Answer:
A. Introducing non-native plants and animals
B. Cutting canals
D. Building levees and other flood control structures
Explanation:
Human activities have significantly contributed to coastal erosion of wetlands in Louisiana. Introducing non-native plants and animals can disrupt the natural balance of wetland ecosystems, leading to the degradation of native vegetation and wildlife habitats.
Cutting canals, such as for navigation or oil and gas exploration, can alter the hydrology of wetlands. This can cause increased saltwater intrusion, reduced freshwater flow, and loss of sediment deposition, all of which contribute to wetland loss and erosion.
Building levees and other flood control structures, while aimed at protecting human settlements from flooding, can have unintended consequences for wetlands. By restricting the natural flow of sediment and freshwater into wetland areas, these structures disrupt the natural processes that sustain wetland health and can lead to erosion and subsidence.
Restoration projects, on the other hand, are aimed at mitigating the impacts of human activities and restoring wetland habitats. They are not a factor contributing to coastal erosion but rather an effort to counteract its effects and promote wetland preservation and recovery.
Therefore, options A, B, and D are ways in which humans have contributed to coastal erosion of the wetlands in Louisiana. Option C, restoration projects, is not a factor contributing to erosion but rather a measure to combat and mitigate its effects.
laws that were unable to change after the apartheid laws in 1994
Certain laws, such as the Group Areas Act, Land Act, and Bantu Education Act, remained unchanged after apartheid in 1994.
Following the abolition of apartheid laws in 1994, several laws remained unchanged despite the collective efforts to bring about comprehensive change in South Africa. One such law was the Group Areas Act, which enforced racial segregation and restricted non-white individuals from residing in designated white areas. Despite its discriminatory nature, the Group Areas Act was not immediately repealed, resulting in continued spatial segregation and limited housing opportunities for marginalized communities.Another law that persisted was the Land Act, which allocated land ownership predominantly to white individuals and limited land access for non-white populations. This perpetuated unequal distribution of land and hindered the process of land reform and redistribution.Additionally, aspects of the Bantu Education Act remained unchanged, contributing to educational disparities among different racial groups. The Act, which enforced separate and inferior education for non-white students, had long-lasting effects on educational opportunities and quality.These laws, among others, demonstrated the challenges faced in dismantling the systemic legacies of apartheid and the complexities involved in transforming the legal framework to ensure equality and justice for all South Africans.The complete question should be Which laws remained unchanged after the apartheid laws in 1994, despite the efforts to bring about change?For more questions on apartheid
https://brainly.com/question/413554
#SPJ8
Can anyone help with this?
Answer:
B. Many Pakistanis criticized their government for helping Western powers in the struggle against militant Islam.
Explanation:
Pakistans role in the fight against terrorism raise dad tension in the country because many Pakistanis criticized their government for helping Western powers in the struggle against militant Islam.
Hope this helps!
How did Hitler and Stalin maintain everyday control of their citizens?
Answer:
Hitler and Stalin maintained control of their citizens through the use of terror tactics, stringent regulations, and government propaganda. Hitler's Nazi Party employed ruthless measures such as Gestapo secret police to terrorize citizens and eliminate any opposition. Stalin also used secret police (the NKVD), labor camps, limited access to food and medical care, and millions of executions to instill fear among his citizens. Both dictators also relied heavily on using government-sponsored propaganda to increase public support for their regimes and control the flow of information. Furthermore, citizens in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were required to adhere to a wide array of restrictions and regulations in order to maintain order and prevent the spread of rebellious ideas.
Explanation:
Which idea applies to the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale?
A.
Courts should be involved in matters of voting rights.
B.
Prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause.
C.
Only the federal government can establish voting laws.
D.
Religious services in schools violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer: B. Prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause
Explanation: The idea that applies to the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale is that prayer in schools violates the Establishment Clause.
