative stimulus (SD) acquires control over a response that is typically under the control of another stimulus. Contextual stimuli can affect the strength of this control, which is why they are sometimes known as occasion setters, contextual stimuli, or modulators. The control of behavior by contextual stimuli is known as conditional control and is a key aspect of the SD-response connection. The difference between SDs and occasion setters (AKA contextual stimuli, modulators) SDs and contextual stimuli are both essential to the acquisition of new behaviors. The primary difference between them is that SDs are stimuli that have been associated with a particular behavior in the past, while contextual stimuli are environmental cues that can impact how SDs influence behavior. Procedure and results that show the difference between contextual stimuli and SDs.
A classic study conducted by Honig and colleagues in 1963 demonstrates the difference between contextual stimuli and SDs. In the experiment, pigeons were taught to peck a key in response to a light. When the light was illuminated, it served as an SD, indicating that pecking the key would result in a food reward. Honig then introduced a second light into the experimental setting, but it was never paired with the food reward, so it was not an SD. Instead, it was a contextual stimulus that altered the birds' behavior towards the SD. When the second light was illuminated, pecking behavior decreased, indicating that the contextual stimulus influenced the birds' behavior towards the SD.
To know more about discriminative stimulus refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13690714
#SPJ11
Critique the implications and the epistemology of Michel
Foucault’s concepts of subject and power. Illustrate
your
assertions with relevant examples
Michel Foucault's concepts of subject and power have had a significant impact on critical theory and have sparked debates and discussions among scholars.
While Foucault's ideas offer valuable insights into the dynamics of power and subjectivity, there are certain implications and epistemological aspects that can be critiqued.
One implication of Foucault's concepts of subject and power is the potential for a deterministic view of individuals as passive subjects shaped solely by external power relations. According to Foucault, power is not something possessed or held by individuals or groups but is dispersed throughout society, operating in various institutional and discursive practices. This view can undermine the agency and autonomy of individuals, suggesting that they are mere products of power structures.
Furthermore, Foucault's epistemology raises questions about the possibility of objective knowledge and the role of the subject in producing knowledge. Foucault challenges the idea of a universal, objective truth, arguing that knowledge is historically and socially constructed, shaped by power relations. While this critique of dominant knowledge systems is valuable, it can also lead to a relativistic stance where all knowledge is seen as contingent and devoid of any grounding in reality.
For example, in the context of gender and sexuality, Foucault's concept of power-knowledge highlights how social norms and discourses shape and regulate individuals' identities and behaviors. However, this does not mean that individuals are completely determined by these norms. People can actively resist and subvert societal expectations, challenging existing power structures and creating new possibilities for self-expression and identity.
To learn more about Michel Foucault, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/5679240
#SPJ11
review Baumrind's caregiving styles parents are warm and caring but have no rules or expectations and without these "limits" on behavior at home, their children are often impulsive and disobedient
In Baumrind's caregiving styles, the described style is known as permissive parenting.
Permissive parents are warm and caring towards their children but lack clear rules and expectations. Without these necessary limits on behavior at home, children often exhibit impulsive and disobedient tendencies. The absence of structure and boundaries can lead to a lack of self-control and discipline in children.
Since they are not accustomed to following rules or facing consequences for their actions, they may struggle to regulate their behavior and make responsible choices. As a result, they may engage in impulsive actions and display disobedience when confronted with boundaries or authority figures.
Learn more about permissive parenting
https://brainly.com/question/27960111
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
"Review Baumrind's caregiving styles. Describe the style in which parents are warm and caring but have no rules or expectations, and explain how without these 'limits' on behavior at home, their children are often impulsive and disobedient."
TRUE / FALSE.
"According to Marx, the deepest level of society is the
""superstructure.""
According to Marx, the deepest level of society is the False because According to Karl Marx's theory of society, the deepest level is the economic base or the "base structure."
The base structure, also known as the material or economic base, consists of the means of production, such as the tools, technology, and resources used for economic activities. It includes the relationships of production, such as the ownership of the means of production and the class relations between the bourgeoisie (owners of capital) and the proletariat (working class).
The superstructure, on the other hand, is the level of society that is built upon the economic base. It includes institutions such as the state, legal systems, education, religion, ideology, and culture. The superstructure is shaped by the economic base and serves to maintain and legitimize the existing social order.
Therefore, according to Marx, the deepest level of society is the economic base or the base structure, not the superstructure.
Learn more about society: https://brainly.com/question/30772200
#SPJ11
Discuss findings for disorders such as schizophrenia or bipolar
disorder in which interactions between biology and environment
determine outcome of symptoms
Schizophrenia is one of the most mysterious and chronic psychiatric illnesses known to science.
It is a serious mental illness that affects around one percent of the population, with signs emerging in early adulthood and in some cases earlier.
It has long been known that this disorder has a strong genetic component, but the exact genetic architecture underlying schizophrenia is still unknown to researchers.
However, we do know that the disease's underlying biology is complex and involves both environmental and genetic factors.
Bipolar disorder, like schizophrenia, has been associated with numerous genetic variants.
However, its precise genetic architecture is not well known. Rather, the condition is thought to arise from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors.
These factors can interact in various ways, including epigenetic alterations and gene-environment interactions. Indeed, there is an increasing amount of evidence indicating that epigenetic alterations can occur in individuals with these disorders and that these alterations can contribute to disease risk.
Epigenetic changes occur when changes to the DNA sequence affect how a gene is expressed. As a result, these modifications can change the way the genome is regulated and can cause changes in gene expression that affect the function of specific genes.
Therefore, the biological and environmental interactions that determine the symptoms of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder are multifaceted and not yet fully understood.
Nonetheless, the findings of various studies support the idea that both biological and environmental factors play a significant role in the development of these disorders.
Know more about Schizophrenia here:
https://brainly.com/question/23035586
#SPJ11
Early and Late Adolescent Development and Learning: A Cross
Cultural Perspective
Teens' moral reasoning can be characterized as a) contrary. b) autonomous. c) immoral. d) heteronomous.
Teens' moral reasoning can be characterized as autonomous, not heteronomous.
During early and late adolescence, individuals undergo significant cognitive and socioemotional changes, which also impact their moral reasoning. Moral reasoning refers to the process by which individuals make judgments about right and wrong, and how they justify their moral decisions.
Autonomous moral reasoning is a key feature of adolescent development, particularly during late adolescence. It involves the ability to think independently, consider multiple perspectives, and make moral judgments based on personal values and principles. Autonomous moral reasoning goes beyond following external rules and authorities and involves the development of one's own moral code.
On the other hand, heteronomous moral reasoning is more characteristic of younger children. It is based on the belief that moral rules are fixed and determined by authorities or external forces. Heteronomous moral reasoning relies on obedience to rules without questioning or considering personal values.
Teens' moral reasoning is not characterized as contrary or immoral. While individual teens may exhibit different moral reasoning patterns, the shift towards autonomous moral reasoning during adolescence is a normal part of cognitive development.
Understanding the development of moral reasoning in adolescence is crucial for educators, parents, and society to support the growth of ethical decision-making and moral development during this critical period of life.
Know more about Late Adolescent Development here:
https://brainly.com/question/28272745
#SPJ11
FILL THE BLANK.
"Q7. The central executive is the part of ________ ________ that
directs attention and processing. a. brain b. working memory c.
frontal lobe d. cortex
Q8. ________ fixedness occurs when people’s sch"
Q7. The central executive is the part of working memory that directs attention and processing. The correct option is b. working memory. Q8. Functional fixedness occurs when people's sch.
1. The central executive is a component of working memory, which is a cognitive system responsible for temporarily storing and manipulating information. It acts as a control center, directing attention to relevant information and coordinating various cognitive processes such as problem-solving, decision-making, and planning. The central executive plays a crucial role in focusing attention, managing resources, and facilitating effective information processing.
2. Functional fixedness occurs when people's sch...
To know more about central executive click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32254813
#SPJ11
Is Affirmative Action a potential solution to the history of racism in American society, Or has Affirmative Action turned the US into a country where the dominant racial/ethnic group is now the main victim of racism?
Affirmative Action is a potential solution to the history of racism in American society by promoting equal opportunities for marginalized groups. However, debates exist regarding its effectiveness and whether it has turned the dominant racial/ethnic group into victims of racism.
Affirmative Action is a policy aimed at addressing historical inequalities and promoting equal opportunities for marginalized groups, including racial and ethnic minorities, women, and individuals with disabilities. Its purpose is to combat the systemic barriers and discrimination that have disadvantaged these groups in education, employment, and other areas.
Proponents argue that Affirmative Action is a necessary step toward rectifying past injustices and creating a more equitable society. By considering race or ethnicity as a factor in decision-making processes such as college admissions or hiring practices, Affirmative Action seeks to level the playing field and increase diversity in institutions.
However, there are debates and criticisms surrounding Affirmative Action. Some argue that it can lead to reverse discrimination, claiming that the dominant racial or ethnic group becomes victims of racism by being disadvantaged in favor of underrepresented groups. These critics argue that Affirmative Action creates a sense of unfairness and perpetuates divisions based on race.
It is important to note that perspectives on Affirmative Action vary widely, and its impact and effectiveness are subject to ongoing discussion. Supporters emphasize the need for proactive measures to address historical inequalities, while opponents raise concerns about potential unintended consequences and question the fairness of policies that consider race or ethnicity in decision-making.
Ultimately, the question of whether Affirmative Action is a solution to racism or perpetuates a sense of victimhood depends on differing viewpoints and interpretations of its implementation and outcomes.
Learn more about Affirmative Action here:
https://brainly.com/question/1163395
#SPJ11
7:
Fill the blanks:
___________ and ________ has been primarily responsible for the
development of Radical sociology in the U.S.A.
C. Wright Mills and Howard S. Becker have been primarily responsible for the development of Radical sociology in the U.S.A.
These two influential sociologists have significantly contributed to the understanding and advancement of Radical sociology through their groundbreaking works and perspectives. C. Wright Mills, a prominent figure in American sociology, played a pivotal role in shaping Radical sociology.
His seminal work, "The Sociological Imagination," published in 1959, examined the intersection of personal troubles and larger social issues, emphasizing the importance of understanding the broader social structures that influence individual experiences.
Mills argued that sociologists should be engaged in critical analysis and challenge the existing power structures, encouraging a more comprehensive understanding of society's inequalities. Howard S. Becker, another influential sociologist, further developed Radical sociology by focusing on the study of deviance and labeling theory.
His work emphasized how social labels and definitions can shape individuals' experiences and opportunities, often leading to marginalization and inequality. Becker's book "Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance," published in 1963, provided a critical perspective on societal norms and the construction of deviance, challenging the prevailing social order.
Together, C. Wright Mills and Howard S. Becker have played a crucial role in the development of Radical sociology in the United States. Through their insightful analysis and critical perspectives, they have contributed to the understanding of power dynamics, social inequalities, and the need for social change within the field of sociology.
Learn more about sociology
https://brainly.com/question/29230409
#SPJ11
1. what is your prior experience with postsecondary education, or is this your first time in college?
2. What are you hoping to get out of this class or from your education in general?
3. when you consider your academic and career plans, what are you nervous or excited about?
4. how can we ( instructor/ classmates) best support you in this class?
Creating an inclusive and supportive learning environment with guidance, feedback, and collaboration from instructors and classmates is crucial for students' academic and career success.
1. For students, they may have attended some college or university courses, or this might be their first time in college.
2. The reasons why students attend college vary; some students want to acquire new skills, expand their knowledge, meet new people, or improve their careers. Therefore, some students might hope to get a job or attain professional development opportunities in their fields.
3. Concerning academic and career plans, students may feel nervous or excited. For instance, they may feel nervous about academic pressure, exams, assignments, or career prospects. On the other hand, students may feel excited about exploring their fields, meeting new people, gaining practical experience, and getting better grades.
4. The best way an instructor and classmates can support students in class is by creating an inclusive, supportive, and conducive learning environment. Instructors and classmates can offer guidance, answer questions, provide feedback, create study groups, and engage in academic discussions. In this way, students feel motivated, valued, and supported in their academic and career pursuits.
To learn more about the learning environment
https://brainly.com/question/17413226
#SPJ11
Which of the following was a major policy or initiative of the Manchus after coming to power in China? Multiple Choice They made peace with nomadic tribes to the north by removing the Chinese military
After coming to power in China, the Manchus implemented a major policy to ensure stability and consolidate their rule.
One of their significant initiatives was making peace with the nomadic tribes to the north by removing the Chinese military. This policy aimed to secure the northern borders and prevent further invasions and conflicts with the nomads. The Manchus recognized the strategic importance of maintaining peaceful relations with these tribes to safeguard their rule and protect their territories. By removing the Chinese military presence, they sought to establish a more harmonious relationship with the nomads, avoiding tensions and promoting stability in the region. This policy of pacification and diplomatic engagement with the nomadic tribes played a crucial role in the Manchu's ability to govern and maintain control over China for several centuries.
To learn more about Manchus, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11841193
#SPJ11
Thinking The text separates the errors in thinking into two categories: "Cognitive and Perceptual Errors in Thinking" and "Social Errors and Biases." Both of these categories are oriented around how people perceive the world and the evidence that is presented to them. Remember that these are all errors you could possibly make in looking at a situation, but they are also errors others might make. As your thinking improves, you may find yourself more confident in challenging the erroneous thinking of others. Make a list of the Errors and write down a brief definition and an example for each. Here is an outline to help you get started: Cognitive and Perceptual Errors in Thinking - Perceptual Errors - Misperception of Random Data - Memorable-Events Error - Probability Errors - Self-Serving Biases - Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Social Errors and Biases - "One of Us/One of Them" Error - Societal Expectations - Group Pressure and Conformity - Diffusion of Responsibility With your notes in front of you, identify the correct term for each of the following definitions. Refer to pages 119 - 134 in your textbook. 10 points The idea that unrelated previous events affect the likelihood of a random event occurring is called: Gambler's Error Group Pressure and Conformity Diffusion of Responsibility Self-Serving Bias 10 points The tendency to remember events that confirm our beliefs and forget those that do not is called: One of Us/One of Them Error 10 points The tendency to remember events that confirm our beliefs and forget those that do not is called: One of Us/One of Them Error Perceptual Error Diffusion of Responsibility Memorable-Events Error 10 points Demonstrating prejudice toward someone from a different race, religion, sex, or political affiliation is called: Societal expectations Group Pressure/Conformity Diffusion of Responsibility One of Us/One of Them 10 points Agreeing to participate in something when you are with your friends that you would never do on your own is an example of: Self-Serving Bias Diffusion of Responsibility Group Pressure/Conformity Societal Expectations 10 points Assigning meaning to something that has no meaning is called: Self-Serving Bias Misperception of Random Data Probability Error Memorable Events Error Superstitious beliefs such as wearing a "lucky shirt" at a ballgame thinking it will help the team win is an example of: Diffusion of Responsibility Probability Error Societal Expectations Self-Serving Bias 10 points The tendency, when in a large group, to regard a problem as belonging to someone else and therefore not taking action one might ordinarily take. Societal Expectation Misperception of Random Data Self-Serving Bias Diffusion of Responsibility 10 points When an unfounded rumor causes people to behave in such a way that they make a rumor come true, this is called: Societal Expectation Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Group Pressure Self-Serving Bias 20 points Provide an example of an irrational belief that someone might hold and identify at least two cognitive/perceptual or social error(s) behind it based on the descriptions given in the textbook.
Errors in thinking are of two types: "Cognitive and Perceptual Errors in Thinking" and "Social Errors and Biases." Here is a list of errors and their brief explanations along with an example. Cognitive and Perceptual Errors in Thinking- Perceptual Errors: These are errors in perception. They occur when our sensory perceptions fail to interpret the world correctly.
Example: The world looks flat to the bare eye
- Misperception of Random Data: People tend to attribute meaning to patterns that do not exist. This is called the misperception of random data. Example: Lucky shirt in a ball game.
- Memorable-Events Error: We remember things that stand out more than things that do not. This can lead to misremembering events. Example: Witnesses of a car accident who cannot agree on the details.
- Probability Errors: People tend to overestimate the likelihood of a rare event and underestimate the likelihood of a common event. Example: Someone buys a lottery ticket thinking they will win.
- Self-Serving Biases: People tend to attribute their successes to their abilities and their failures to external factors. Example: A student gets an A in a test and thinks it's because of his intelligence but if he gets an F, he thinks it's the teacher's fault.
Social Errors and Biases- "One of Us/One of Them" Error: People tend to see others who are like them as good and others who are not like them as bad. Example: Political parties labeling other parties as corrupt.
- Societal Expectations: People tend to conform to the expectations of society. Example: Women staying at home to raise children is expected by society.
- Group Pressure and Conformity: People are influenced by the opinions of those around them. Example: Children smoking to be accepted by a particular group.
- Diffusion of Responsibility: People tend to take less responsibility when they are part of a group. Example: People do not take action when they see a person in trouble, as they expect someone else to intervene. Providing an example of an irrational belief that someone might hold and identifying at least two cognitive/perceptual or social error(s) behind it based on the descriptions given in the textbook:
Example: A person might think that they are always going to get into a car accident whenever they drive. They may believe that because they have experienced a car accident in the past. Two cognitive errors behind this belief are the "Memorable-Events Error" and the "Probability Errors." The person's mind is exaggerating the probability of an accident, and this is also due to the fact that the accident is a memorable event that stands out. One social error behind this belief is "Self-Serving Biases." The person might blame their car accidents on external factors like bad weather or other drivers.
To know more about Cognitive and Perceptual Errors in Thinking refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/32873521
#SPJ11
30. In a visual habituation task, Kellman & Spelke (1983) randomly assigned infants to one of two groups. Group A habituated to a stationary rod behind a box, and Group B habituated to a moving rod behind box. During the test phase, the infants in Group B dishabituated to Od so the researchers can conclude that infants in Group B thought the original rod (the one they saw during habituation phase) was B gri Group A one rod; two bits b. one rod; one rod two bits, one Tod d._ twe-bits, two bits
Kellman & Spelke 1983 conducted a visual habituation task and randomly assigned infants to two groups. Group A habituated to a stationary rod behind a box, and Group B habituated to a moving rod behind a box. During the test phase, the infants in Group B dishabituated to Od, so the researchers could conclude that infants in Group B thought the original rod the one they saw during the habituation phase was moving. Therefore, the correct answer is one rod two bits. ExplanationVisual habituation is a research technique used in developmental psychology to study visual perception. It involves exposing infants to a visual stimulus repeatedly until their attention to the stimulus decreases habituation. Then, the infant is presented with a novel stimulus to see if their attention to the new stimulus increases dishabituation. Kellman Spelke 1983 conducted a visual habituation task to investigate whether infants can distinguish between a moving rod and a stationary rod behind a box.
About HabituationHabituation is simply habituation, or adjustment to something. Habituation is a non-associative learning process which is classified as a basic learning process, namely when the stimulus is given continuously, the resulting response will decrease.
Learn More About Habituation at https://brainly.com/question/15513563
#SPJ11
Does believing that euthanasia is morally permissible entails
believing that euthanasia should be legally permissible?
Yes, believing that euthanasia is morally permissible entails believing that euthanasia should be legally permissible. Euthanasia is the process of ending an individual's life to relieve them from their pain and suffering.
In most countries, euthanasia is regarded as illegal, and anyone who assists someone in euthanasia can face criminal charges.However, many individuals believe that euthanasia is morally permissible, which means that it is ethically justified. The primary argument in favor of euthanasia is that every individual has the right to choose how they want to live their lives and end their suffering.
Additionally, it is argued that it is better to end the suffering of an individual through euthanasia than to prolong their pain and suffering.Accordingly, legalizing euthanasia has been a subject of debate among scholars and policymakers. Supporters of euthanasia argue that legalizing it would offer patients a choice, allow them to die with dignity, and provide relief to their families.
Conversely, those against euthanasia argue that it violates the sanctity of life and undermines the role of medical professionals.In conclusion, believing that euthanasia is morally permissible entails believing that it should be legally permissible. Legalizing euthanasia would enable individuals to make an informed decision regarding their life, and it would prevent them from having to suffer through unnecessary pain and agony.
To learn more about euthanaisa, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/32241732
#SPJ11
Three major theories underlie the developmental basis of social and emotional development: Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory, Vygotsky's Theory of Development as well as Freud's Psycho-sexual theory of development. Please describe all three theories, provide comparisons of each in terms of their similarities and differences and also articulate the developmental endpoints for each theory. PSY Social & Emotional Development in Childhood
Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory focuses on the cognitive processes that children go through as they develop and acquire knowledge.
According to Piaget, children progress through four stages of cognitive development: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational. In each stage, children develop new ways of thinking, understanding the world, and solving problems. Piaget's theory emphasizes the role of active exploration and interaction with the environment in shaping cognitive development. The developmental endpoint in Piaget's theory is the attainment of formal operational thinking, which occurs during adolescence and is characterized by abstract reasoning and hypothetical thinking.
Vygotsky's Theory of Development, on the other hand, emphasizes the sociocultural context in which children develop. Vygotsky proposed that social interactions and cultural tools, such as language, play a crucial role in cognitive development. He introduced the concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), which refers to the gap between a child's current level of development and their potential level of development with the help of a more knowledgeable individual. Vygotsky's theory highlights the importance of social interactions, scaffolding, and cultural influences in shaping cognitive and social development. The developmental endpoint in Vygotsky's theory is the development of higher mental functions and the internalization of socially shared knowledge.
Freud's Psychosexual Theory of Development emphasizes the role of unconscious processes and the influence of early childhood experiences on personality development. According to Freud, individuals pass through several psychosexual stages.. Each stage is associated with specific psychosexual conflicts that must be resolved for healthy development. Freud believed that unresolved conflicts during these stages could lead to fixations and the development of psychological issues later in life. The developmental endpoint in Freud's theory is the attainment of mature adult sexuality and the resolution of psychosexual conflicts.
In terms of similarities, all three theories acknowledge the importance of early childhood experiences in shaping development. They also recognize that development occurs in stages or phases, although the specifics of these stages differ across theories. Additionally, they all highlight the role of cognitive processes in development, albeit from different perspectives.
However, there are also notable differences among the theories. Piaget's theory focuses primarily on cognitive development, whereas Vygotsky's theory emphasizes the sociocultural context and the role of social interaction. Freud's theory, on the other hand, emphasizes unconscious processes and the influence of psychosexual development on personality. Another difference is that Piaget's and Vygotsky's theories have more emphasis on normative development, while Freud's theory places more emphasis on individual differences and psychopathology.
In summary, Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory emphasizes cognitive processes and stages of development, Vygotsky's Theory of Development emphasizes the sociocultural context and social interaction, and Freud's Psychosexual Theory focuses on unconscious processes and psychosexual development. While there are similarities in terms of the importance of early experiences and cognitive processes, there are also differences in the specific aspects and focus of each theory.
To know more about Theory of Development, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11501873
#SPJ11
Which of the following was claimed in the Ramenzoni & Liszkowski article? a. across many cultures, pointing emerges around 9-14 months b. 6-month-olds won't reach for objects that are out of their reach, but 8-month-olds reach for out-of-reach objects offered by an adult c. Experiment 2 showed that infants use gestures to communicate, even with adults they are not familiar with d. All of the above Clear my choice
The Ramenzoni & Liszkowski article claims that across many cultures, pointing emerges around 9-14 months, 6-month-olds won't reach for objects that are out of their reach, The correct answer is option d. All of the above
but 8-month-olds reach for out-of-reach objects offered by an adult, and Experiment 2 showed that infants use gestures to communicate, even with adults they are not familiar with. Therefore, the correct answer is option d. All of the above. Pointing is a nonverbal form of communication that involves using one's body to indicate an object or location of interest.
It's a fundamental human behavior that emerges early in infancy, with studies indicating that infants begin pointing at objects and people around 9-14 months old. They often combine pointing with vocalizations or other communicative gestures to convey meaning.
To know more about human behavior refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2099913
#SPJ11
Visit the American Association of Retired
Persons (AARP) website. Spend some time
exploring the many things available (click the
menu in the top left corner of the
homepage). After exploring the site, reflect
on what you think about the site's usefulness
to people over the age of 50. Consider this in terms of cognitive, social, cultural, physical, etc. aspects of development for people over 50, not just your own point of view.
- What is good/well done?
- What might you change?
The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) website provides valuable information and resources for individuals over the age of 50. The website offers numerous features, including news articles, information on healthcare and insurance, retirement planning tools, and advocacy resources for senior citizens.
Overall, the website is a useful tool for people over 50 in terms of their cognitive, social, cultural, physical, etc. aspects of development. Here are some of the things that are good/well done on the AARP website:
1. Navigation: The website is easy to navigate, and all the information is organized into different sections. The menu in the top left corner provides easy access to all the features of the website.
2. Content: The website provides valuable and informative content that is relevant to senior citizens. It covers topics like health, finances, travel, and lifestyle, which are all important to people over 50.
3. Design: The website has a clean and modern design that is visually appealing and easy to read. The font size is large enough to be readable, and the colors are easy on the eyes.
However, there are some areas where the website could be improved:
1. Speed: The website can be slow to load at times, which can be frustrating for users.
2. Accessibility: The website could be more accessible to people with disabilities. For example, it could provide captions for videos and audio content for people who are visually impaired.
3. Personalization: The website could provide more personalized content based on the user's interests and preferences.
In conclusion, the AARP website is a useful tool for people over 50, and it provides valuable information and resources for their cognitive, social, cultural, physical, etc. aspects of development. While there are areas for improvement, the website is well-designed and easy to navigate, making it a valuable resource for senior citizens.
To know more about American Association of Retired Persons refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2915015
#SPJ11
If a researcher was to conduct an in-depth interview with a famous serial killer to find out their motivation and family history, which research design would be used? naturalistic observation correlational case study experiment Question 21 Within the limbic system, the amygdala plays a key role in motor coordination memories emotions like fear and anxiety controlling impulses & regulating emotions 1 pts
The research design that would be used to conduct an in-depth interview with a famous serial killer to understand their motivation and family history is a case study.
A case study is a research design that involves in-depth investigation and analysis of a single individual or a small group. It is particularly useful for studying unique or rare phenomena, such as the motivations and family history of a famous serial killer. By conducting an in-depth interview, the researcher can gather detailed information about the individual's personal experiences, psychological factors, and environmental influences. The case study design allows for a comprehensive exploration of the specific case, providing rich qualitative data that can contribute to a deeper understanding of complex behaviors and motivations.
Regarding the limbic system, the amygdala is indeed a key structure involved in various functions, including the processing and regulation of emotions such as fear and anxiety. Additionally, it plays a role in memory consolidation, evaluating threats, and modulating emotional responses. The amygdala is not directly responsible for motor coordination, impulse control, or the regulation of all emotions, but its interconnections with other brain regions contribute to these processes in a broader neural network.
To know more about research design click here,
https://brainly.com/question/30156874
#SPJ11
How would you distinguish between history and historical
fiction?
History is the study of past events and occurrences while historical fiction is a literary genre that is based on real historical events but fictionalized to suit the author's creativity. The main difference between history and historical fiction is that history presents accurate information based on factual events while historical fiction often takes some liberties to entertain its audience.
The following are a few distinguishing factors that differentiate history and historical fiction: Accuracy: The accuracy of history is based on primary sources, written accounts, and official documents that present the actual events that occurred during a specific period. Historical fiction, on the other hand, is based on the author's interpretation of events. Some events may be exaggerated or completely made up to suit the author's desired narrative.
Purpose: The purpose of history is to present accurate information about past events to inform and educate the reader. Historical fiction, on the other hand, is meant to entertain the reader and keep them engaged with a well-told story. Authorship: Historians usually have a professional background in history and present their findings based on rigorous research and analysis. Authors of historical fiction, on the other hand, may or may not have formal education in history, and they base their work on their creativity and imagination.
Learn more fiction
https://brainly.com/question/29587655
#SPJ11
Alice Walker once said "Not everyone's life is what they make of it. Some people's life is what other people make it." This quote best embodies the notion of how things like racial injustice can occur as a result of a(n) external attribution O illusory correlation O fundamental attribution error self-fulfilling prophecy
This quote of Alice Walker best embodies the notion of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a belief or expectation about a person or a group that influences their behavior in a way that aligns with the original belief or expectation. In this context, the quote suggests that individuals' lives can be shaped or influenced by the actions and perceptions of others, rather than solely being determined by their own choices or efforts. The quote implies that external factors, such as societal biases and injustices, can play a significant role in shaping individuals' lives. It suggests that individuals may be limited or impacted by the expectations and treatment imposed upon them by others. This aligns with the concept of a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the beliefs or actions of others contribute to shaping an individual's life trajectory.
It highlights the influence that external attributions, expectations, and social structures can have on individuals and their opportunities.
To know more about societal biases, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26244302
#SPJ11
Look at the figure on page 21, chapter 2 of the Sapolsky book. Based on that figure and what you read in the first few lessons, which of the following fits this information best? (this question is worth 2 points) Based on the figure on page 21, it is clear that the sympathetic nervous system is active during the alarm stage of Selye's General Adaptation Response, while the parasympathetic nervous system is active during the resistance stage. The sympathetic nervous system decreases the pupil size during an alarm phase of a stressful experience so we can focus more acutely on immediate threatening tasks, while the parasympathetic nervous system widens the pupil size while we are relaxed. The sympathetic nervous system speeds up the heart rate, while the parasympathetic nervous system slows it down, and this fits well with the concept of Allostasis because the body prepares to face a threat when necessary, and reserves energy when a threat has passed. Allostasis is a product of the parasymapthetic nervous system, not the sympathetic nervous system.
The sympathetic nervous system is active during the alarm stage, while the parasympathetic system is active during the resistance stage. Both contribute to allostasis and physiological responses.
The sympathetic nervous system is active during the alarm stage of Selye's General Adaptation Response, while the parasympathetic nervous system is active during the resistance stage.
The sympathetic nervous system causes pupil constriction and increased heart rate, while the parasympathetic nervous system promotes pupil dilation and decreased heart rate. However, it is important to note that allostasis, the body's ability to maintain stability through change, is a product of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems working together.
Therefore, it is important to recognize the distinct roles of the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems in different stages of stress response and their contributions to overall physiological adaptation and balance.
Learn more about sympathetic nervous system here:
https://brainly.com/question/30151825
#SPJ11
How does moral character and convictions relate to identity? O We attribute both the good and bad moral aspects of a person to their true moral self. We only hold moral character essential to the identity of others-not to our own identity We tend to hold that a person is the same self through any change expect deep change in moral character.
Moral character and convictions play a significant role in shaping and relating to one's identity. **We tend to hold that a person is the same self through any change, except deep changes in moral character**.
This means that while people may undergo various transformations and experiences throughout their lives, their fundamental moral character is often seen as a consistent aspect of their identity.
In terms of attributions, **we attribute both the good and bad moral aspects of a person to their true moral self**. When someone demonstrates virtuous or morally upright behavior, we consider it a reflection of their inherent moral character. Conversely, when someone engages in morally reprehensible actions, it is often attributed to their true moral self as well.
However, it's important to note that the relationship between moral character and identity is not solely focused on others. While we may attribute moral character to the identity of others, we also recognize its significance within our own identity. Our moral beliefs and values shape how we see ourselves and contribute to the formation of our self-identity.
Overall, moral character and convictions are closely tied to identity, as they influence how individuals perceive themselves and how others perceive them in terms of their moral standing.
To learn more about Moral character
https://brainly.com/question/30737120
#SPJ11
What is Sam's terrible dilemma in the excerpt we read from
Abraham's "Tell Freedom"?
In the excerpt that we read from Abraham's "Tell Freedom," Sam's terrible dilemma is the fact that he could not sign the papers that would give him the freedom he desires without placing the rest of his family in peril.
In "Tell Freedom," an autobiography of an ex-slave, Peter Abrahams explores the experiences of black people in South Africa's apartheid system. In the excerpt that we read from the book, Sam is one of the characters who finds himself in a terrible situation. In the excerpt, Sam's master, Van der Merwe, promised him his freedom in exchange for good behaviour. In that context, Sam was both elated and sceptical; he was happy that he was finally going to be free, but he was also sceptical because he had seen Van der Merwe break promises before.However, his excitement soon turned to concern when Van der Merwe came to him with a document for him to sign that would grant him his freedom.
Know more about Abraham's "Tell Freedom here:
https://brainly.com/question/16347225
#SPJ11