Answer:
Explanation:
The question of who was the aggressor in the Mexican-American War is a complex one and is open to interpretation. However, based on the historical facts presented, it can be argued that the United States was the aggressor in the war.
The United States sent troops to the Rio Grande river, which Mexico considered to be its own territory, and refused to withdraw them. This action by the United States can be seen as provocative and aggressive towards Mexico, as it involved military occupation of land that Mexico considered to be its own. Additionally, the United States had annexed Texas in 1845, which was a disputed territory between the two countries, and this had already strained relations between the two nations.
Furthermore, the fact that the United States knew that Mexico believed the boundary to be north of the Rio Grande by 100 miles, and still chose to send troops to the river, suggests that the United States was willing to use force to pursue its territorial ambitions.
Therefore, based on these historical facts, it can be argued that the United States was the aggressor in the Mexican-American War.
What was the most common negative effect of imperialism on Asian nations?
Answer: Locals were repressed, and imperialists benefited from the usage of local resources.
Explanation: Hope this helps bae!! C;
how were europeans able to dominate native americans? is there another factor not listed in the documentary?
The Europeans had the option to rule local Americans given their mechanical advances. The Europeans had the headway of weapons, ponies, and routes. The authority of explosive innovation was pivotal for the European triumphs.
There are different elements not recorded in the narrative are monetary addition and religion Europeans likewise needed to switch Local Americans over completely to Christianity. the two factors that most impacted the elements of European.
As a general rule, they had an undeniably more useful populace and a bigger populace that took into consideration work specialization. They had those things because their innovation was better, and took into consideration that kind of society.
Learn more about Europeans:
https://brainly.com/question/1831222
#SPJ4
why did irish immigrants generally become more devout than they had been in ireland? a. most americans assumed that all irish people were roman catholics. b. there were more churches in the united states. c. they felt gratitude for being saved from the potato famine in the land of their birth. d. the church helped them resist america's overwhelming protestant culture.
Irish immigrants generally became more devout than they had been in Ireland because the church helped them resist America's overwhelming Protestant culture. So the correct option is D .
Irish immigrants faced many challenges when they arrived in the United States, including discrimination, poverty, and a sense of displacement from their homeland. The Catholic Church provided a sense of continuity and stability in their lives, and helped them maintain their cultural identity in the face of these challenges. The Church also played a role in helping Irish immigrants adapt to American society, providing social services and support networks to help them adjust to their new lives.
In addition, the Catholic Church was a source of comfort and solace for many Irish immigrants who faced difficult living and working conditions in the United States. The Church provided a sense of community and belonging, and helped them deal with the loneliness and isolation that often accompanied immigration.
Learn more about immigrants
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ4
which of the following most directly led to the arrival of substantial numbers of africans in the americas at the time of the painting? responses the collapse of the inca and aztec empires as a result of spanish invasion the collapse of the inca and aztec empires as a result of spanish invasion the growth of industrial production in the united states the growth of industrial production in the united states the expansion of the plantation system for growing sugarcane and other crops the expansion of the plantation system for growing sugarcane and other crops the development of large-scale silver mining operations in south america
The expansion of the plantation system for growing sugarcane and other crops most directly led to the arrival of substantial numbers of Africans in the Americas at the time of the painting. So the answer is : the plantation system for growing sugarcane and other crops.
The reasons for the arrival of substantial numbers of Africans in the Americas at the time of the painting, the response that most directly led to this is the expansion of the plantation system for growing sugarcane and other crops. Enslaved Africans were brought over to the Americas to work on the plantations in large numbers. They were needed because the indigenous populations were unable to withstand the harsh labor conditions demanded of them by the plantation owners.
Sugar production in the New World was a highly lucrative enterprise, and the plantation system rapidly expanded as the demand for sugar increased. This expansion relied on a constant supply of labor to maintain the crops, which was provided by enslaved Africans from West and Central Africa. As a result, millions of Africans were forcibly transported to the Americas, and their labor was crucial in the development of the plantation economy. Therefore the answer is : the plantation system for growing sugarcane and other crops.