Drag each label to the correct location on the table
Match powers granted by the US Constitution to their types.
issue drivers' licenses
conduct elections
print money
make treaties with other countries
defense of the homeland
Enumerated Powers
Reserved Powers
The correct matching will be:
issue drivers' licenses - Reserved Powersconduct elections - Reserved Powersprint money - Enumerated Powersmake treaties with other countries - Enumerated Powersdefense of the homeland - Reserved PowersIssue drivers' licenses and conducting elections are examples of reserved powers granted by the US Constitution. Reserved powers are those not specifically delegated to the federal government and are instead reserved for the states. These powers allow states to regulate and manage certain aspects within their jurisdiction. On the other hand, the power to print money and make treaties with other countries are enumerated powers, explicitly granted to the federal government. The authority to defend the homeland falls under both categories, as it involves a combination of reserved powers exercised by the states and enumerated powers vested in the federal government, working together to ensure the safety and security of the nation.For more questions on Reserved Powers:
https://brainly.com/question/3599116
#SPJ8
How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the New England and souther colonies
Answer:
Most of the people in the middle colonies were Puritan
Puritan means: a member of a group of English Protestants of the late 16th and 17th centuries who regarded the Reformation of the Church of England under Elizabeth as incomplete and sought to simplify and regulate forms of worship.
Hope this helps:)
Answer: New England had skilled craftsmen in the industry of shipbuilding. The Mid-Atlantic presented a diverse workforce of farmers, fisherman, and merchants. The Southern Colonies were primarily agricultural with few cities and limited schools.
Explanation:↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Who was responsible for civil rights
Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation: President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964—legislation initiated by President John F. Kennedy before his assassination—into law on July 2 of that year. King and other civil rights activists witnessed the signing.
Answer: President Lyndon Johnson
Despite Kennedy's assassination in November of 1963, his proposal culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Lyndon Johnson signed it into law just a few hours after it was passed by Congress on July 2, 1964.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Which descriptions of the Ottoman Empire are accurate?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Responses
founded by Osman in the thirteenth century
expanded through Africa and Asia but could not successfully invade Europe
experienced frequent conflict with Safavid Shi'ites as Sunni Muslims
included territory that is now part of Turkey, Greece, and Egypt at its height
had a brief moment of glory before being conquered by Mongols
Answer:
The correct descriptions of the Ottoman Empire are:
Founded by Osman in the thirteenth century Experienced frequent conflict with Safavid Shi'ites as Sunni Muslims Included territory that is now part of Turkey, Greece, and Egypt at its heightWhy in about 400 AD would settlers choose to settle on Easter Island?
Settlers may have chosen to settle on Easter Island around 400 AD due to its abundant natural resources, fertile land, and strategic location for trade and exploration.
The settlers who chose to settle on Easter Island around 400 AD were likely attracted by several factors.
First, the island offered a range of natural resources, including timber, fresh water, and fertile soil, which would have supported agricultural activities and provided sustenance for the settlers.
Additionally, the surrounding waters provided a rich source of fish and other marine life, ensuring a reliable food supply.
Furthermore, Easter Island's isolated location in the Pacific Ocean may have made it an attractive choice for settlers seeking a place to establish a new community. The distance from other populated areas could have provided a sense of security and allowed the settlers to maintain their own distinct culture and way of life.
Lastly, the strategic location of Easter Island may have played a role in attracting settlers. It served as a stopping point for voyagers and explorers crossing the Pacific, making it a hub for trade and exchange of goods and ideas.
In conclusion, the abundant natural resources, fertile land, and strategic location of Easter Island likely influenced settlers' decision to establish a settlement there around 400 AD.
For more questions on Settlers
https://brainly.com/question/24347206
#SPJ8
which was a result of britains plan to declonize india?
Answer: b. two new nations - a Hindu India and a Muslim Pakistan
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Which Progressive wrote a book that led to Standard Oil being broken up into smaller businesses? Responses a. Jane Addams
b. Ida Tarbell c. Upton Sinclair d. Jacob Riis
Answer:
Ida Tarbell wrote the book "The History of the Standard Oil Company" which exposed John D. Rockefeller's business practices and eventually led to the break up of the company into smaller businesses
Explanation:
What is common complaint among protesters?
Answer:
Explanation:
Protesters may have various complaints depending on the specific context and issues they are advocating for. However, there are a few common complaints that often emerge among protesters:
1. Injustice and Inequality: Many protesters voice their concerns about perceived injustices and inequalities within society. This can include issues related to social, economic, racial, or gender inequality, as well as grievances against systems or institutions that they believe perpetuate unfairness.
2. Human Rights Violations: Protesters often raise concerns about human rights violations, both domestically and internationally. This can involve advocating for civil liberties, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and opposing actions or policies that they believe infringe upon these rights.
