France decided to help America due to rivalry, and keenness for revenge, whereas Spain wanted expansion. Thus, there was a difference in their reasons
Supporting the American colonists offered France an opportunity to undercut their British rivals, with whom they had a protracted rivalry. After losing many colonies to Britain during the Seven Years' War, France wanted retribution. A means of retaliation was to aid the American colonies in their war with the British. In addition, France perceived possible financial gains in aiding the American cause. France anticipated that by supporting the colonies in their fight for independence, it would be able to gain economic partnerships, access to American markets, and potential resources.
With its own competition with Britain, Spain saw a chance to limit British influence by aiding American colonists. Spain had territorial aspirations in North America and anticipated that by aiding the colonists there, they would be able to retake possession of areas they had lost to the British, such as Florida and Gibraltar. They also intended to stop the British from intruding on Spanish possessions in the New World due to British expansionism. By aiding the American colonists, a barrier against British influence was kept in place.
Read more about America on:
https://brainly.com/question/28968808
#SPJ4
Causes and Effects What were the unexpected consequences of Britain’s victory in the French and Indian War?
The unexpected consequences of Britain's victory in the French and Indian War were the increase in Britain's debt and the beginning of tensions between Britain and its American colonies.
The French and Indian War, which took place from 1754-1763, resulted in a victory for Britain. However, this victory came with unexpected consequences. One of the main consequences was an increase in Britain's debt. The war was expensive for Britain, and the cost of maintaining its newly acquired territories also added to the debt.
Another consequence was the beginning of tensions between Britain and its American colonies. Prior to the war, the colonies had enjoyed a level of autonomy, but following the war, Britain began to tighten its control over the colonies, imposing taxes and other restrictions. This led to resentment among the colonists and eventually to the American Revolution.
Know more about American colonies, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30924696
#SPJ11
What were two reasons why the revolutionary army fared poorly against prussia in 1792?
The revolutionary army of France struggled against the military might of Prussia during the French Revolutionary Wars. Two significant reasons why the revolutionary army fared poorly against Prussia in 1792 are as follows:
Inadequate training and low morale of soldiers Inadequate training of soldiers was one of the significant reasons behind the revolutionary army's failure against Prussia in 1792. Most of the soldiers had no prior experience in fighting, and their training was inadequate. The French Revolution had just taken place, and many individuals who had never served in the army were now enlisted in it.
The lack of trained soldiers was a disadvantage for the revolutionary army, as Prussia had a well-trained army. The French soldiers were not prepared to fight on the battlefield, and many of them panicked, retreated, or surrendered at the first sight of danger.
Low morale among the soldiers was also a factor that contributed to their failure in battle. The soldiers were not motivated, and they had lost faith in their commanders. They were poorly fed and ill-equipped, and their living conditions were miserable.
To know more about revolutionary visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30774955
#SPJ11
Why did many Americans wish to limit the immigration of Jews into the United States during the 1930s?
During the 1930s, many Americans wished to limit the immigration of Jews into the United States due to prevalent anti-Semitism, economic concerns during the Great Depression, national security fears, and cultural/religious biases.
During the 1930s, many Americans sought to limit the immigration of Jews into the United States for various reasons. Anti-Semitism was widespread, with deep-seated stereotypes and prejudices against Jews fueling discrimination. Economic concerns stemming from the Great Depression led some to believe that restricting Jewish immigration would alleviate job competition. National security fears emerged as tensions rose in Europe, with suspicions of spies or subversive elements entering the country. Cultural and religious biases also played a role, as some perceived Jews as different or incompatible with American values. These motivations, rooted in prejudice and discrimination, led to restrictive immigration policies, reflecting a darker chapter in American history. It is important to recognize the injustice of these attitudes and the subsequent efforts made to promote equality and inclusivity.In conclusion, during the 1930s, restrictions on Jewish immigration to the United States were driven by anti-Semitism, economic anxieties, national security fears, and cultural biases against Jews.
For more questions on immigration of Jews:
https://brainly.com/question/30288223
#SPJ8
How did formerly enslaved people first respond to freedom?
The formerly enslaved people responded to freedom by pursuing education and seeking family reunification. This helped them to rebuild their lives after the long years of slavery.