For more questions on: sugarcane
https://brainly.com/question/28523838
#SPJ11
1. How would you describe the attitude of the narrator toward elite New York society?
-
2. Why do you think Wharton uses words such as ¨pressed,¨ ¨expected,¨ ¨obliged,¨ ¨forced,¨ and ¨plunged¨?
-
3. How does the young girl described in the excerpt contrast with those around her?
-
4. How does the author foreshadow that problems will arise for the young girl depicted in the excerpt? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
-
5. Why do you think Wharton´s novel reflected overall trends in society?
In "The Age of Innocence," the narrator has a critical and satirical attitude towards elite New York society.
How is the society depicted?The society is depicted as shallow, hypocritical, and obsessed with maintaining social norms and conventions. The characters are shown to be constrained by societal expectations and conventions, leading to a suffocating atmosphere.
However, the young girl, May Welland, is portrayed as innocent, pure, and unspoiled by the corrupting influences of New York society. The author foreshadows problems for May through the description of her engagement to Newland Archer, who appears to be uncertain about their relationship.
The novel reflects broader social and cultural shifts taking place during the late 19th century in America, such as the rise of industrialization, urbanization, and social reform movements, and highlights the growing divide between the old, established elite and the new, upwardly mobile middle class.
Read more about foreshadowing here:
https://brainly.com/question/25079664
#SPJ1
In 1993, Rwanda saw genocidal violence of?
a. the Hutu people against the Tutsi people
b. the communist government against capitalists
c. the Muslim government against tribes that had converted to
d. Christianity the communist revolutionaries against the economic upper classes
In 1993, Rwanda saw genocidal violence of the Hutu people against the Tutsi people.
Why it is?
The Rwandan Genocide was a mass slaughter of Tutsi and moderate Hutu people in Rwanda by members of the Hutu majority. It is estimated that between 500,000 and 1,000,000 Rwandans were killed during the 100-day period from April 7 to mid-July 1994, constituting as much as 70% of the Tutsi population.
The genocide was sparked by the assassination of the Rwandan President Juvénal Habyarimana, a Hutu, on April 6, 1994. Hutu extremists blamed the Tutsi minority for the assassination and began a campaign of terror against Tutsi civilians and moderate Hutus. The international community has been criticized for its failure to intervene and stop the genocide.
To know more about Hutu People related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6723837
#SPJ1
What are enumerated powers?
powers that voters give Congress
powers that the president gives Congress
powers that the Constitution gives Congress
powers that the Supreme Court gives Congress
Enumerated powers are the powers that the Constitution gives Congress, which are mostly listed in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S constitution.
They included the ability to levy and collect taxes, pay bills and borrow money, regulate commerce, mint money, establish post offices, safeguard patents and copyrights, set up subordinate courts, declare war, and recruit and sustain an Army and Navy.
Hence, the correct answer is C. powers that the Constitution gives Congress.
What is the straightforward definition of constitution?The constitution serves as a political framework under which a nation's values and laws are created. The rights and responsibilities of people are outlined in the constitution. The constitution establishes how individuals and governments interact.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
how did christiamity build on Jewish beliefs about the
Answer:
How did Christianity build on Jewish beliefs about the Messiah"?
Christianity built on Jewish beliefs about the Messiah by identifying Jesus of Nazareth as the long-awaited Messiah prophesied in the Hebrew Bible. Christians believe that Jesus fulfilled these prophecies through his life, death, and resurrection, and that he is the savior of humanity.
Explanation:
The lesson states that in 1832 in the case of Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee had absolute rights over their tribal land and that no federal or state government had legal rights there, however; President Jackson refused to uphold Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling. Because the Supreme Court does not have any authority to enforce the rulings they pass it is possible for them to be disregarded, as was done by Andrew Jackson. Should the Supreme Court have any additional powers to allow them to enforce their rulings? If so, why, and what should the power be? If not, why not?
Your response should be 3-5 sentences long and show that you’ve thought about the topic/question at hand. Please be aware we are looking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION and there is not a single “correct answer.”
Answer: This is a complex and controversial question that does not have a definitive answer. Some possible arguments for and against giving the Supreme Court additional powers to enforce their rulings are:
For: The Supreme Court is the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution and the guardian of the rule of law. If its rulings are ignored or defied by other branches of government, it undermines the authority and legitimacy of the Court and the Constitution. Giving the Supreme Court some enforcement power, such as imposing sanctions, withholding funds, or ordering executive action, would ensure that its decisions are respected and implemented. This would also enhance the accountability and transparency of the government and protect the rights and interests of the people.
Against: The Supreme Court is an unelected and unaccountable body that has no democratic mandate or popular support. Giving it additional powers to enforce its rulings would violate the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances that are essential for a constitutional democracy. The Supreme Court would become too powerful and dominant over the other branches of government, which could lead to judicial tyranny or activism. The Supreme Court should rely on its moral authority and persuasive reasoning to convince the other branches and the public to follow its rulings, rather than resorting to coercion or force.
n your own words, why did the Spanish Empire rely on native populations to mine silver?
The Spanish Empire relied on native populations to mine silver mainly due to their familiarity with the local environment, abundance of manpower, and their role in the colonial labor system.
Native populations had knowledge of the region's geography and mineral deposits, which facilitated more efficient mining operations. Furthermore, the Spanish Empire faced a shortage of their own labor force in the colonies, making it necessary to tap into the local workforce.
The colonial labor system, known as the encomienda system, allowed Spanish colonists to essentially exploit native populations as forced labor. Natives were required to work in mines or on plantations in exchange for protection, education, and conversion to Christianity. This system enabled the Spanish Empire to extract valuable resources, such as silver, at a low cost and with minimal resistance.
For more such questions on Spanish Empire, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/4559849
#SPJ11
Cast it down in agriculture, mechanics, in commerce, in domestic service, and in the professions. And in this connection it is well to bear in mind that whatever other sins the South may be called to bear, when it comes to business, pure and simple, it is in the South that the Negro is given a man's chance in the commercial world, and in nothing is this Exposition more eloquent than in emphasizing this chance. Our greatest danger is that in the great leap from slavery to freedom we may overlook the fact that the masses of us are to live by the productions of our hands, and fail to keep in mind that we shall prosper in proportion as we learn to dignify and glorify common labour, and put brains and skill into the common occupations of life; shall prosper in proportion as we learn to draw the line between the superficial and the substantial, the ornamental gewgaws of life and the useful. No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem. It is at the bottom of life we must begin, and not at the top. Nor should we permit our grievances to overshadow our opportunities.
--The Atlanta Compromise Speech, 1895.
Which scenario would Booker T. Washington have supported MOST?
Responses
A a young African-American male applying to college to study literaturea young African-American male applying to college to study literature
B programs to provide welfare for African-Americans in the Southprograms to provide welfare for African-Americans in the South
C a young African-American male training to become a mechanica young African-American male training to become a mechanic
D a young African-American male moving to Europe to escape racism and segregation
Scenario C, a young African-American male training to be a mechanic, would have been supported by Booker T. Washington's philosophy.
Washington was a prominent African-American educator and leader who believed in the importance of vocational education and practical skills training for African-Americans in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He believed that by learning practical skills, African-Americans could achieve economic independence and social advancement, as well as greater political power and civil rights supported by Booker T. Washington.
Washington established the Tuskegee Institute to train African-Americans in trades such as agriculture, carpentry, and mechanics. He believed that by emphasizing practical skill development, African-Americans could become self-sufficient and gain greater respect and recognition in American society.
Washington, on the other hand, was less supportive of political activism and direct confrontation with white society, which is why he might not have supported scenario D, in which an African-American male is moving to Europe to escape racism and segregation.
Hence, Scenario C is more supportive.
Learn more about Racism:
https://brainly.com/question/31306329
#SPJ1
the pendleton act a. designated portions of the pacific northwest as national scenic sites. b. raised the tariff on foreign-made goods by 10 percent. c. divided indian reservations into individual homesteads for indians. d. created the civil service commission to administer competitive examinations for non-policy-level federal jobs.
The Pendleton act created the civil service commission to administer competitive examinations for non-policy-level federal jobs.
The correct answer is option D.
The Pendleton Act commanded that civil government positions be filled through competitive examinations and on the base of merit. Also, the enactment proscribed blasting or demeaning workers for political purposes who were defended by the law. The 47th United States Congress approved the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, which President Chester.
Arthur inked into law on January 16, 1883. The act permits most civil government positions to be filled on the base of capability rather than political favouritism. By the late 1820s, the booties system, a form of political patronage in which commanders gave their cohorts government employment in exchange for fiscal support.
Learn more about The Pendleton act at
https://brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ4
i have a really important question whats 1 plus 1
To sum up, 1+1 is always equal to 2, according to the recognised decimal system and its principles. The particular arithmetic system's set of rules, which provide the rationale behind the outcome.
What is 1 plus 1?
How does the formula 1+1=11 look? Energy equations can entangle in such a way that one plus one equals eleven. A phenomena in physics known as "quantum entanglement" occurs when two elements may interact and improve each other's performance in a way that defies logic.
1+1=2 since the notion of 2 that we often use is 1. When you combine 1 and 1, you get 2. Similar to how we define 2+1, or (1+1)+1, as 3, so do we.
The mathematical phrase 1+1 is equal to: (Number) 2 (in ordinary arithmetic) Number 1 (written in Boolean algebra with the symbol "+" signifying a logical disjunction) 0 (number) (in a quotient ring of numbers modulo 2 or in Boolean algebra with a notation where "+" denotes the "exclusive or" operation)
Learn more about 1 plus 1:
https://brainly.com/question/29285129
#SPJ1
learning curve how did president andrew jackson react to the victory of the republic of texas over mexico in 1836?
President Andrew Jackson was very supportive of the victory of the Republic of Texas over Mexico in 1836.
He had a long history of supporting the cause of states’ rights and was sympathetic to the Texans’ desire for independence. Jackson was a staunch supporter of the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States had a divine mission to expand across the entire continent.
He viewed the victory as a step towards achieving this goal and encouraged the Texans in their cause. Jackson even offered to send US troops to aid in the war if necessary. Jackson saw the victory as a demonstration of the strength of the US and a symbol of its progress and prosperity. He was proud of the Texans’ accomplishment and saw it as an example that the US could use to expand its control and power in the region.
To know more about Manifest Destiny, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11669373
#SPJ4
Devante drew this model of Earth.
Why is it helpful to Earth’s systems that the atmosphere is so thick? Select the three that apply.
A. to allow for the sun's rays to reflect off Earth and heat the rest of the solar system
B. to trap the necessary heat to allow living organisms to survive
C. to prevent the hydrosphere from freezing
D. to protect the biosphere from some of the sun's UV rays
Answer:A
Explanation:
Based on the excerpt of the Berlin Wall Speech, explain how audience affects the way Ronald Reagan presents his ideas.
Answer:
Reagan was one of the greatest orators ever to take up the seat of the president.
He knew the public and phrased his speeches to rile them up to his cause and to know the temperature of the room he walked into.
The issue of the Berlin wall was a sensitive one and he wanted to drive home the point that it is in fact the Americans that had led to this success by coercing USSR with diplomatic pressure and the arms race.
It was significant for the public to know that the polices of the government had had a result.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
Mark me brianliest :))
what was the greatest challenge to the movie industry in the 1950s? group of answer choices television communists poor attendance in theaters
The greatest challenge to the movie industry in the 1950s was television. The rise of television during this time period led to a decline in movie attendance, as people could now watch entertainment from the comfort of their own homes. Option (1)
As a result, movie studios had to find new ways to compete with television by introducing widescreen formats, 3D technology, and other innovations to draw audiences back to theaters.
While there were concerns about communism during this time period, with the Hollywood blacklist and investigations by the House Un-American Activities Committee, this was not the greatest challenge to the movie industry. Poor attendance in theaters was a result of the competition from television, rather than a cause.
Learn more about movie industry
https://brainly.com/question/30054898
#SPJ4
Full Question: what was the greatest challenge to the movie industry in the 1950s? group of answer choices
television communists poor attendance in theatersThe Ayatollah Khomeini returned from exile to rule Iran after the Iranian people rose up against Shah Reza Pahlavi. What TWO issues were MOST significant in causing this uprising?
the exhaustion of Iranian oil resources due to industrial development
the shah's prohibition against Muslim religious practices
the brutality and oppression of the shah's despotic regime
the perception that the shah was a puppet of the United States
the depressed economy that resulted from a US sanctions on Iran
The TWO issues that were MOST significant in causing the Iranian uprising against Shah Reza Pahlavi were: The brutality and oppression of the shah's despotic regime: The shah's regime was known for its brutality, oppression, and human rights violations.
The regime was notorious for its secret police (SAVAK), which brutally suppressed any dissent or opposition to the regime. The perception that the shah was a puppet of the United States: The shah's close ties with the United States and the West, particularly his dependence on American military and economic aid, were seen as evidence of his subservience to foreign powers. This perception of the shah as a puppet of the United States and his failure to address the needs and concerns of the Iranian people fueled the anti-Shah sentiment and ultimately led to his overthrow. Although the other issues mentioned in the options, such as the exhaustion of Iranian oil resources, depressed economy resulting from US sanctions, and the shah's prohibition against Muslim religious practices, may have contributed to the overall discontent of the Iranian people, they were not as significant as the brutal and oppressive nature of the shah's regime and the perception of his subservience to foreign powers.
For more information on perception see:
https://brainly.com/question/29776172
#SPJ1
Answer:
it's
the brutality and oppression of the Shah's despotic regime
the perception that the Shah was a puppet of the United States
Explanation:
I got it right on the test, you're welcome and have a nice day✴︎
what did land ordinance of 1785 do?
Answer:it defined how ownership of the vast lands in the northwest territory would be legally transferred from the federal government to states and individual landowners
Explanation:
What was the religion of the majority of the Mughal Empire's population?
A. Hinduism
B. Buddhism
C. Islam
D. Sikhism
can the declaration of independence be considered a declaration of war? using evidence from the text argue whether this is or is not true.
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence can be considered a declaration of war, but not in the traditional sense of declaring war against another country. Rather, it is a declaration of war against the British government's authority over the American colonies.
Explanation:
The text of the Declaration of Independence includes several statements that indicate a willingness to use force to secure American independence. For example, the opening sentence declares that "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another...they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." This suggests that the American people have decided that it is necessary to break away from British rule and are willing to take action to achieve that goal.
Additionally, the Declaration includes language that suggests a readiness to use military force to defend the new nation. For instance, the document declares that "we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor" in order to secure independence. This statement implies that the signers of the Declaration are willing to risk their lives and wealth to defend their new nation if necessary.
Overall, while the Declaration of Independence is not a formal declaration of war against another country, it can be seen as a declaration of war against British authority over the American colonies, and a willingness to use force to secure American independence.
The Declaration of Independence cannot be considered a declaration of war. It is a statement that explains the reasons for the 13 American colonies' decision to separate from British rule and form their own nation.
However, it does list various grievances against the British government, which contributed to the American Revolutionary War. In the text, the Declaration outlines specific complaints against King George III and the British government, such as imposing taxes without the colonies' consent, quartering troops among the population, and limiting their trade. These grievances justify the colonies' decision to break away from British rule, but they do not explicitly declare war.
The main purpose of the Declaration of Independence is to assert the colonies' right to self-governance and freedom, as stated in the famous line, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
In conclusion, while the Declaration of Independence was a significant factor in the American Revolutionary War, it is not a declaration of war itself. It is a statement of principles and grievances that led the colonies to seek independence and form their own nation.
For more about Declaration:
https://brainly.com/question/30724602
#SPJ11
americans used the homestead act of 1862 to acquire: group of answer choices railroad bonds cattle ranches lands in the west
Americans used the Homestead Act of 1862 to acquire is "lands in the West." The correct option is lands in the West.
The Homestead Act of 1862 was signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln on May 20, 1862. This act allowed any adult citizen or intended citizen who headed a household to claim 160 acres of public land in the western United States. In order to qualify, settlers were required to improve the land by building a dwelling and farming it for a period of five years.
After the land had been improved and the five-year period had passed, settlers were then given full ownership of the land.This act was intended to encourage settlement in the western territories, and it led to the acquisition of large amounts of land by Americans during the latter half of the 19th century. The Homestead Act was a significant factor in the expansion of the United States westward and the development of agriculture in the Great Plains region.
For more about Homestead Act:
https://brainly.com/question/18634412
#SPJ11
Why do you think Lewis says "we have nothing to be proud of"?
In his speech, John Lewis may have said "we have nothing to be proud of" in reference to the ongoing struggle for civil rights and the fact that despite some progress.
Why did Lewis says "we have nothing to be proud of"?The quote is a reference to civil rights leader and congressman John Lewis, who gave a speech at the March on Washington in 1963. In his speech, John Lewis may have said "we have nothing to be proud of" in reference to the ongoing struggle for civil rights.
The fact that despite some progress, there were still many systemic injustices and inequalities that needed to be addressed. He may have been calling for continued action and advocacy to achieve true equality and justice for all.
Read more about Washington march
brainly.com/question/12221088
#SPJ1
In 1912, voters sympathetic to Republicans split their vote between the Republican Party and the Progressive Party. Based on the table, how did this split affect the election results? The split left the Democratic Party with enough support to win the election. O The split left the Progressive Party with less support than the Republican Party. O The Progressive and Republican vote total prevented a Democratic win. The strong Progressive vote prevented vin for Theodore Roosevelt.
After losing the Republican Party nomination to his former protégé rival, incumbent president William Howard Taft, in 1912, former president Theodore Roosevelt founded the Progressive Party .Option B is correct .
What was the result of the 1912 official political race?Wilson won 435 of the 531 available votes, easily defeating Taft and Roosevelt. Wilson also won 42% of the vote, while Roosevelt, his closest rival, only got 27%.
In the 1912 presidential election, who were the progressive politicians?In 1912, Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, defeated William Howard Taft, a Republican, the incumbent, the former president Theodore Roosevelt, a Progressive, and Eugene Debs, a Socialist.
To learn more about Republican visit :
https://brainly.com/question/2605617
#SPJ1
Complete question -
In 1912, voters sympathetic to Republicans split their vote between the Republican Party and the Progressive Party. Based on the table -Wilson won 435 of the 531 available votes, easily defeating Taft and Roosevelt. Wilson also won 42% of the vote, while Roosevelt, his closest rival, only got 27%., how did this split affect the election results?
The split left the Democratic Party with enough support to win the election. O The split left the Progressive Party with less support than the Republican Party. O The Progressive and Republican vote total prevented a Democratic win. The strong Progressive vote prevented vin for Theodore Roosevelt.
This excerpt describes U.S. policy in Lebanon. From 1981 onward, the Reagan administration feared that conflict between Lebanese factions backed by Syria and Israel, along with clashes between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), could escalate into an Arab- Israeli war. Yet American policymakers differed over how to prevent such a conflict, especially over whether to commit troops for that purpose. Following Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon, the advocates of military intervention won out. But by 1984, terrorist attacks, a lack of diplomatic progress, and congressional opposition led President Ronald Reagan to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon. --"The Reagan Administration and Lebanon, 1981-1984," U.S. Department of state, history.state.gov (accessed April 17, 2020)
Based on the excerpt, why were U.S. forces initially sent to Lebanon?
To provide military assistance to Israel
To help maintain peace between warring groups
To provide military support to Syria
To regain control of vital oil fields
U.S. forces were initially sent to Lebanon to help maintain peace between warring groups, specifically to prevent the conflict between Lebanese factions backed by Syria and Israel.
What is a conflict?A conflict refers to a disagreement or dispute between two or more parties who have incompatible goals, interests, or values. Conflicts can arise in various contexts, such as personal relationships, organizations, communities, or nations. Conflicts can be triggered by various factors, including competition for resources, power struggles, differences in beliefs, misunderstandings, or cultural clashes. Conflicts can be expressed in different ways, such as verbal arguments, physical aggression, or passive resistance. Conflicts can have negative consequences, such as emotional distress, social tension, economic losses, or physical harm. Conflicts can be managed or resolved through various strategies, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation, depending on the nature and severity of the conflict and the willingness of the parties to cooperate.
To learn more about conflict, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14379057
#SPJ1
TEXT ANSWER
How did the geography of early civilizations help them become successful?
Write your response in 1 to 2 complete sentences.
Rivers, plains, and mountains were necessary for commerce. People were able to travel to neighboring towns to exchange crops, livestock, and construction materials because to these geographical advantages.
How did early civilization succeed?
The majority of historical civilizations developed around big rivers, particularly when those rivers flowed into the sea. Tribes that were distant from rivers were typically forced to remain nomadic. Rivers give civilizations a source of fresh, healthy water that they may use for themselves, their livestock, and their crops.
The oldest civilizations emerged between 4000 and 3000 B.C.E., when the development of commerce and agriculture made it possible for people to have an abundance of food and a stable economy. The fact that many people were no longer required to work in agriculture allowed a wide range of professions and interests to flourish in a relatively small area.
Nearly every civilization has had a significant impact on its development and prosperity through geography and the environment. For instance, rivers give water and enable the growth of agriculture, but mountains or deserts offer protection and act as a barrier.
Learn more about early civilization success:
https://brainly.com/question/28572610
#SPJ1
anthony johnson overcame heavy racial discrimination and succeeded in early 17-century virginia. true false
The given statement “Anthony Johnson overcame heavy racial discrimination and succeeded in early 17-century Virginia” is true because he was a Black indentured servant who arrived in Virginia in 1621.
Despite facing heavy racial discrimination, he managed to work his way up the social ladder and become a successful farmer and landowner. In 1651, he even won a court case that allowed him to own his indentured servants, which was an unusual position for a black man in that time period.
Johnson's success was a remarkable achievement given the widespread racism and oppression faced by Black people in early 17th-century Virginia. The colony was founded on the exploitation of enslaved Africans, and racism was deeply ingrained in the society, the statement is true.
To learn more about racial follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/15745266
#SPJ4
What if another country, allied with their number-one fear, attacked? How were they obligated to respond?
If another country, allied with their number-one fear, attacked, the country would be obligated to respond based on the terms of their mutual defense agreement with their allies.
How were allies obligated to respond?For example, if a country is a member of NATO and is attacked by another country, then the other NATO members are obligated to come to their defense under Article 5 of the NATO treaty. The specific response would depend on the severity and nature of the attack, and the military capabilities and strategies of the defending country and its allies.
The defending country may choose to retaliate with military force or pursue diplomatic solutions, depending on the circumstances. Ultimately, the response would aim to protect the defending country's sovereignty and security, as well as the security of their allies
Read more about allied country
brainly.com/question/1174232
#SPJ1
what action did jackson take in his second administration to destroy the national bank? multiple choice question. moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks moved federal government deposits from state banks to the national bank
In his second administration, Jackson moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks. The correct option is A) moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks.
This action was a significant part of his broader efforts to eliminate the National Bank, which he believed was a corrupt institution that favored the wealthy and powerful over ordinary Americans. Jackson saw the bank as a threat to democracy and believed that it needed to be dismantled to ensure that the country's financial system worked for all Americans.
Jackson's decision to move the government deposits out of the national bank and into state banks was part of his broader strategy to undermine the bank's power and reduce its influence over the nation's financial system. By taking this action, Jackson hoped to weaken the bank's ability to control credit and money supply, making it easier for ordinary Americans to access credit and loans, which he believed was essential to promoting economic growth and opportunity.
Jackson's actions had significant consequences for the nation's economy and financial system, contributing to a period of economic instability and financial speculation that lasted for several years. Despite these challenges, Jackson remained committed to his vision of a more democratic and inclusive financial system, and his legacy continues to shape American politics and economics to this day.
To learn more about federal government here:
https://brainly.com/question/695831#
#SPJ11
Complete Question
what action did jackson take in his second administration to destroy the national bank? multiple choice question. A) moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks. B) moved federal government deposits from state banks to the national bank.
How is nationalism a cause of world war 2 how did intense nationalism grow in axis countries
World War II was significantly influenced by nationalism. Intense nationalism developed in nations like Germany, Italy, and Japan in the years preceding World War II, resulting in aggressive foreign policies.
What are the causes of World War 2?The causes of World War II have been given impressive consideration by history specialists.
The prompt accelerating occasion was the intrusion of Poland by Nazi Germany on September 1, 1939, and the consequent affirmations of war on Germany made by Britain and France, but numerous other earlier occasions have been proposed as extreme causes.
Essential subjects in chronicled investigation of the war's beginnings incorporate the political takeover of Germany in 1933 by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
Japanese militarism against China, which driven to the Moment Sino-Japanese War.
Italian hostility against Ethiopia, which driven to the Moment Italo-Ethiopian War and Germany's introductory victory in arranging the Molotov–Ribbentrop Agreement with the Soviet Union to isolate the regional control of Eastern Europe between them.
To know more about world war 2, viist:-
https://brainly.com/question/20987466
#SPJ9