3. Government Actions and Policies: Protesters frequently voice their opposition to specific government actions or policies that they perceive as detrimental to the public interest or contrary to their values. This can range from protesting against specific laws, government decisions, or controversial policies, such as those related to healthcare, education, immigration, or the environment.
4. Police Brutality and Misconduct: Protests against police brutality and misconduct are widespread and highlight concerns over excessive use of force, racial profiling, and systemic issues within law enforcement agencies. Such protests often call for police reform and accountability measures.
5. Environmental Issues: Many protests focus on environmental concerns, such as climate change, deforestation, pollution, or unsustainable practices. Activists often advocate for stronger environmental regulations, renewable energy, conservation efforts, and sustainable development.
6. War and Conflict: Demonstrations against wars, military interventions, and conflicts are another common complaint among protesters. These protests may express opposition to specific military actions, advocate for peaceful resolutions, or demand an end to armed conflicts.
It's important to note that the specific complaints can vary significantly depending on the social, political, and cultural context in which protests occur. Protest movements are driven by a wide range of grievances, and the above examples provide a general overview of common concerns raised by protesters worldwide.
The following passage is from The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848.
“Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. The proletarians [workers] have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!”
Which best explains what Marx hoped to get across?
Workers are slaves and should be inspired to revolt.
Workers should unite in the communist movement.
Workers should scare rulers into giving up their wealth.
Workers must be asked to incite a revolution against the rich.
Marx hoped to get across is: Workers should unite in the communist movement.
In the quoted passage from The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx expresses his hope for the unity of the working class in the communist movement. Marx believed that the ruling classes, or bourgeoisie, held economic and political power over the proletariat, the working class. He saw this class division as inherently exploitative, with the bourgeoisie benefiting from the labor of the proletariat.Marx's statement is a call to action for the workers, encouraging them to recognize their collective power and to come together in solidarity. By emphasizing that the proletarians have "nothing to lose but their chains," Marx implies that workers are currently oppressed and alienated by the capitalist system. He suggests that through unity and revolution, they can free themselves from this oppression and work towards building a new world.Marx's ultimate goal was the establishment of a communist society where class distinctions and the exploitation of labor would be eliminated. By urging the working men of all countries to unite, Marx sought to mobilize the working class to challenge the existing social and economic order and to strive for a society based on principles of equality and shared ownership of resources.It is important to note that while the passage highlights Marx's call for workers' unity, understanding his broader ideas and the historical context in which they were written is necessary for a comprehensive interpretation of his work.The correct option is: Workers should unite in the communist movement.
For more such questions on communist movement.
https://brainly.com/question/3055516
#SPJ8
Witch period of egyptian occurred closest to the beginnig of the common era
The period of Egyptian history that occurred closest to the beginning of the Common Era is the Ptolemaic period.
Explanation: The Ptolemaic period in Egypt refers to the dynasty of pharaohs who ruled Egypt after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BCE until the Roman conquest of Egypt in 30 BCE. The Ptolemaic dynasty was founded by Ptolemy I Soter, one of Alexander's generals. This period is named after the ruling dynasty, which was of Macedonian-Greek origin.
The Ptolemaic period is known for its significant Greek influence and Hellenization of Egyptian culture. The Ptolemies adopted many aspects of Egyptian pharaonic traditions and presented themselves as pharaohs, but they also promoted Greek language, customs, and religion. The city of Alexandria, founded by Alexander the Great, became a thriving center of intellectual and cultural exchange during this period.
The end of the Ptolemaic period and the beginning of the Common Era marked a transition in Egyptian history as the Roman Empire gradually expanded its influence over the Mediterranean region. With the defeat of the last Ptolemaic queen, Cleopatra VII, by the Roman general Octavian (later known as Augustus), Egypt became a Roman province in 30 BCE. This marked the end of the Ptolemaic rule and the beginning of direct Roman control over Egypt.
In summary, the Ptolemaic period of Egyptian history, characterized by the rule of the Ptolemaic dynasty and the blending of Greek and Egyptian cultures, occurred closest to the beginning of the Common Era. It came to an end with the Roman conquest of Egypt, marking a significant transition in the region's history.
To learn more about Egyptian click here:
brainly.com/question/27926504
#SPJ11
What did Muhammad instruct his followers to do during his Farewell Sermon?
Answer:
During his Farewell Sermon, Muhammad instructed his followers to adhere to the teachings he had set forth in the Quran and sunnah. He also emphasized the importance of unity among Muslims and warned against committing acts of injustice and spreading mischief in the land. Additionally, he reminded his followers of the sanctity of human life and property and advised them to treat women with kindness and care. Finally, he concluded the sermon with the famous words: "Take heed, therefore, to yourselves concerning them; it is not lawful to shed their blood or take their property without lawful right."
Explanation:
Answer: Muhammad instructed his followers to do the following during his Farewell Sermon:
To uphold the sanctity of life, property, and honor of all Muslims, and to avoid injustice and oppression.To abolish the practices of the pre-Islamic era, such as usury, blood vengeance, and tribalism, and to establish a brotherhood of faith and equality among all Muslims.To treat their women with kindness and respect, and to grant them their rights and duties.To worship God alone, and to perform the pillars of Islam, such as prayer, fasting, charity, and pilgrimage.To follow his example and teachings, and to hold fast to the Quran and the sunnah.
Explanation: Muhammad’s Farewell Sermon is considered by Muslims to be one of his most important and comprehensive speeches, delivered shortly before his death on his final pilgrimage to Mecca. It summarizes the main teachings of Islam and provides guidance for Muslims on various aspects of their personal and social lives. Some of the main points that Muhammad instructed his followers to do during his Farewell Sermon are:
To uphold the sanctity of life, property, and honor of all Muslims, and to avoid injustice and oppression. Muhammad reminded his followers that they are all equal before God, and that they should not harm or wrong each other in any way. He declared that all bloodshed, theft, and violation of rights that occurred in the pre-Islamic era are forgiven and cancelled, and that no one has any claim or revenge over another. He also warned them that they will have to face God on the Day of Judgment and account for their deeds.To abolish the practices of the pre-Islamic era, such as usury, blood vengeance, and tribalism, and to establish a brotherhood of faith and equality among all Muslims. Muhammad denounced the customs and traditions that were based on ignorance and injustice, such as charging interest on loans, seeking revenge for bloodshed, and discriminating against people based on their race or lineage. He urged his followers to renounce these practices and to adopt a new way of life based on Islam. He emphasized that all Muslims are brothers and sisters, regardless of their origin or status, and that they should love and support each other.To treat their women with kindness and respect, and to grant them their rights and duties. Muhammad addressed the issue of women’s rights and responsibilities in Islam, which were often neglected or abused by men. He reminded his followers that women are their partners and helpers, not their property or slaves. He instructed them to feed and clothe them well, to honor their dignity and privacy, and to not oppress or harm them. He also stated that women have obligations towards their husbands, such as being faithful and obedient, and not making friends with those whom their husbands disapprove of.To worship God alone, and to perform the pillars of Islam, such as prayer, fasting, charity, and pilgrimage. Muhammad reaffirmed the core belief of Islam: that there is no god but God (Allah), and that Muhammad is His messenger. He urged his followers to worship God sincerely and exclusively, without associating any partners or idols with Him. He also reminded them of the essential acts of worship that they should perform regularly: the five daily prayers (salah), the fasting during Ramadan (sawm), the obligatory charity (zakat), and the pilgrimage to Mecca (hajj) if they have the means.To follow his example and teachings, and to hold fast to the Quran and the sunnah. Muhammad declared that he has completed his mission of conveying God’s message to humanity, and that he has left behind two sources of guidance for Muslims: the Quran (the word of God) and the sunnah (the example of Muhammad). He advised his followers to adhere to these sources faithfully and diligently, without adding or subtracting anything from them. He also warned them against dividing into sects or factions over religious matters.Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)
How were the motivations for establishing NATO and the Warsaw Pact similar?
A. Both were established to end the trade of nuclear weapons.
B. Both were established to protect the interests of countries with similar economic systems.
C. Both were established to spread the influence of the United States.
D. Both were established to provide financial assistance for countries rebuilding in postwar Europe.
Answer:
D. Both were established to provide financial assistance for countries rebuilding in postwar Europe is the most accurate statement regarding the motivations for establishing NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
When Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor in Germany, which of the following became an official policy?
When Adolf Hitler became Chancellor in Germany, the official policies that emerged included anti-Semitism, the establishment of a totalitarian state, and the pursuit of aggressive expansionist goals. These policies had far-reaching consequences, leading to the persecution of minority groups, the erosion of civil liberties, and ultimately, the devastation of World War II.
When Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor in Germany, one of the official policies that emerged was the implementation of the Nazi Party's ideology, which included the promotion of Aryan supremacy and the persecution of minority groups, particularly Jews. This policy, known as anti-Semitism, aimed to exclude Jews from society, strip them of their rights, and ultimately eliminate them from Germany.
Under Hitler's leadership, the Nazi regime implemented a series of discriminatory laws and regulations that targeted Jews. One of the most significant policies was the Nuremberg Laws, introduced in 1935, which stripped Jews of their German citizenship and prohibited marriage or sexual relations between Jews and non-Jews. These laws institutionalized the persecution of Jews and laid the groundwork for further oppressive measures.
Another official policy implemented by Hitler was the establishment of a totalitarian state. Hitler and the Nazi Party sought to centralize power and control all aspects of German society, including politics, economy, education, and culture. They suppressed political opposition, silenced dissenting voices, and implemented a system of propaganda to manipulate public opinion and maintain their grip on power.
Furthermore, Hitler's appointment as Chancellor also marked the beginning of Germany's rearmament and expansionist policies. In violation of the Treaty of Versailles, which had imposed restrictions on Germany's military capabilities after World War I, Hitler initiated a massive military buildup and embarked on territorial expansion. This aggressive policy eventually led to the invasion of neighboring countries and the outbreak of World War II.
for more questions on World War II.
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ8
the women's rights movement fractured along racial lines because?
The women's rights movement fractured along racial lines primarily due to differing experiences and priorities shaped by the intersecting dynamics of race, gender, and class.
The mainstream women's suffrage movement in the United States was predominantly led by white women who focused primarily on securing voting rights for themselves.Women of color, particularly Black women, faced additional layers of discrimination and oppression stemming from racial inequality.The experiences of women of color, including the harsh realities of racism and segregation, led them to advocate for broader social justice issues beyond suffrage alone. They recognized that the fight for gender equality must also address the systemic racism and racial violence faced by communities of color.The mainstream suffrage movement often marginalized or excluded women of color, reinforcing racial divisions within the broader struggle for women's rights. The emphasis on a single-issue agenda and the prioritization of the concerns of white women created a division and limited the ability to build a united front.The fracturing of the women's rights movement along racial lines highlights the importance of intersectionality in understanding social justice movements. It underscores the need for recognizing and addressing the distinct experiences and challenges faced by different groups of women based on their racial identities, in order to foster a more inclusive and comprehensive movement for gender equality.For more such questions on women's rights movement
https://brainly.com/question/14986743
#SPJ8
__ vastly expanded Persian territories, establishing the___, which was the largest the world had ever seen.
Answer: Cyrus the Great; Persian empire
Explanation: Cyrus the Great vastly expanded Persian territories, establishing the Persian Empire, which was the largest the world had ever seen.
Why do you think the native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico
weren’t able to effectively resist the Spanish? What is a key
factor that stands out to you?
The native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to several factors that played against them. The Spanish were able to defeat the native people through their advanced technology and weapons, as well as through the diseases that they brought with them.
The native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to several factors that played against them. The Spanish were able to defeat the native people through their advanced technology and weapons, as well as through the diseases that they brought with them. In addition, the Spanish were able to gain the support of other native groups who had been oppressed by the same people they were fighting. A key factor that stands out in this situation is the technological advancements of the Spanish. They had guns, cannons, and horses, which the native people had never seen before. This gave them a significant advantage in battle, as well as in intimidating the native people. Furthermore, the Spanish had armor, which made them difficult to kill with the native people's weapons. The diseases that the Spanish brought with them were also devastating to the native people. The Spanish were immune to these diseases, but the native people were not, which led to a significant loss of life. In conclusion, the native peoples of the Caribbean and Mexico were unable to effectively resist the Spanish due to the Spanish's technological advantages and the diseases they brought with them.
To know more about technology visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9171028
#SPJ11
In which country did fascism start, and who was the leader that started
that style of government?
Answer: It started in Italy and the leader that started it was Benito Mussolini.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Why did Hitler most likely believe Germany had a right to invade other countries?
Answer:
Explanation:
Hitler most likely believed that Germany had a right to invade other countries because he believed that the Treaty of Versailles did not mention that Germany could not invade other countries.He embraced the concept nationalism and had a superiority complex, believing that the German race was far superior than the rest
The participants in Washington's Constitutional Convention worked to..
Answer:
The participants in Washington's Constitutional Convention worked to create a document that would serve as a framework for the laws, government, and fundamental principles of the United States of America. They sought to provide the nation with an effective and unified system of government to replace the Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each hypothesis/arguments for extinction of Pleistocene Megafauna in North America?
1. Climate change with warm weather.
2. Overkill by humans(by hunting).
Answer:
The extinction of Pleistocene Megafauna in North America is a complex issue that has been the subject of much debate and research. Two of the main hypotheses that have been proposed to explain this extinction are climate change and overkill by humans. Here are some of the strengths and weaknesses of each hypothesis:
Climate Change Hypothesis:
Strengths:
- There is strong evidence that the climate was warming at the end of the Pleistocene epoch, which could have had a significant impact on the environment and the survival of megafauna.
- Climate change could have caused changes in vegetation patterns, which could have affected the availability of food for megafauna.
- Climate change could have also caused changes in the distribution of water resources, which could have affected the survival of megafauna that relied on water sources.
Weaknesses:
- The timing of the extinction of megafauna does not perfectly align with the timing of climate change. Some species went extinct before the most significant warming occurred.
- There were previous periods of climate change during the Pleistocene epoch that megafauna survived, which suggests that climate change alone may not have been the sole cause of extinction.
Overkill Hypothesis:
Strengths:
- There is evidence that humans were present in North America at the time of the megafauna extinction and that they were hunting large animals.
- There is also evidence that humans were capable of causing extinctions on other continents, such as Australia.
Weaknesses:
- There is some debate about the extent to which humans were responsible for the extinction of megafauna. Some researchers argue that the timing of the extinction does not match up with the arrival of humans, and that other factors may have been at play.
- There is also some evidence that suggests that humans may have coexisted with megafauna for thousands of years before the extinction, which suggests that overhunting may not have been the sole cause.
Overall, both the climate change and overkill hypotheses have their strengths and weaknesses, and it is likely that a combination of factors contributed to the extinction of Pleistocene Megafauna in North America. Further research and evidence may be needed to fully understand the complex causes of this extinction.
Which phrase best completes this diagram?
The Virginia
Plan for the
federal
government
?
Favored by
larger states
A. Established the executive branch as superior to the legislative and
judicial branches
B. Was particularly advantageous to southern states
C. Called for each state's representation in Congress to be based on
population size dy
D. Created a unicameral, or one-house, Congress
Answer:
The correct option is C
Explanation:
Called for each state's representation in Congress to be based on population size.
Match each battle with its description.
Tiles
Pearl Harbor
El Alamein
Midway
Guadalcanal
Stalingrad
Anzio
Pairs
decisive naval victory for the United States
arrowBoth
battle that gave Allies control of Italy
arrowBoth
attack that caused the United States to enter the war
arrowBoth
single bloodiest battle of the twentieth century
arrowBoth
battle that prevented German troops from seizing
the Suez Canal
arrowBoth
battle for control of the sea route that connected
the United States with Australia
arrowBoth
The battles and their descriptions are as follows:
Pearl Harbor: attack that caused the United States to enter the war.Midway: decisive naval victory for the United States.Stalingrad: single bloodiest battle of the twentieth century.El Alamein: battle that prevented German troops from seizing the Suez Canal.Guadalcanal: battle for control of the sea route that connected the United States with Australia.Anzio: battle that gave Allies control of Italy.Pearl Harbor refers to the surprise military strike by the Imperial Japanese Navy on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 1941. The attack led to the United States' entry into World War II.The Battle of Midway was a pivotal naval battle fought in the Pacific in June 1942. The United States decisively defeated the Japanese fleet and turned the tide of the war in the Pacific in favor of the Allies.Stalingrad was a major battle fought between German and Soviet forces from August 1942 to February 1943. It was one of the deadliest battles in history, resulting in significant casualties and the defeat of the German army, marking a turning point on the Eastern Front.El Alamein refers to two battles fought in Egypt during World War II (1942). The second Battle of El Alamein was a significant Allied victory that prevented German troops from capturing the Suez Canal and halted their advance in North Africa.Guadalcanal was a campaign fought between the United States and Japan in the Pacific during World War II. The battle for Guadalcanal was crucial in securing control of the sea route between the United States and Australia.The Battle of Anzio took place in Italy in 1944. It resulted in the Allied forces gaining control of Anzio and the surrounding area, allowing them to launch an offensive and eventually liberate Rome.In summary, each battle played a significant role in World War II, with Pearl Harbor bringing the United States into the war, Midway securing a crucial naval victory, Stalingrad being the bloodiest battle, El Alamein preventing German advancement, Guadalcanal securing a sea route, and Anzio giving the Allies control of Italy.
For more questions on battles
https://brainly.com/question/27228932
#SPJ8
1. What were the laws of migration from 1895?
2. What are some of the largest source countries for migration and the largest destination countries?
3. Why is migration within and into Europe extremely frequent?
4. What are 5 stages of U.S. immigration?.
5. What are 3 different migration patterns that have historically taken place within the US?.
Answer:
1. The Laws of Migration from 1895 refer to a set of principles developed by British demographer Ernst Ravenstein. These laws describe patterns observed in human migration and include:
- Most migrants move only a short distance.
- Long-distance migration is typically to larger cities and urban centers.
- Rural areas are more likely to be the source of migrants than urban areas.
- Migration is typically driven by economic reasons, such as seeking employment or better wages.
- Migration is typically counterbalanced by movements in the opposite direction.
2. The largest source countries for migration vary depending on the time period and region, but some of the countries that have historically been major sources of migration include Mexico, India, China, and the Philippines. The largest destination countries for migration include the United States, Canada, Australia, and various countries in Europe.
3. Migration within and into Europe is frequent for a number of reasons, including:
- The European Union's policy of free movement within member countries.
- The continent's history of colonialism and its legacy of migration and settlement.
- The ongoing conflicts and political instability in parts of the Middle East and Africa, which have led to large numbers of refugees and migrants seeking asylum in Europe.
- Economic factors, such as the search for better job opportunities and living standards.
4. The five stages of U.S. immigration, as described by historian Roger Daniels, are as follows:
- Pre-1820: The period of colonization and settlement by European immigrants.
- 1820-1880: The period of mass immigration, primarily from Northern and Western Europe.
- 1880-1924: The period of peak immigration, with large numbers of immigrants coming from Southern and Eastern Europe.
- 1924-1965: The period of restriction, with strict quotas and limits on immigration.
- 1965-present: The period of modern immigration, with a more diverse range of immigrants coming from all parts of the world.
5. Three different migration patterns that have historically taken place within the US include:
- Westward migration: The movement of settlers across the North American continent, particularly during the 19th century, in search of land, resources, and new opportunities.
- Urbanization: The movement of people from rural areas to cities in search of employment and other opportunities, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- Internal migration: The movement of people from one part of the country to another, often for economic reasons, such as the movement of African Americans from the rural South to urban centers in the North and West during the Great Migration of the early 20th century.
What did Alexander Hamilton not do as secretary of the Treasury.
The Great Plains are part of a
of rainfall each year and have very few trees.
OA grassland
OB. temperate forest
OC. desert
OD chaparral
ecosystem. They receive 20 to 35 inches
A
Answer: A
Explanation: The Northern Great Plains spans more than 180 million acres and crosses five U.S. states and two Canadian provinces. As large as California and Nevada combined, this short- and mixed-grass prairie is one of only four remaining intact temperate grasslands in the world.
YIPPPEE
What was presidents Roosevelt response to kristallnacht
Answer:
President Roosevelt responded to Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, by publicly condemning the violence and calling for an investigation into the incident. He also recalled US Ambassador Hugh Wilson from Germany in response to the Nazi treatment of Jews, and increased immigration quotas for refugees from Germany. The US Congress also passed a joint resolution condemning the “atrocities” and expressing support for the “civilized world”. Roosevelt’s response was considered relatively weak, however, in comparison to other democratic nations that sent troops to prevent similar episodes.
Explanation: