The two-way frequency table shows the results of a survey of middle school students.


Find the probability that a randomly chosen student is a male who enjoys reading. Round


to the nearest thousandth.


Totals


Enjoys Reading


Female


Male


Enjoyment of Reading


Yes


No


40


30


15


30


55


60


70


45


Totals


115

We find that the maximum possible number of animals is 37, with 17 white mice and 20 rabbits.

Let's use the following variables:

x be the number of white mice

Let y be the number of rabbits

Based on the given information, we can create the following system of linear inequalities:

10x + 12y ≤ 420 (maximum time available in environment I)

25x + 15y ≤ 600 (maximum time available in environment II)

We also have the constraints that x and y must be non-negative integers.

To solve this problem, we can use a graphing approach. We can graph each inequality on the same coordinate plane and shade the region that satisfies all the constraints. The feasible region will be the region that is shaded.

However, since x and y must be integers, we need to find the corner points of the feasible region and test each one to see which one gives us the maximum value of x + y.

To find the corner points, we can solve each inequality for one variable and then substitute into the other inequality:

For the first inequality: 12y ≤ 420 - 10x, so y ≤ (420 - 10x)/12

For the second inequality: 15y ≤ 600 - 25x, so y ≤ (600 - 25x)/15

Since y must be a non-negative integer, we can use the floor function to round down to the nearest integer:

For the first inequality: y ≤ ⌊(420 - 10x)/12⌋

For the second inequality: y ≤ ⌊(600 - 25x)/15⌋

We can then plot these two expressions on the same graph and find the points where they intersect. We can then test each point to see if it satisfies all the constraints and if it gives us the maximum value of x + y.

After doing all the calculations, we find that the maximum possible number of animals is 37, with 17 white mice and 20 rabbits.

To know more about variables refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

It appears that the relationship between the number of registered pleasure boats and manatee deaths fluctuates over the years. While there is no clear trend, it is important to consider the possible effects of increased boat registration on manatee populations.

The table you provided shows the number of registered pleasure boats (in tens of thousands) and the number of manatee deaths caused by boats in Florida from 1991 to 2014.

When the number of registered pleasure boats increases, there could be a higher likelihood of boat-related manatee deaths. As more boats are present in the water, manatees may face increased risks from boat strikes, which can lead to injuries or fatalities. Additionally, more boats may lead to habitat destruction, indirectly affecting manatee populations.

It is crucial for boat owners to follow safe boating practices to protect manatees and their habitats. Some measures to reduce manatee deaths include obeying speed limits in designated manatee zones, wearing polarized sunglasses to increase visibility, and being cautious in shallow areas where manatees might be feeding or resting.

In conclusion, the relationship between the number of registered pleasure boats and manatee deaths in Florida is complex and fluctuating. However, it is essential for boat owners to be aware of the potential risks and take necessary precautions to protect these gentle marine mammals.

To know more about registered pleasure boats refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19546124#

#SPJ11

The expression for the area of the flower garden is (45+2x)(20+2x) - 900.

Area of vegetable garden:

[tex]A_v = 45 ft * 20 ft[/tex] = 900 sq ft

Dimensions of entire garden:

Length = 45 ft + 2x

Width = 20 ft + 2x

Area of entire garden:

[tex]A_e = (45+2x)(20+2x)[/tex]

Area of flower garden:

[tex]A_f = A_e - A_v = (45+2x)(20+2x) - 900 sq ft[/tex]

So, the expression for the area of the flower garden is (45+2x)(20+2x) - 900.

Read more about area here:

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

Pick any of the two points...I'll use the first two

calculate slope:     m  = ( y1-y2) / (x1-x2) =  (-14 - -5) / (-2 -1) = -9/-3 = 3

   equation of a line in slope intercept form is y = mx+ b

      so now you have    y = 3x + b  

             sub in any of the x,y  points given (8,16)  to calculate 'b'

                             16 = 3 (8) + b

                                  b = -8

so your first line is     y = 3x - 8

In a similar fashion, for the second one   m = - 5/8    and b = 2

           y = -5/8 x + 2

Answer:

1)3 pm

Step-by-step explanation:

1st) so till 12 15 he will have checked 3 patients and after the break the other two, I think he will finish at 3 pm

A general formula that gives all the times when the voltage will be 0 is t = ±√((pπ)/10)

To find the general formula for the times when the voltage will be 0, we need to analyze the given equation: V(t) = 12sin(5t²). Since V(t) represents the voltage at time t, we want to find the values of t for which V(t) = 0. This will occur when the sine function equals 0.

The sine function, sin(x), is equal to 0 when its argument x is a multiple of π. Mathematically, this can be expressed as:

sin(x) = 0 ⟺ x = nπ, where n is an integer (0, ±1, ±2, ...)

In our case, the argument of the sine function is 5t². Thus, we want to find values of t for which:

5t² = nπ, where n is an integer.

Now, let's solve this equation for t:

t² = (nπ)/5

t = ±√((nπ)/5)

Since the question asks for a formula in terms of p, let's define p as an integer such that p = 2n (n can be any integer). Thus, the formula becomes:

t = ±√((pπ)/10)

This formula represents the general sequence of times t (in milliseconds) when the voltage V(t) will be equal to 0. Here, p is an even integer (0, ±2, ±4, ...) representing different instances when the voltage is zero.

Know more about general formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/2492579

#SPJ11

The missing terms in the blanks  and number of terms  are determined below.

The missing terms in the blanks for the pattern and number of terms  can be determined as follows:

1. 32, 30, 28, 26, 32__________________________, 0

The difference is 2. Thus, subtract 2 till you reach 0. That is:

32, 30, 28, 26, 24, 22, 20, 18, 16, 14, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0

Number of terms: 16

2. 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, ____________________, 0

The difference is 5. Thus, subtract 5 till you reach 0. That is:

75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 0

Number of terms: 15

3. 30, 27, 24, 21, ___________________________, 0

The difference is 3. Thus, subtract 3 till you reach 0. That is:

30, 27, 24, 21, 18, 15, 12, 9, 6, 3, 0

Number of terms: 10

4. 81, 72, 63, ______________________________, 0

The difference is 9. Thus, subtract 9 till you reach 0. That is:

81, 72, 63, 54, 45, 36, 27, 18, 9, 0

Number of terms: 9

5. 48, 44, 40, 36, __________________________, 0

The difference is 4. Thus, subtract 4 till you reach 0. That is:

48, 44, 40, 36, 32, 28, 24, 20, 16, 12, 8, 4, 0

Number of terms: 12

Learn more about number patterns on:

https://brainly.com/question/28580633

#SPJ1

Answer:

United States medals to Soviet Union medals:

Fraction: 1211/1010

Decimal: 1.198

Percent: 119.8%

Soviet Union medals to Great Britain medals:

Fraction: 1010/867

Decimal: 1.165

Percent: 116.5%

United States medals to Great Britain medals:

Fraction: 1211/867

Decimal: 1.397

Percent: 139.7%

The number of countries that have won between 2,250 and 2,499 total medals to the number of countries that have won between 0 and 249 total medals:

Fraction: 2/1

Decimal: 2

Percent: 200%

Only one country participating in the Summer Olympics has never won a medal. Write a comparison of the number of countries that have never won a medal to the number of participating countries:

Fraction: 1/205

Decimal: 0.00488

Percent: 0.488%

Step-by-step explanation =

United States medals to Soviet Union medals:

The fraction represents the ratio of medals won by the United States to those won by the Soviet Union. To find it, you can divide the number of medals won by the United States (1,211) by the number of medals won by the Soviet Union (1,010): 1211/1010.

To convert this fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator (1211) by the denominator (1010): 1.198.

To convert the decimal to a percent, multiply it by 100: 119.8%.

Soviet Union medals to Great Britain medals:

The fraction represents the ratio of medals won by the Soviet Union to those won by Great Britain. To find it, you can divide the number of medals won by the Soviet Union (1,010) by the number of medals won by Great Britain (867): 1010/867.

To convert this fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator (1010) by the denominator (867): 1.165.

To convert the decimal to a percent, multiply it by 100: 116.5%.

United States medals to Great Britain medals:

The fraction represents the ratio of medals won by the United States to those won by Great Britain. To find it, you can divide the number of medals won by the United States (1,211) by the number of medals won by Great Britain (867): 1211/867.

To convert this fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator (1211) by the denominator (867): 1.397.

To convert the decimal to a percent, multiply it by 100: 139.7%.

The number of countries that have won between 2,250 and 2,499 total medals to the number of countries that have won between 0 and 249 total medals:

The fractions represent the ratios of the number of countries that have won between two ranges of total medals. To find these fractions, you need to count the number of countries that fall into each range, and then divide one by the other. According to the information provided, there are 2 countries that have won between 2,250 and 2,499 total medals, and 1 country that has won between 0 and 249 total medals. So the fraction is 2/1.

To convert this fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator (2) by the denominator (1): 2.

To convert the decimal to a percent, multiply it by 100: 200%.

Only one country participating in the Summer Olympics has never won a medal. Write a comparison of the number of countries that have never won a medal to the number of participating countries:

The fraction represents the ratio of the number of countries that have never won a medal to the total number of participating countries. According to the information provided, only one country has never won a medal, and there are 205 participating countries. So the fraction is 1/205.

To convert this fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator (1) by the denominator (205): 0.00488.

To convert the decimal to a percent, multiply it by 100: 0.488%.

D (5,2) and (2,5)

This is correct indeed

The evaluated probability that there have been 2 occurrences in ten minutes  is 0.0842, under the condition that the mean number of occurrences in ten minutes is 5.

Here we have to apply  the Poisson distribution formula. The formula is
[tex]P(X = k) = (e^{-g} * g^k) / k!,[/tex]
Here
X = number of occurrences,
k = number of occurrences we want to find the probability for,
e = Number of Euler's
g = mean number of occurrences in ten minutes.

For the given case, g = 5 since
Therefore,
P(X = 2) = (e⁻⁵ × 5²) / 2!
≈ 0.0842.

Hence,  after careful consideration the  evaluated probability that there are 2 occurrences in ten minutes is  0.0842.

To learn more about probability
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ4

The trinomial can now be represented by the square of the binomial (0.123 + 10c)²

To insert a monomial so that the trinomial may be represented by the square of a binomial, consider the trinomial 0.0152 + ... + 100c².

1: Identify the square root of the first and last terms, which are √0.0152 and √100c². The square roots are 0.123 and 10c, respectively.

2: Determine the middle term by multiplying the square roots together and doubling the result. (0.123)(10c)(2) = 2.46c.

3: Insert the middle term into the trinomial, forming the complete trinomial: 0.0152 + 2.46c + 100c².

To know more about trinomial click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/8985142#

#SPJ11

To find the scale factor that takes polygon N to polygon P, you need to divide the corresponding side lengths of the two polygons.

To find the scale factor that takes polygon N to polygon P, you need to divide the corresponding side lengths of the two polygons.

For example, if one of the sides of polygon N is 6 units long, and the corresponding side of polygon P is 9 units long, then the scale factor is 9/6 or 1.5. This means that polygon P is 1.5 times larger than polygon N in all dimensions.

To determine the scale factor for all the corresponding sides of the polygons, you can compare each pair of sides and divide the length of the corresponding side of polygon P by the length of the corresponding side of polygon N.

It's important to note that when finding the scale factor between two polygons, you must compare corresponding sides. That is, you can't just choose any two sides to compare; you must compare the sides that are in the same position in the two polygons.

Learn more about polygon here: https://brainly.com/question/29425329

#SPJ1

The solution to the integral is ∫ dx/|x|*√4x²-16 is ∫ dx/|x|*√(4x²-16) = 2 ln|sin(θ)| + CC

We can then rewrite the integral in terms of u as:

∫ dx/|x|*√(4x²-16) = ∫ du/|u|*√(u²-16)

Next, we can use another substitution of the form u = 4sec(θ), which will transform the integrand into: 2/(|sec(θ)|*√(sec²(θ)-1)) dθ

Using the identity sec²(θ)-1=tan²(θ), we can simplify the integrand to:

2/(|sec(θ)|sqrt(sec²(θ)-1)) = 2/(|sec(θ)||tan(θ)|)

We can then split the integral into two parts, corresponding to the two possible signs of sec(θ):

∫ du/|u|*√(u²-16) = 2 ∫ dθ/(sec(θ)tan(θ))

= 2 [ ∫ dθ/(sec(θ)tan(θ)), for sec(θ)>0

∫ dθ/(-sec(θ)tan(θ)), for sec(θ)<0 ]

The integral ∫ dθ/(sec(θ)tan(θ)) can be solved using the substitution u = sin(θ), which gives:

∫ dθ/(sec(θ)tan(θ)) = ∫ du/u = ln|u| + C = ln|sin(θ)| + C

Therefore, the indefinite integral is:

∫ dx/|x|*√(4x²-16) = 2 ln|sin(θ)| + C

where θ satisfies the equation 4sec(θ) = 2x.

Learn more about integral on

https://brainly.com/question/27419605

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 3x^4 + 8x/(2x)=

y = 3x^4 + 4       then

dy/dx = 12 x^3        and this = 882

12 x^3 = 882

x^3 = 73.5

x =  4.1889

The marginal revenue at 1000 units is 40, at 3000 units is 0, and at 6000 units is -60.

Find the marginal revenue?

To find the marginal revenue for the given production levels, we first need to solve the demand equation for p and then derive the revenue function R(q).

Solve the demand equation for p.
q = 6000 - 100p
100p = 6000 - q
p = (6000 - q) / 100

Find the revenue function R(q) using R(q) = qp.
R(q) = q * ((6000 - q) / 100)

Derive the marginal revenue function MR(q) by taking the derivative of R(q) with respect to q.
MR(q) = dR(q)/dq = d(q * (6000 - q) / 100)/dq

Using the product rule:
MR(q) = (1 * (6000 - q) - q * 1) / 100
MR(q) = (6000 - 2q) / 100

Now, we can plug in the given production levels to find the marginal revenue at each level.

The marginal revenue at 1000 units is:
MR(1000) = (6000 - 2 * 1000) / 100 = (6000 - 2000) / 100 = 4000 / 100 = 40.

The marginal revenue at 3000 units is:
MR(3000) = (6000 - 2 * 3000) / 100 = (6000 - 6000) / 100 = 0 / 100 = 0.

The marginal revenue at 6000 units is:
MR(6000) = (6000 - 2 * 6000) / 100 = (6000 - 12000) / 100 = -6000 / 100 = -60.

So, the marginal revenue at 1000 units is 40, at 3000 units is 0, and at 6000 units is -60.

Learn more about revenue.

brainly.com/question/8645356

#SPJ11

If the cake is in the shape of a rectangular prism, the total surface area of the cake that will be covered in frosting is 314 sq. inches.

To find the total surface area of the cake that will be covered in frosting, we need to calculate the area of all sides except the bottom. A rectangular prism has 6 sides, and we will be considering 5 of them.

Surface area of top: length × width = 13 × 8 = 104 sq. inches
Surface area of front: length × height = 13 × 5 = 65 sq. inches
Surface area of back: length × height = 13 × 5 = 65 sq. inches
Surface area of left side: width × height = 8 × 5 = 40 sq. inches
Surface area of right side: width × height = 8 × 5 = 40 sq. inches

Now, we will sum the areas of all these sides:
104 + 65 + 65 + 40 + 40 = 314 sq. inches

So, the total surface area of the cake that will be covered in frosting is 314 sq. inches. None of the provided options match this answer, so it is important to double-check the question for any discrepancies.

More on surface area: https://brainly.com/question/10667581

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Two lines are perpendicular to each other if their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. So,  The equations i and ii are perpendicular to each other since their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other.

In other words, if the slope of one line is m, then the slope of the other line is -1/m.

To determine the slope of each equation, we can rewrite each equation in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the

y-intercept.

i. 3x - 2y = 12

-2y = -3x + 12

y = (3/2)x - 6

The slope of this line is 3/2.

ii. 3x + 2y = -12

2y = -3x - 12

y = (-3/2)x - 6

The slope of this line is -3/2.

iii. 2x - 3y = -12

-3y = -2x - 12

y = (2/3)x + 4

The slope of this line is 2/3.

Therefore, equations i and ii are perpendicular to each other since their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. Equation iii is not perpendicular to either of the other two equations.

To know more about perpendicular refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29268451#

#SPJ11

Answer:

3x

Step-by-step explanation

Over (-∞, 0) interval is Store A's profit greater than Store B's.

To determine the interval over which Store A's profit is greater than Store B's, we need to solve the inequality:

f(x) > g(x)

Substituting the given profit functions, we have:

2x > 83x

Simplifying this inequality, we can subtract 83x from both sides:

-81x > 0

Dividing both sides by -81 (and reversing the inequality because we are dividing by a negative number), we get:

x < 0

Therefore, Store A's profit is greater than Store B's for all values of x less than 0. In interval notation, we can write:

(-∞, 0)

So the interval over which Store A's profit is greater than Store B's is the open interval from negative infinity to 0.

Know more about profit here:

https://brainly.com/question/1078746

#SPJ11

The difference between the means expressed as a multiple of the mean absolute deviation is 2.3.

To find the difference between the means expressed as a multiple of the mean absolute deviation, we need to calculate the absolute difference between the two means and divide it by the mean absolute deviation.

The absolute difference between the means is:

|30.2 - 25.6| = 4.6

To express this difference as a multiple of the mean absolute deviation, we divide it by the mean absolute deviation:

4.6 / 2 = 2.3

Therefore, the difference between the means expressed as a multiple of the mean absolute deviation is 2.3.

Learn more about absolute deviation

brainly.com/question/10528201

#SPJ11

We conclude that the data are consistent with Mendel's prediction of a 3:1 ratio of smooth to wrinkled peas.

To carry out a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, we need to calculate the expected number of smooth and wrinkled peas based on Mendel's prediction of a 3:1 ratio.

The total number of peas observed in the experiment is:n = 423 + 133 = 556The expected number of smooth peas is 3/4 of the total number of peas, and the expected number of wrinkled peas is 1/4 of the total number of peas.

Therefore, we have: Expected number of smooth peas = 3/4 × 556 = 417Expected number of wrinkled peas = 1/4 × 556 = 139

We can now calculate the chi-square statistic as follows:chi-square = Σ[(observed - expected)² / expected]where the sum is taken over the two categories (smooth and wrinkled).

For the observed values of 423 smooth and 133 wrinkled peas, we have: chi-square = [(423 - 417)^2 / 417] + [(133 - 139)^2 / 139]= 0.84 + 0.84= 1.68

The degrees of freedom for this test are (number of categories - 1), which is 2 - 1 = 1.

Using a significance level of 0.05 and a chi-square distribution table with 1 degree of freedom, we find that the critical value of chi-square is 3.84.

Since our calculated chi-square value of 1.68 is less than the critical value of 3.84, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that the observed frequencies do not differ significantly from the expected frequencies based on Mendel's prediction.

Therefore, we conclude that the data are consistent with Mendel's prediction of a 3:1 ratio of smooth to wrinkled peas.

Learn more about chi-square here:https://brainly.com/question/29728594

#SPJ1

For the piecewise-defined function, f(-4) = 42.

The given function is a piecewise-defined function, which means that it is defined differently depending on the value of x. In this case, we have two different formulas for the function depending on whether x is less than or greater than 3. For values of x less than 3, the function is given by f(x) = 22 - 5x, while for values of x greater than 3, the function is given by f(x) = 2x + 5.

To find f(-4), we need to determine which part of the function applies to the value of x = -4. Since -4 is less than 3, we use the first part of the function, which gives us f(-4) = 22 - 5(-4) = 22 + 20 = 42. This means that if x is equal to -4, the function f(x) evaluates to 42.

Piecewise-defined functions can be useful in modeling real-world problems where the relationship between variables changes depending on certain conditions or constraints. By defining the function differently depending on the value of x, we can more accurately capture the behavior of the system being modeled.

In this case, the function could be used to model a situation where the value of a variable has different relationships to other variables depending on whether it is less than or greater than a certain threshold value.

To know more about piecewise-defined function, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/12561612#

#SPJ11

Answer:  640

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The volume is the height times the length times the width (order does not matter in this case).

4.5 x 3.5 x 7= 110.25

The volume of this block of wood is 110 cubic inches.

PLEASE PICK ME AS BRAINLIEST!

Step-by-step explanation:

The two equations which can be used to form a system of equations for the scenario are X + Y = 12 and 3.50X + 4.50Y = 50

To solve this problem, we need to form a system of equations. Let X be the amount of chocolate and Y be the amount of almonds. The first equation we can form is based on the total amount of snack mix that Penny needs, which is 12 ounces:

X + Y = 12

The second equation we can form is based on the cost of the ingredients. We know that chocolate costs $3.50 per ounce and almonds cost $4.50 per ounce. If X is the amount of chocolate and Y is the amount of almonds, then the total cost of the snack mix will be:

3.50X + 4.50Y = 50

This equation represents the fact that Penny has $50 to spend on the snack mix. Now we have a system of two equations that we can use to solve for X and Y. We can use substitution or elimination to solve the system and find the values of X and Y that satisfy both equations.

Once we have those values, we can check that they add up to 12 and that the total cost is $50. This system of equations allows us to calculate the amount of chocolate and almonds Penny needs to make the snack mix within her budget.

To know more about equations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983#

#SPJ11

Maximum Height of the ball: 6.25 units

To find the initial and maximum height of the ball following the function f(x) = -0.25(x-3)^2 + 6.25, we need to evaluate the function at the initial position and find the vertex of the parabola.

Initial height:
When the ball is initially thrown, it's at position x=0. Plug this value into the function:

f(0) = -0.25(0-3)^2 + 6.25
f(0) = -0.25(-3)^2 + 6.25
f(0) = -0.25(9) + 6.25
f(0) = -2.25 + 6.25
f(0) = 4

The initial height of the ball is 4 units.

Maximum height:
The maximum height corresponds to the vertex of the parabola. Since the function is in the form f(x) = a(x-h)^2 + k, the vertex is at the point (h, k). In our case, h = 3 and k = 6.25.

The maximum height of the ball is 6.25 units.

To know more about Vertex Parabola:

https://brainly.com/question/25651698

#SPJ11

The unit rate in teaspoons per cup is 2 teaspoons per cup

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Unit rate = teaspoons/Recipe

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Unit rate = (4/3)/(2/3)

Evaluate

Unit rate = 2

Hence, the unit rate is 2

Read more about unit rates at

brainly.com/question/4895463

#SPJ1

This function is not differentiable at all points in [tex]R^2[/tex]. To see this, consider the points on the x-axis, where y = 0. At these points, the function is not differentiable because it has a sharp corner.

To show that the function f(x, y) = |y| is differentiable at (0, 0), we need to show that there exists a linear transformation L such that:

[tex]lim (h,k) - > (0,0) [f(0+h,0+k) - f(0,0) - L(h,k)] / \sqrt{(h^2 + k^2)} = 0[/tex]

where f(0,0) = 0 since |0| = 0.

We have:

f(0+h,0+k) - f(0,0) = |k|

Now we need to find L(h,k), which is a linear transformation of (h,k) that approximates f(0+h,0+k) - f(0,0) near (0,0). We can take:

L(h,k) = 0

Since L is a constant function, it is a linear transformation. Also, we have:

f(0+h,0+k) - f(0,0) - L(h,k) = |k|

So we have:

[tex]lim (h,k) - > (0,0) [f(0+h,0+k) - f(0,0) - L(h,k)] / \sqrt{(h^2 + k^2) } = lim (h,k) - > (0,0) |k| / \sqrt{(h^2 + k^2)}[/tex]

Using the squeeze theorem, we can show that this limit is equal to 0, since[tex]|k| < = \sqrt{(h^2 + k^2)}[/tex] for all (h,k) and[tex]lim (h,k) - > (0,0)\sqrt{ (h^2 + k^2) } = 0.[/tex]

Therefore, f(x, y) = |y| is differentiable at (0,0).

for such more question on differentiable

https://brainly.com/question/25731911

#SPJ11

The value of y is 50, and the perimeter of triangle ABC is approximately 49.3 units.

To find the value of y in the coordinate of vertex B, we can use the formula for the area of a triangle given the coordinates of its vertices:

Area =[tex]\frac{ 1}{2}[/tex] * |(x1(y2-y3) + x2(y3-y1) + x3(y1-y2))|

Let's substitute the given values into the formula:

12 = [tex]\frac{ 1}{2}[/tex]* |(3(y-6) + 8(6-1) + 4(1-y))|

Simplifying the equation:

24 = |(3y - 18 + 40 + 4 - 4y)|

24 = |(-y + 26)|

Now, we can solve the equation by considering both the positive and negative values of the absolute expression:

-y + 26 = 24

-y = -2

y = 2

-y + 26 = -24

-y = -50

y = 50

So we have two possible values for y: y = 2 or y = 50.

To determine the correct value for y, we need to analyze the given information further. Since we know that triangle ABC is not an isosceles triangle (as the base lengths differ), we can eliminate the possibility of y = 2, leaving us with y = 50.

Now, let's calculate the perimeter of triangle ABC using the coordinates of its vertices:

AB = [tex]\sqrt((8 - 3)^2 + (y - 1)^2)[/tex]

BC = [tex]\sqrt((4 - 8)^2 + (6 - y)^2)[/tex]

CA = [tex]\sqrt((3 - 4)^2 + (1 - 6)^2)[/tex]

Perimeter = AB + BC + CA

Substituting the known values:

Perimeter = [tex]\sqrt((8 - 3)^2 + (50 - 1)^2) + \sqrt((4 - 8)^2 + (6 - 50)^2) + \sqrt((3 - 4)^2 + (1 - 6)^2)[/tex]

Calculating each term:

Perimeter = [tex]\sqrt(25 + 2401) + \sqrt(16 + 2025) + \sqrt(1 + 25)[/tex]

Perimeter = [tex]\sqrt(2426) + \sqrt(2041) + \sqrt(26)[/tex]

Rounding the perimeter to the nearest tenth of a unit:

Perimeter ≈ 49.3 units

Therefore, the value of y is 50, and the perimeter of triangle ABC is approximately 49.3 units.

Learn more about the vertex and area of a triangle.

brainly.com/question/14272448

#SPJ11

Answer:

Sure, I can help you with that! The volume of a cone with a radius of 2.5 and a height of 4 is (1/3)*pi*(2.5^2)*4. This equals approximately 26.18 cubic units.