After years of slavery, the formerly enslaved people were finally granted freedom. While they were happy about it, they were also uncertain about what was next for them. Many of them had no homes, jobs, or education, which left them in a vulnerable position. However, some of them immediately began to pursue education as a way to rebuild their lives and improve their future prospects. Others focused on seeking family reunification.
Since the enslavers had separated many families over the years, the newly freed people worked hard to reunite with their families. They organized meetings, searched for missing relatives, and even used newspaper advertisements to try and locate their loved ones. In conclusion, the formerly enslaved people responded to freedom by pursuing education and seeking family reunification, as these were seen as ways to help rebuild their lives.
Know more about slavery, here:
https://brainly.com/question/866336
#SPJ11
Events of history and mythology inform a variety of Minoan objects and sites. How did archaeologists draw from that knowledge to uncover ancient sites and interpret objects? Identify two or three examples. How have interpretations of these sites changed over time?
Archaeologists drew from the knowledge of history and mythology to uncover ancient sites and interpret objects. A variety of Minoan objects and sites were informed by events of history and mythology.
The following are some of the ways that archaeologists drew from this knowledge to uncover ancient sites and interpret objects:
Mycenaeans and other early Greeks influenced Minoan objects and sites.The Minoan civilization was heavily influenced by the Mycenaean civilization, which came after it. In addition, other early Greeks, such as the Achaeans and the Dorians, influenced the Minoans. These influences can be seen in the objects and sites that the Minoans left behind.
For example, the palace at Knossos was heavily influenced by Mycenaean culture, as were many other Minoan sites. Linear B script, the language of the Mycenaeans, was also found on some Minoan objects.The religious beliefs of the Minoans were also informed by mythology.
The Minoans had a complex religious system that was heavily influenced by mythology.
The bull was a central figure in Minoan religion and mythology, and bull-leaping was a popular sport that was performed during religious ceremonies. Minoan art often depicted bulls and other mythological figures, such as the snake goddess, who was worshipped by the Minoans.
Interpretations of these sites have changed over time.Interpretations of Minoan objects and sites have changed over time. For example, the palace at Knossos was once believed to be a labyrinth, based on the myth of the Minotaur.
However, it is now believed to have been a palace, with no evidence of a labyrinth. Similarly, the bull-leaping fresco at Knossos was once believed to depict a religious ceremony, but is now believed to have been a sport. Finally, the role of women in Minoan society has also been reevaluated. It was once believed that women had a prominent role in Minoan society, but this interpretation has been challenged.
To learn more about Archaeologists, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31720195
#SPJ11
The longitude of the
prime meridian
is 0°. The
meridian
on the opposite side of Earth is at
180°
longitude.
The prime meridian is at 0° longitude, while the opposite side of the Earth is at 180° longitude.
The longitude of the prime meridian, which runs through Greenwich, London, is defined as 0°. This line serves as the reference point for measuring eastward and westward distances around the globe. On the opposite side of the Earth, directly opposite the prime meridian, is the 180° longitude line.The 180° longitude line, also known as the International Date Line, is located in the Pacific Ocean. It serves as the dividing line between one calendar day and the next. When traveling across this line from west to east, you add one day, and when crossing from east to west, you subtract one day.The existence of the 180° longitude line helps to maintain a consistent global timekeeping system and avoids discrepancies in date and time as we move from one side of the world to the other. It is a significant reference point for navigational purposes and plays a crucial role in international relations and coordinating activities across different time zones.For more such questions on Prime meridian:
https://brainly.com/question/28215688
#SPJ8
In 1914 Woodrow Wilson proclaimed U.S. neutrality, and asked the American people to remain "impartial in thought as well as deed." At the end of the war, some members of the government pushed to expand American influence but to also remain free of any commitments, a policy its critics referred to as isolationism.
In your opinion, did America remain neutral in "thought and deed" from 1914 to 1917? Discuss and support your response.
From 1914 to 1917, America did not remain neutral in "thought and deed." The US government showed signs of partiality in several ways despite President Woodrow Wilson's call for neutrality.
However, Americans were divided about the prospect of the country joining the war, with some urging that they stay neutral while others saw this as an opportunity for America to show its might. The following are some of the ways in which the US did not remain neutral in "thought and deed":
- Wilson's economic policies were not neutral: Wilson's neutrality policies were at odds with his economic policies. Although the government adhered to strict neutrality regulations, businesses were encouraged to provide goods to both the Central Powers and the Allies. The United States did not strictly comply with the principles of neutrality since both the Allies and the Central Powers bought American weapons, ammunition, and supplies.
- Loaning to the allies: In order to provide economic support to the Allies, the US lent them money. In addition, the US government provided Britain and France with critical supplies, such as weapons, ammunition, and food. American banks, such as JP Morgan, played a critical role in funding the Allies' efforts.
Overall, despite President Woodrow Wilson's call for neutrality, the United States did not remain neutral in "thought and deed" from 1914 to 1917.
To know more about neutrality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29567624
#SPJ11
3. how can we work together to create an open, supportive, and
reflective learning community? this response is your opinion.
Here are some ways that can help create such a community:
1. Encourage Open Communication: Communication is vital in creating a supportive learning environment. Teachers should encourage students to share their thoughts and feelings with one another.
2. Emphasize Reflection: Reflective thinking helps learners assess their strengths, weaknesses and the areas they need to improve on. Encouraging students to reflect regularly helps them to focus on their learning and identify what they have learned.
3. Encourage Collaboration: Collaboration is essential for learning in a community. Teachers should encourage students to work together and help each other to solve problems.
4. Encourage Respect: Respect is the cornerstone of a positive and supportive learning community. Students should respect their fellow learners, their teachers, and the community.
5. Encourage Creativity: Creativity is essential for learning. Encourage students to be creative, to explore new ideas, and to think critically. Give them opportunities to express themselves in different ways, and allow them to learn through experimentation.
To know more about Communication visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29811467
#SPJ11
do you believe the japanese announcement is accurate why?
Answer:to make it legal to move Japanese Americans to internment camps
Explanation:
what makes Malthus views relevant in today's world
Thomas Malthus’s ideas influenced public policy (such as reforms of the English Poor Laws) and the work of economists, demographers, and evolutionary biologists, notably Charles Darwin.
which of these statements best describes one of the union's advantages over the confederacy during the civil war?
One of the union's advantages over the Confederacy during the Civil War was that the Union had more resources, including more significant industrial production, better transportation, and a larger population, which gave them a more significant number of soldiers and better equipment.
The Union's superior resources were critical during the Civil War. They enabled the Union to equip their soldiers better, transport them, and provide food, clothing, and weapons for them. Union armies could advance into Confederate territory more effectively because they had better logistics. Additionally, the Union had a more extensive industrial base, allowing them to produce more war materials such as arms, ammunition, clothing, and shoes. With a more significant population, the Union could mobilize more men into their armies. The Union had access to more extensive networks of railways and canals, making it easier for them to transport troops and supplies.
These advantages enabled the Union to maintain a robust blockade of Confederate ports, choking off the Confederacy's ability to trade with foreign countries.
To know more about Confederacy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29766761
#SPJ11
The Union also had an established government and a recognized leader in President Abraham Lincoln, whereas the Confederacy struggled with unity and leadership. These advantages ultimately played a significant role in the Union's victory in the Civil War.
Confederacy during the Civil War was their larger population and industrial cap One of the Union's advantages over the acity. This advantage allowed the Union to mobilize a larger army and produce more weapons, ammunition, and supplies.
The Union also had a more developed transportation system, including railroads, which helped them move troops and supplies more efficiently.
Additionally, the Union had control of the major waterways, such as the Mississippi River, which allowed them to cut off Confederate supply lines and divide their forces.
To know more about government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ11
How were Judeo-Christian and Greco-Roman views similar?
There are many similarities and differences between Greco- Roman and Judeo christian views of laws and faith, and duties to the individual. Ancient Greek philosophy arose in the 6th century BCE and continued throughout the Hellenistic period in which Ancient Greece was part of Empire. It dealt with a wide variety of subjects including political philosophy, ethics, metaphysics ontology, logic, biology, art, rhetorics, and aesthetics. Judeo- christian is a term used by Christian and some jews since 1950s to encompass common beliefs of christianity and judaism. It became part of American Civil Religion.
Connect Today to What modern American values might be familiar to a 17th-century Puritan?
The modern American values that might be familiar to a 17th-century Puritan includes religious devotion and moral righteousness.
How might 17th-century Puritans relate to modern American values?The Puritans placed a strong emphasis on religious devotion and moral righteousness, seeking to live according to their strict interpretation of Christian principles.
This commitment to religious faith and the pursuit of moral virtue are seen in contemporary American society where many individuals still prioritize religious beliefs and strive to live ethically.
Read more about American values
brainly.com/question/23246475
#SPJ4
Which details give explicit examples of starvation during elizabethan times?
Starvation during Elizabethan times was a significant problem in England. The poor were more likely to starve because they had less access to food, and the price of food was very high, as compared to today’s world.
People died in large numbers, and the government struggled to manage the crisis. Starvation affected both the poor and the rich, and it was a widespread issue throughout the country. The problem was so severe that the government issued proclamations calling on people to give money and food to the poor.
They also believed that the poor were lazy, which is why they were starving. One of the explicit examples of starvation during Elizabethan times is the story of Mary Queen of Scots. She was imprisoned by Elizabeth I, and she died from starvation after being held captive for several years.
To know more about imprisoned visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28731950
#SPJ11
Writing Newspaper Article Suppose you are a journalist for a foreign newspaper. Write an article describing war-time conditions in both the Confederacy and the Union.
The article could cover the realities experienced by the Confederacy and the Union, providing insight into difficulties faced on American territory.
The Confederacy and the Union went through radically different wartime circumstances in the middle of the American Civil War. The reality that the two sides are dealing with gives a foreign observer a window into the difficulties and struggles encountered on American territory. The Confederate States experienced a wide range of sufferings as a result of the war. Resources are scarce, and the economy is struggling. Given the sharp rise in inflation and surging food prices, food shortages have become a terrible reality. As more young men enlist in the war, the agricultural civilization of the Confederacy has seen its fields damaged, farms abandoned, and labor force diminished. In an era of scarcity, women have carried heavy burdens while attempting to support their families.
Additionally, the Confederate States had weak industrial capacity and deteriorating infrastructure, making it difficult to provide crucial war supplies. Networks for communication and transportation are hampered, which hinders effective coordination and reaction. In contrast, a different scenario plays out in the Union. Infrastructure growth and industrialization have benefited the Union. Despite challenges and sacrifices, the Union is better able to maintain its culture and military than the Confederacy.
But the burden of loss and sacrifice falls equally on both sides. As loved ones fight on opposing sides in a deadly conflict, families are torn apart. Communities are destroyed, and the cost to human lives is tremendous. These wounds may not heal for years. The contrasting realities of the Confederacy and the Union provide a simple portrayal of the complex effects of war as it endures.
Read more about Confederacy on:
https://brainly.com/question/951920
#SPJ4
How does the narrator describe his feeling of uncertainty in his mind? What is the action he uses to test his feeling one day when he is having meditation on this subject?
Rousseau, be that as it may, went the alternate way. He recommended that the condition of nature wasn't exactly terrible, suggesting that individuals in it were independent, genuinely singular by decision, thoughtful to other people, and quiet
The narrator in question describes his feeling of uncertainty in his mind as a lingering sense of doubt and hesitancy. He grapples with an underlying unease, unsure of his own convictions and beliefs. This uncertainty manifests itself as a constant questioning of his thoughts and emotions, creating a state of inner turmoil. The narrator's mind is filled with conflicting ideas and perspectives, leaving him feeling unsettled and unsure of how to navigate the complexities of his own thoughts.
In an attempt to test his feelings of uncertainty, one day during his meditation on this subject, the narrator engages in a specific action. This action involves introspection and deep reflection. He delves into the depths of his mind, searching for clarity and understanding. Through this process, he seeks to gain insight into his own thoughts and emotions, hoping to find a solid foundation upon which to build his convictions.
The narrator's sense of uncertainty reflects the human condition of grappling with existential questions and the inherent ambiguity of life. This state of mind is relatable to many individuals who have experienced moments of doubt and internal conflict.
The action of introspection and deep reflection is a common method used to examine one's thoughts and emotions. By delving into the recesses of the mind, individuals aim to gain a better understanding of themselves and the world around them. It is through this process of self-discovery that the narrator hopes to find solace and clarity amidst his uncertainty.
Learn more about feeling
brainly.com/question/13044426
#SPJ11
Read this excerpt from a presentation on how to have better friendships.
When it comes down to it, respect is one of the most precious things you can give to someone. But it can be one of the most difficult things to learn. Many people have trouble even defining respect. I like to think of respect as treating others as if they are appreciated and have worth that makes them important.
Which revision makes the meaning of the underlined sentence clearer?
A) I like respect as treating others as important, as appreciated, as worthy.
B) I like to think of showing respect as treating others like they are appreciated and important.
C) Thinking of respect, showing others is about appreciation and worth.
D) Showing respect is about treating important others with worth.
Answer:
B) I like to think of showing respect as treating others like they are
Explanation:
Eugenics theories most clearly benefited
OA. European imperialists
OB. social gospel missionaries
OC. immigrant workers
OD. Progressive reformers
Explain the importance of
• Eddie Rickenbacker • Second Battle of the Marne
• Belleau Wood • Alvin York
The First World War was one of the deadliest conflicts in history, causing extensive human and material damage. The United States was involved in the war, which lasted from 1914 until 1918.
The Second Battle of Marne, Eddie Rickenbacker, Belleau Wood, and Alvin York are essential parts of American history. They all contributed to the victory of the Allied Powers against the Central Powers and were critical to the war effort. It was fought between German and Allied forces in the summer of 1918. The Germans were heavily outnumbered and outgunned, and their attack was defeated.
These events are important because they represent some of the most significant moments of the First World War. They highlight the bravery and heroism of American soldiers and demonstrate the country's growing military power.
To know more about World War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13382356
#SPJ11
The change in the arrest rates for girls' violence since the 1980's is partially due to: Zero-tolerance arrest policies Upcriming BOTH zero-tolerance arrest policies and upcriming None of these responses; there has been no change over time in these arrest rates.
The change in the arrest rates for girls' violence since the 1980's is partially due to both zero-tolerance arrest policies and upcriming.
The change in the arrest rates for girls' violence since the 1980s is partially due to both zero-tolerance arrest policies and upcriming. Zero-tolerance arrest policies are a police response to minor and major criminal activities, and it has seen increasing popularity since the 1980s. On the other hand, upcriming occurs when minor offenses are taken seriously and punished harshly, giving the impression that the crime rate is rising.
The dual trends of zero-tolerance arrest policies and upcriming have contributed to the increased number of girls arrested for violent crimes since the 1980s. Additionally, some scholars argue that the role of gender norms and expectations, which shape responses to delinquency, might have also influenced the change in arrest rates for girls' violence.
To know more about violence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31455787
#SPJ11
Please write 1 paragraph on the following 2 texts and use the outline I created to help discuss the 2 texts. Use evidence from the texts and include in-text citation.
WEB DuBois’s "Close Ranks" Article in Crisis (1918)
and
Soviet Union, The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (1938)
First Body Paragraph (Main Idea)
Main Idea of Du Bois document
Main Idea of Soviet Union document
The main idea of W.E.B. Du Bois's article "Close Ranks" in Crisis (1918) is to emphasize the importance of African American support and loyalty to the United States during World War I.
Du Bois argues that despite facing systemic racism and discrimination, African Americans should put aside their grievances and rally behind the war effort. He asserts that their participation and sacrifice in the war would serve as a demand for full citizenship rights and equality in the post-war era.
Du Bois acknowledges the injustices faced by African Americans but encourages them to temporarily unite with their white compatriots to fight against the common enemy of racism.
On the other hand, the main idea of "The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union" (1938) is to provide an official account of the party's history and its role in shaping the Soviet Union.
The document, prepared under the direction of Joseph Stalin, presents a narrative that highlights the party's successes, achievements, and contributions to the development of socialism in the Soviet Union.
It portrays the Communist Party as the vanguard of the working class, leading the country through various stages, including the overthrow of the bourgeoisie, collectivization, and industrialization.
The main idea of this document is to establish the legitimacy and authority of the Communist Party and to solidify its position as the ruling party in the Soviet Union.
Learn more about Communist Party of the Soviet Union at
brainly.com/question/13842431
#SPJ4
What was chief joseph’s point of view about the frontier wars? the nez perce wanted peace, but the us government forced them into a conflict. the nez perce started a war with the us government to drive settlers out of washington. both the nez perce people and the us government could be blamed for causing the conflict. the us government became involved in a conflict between the nez perce and another tribe.
Chief Joseph’s point of view about the Frontier Wars was that the US government forced his tribe, the Nez Perce, into a conflict.
He believed that the Nez Perce wanted peace and that they did not want to start a war with the US government. In his view, both the Nez Perce people and the US government could be blamed for causing the conflict.Chief Joseph was a Native American leader who led his tribe, the Nez Perce, in the late 19th century.
The Nez Perce were a peaceful people who had lived in the Pacific Northwest for centuries. They had good relations with the US government and had signed treaties with them in the past. when gold was discovered on their land in the 1860s, the US government began to pressure them to leave their ancestral homeland.
To know more about Frontier visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15520789
#SPJ11
Who helped spread industrialization form Britain to the United States?
Prompt:
Using the primary documents, construct a conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle class American in which each evaluates the economic challenges and benefits they face. In doing so, be sure to define and explain what Americans understood to be meant by "the middle class. " Why was it almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle class status?
In this conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American, they discuss their economic challenges and benefits.
The middle class is defined as a social and economic group that enjoyed a relatively comfortable lifestyle and had aspirations for upward mobility. It was almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle-class status due to various factors such as limited access to land, lack of capital, and the dominance of large-scale agriculture.
Conversation:
Farmer: I'm struggling to make ends meet. As a poor, landless farmer, I barely have enough to feed my family. It seems like there's no way out of this cycle of poverty.
Middle-class American: I understand your struggles, and I sympathize with your situation. As a middle-class American, I have a stable job, a decent income, and some financial security. However, I still face my own set of economic challenges.
Farmer: What does it mean to be part of the middle class? How do you define it?
Middle-class American: The middle class is generally considered the social and economic group that falls between the working class and the upper class. It is characterized by a certain level of income, education, and standard of living. Middle-class individuals typically have steady employment, own homes, and can afford basic comforts and some luxuries.
Farmer: It seems almost impossible for landless farmers like me to achieve middle-class status. Why is that?
Middle-class American: There are several reasons for this. One major factor is the limited access to land. Land ownership was a key source of wealth and economic stability in America, and without land, it was challenging for farmers to build wealth and security.
Additionally, the dominance of large-scale agriculture and the rise of mechanization meant that small-scale farmers struggled to compete. They faced intense competition, low prices for their produce, and difficulty accessing credit and resources.
Moreover, landless farmers lacked the capital and resources needed to invest in modern farming techniques and technologies that could improve productivity and profitability. This further hindered their ability to break free from poverty and achieve middle-class status.
In conclusion, the middle class in America enjoyed a relatively comfortable lifestyle and had aspirations for upward mobility. However, for landless farmers, achieving middle-class status was almost impossible due to limited access to land, lack of capital, and the challenges posed by large-scale agriculture. These systemic barriers prevented them from escaping poverty and realizing the economic benefits enjoyed by the middle class.
Learn more about Economic challenges in america here:
brainly.com/question/14052264
#SPJ11
The middle class was characterized by land ownership, economic stability, and independence, while landless farmers faced dependence and limited social mobility. Due to lack of land, it was nearly impossible for farmers to achieve middle class status.
Explanation:The middle class in America during this period was defined by possession of land, some level of economic stability, and the ability to participate in society as independent citizens. Their economic challenges included market competition, economic fluctuations, and the need to maintain a certain standard of living. Benefits included the ability to provide for their families, influence in society, and opportunities for leisure.
The landless farmer, on the other hand, faces economic challenges such as dependence on others for livelihood, susceptibility to economic downturns and exploitation, scarcity of resources, and limited social mobility. The benefits, although limited, might include a simpler lifestyle, strong community bonds, and some level of freedom from market forces.
It was almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle class status because they did not possess the assets, specifically land, that allowed for economic stability and independence. Without land ownership, it's difficult to generate a stable and sufficient income, acquire additional resources, or gain societal respect and influence.
Learn more about Social Stratification here:https://brainly.com/question/32082422
#SPJ11
In what ways did the war change America?
The war had significant impacts on America. It transformed America socially, economically, and politically. These changes included the emergence of the US as a global power, increased economic growth, technological advancement, and the creation of new industries.
The war provided a boost to the US economy. It led to increased production of war-related goods and services, which generated employment and increased wages for Americans. Additionally, the war stimulated technological advancement, particularly in the aviation and defense industries. The war also helped to promote social change. Women and minorities were given employment opportunities they would not have had during peacetime. African American soldiers also helped to advance the civil rights movement. Politically, the war changed America's role in the world. The US emerged as a global power, with its influence felt beyond its borders.
The inflation-adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy during a fiscal year can be defined as economic growth. The real and nominal gross domestic product growth rate is typically used by statisticians to gauge such growth.
Know more about economic growth, here:
https://brainly.com/question/33408189
#SPJ11
The Revolutionary War ended with both sides agreeing to the Treaty of Paris in 1783. What did the new United States gain as a result of the treaty?
A. Control of the land on the British Isles
B. Control of the entire North American continent
C. Control of most of the land east of the Mississippi River
D. Control of all land owned by Great Britain
Making Inferences Why do you think the Mercator projection is used for all types of navigation?
The Mercator projection is used for all types of navigation because it provides a consistent and accurate representation of a straight line of travel.
The Mercator projection is a cylindrical map projection that shows a true direction between any two points on Earth, keeping the same shape for small areas. It has a constant scale along the equator and shows all the meridians and parallels as straight lines that meet at right angles, which helps navigators plot a course that minimizes distance and avoids distortion.
Aside from its consistency and accuracy, the Mercator projection is commonly used because it can be easily reproduced, it is simple to use, and it offers a great way to measure distances accurately. The Mercator projection is widely used in navigation charts and maps because it presents the true angle between two points, allowing sailors to plot a straight course, and it is highly useful in aviation navigation and other fields that require precise measurements.
To know more about Mercator projection :
https://brainly.com/question/30060339
#SPJ11
Democratic institutions may not ensure stable, civilian government unless what common practices are present to make democracy work?
Abstract
Political scientists have conventionally assumed that achieving democracy is a one-way ratchet. Only very recently has the question of “democratic backsliding” attracted any research attention. We argue that democratic instability is best understood with tools from complexity science. The explanatory power of complexity science arises from several features of complex systems. Their relevance in the context of democracy is discussed. Several policy recommendations are offered to help (re)stabilize current systems of representative democracy.
Introduction
The Economist recently identified 80 countries whose democracy score declined during the last decade, including the USA and some consolidated European democracies (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2017). While the question of how democracies arise and how such rise can be facilitated has received much research attention, little is known as yet about how democracies destabilize.Footnote1 The conventional assumption amongst political scientists was that achieving democracy is a one-way ratchet. Only very recently has the question of “democratic backsliding” attracted any research attention (Waldner and Lust, 2018). We argue that insights from complexity science can facilitate the study of democratic processes and institutions and the design of stabilizing policies. The cross-disciplinary approach to political science that we advocate here rests on mathematical models of human societies, built with tools from statistical physics, dynamical systems, complex networks, and game theory (Wiesner et al., 2018). These tools allow scientists to focus on the salient features of the complex system at hand.
1. Place a checkmark next to each reason the colonists protested British taxation:
Review
They were taxed without any representation in Parliament.
The taxes took away their rights to life, liberty, and property.
The taxes unfairly targeted the rich.
The taxes made imported tea cheaper than colonial tea.
The taxes were used to fund a war with Spain.
The taxes were used to explore the western territories.
The taxes took away their freedom of speech.
The checkmark is next to the following reasons why the colonists protested against British taxation: was
They were taxed without any representation in Parliament.The taxes took away their rights to life, liberty, and property.What was the Genesis behind ReasonsThe above reasons was the core reasons for the colonists' to protest against the British taxation policy. The colonists felt that they have not being represented in the British Parliament which was against the British constitution since they were not represented in the parliament hence, the taxes which was imposed on them was not consent through a representative which is against their right a citizens
Also the tax imposed on them was said o believed that their right to life, liberty, and property has being taken from them since its against their consent and there was no representative to negotiate on the policy and they saw it an infringement of the British constitution and their rights
Learn more British taxation policy on brainly.in/question/6768922
#SPJ1
Explain the significance of each of the following.
Three-Fifths
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a critical agreement made at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. The agreement, which took place between slaveholding and non-slaveholding states, was crucial in determining how slaves would be counted in the population for purposes of representation and taxation.
The Three-Fifths Compromise resolved this issue by counting each slave as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation. This compromise gave the slaveholding states more power in Congress than they would have had otherwise, but it was not as much power as they had wanted.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was significant because it addressed two critical issues: representation and taxation. The agreement ensured that slaves would be counted as part of the population for purposes of representation and taxation, but not as much as the slaveholding states had wanted.
To know more about Constitutional visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ11