Need to find the x and y

Answer:

its F

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the numerical expression 5² + 7 - 3 + 4 will be 33.

Algebra is the study of abstract symbols, while logic is the manipulation of all those ideas.

The acronym PEMDAS stands for Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. This approach is used to answer the problem correctly and completely.

The expression is given below.

⇒ 5² + 7 - 3 + 4

Simplify the expression, then we have

⇒ 5² + 7 - 3 + 4

⇒ 25 + 7 - 3 + 4

⇒ 36 - 3

⇒ 33

The value of the numerical expression 5² + 7 - 3 + 4 will be 33.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

7x+3= 3x+35

4x= 32

x=8

they are corresponding angles

helo. since the top and bottom lines are straight and parallel, it = 180. also, since theyre parallel, the other side of the top line also=3x+35. so...

7x + 3 + 3x + 35=180

10x+38=180

10x=142

x=14.2

Answer:

[tex]3a + 1 - a = 9 \\ 2a = 8 \\ a = 4 \\ 5a + 2 = \\ 5(4) + 2 = 22[/tex]

first find the value of a, which is 4

then substitute a with 4

Answer:

[tex]\frac{7}{6}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{5}{12} + \frac{9}{12} = ?[/tex]

When adding fractions, the denominators must be the same. In this case, they are both 12, so we can just add the numerators.

5 + 9 = 14

We are left with:

[tex]\frac{14}{12}[/tex]

14 and 12 are both even numbers and can be simplified by dividing by 2.

14 ÷ 2 = 7

12 ÷ 2 = 6

[tex]\frac{14}{12}[/tex] simplifies to [tex]\frac{7}{6}[/tex]

This is your answer.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

I think that the answer is 3495.24in

Answer:

The ratio given cannot be used to find the answer

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.0018, which means that for a level of significance higher than this, there is sufficient evidence to claim that less than 50% of Internet users get their health questions answered online.

Step-by-step explanation:

Test the claim that less than 50% of Internet users get their health questions answered online.

At the null hypothesis, we test that 50% of Internet users get their health questions answered online, that is:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.5[/tex]

At the alternate hypothesis, we test that this proportion is less than 50%, that is:

[tex]H_a: p < 0.5[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.5 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.5, \sigma = \sqrt{0.5*0.5} = 0.5[/tex]

A random sample of 1318 Internet users was asked where they will go for information the next time they need information about health or medicine; 606 said that they would use the Internet.

This means that [tex]n = 1318, X = \frac{606}{1318} = 0.4598[/tex]

Test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.4598 - 0.5}{\frac{0.5}{\sqrt{1318}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -2.92[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion below 0.4598, which is the p-value of z = -2.92.

Looking at the z-table, z = -2.92 has a p-value of 0.0018.

The p-value of the test is 0.0018, which means that for a level of significance higher than this, there is sufficient evidence to claim that less than 50% of Internet users get their health questions answered online.

9+5+1+5+4=24 In

this shld be the ans.

if its that simple

The closest to the number of yards of ribbon Mario had altogether will be 11 yards

A fraction is a part of the whole number, and a way to split up a number into equal parts. Or, A number that is expressed as a quotient is called a fraction. It can be written in the form of p: q, which is equivalent to p / q.

Given that;

Mario had 8 1/5 yards of ribbon for a project.

And, Sue gave him 2 3/4 more yards of ribbon.

Since Mario had 8 1/5 yards of ribbon for a project. And, Sue gave him 2 3/4 more yards of ribbon.

Hence, Total ribbon for the project Mario have = 8 1/5 yards + 2 3/4 yards

= 41/5 + 11/4

= (164 + 55) / 20

= 219 / 20 yards

= 10.95 yards

≈ 11 yards

Thus, the total ribbon for the project Mario has = 11 yards

The complete question is given below;-

Mario had 8 1/5 yards of ribbon for a project. Sue gave him 2 3/4 more yards of ribbon. Which is closest to the number of yards of ribbon Mario had altogether?

To learn more about the fraction visit:

brainly.com/question/5454147

#SPJ1

She would need to make two extra grades of 86 each.

Here we can see that the average of the scores that Victoria would need to make is an average score of 85 so as to be able to pull through. In this case, we can see that we have the scores; 82, 81, and 90

Let the scores tat we have to count twice be p each and then we have;

85 = 82 + 81 + 90 + p + p/5

85 = 253 + 2p/5

5(85) = 253 + 2p

p = 5(85)  - 253/2

p = 86

Hence, the twice scores that need to be earned for Victoria are both 86.

Learn more about average score:https://brainly.com/question/28993111

#SPJ1

Answer:2/10, which can be reduced to 1/5.  

2. If a tank is 5/8 filled with solution, how much of the tank is empty?  

Ans: 3/8 of the tank is empty. Since the whole tank would equal 8/8, or 1, and 5/8 of it is filled, then that  

means 3/8 of it remains empty.  

3. 1/2 x 3/5 x2/3 =  

Ans: 6/30, which can be reduced to 1/5.

4. 5/9 ÷ 4/11 =  

Ans: 55/36. You cannot reduce this fraction any further.  

5. Convert 27/4 to a decimal.  

Ans: 6.75. This answer is arrived at by dividing 4 into 27.  

6. Convert 0.45 to a fraction.  

Ans: 45/100, which can be reduced to 9/20.  

7. 4.27 x 1.6 =  

Ans: 6.832  

8. 6.5 ÷ 0.8 =  

Ans: 8.125  

9. 12 + 4.52 + 245.621 =  

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5/3 is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.6 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex] \frac{8}{5}~hours~~or~~1.6~hours} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{4}{5}~of~2~hours = [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{4}{5} \times 2~hours [/tex]

[tex]= \frac{4}{5} \times \frac{2}{1}~hours[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{4 \times 2}{5 \times 1}~hours [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{8}{5}~hours [/tex]

[tex] = 1.6~hours [/tex]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4/15

Step-by-step explanation:

find common denominators, which is 15

multiply 2/3 by 5 and and 2/5 by 3

2 x 5 = 10 and

3 x 5 = 15

10/15

2 x 3 = 6 and

5 x 3 = 15

6/15

subtract numerators

10 - 6

 15

= 4/15

Answer:

10 ml of 10%

30 ml of 50%

Step-by-step explanation:

x = amount of 10%

40 - x = amount of 50%

-------------------------------------

10x + 50(40 - x) = 40(40)

10x + 2000 - 50x = 1600

-40x + 2000 = 1600

-40x = -400

x = 10 ml of 10%

40 - x = 30 ml of 50%

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

By sampling a larger proportion of Mississippi's population, the percentage of people who wear seatbelts in Mississippi surveys would be closer and nearer to the population proportion.

The rule of large numbers states that if we collect samples of increasing size from every population (here, Mississippi vs. Washington WA state), the sampling distribution's mean, px, continues to get closer and nearer to the actual true population proportion (p).

Recall that as n becomes greater, the sample mean obeys a normal distribution because of the Central Limit Theorem. However, as (n) rises, the sampling distribution's standard deviation reduces.

where:

sampling proportion's standard deviation = [tex]\sqrt{\dfrac{p((1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

If n rises, the sample proportion [tex]P_x[/tex] have to get nearer to the population proportion P.

For both counties, the sample size is 1000, but the true population varies. According to the provided statement, the true population of Mississippi (3 million) is less than that of Washington State (7.5 Million). As a result, we can confidently assume that our sampling proportion in Mississippi seems to be much closer to the true actual population than our sampling proportion in Washington state.

Answer:

answers 3

Step-by-step explanation:

took more thinking than it should've tbh (3-2=1) (3+10=13) 1x13=13

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Just find where both lines intersect. In this case, the two lines intersect at the point (2,4)

Answer: 0.071%

Step-by-step explanation:

To get from $3.50 - $3.75, there was an increase of $0.25.

(Sorry if I'm getting the currency bit wrong, I'm British.)

Divide 0.25 by the original cost of 3.50, and you get:

0.07142857142857142857142857142857

Round this and you get a 0.071% increase

Answer:

The percent change in the price of a gallon of gas is 0.0714%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, The price increased from $3.50 to $3.75, a change of $0.25.

So,

$0.25 ÷ $3.50 × 100% = 0.0714%

Thus, The percent change in the price of a gallon of gas is 0.0714%.

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

Cuz the factor of y is angle to the 115° is to the Y value

The angle measure of ∠F is approximately 66.9º.

What is an angle?

To find ∠F, we can use the Law of Cosines:

c² = a² + b² - 2ab cos(C)

Where c is the side opposite to the angle we want to find (in this case, side EF), a and b are the other two sides, and C is the angle opposite to side c (in this case, ∠F).

First, we need to find the length of side EF:

EF² = DE² + DF² - 2DE * DF cos(∠D)

EF² = (9.8)² + (5.6)² - 2(9.8)(5.6)cos(149º)

EF² ≈ 95.415

EF ≈ 9.769

Now, we can use the Law of Cosines again to find ∠F:

EF² = DE² + DF² - 2DE * DF cos(∠F)

cos(∠F) = (DE² + DF² - EF²) / 2DE * DF

cos(∠F) = ((9.8)² + (5.6)² - (9.769)²) / (2 * 9.8 * 5.6)

cos(∠F) ≈ 0.4035

∠F ≈ [tex]cos^{-1(0.4035)}[/tex]

∠F ≈ 66.9º (rounded to the nearest 10th)

Therefore, the measure of ∠F is approximately 66.9º.

To know more about angle, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ1

Complete question is: In ADEF, e = 9.8 inches, f = 5.6 inches and ZD=149º, the measure of ∠F is approximately 66.9º.

Teacher: In all your subjects I am giving you D's.

Student: Well I am also going to be giving you D's.

Teacher: What do you mean?

Student: Deeez nuts!

Step-by-step explanation:

try this option:

[tex]a) \ log_{15}5+log_{15}3=log_{15}15;\\b) \ log_{1/2}log_{49}7=log_77;\\c) \ log_44=log_22.[/tex]