Theory of an implicit social contract, individuals provide their consent to become members of the society they are currently in and, if applicable, to be subject to its government by continuing to reside in its jurisdiction
What distinguishes the natural order from the social contract?In a state of nature, individuals defend their inherent, fundamental rights—life, liberty, and property—by relying on their own power and ability.
What did Locke say about the nature of people and the natural world?He believes that tolerance and reason govern human nature. While the State of Nature is prior to politics, it is not prior to morality. People are taken to be equal to one another and so equally capable in such a scenario.
To know more about governmental visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/31221354
#SPJ9
Why did the American colonies want to form a national government after declaring independence from Great Britain?
They wanted to write a constitution.
They wanted to unite against Great Britain.
They were unhappy with their state constitutions.
They were about to lose the war against Great Britain.
The American colonies wanted to form national government after declaring independence from Great Britain primarily because they wanted to unite against Great Britain.
What are colonies?Colonies refer to territories that are under the control and administration of a foreign power, usually a country. These territories are often established through conquest, settlement, or colonization, and are maintained for economic, political, or strategic reasons. Colonies are usually characterized by an unequal relationship between the ruling power and the colonized people, with the former exercising political, economic, and cultural dominance over the latter. The colonization of various regions of the world by European powers in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, for example, led to the establishment of colonies in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania. The impact of colonialism on the colonized people and their cultures has been the subject of much debate and controversy.
To learn more about colonies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29219594
#SPJ1
Answer:
option B
Explanation:
hope this helps:)
Life during the Cold War in the Soviet Union
Answer:
During the Cold War in the Soviet Union, there was a significant emphasis on military power and national security. The government controlled many aspects of daily life, including media and education, and dissent was not tolerated.
Explanation:
Children were expected to join organisations outside of school that would instruct them in how to behave like decent communist citizens.
How is life in the Soviet Union surviving the cold war?Under Stalin, the family was given more priority, and getting a divorce was more challenging. Although healthcare was improved, the Soviet Union's inhabitants continued to face serious housing and food shortages.
During the Cold War, Soviet Union life was quite dissimilar from US living. The clear distinction was communism, which denied common people their liberties. Under Stalin, the government had complete control over all media, and anyone found reading, watching, or listening to anything that was not authorised by the authorities would face harsh penalties.
To know more about cold war visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ1
Help me with this question?
1. How did white settlers seem to view the buffalo, and how did that differ from how the Nez Percé thought about them? (2.5 points)
2. How did the gold miners see the value of the Nez Percé Reservation land, and how did that differ from how the Nez Percé saw the value of the land? (2.5 points)
3. How did different groups of Nez Percé feel about the Treaty of 1863? How did that differ from the U.S. government's position? (2.5 points)
4. How do the Nez Percé think about the flight of 1877, and how does that contrast with how it was seen by the U.S. government? (2.5 points)
Answer:
How did white settlers seem to view the buffalo, and how did that differ from how the Nez Percé thought about them? (2.5 points)
2. How did the gold miners see the value of the Nez Percé Reservation land, and how did that differ from how the Nez Percé saw the value of the land? (2.5 points)
3. How did different groups of Nez Percé feel about the Treaty of 1863? How did that differ from the U.S. government's position? (2.5 points)
4. How do the Nez Percé think about the flight of 1877, and how does that contrast with how it was seen by the U.S. government? (2.5 points)
The Pathfinder is an example of an instrument that allowed scientists to explore space through
a.
a satellite radar system.
b.
a remote-controlled vehicle.
c.
picture imaging.
d.
astronaut voice journals.
Refer to Inside Out and Back Again for a complete version of this text.
Which answer is an example of a cause-and-effect relationship in the story?
O "From now on / he's to work / only on engines."
O 'I used to buy less pork / so I could buy fried dough."
O "It's time to tell Mother / why misery / keeps pouncing on me."
O " used to like making the girl / who shared my desk cry."
Answer:
The example of a cause-and-effect relationship in the story is: "It's time to tell Mother why misery keeps pouncing on me." This sentence implies that there is a cause (something that is making the narrator miserable) and an effect (the narrator being repeatedly attacked by misery).
Answer:
The example of a cause-and-effect relationship in the story is: "It's time to tell Mother why misery keeps pouncing on me." This sentence implies that there is a cause (something that is making the narrator miserable) and an effect (the narrator being repeatedly attacked by misery).
What point is this cartoon trying to get across to its audience?
Answer:
It's trying to get people to think about and answer the bigger question " Can we afford to not help Europe."
Explanation:
Mr. Lopez gives his middle school class an assignment to create a proposal about an environmental problem. What will the class do to complete this task?
The class will organize an event to help solve the problem.
The class will turn in formal plans about how to address the problem.
The class will change their habits in ways that benefit the environment.
The class will help to raise funds for a nongovernmental organization.
The class will turn in formal plans about how to address the problem.
What exactly is an environmental problem?The term "environmental issue" describes a situation in which the ecosystem's order and law have collapsed because the ecological role it once served has been lost as a result of human activity. Conflicts between humans and nature give birth to these environmental issues.
What environmental issue is the most typical?Environmental issue illustration-
Yet, it is not the only significant environmental issue that humanity will encounter in the coming ten years. We'll look at a few of these, from waste management to water scarcity and biodiversity loss, and talk about the difficulties we still face.
To know more about Environmental visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1154761
#SPJ1
1. Who, according to the authors of this document, is giving them the power to declare independence
Answer: Thomas Jefferson
Explanation:
30 points need help
Molly is a concerned citizen who is worried about drought conditions in Africa. Which of these would be the best way for her to take action as a citizen?
A. write a letter to her state representative
B. send a petition to her governor
C. write a letter to her national representative
D. file a petition at a local court
Molly is a concerned citizen who is worried about drought conditions in Africa. C. write a letter to her national representative would be the best way for her to take action as a citizen.
What impact does the drought have on South Africa's economy?A decline in agricultural output could cause a shortage of various foods, including wheat, corn, and some forms of protein like meat and eggs. South Africa might therefore be forced to import more as a result. Thirdly, a lack of locally grown food could result in price increases.
A decline agricultural output could cause a shortage of various foods, including wheat, corn, and some forms of protein like meat and eggs. South Africa might therefore be forced to import more as a result. Thirdly, a dearth of locally grown food could raise prices.
To know more about drought conditions in Africa, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27943654
#SPJ1
why was the boston tea party a successful event?
a. british troops were distracted by a riot at the harbor
b.slave ships were not guarded in the northern states
c. it was carefully planned over many secret meetings
Why did the Americans shut down the logging camp in the book ground zero
Explanation:
It is not possible for me to determine which book you are referring to as there may be several books with the title "Ground Zero". However, if you are referring to the book "Ground Zero" by Alan Gratz, then the logging camp was not shut down by Americans in that book.
Instead, "Ground Zero" is a novel about the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. The book tells the story of two middle school students, Brandon and Reshmina, who are on opposite sides of the world but both affected by the events of 9/11. The book does not mention a logging camp or any American action to shut it down.
If you are referring to a different book titled "Ground Zero", please provide more information so I can better assist you
Identify and explain any THREE (3) differences between the Samurai culture and the
modernized culture that is being introduced at this time period.
Answer:
The Samurai culture and the modernized culture introduced during that time period are vastly different. Here are three key differences:
Social Structure: The Samurai culture was based on a rigid social structure, where each person's role was clearly defined. The Samurai were at the top of this hierarchy and were respected for their martial skills and honor code. The modernized culture, on the other hand, was more egalitarian, with less emphasis on social status and more on individual achievement.
Education: In Samurai culture, education focused on military training and developing martial skills, while modernized education focused on science, technology, and other academic subjects. Samurai education was often limited to the elite class, while modernized education was more widely available to the general population.
Values: The Samurai culture placed great emphasis on honor, loyalty, and duty, and Samurai were expected to follow a strict code of conduct. The modernized culture, on the other hand, placed more emphasis on individualism, progress, and material wealth. The Samurai were willing to die for their beliefs, while modernized culture placed a higher value on personal safety and self-preservation.
Overall, the Samurai culture was based on a traditional, hierarchical social structure, with a focus on martial training and honor. Modernized culture, on the other hand, emphasized individualism, progress, and academic education, and placed less emphasis on rigid social hierarchies and honor codes.
I need help with this, I'm really bad in history
To compare and contrast different perspectives on the Zebulon Pike expedition, it would be necessary to identify specific sources and analyses that present divergent viewpoints and consider the evidence and arguments presented by each.
What should we know about Zebulion Pike expedition?The Zebulon Pike expedition was a United States military expedition that explored the western portion of the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican territory in the early 19th century. The expedition was led by Zebulon Pike, a United States Army officer, and involved significant interaction with Native American tribes in the region.
There have been multiple perspectives of the expedition and its impact on the region and its people. Some view the expedition as a valuable contribution to American knowledge and exploration, while others criticize its impact on Native American communities and the violence and displacement that ensued.
Read more about Zebulion Pike expedition
brainly.com/question/22028630
#SPJ1
why is pompeii such an important archaeological site? group of answer choices it is the location of augustus's wife's private vacation villa. its aqueduct (aqua augusta) is the best preserved in italy. it tells us most of what we know about everyday roman life. its ruins document pliny the elder's descriptions.
Pompeii is such an important archaeological site because it tells us most of what we know about everyday Roman life. So the correct option is C .
Pompeii was an ancient Roman city that was buried under layers of ash and pumice after the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79. The city remained buried and largely forgotten for almost 1,700 years until its rediscovery in the 18th century. The ash and pumice that covered the city preserved the buildings, artifacts, and human remains almost perfectly, offering a unique and unparalleled snapshot of life in an ancient Roman city.
Learn more about Pompeii
https://brainly.com/question/15318384
#SPJ4
What provisions does the opening paragraph make in regard to treatment of Indians? Given the main debate regarding Kansas and Nebraska was over slavery, why do you think these provisions regarding Indians received such a prominent place in the Act?
The treatment of Native Americans in the newly created territories of Kansas and Nebraska is addressed in the first paragraph of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which was passed by the US Congress in 1854.
What rules did the Kansas-Nebraska Act have?On May 30, 1854, it was made a law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act provided for popular sovereignty, abolished the Missouri Compromise, and established two additional territories. A violent revolt known as "Bleeding Kansas" was partly a result of the pro- and anti-slavery advocates who flocked to the territories to influence the vote.
What cause did the Kansas-Nebraska Act seek to advance?A bill that created Kansas and Nebraska out of the territory immediately west of Missouri was submitted by Illinois senator Stephen Douglas in January 1854. He protested in favor of popular sovereignty, or the idea that the settlers of the new territories should decide if slavery would be legal there
To know more about slavery visit:-
brainly.com/question/9331183
#SPJ1
How would supply-side economics describe the expected outcome of these tax cuts?
Supply-side economics would argue that these tax cuts would result in increased economic growth and prosperity because they would provide individuals and businesses with more disposable income and resources to invest in the economy.
The idea is that by reducing taxes and regulations, individuals and businesses will be incentivized to work harder, save more, and invest more in the economy, which will ultimately lead to increased productivity, employment, and earnings.
In other words, supply-side economics suggests that these tax cuts will stimulate the supply of goods and services in the economy, which will in turn drive economic growth and increase overall prosperity.
How do the Soviets feel about Non-communist countries?
Answer: The Soviet Union's ideological commitment to achieving communism included the development of socialism in one country and peaceful coexistence with capitalist countries while engaging in anti-imperialism to defend the international proletariat, combat capitalism and promote the goals of communism.
Explanation:
Read the passage. Sofia’s creative writing club is entering a local writing contest. The writing topic is a recent hurricane that struck the city. Sofia wants each club member to write one verse about something that happened to them during the hurricane. The group will then put the verses together to create a poem to submit. Isabella has a different idea. "Why can’t we each send our own entries to the contest?” Isabella asks. "I’ve already written an essay about what happened on my block.” "No way—that’s not going to work,” Sofia replies. "I’m the president of this club! We are going to send in something as a group.” Which statement best describes the discourse in this scenario? It is ineffective because Isabella’s idea is clearly better than Sofia’s. It is effective because different people are sharing their points of view. It is ineffective because Sofia is not willing to listen to other people’s ideas. It is effective because Sofia, as president, gets to make the final decision.
please hurry!!! timed quiz!!! 15 mins left!!! its on edge
The effective alternative is the correct one because various viewpoints are being expressed.
How should the group achieve its goal?Your team's goals give it a clear direction and action plan. Team objectives present chances to foster cooperation and trust. Team goals aid in team members' professional development and acquisition of new skills. A framework for tracking individual and group progress is provided by team goals. Because teamwork allows your group to share ideas and responsibilities, it helps everyone feel less stressed and enables them to be more meticulous and thorough in their task completion. This will help them quickly reach their sales objectives.
To know about team work visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15085199
#SPJ1
What groups made up the Puritan movement?
Presbyterian
Separatist
Episcopalian
Roman Catholic
Quaker
Explanation:
The Puritan movement emerged within the Church of England in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, and it was made up of several different groups with varying beliefs and practices. These groups included:
Presbyterian: These Puritans sought to reform the Church of England along Presbyterian lines, with a hierarchy of ministers and ruling elders. They were influenced by the Scottish Presbyterian Church and were known for their emphasis on a disciplined, educated clergy.
Separatist: These Puritans believed that the Church of England was irredeemably corrupt and that true Christians needed to separate themselves from it entirely. They formed their own independent congregations, often in secret, and were persecuted by the authorities.
Episcopalian: These Puritans believed in the importance of bishops and the traditional liturgy of the Church of England, but they wanted to reform the church to make it more moral and focused on individual salvation.
Roman Catholic: While not strictly a part of the Puritan movement, some English Catholics were sympathetic to Puritan ideas and practices, such as a focus on personal piety and a rejection of certain aspects of the established church.
Quaker: The Quakers were not strictly Puritan, but they emerged from the same religious and social context as the Puritan movement. They rejected formal religious institutions and believed in the direct inspiration of the Holy Spirit in each individual.
The Puritan movement was mainly made up of two groups: the Presbyterians and the Separatists. Presbyterians aimed to change the system within the Church of England, while Separatists believed that the Church was beyond saving and formed their own congregations.
Explanation:The Puritan movement, which emerged in the 16th century in England, was a religious reform movement intended to 'purify' the Anglican Church of elements reminiscent of the Catholic Church. It was comprised of several groups, with varying degrees of radicalism and aims for reform. The primary groups within the Puritan movement include the Presbyterians and the Separatists.
Presbyterians wanted to replace the episcopal system of the Church of England with a system of elected assemblies, or presbyteries. On the other hand, the Separatists believed the Church of England was beyond reform and separated completely, forming their own independent congregations. Other groups like the Episcopalians, Roman Catholics, and Quakers were not part of the Puritan movement. Episcopalians and Roman Catholics were elements of the establishment that Puritans found problematic, while Quakers emerged later as a separate religious group with distinct beliefs.
Learn more about Puritan Movement here:https://brainly.com/question/17737677
#SPJ2
Many times in today's society is critiqued for being lazy. Is it? Why or why not? Could you have shown the same determination that Braddock did to succeed? Explain.
The same determination that Braddock did to succeed it is not entirely accurate to label today's society as lazy, as this generalization overlooks the hard work and determination displayed by many individuals.
Comparing the determination of someone in today's society to that of James Braddock, a famous boxer who overcame adversity during the Great Depression, can be challenging due to differences in context and personal experiences. Braddock's story of resilience and persistence is certainly inspiring and serves as a reminder of the importance of determination in overcoming challenges. However, it is true that some people may exhibit laziness or a lack of motivation. Various factors can contribute to this perception, such as advancements in technology, which have made certain tasks more convenient and accessible.
It is possible for individuals in today's society to show the same level of determination as Braddock. However, it ultimately depends on the individual's personal experiences, mindset, and circumstances. Each person faces unique challenges, and the way they respond to these challenges determines their level of determination and success.
In conclusion, it is not accurate to label today's society as lazy, as it overlooks the hard work and determination of many individuals. Comparing one's determination to that of James Braddock can be difficult due to differing circumstances, but it is possible for individuals to exhibit the same level of determination in overcoming their challenges.
Know more about Braddock here:
https://brainly.com/question/29731763
#SPJ11
the confederate attack on new mexico led by h.h. sibley: a) failed because of a lack of determination by confederates fighting in desert conditions; b) succeeded because of a lack of determination by union troops fighting in desert conditions; c) had some military successes but failed when their supply train was captured, leaving them without food or supplies; d) forced president lincoln to abandon all plans to attack texas during the civil war.
The Confederate attack on New Mexico led by H.H. Sibley (c) had some military successes but failed when their supply train was captured, leaving them without food or supplies. So the right option is (c).
The Confederate attack on New Mexico led by H.H. Sibley, the correct answer is option C: had some military successes but failed when their supply train was captured, leaving them without food or supplies. While the Confederates had some military successes during their campaign in New Mexico, they were ultimately unsuccessful due to their supply train being captured, leaving them without food or supplies. This forced the Confederate forces to retreat back to Texas, abandoning their campaign in New Mexico.
Therefore the correct option is : option (c) had some military successes but failed when their supply train was captured, leaving them without food or supplies.
For more questions on: Confederate
https://brainly.com/question/1208903
#SPJ11
The founding fathers learned from the limitations of the Articles of Confederation when they drafted the United States Constitution.
True or false
True. When writing the United States Constitution, the founding fathers took into account the constraints of the Articles of Confederation.
Who of the founders backed the Articles of Confederation?A proposal for "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" was written by Benjamin Franklin. Thomas Jefferson was among the delegates who backed Franklin's idea, although the majority of them were adamantly opposed.
The Articles of Confederation were drafted by which founding father? What else is famous about him?Before Congress decided on the final text of the Articles in 1777, a total of six draughts of the document were created. The first was written by Benjamin Franklin, who in July 1775 delivered it to Congress.
To know more about Constitution visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ1
People who study the material remains of ancient civilizations are known as
In two to three sentences, explain how the leaders of Germany, Italy, and Japan, began expansion through aggression in the 1930s.
Answer:
In the 1930s, the leaders of Germany, Italy, and Japan began expansion through aggression due to a combination of economic problems, nationalist ideologies, and a desire for military power. All three countries sought to expand their territories and create empires, leading to a series of invasions, annexations, and conflicts that eventually culminated in World War II.
_________were organizations that arose in the 1980s that resisted control of the
Indian Union Government and were ultimately increased the direct control of Indian
government.
(A) Militant Organizations
(B) World Trade Organizations
(C) Non-Profit Organizations
(D) Political Parties
Answer:
the answer is C
Explanation:
Non-Profit Organizations were organizations that arose in the 1980s that resisted control of the Indian Union Government and were ultimately increased the direct control of Indian government. Thus, option C is correct.
What are non-profit organizations?A non-profit organization is a group that was established with the intention of making a profit, and in which no part of the organization's revenue is given to its directors, officials, or members. "Non-stock corporations" are a common moniker for nonprofit organizations.
They can be organized as a corporation, an unincorporated person business association, a partnership, a foundation (which is differentiated by the founder's endowment and takes the form of a trusteeship), or a condominium (joint ownership of common areas by owners of adjacent individual units incorporated under state condominium acts). When they are established, nonprofit organisations must declare themselves to be so and are only allowed to work on projects that fall under their legal definition. Churches, public schools, public charities, public clinics and hospitals, political organizations, legal assistance societies, volunteer services organizations, and labor unions are examples of non-profit organizations.
Therefore, we can conclude that option C is correct.
Learn more about Non-profit organizations here:
https://brainly.com/question/21307064
#SPJ2
How did the movements of the counterculture develop both politically and socially?
Answer:
Explanation:
The counterculture movements of the 1960s and 1970s developed both politically and socially in response to several issues and factors that affected society at the time. These movements were characterized by a rejection of mainstream values and a desire for change in areas such as civil rights, women's rights, environmentalism, and opposition to the Vietnam War.
Politically, the counterculture movements were marked by their opposition to the status quo and calls for more participation and empowerment of ordinary people. These movements challenged the political establishment, which was seen as out of touch and unresponsive to the needs of ordinary people. They mobilized a large number of young people, who used protests, civil disobedience, and other forms of activism to demand change. The counterculture movements led to a greater emphasis on grassroots politics, as well as increased participation in the democratic process.
Socially, the counterculture movements were marked by a rejection of traditional values and a desire for greater personal freedom. These movements embraced alternative lifestyles, such as communal living, experimentation with drugs, and a rejection of mainstream consumer culture. They also promoted new forms of artistic expression, such as psychedelic art and music, which challenged the traditional norms of society. The counterculture movements also led to the emergence of new subcultures, such as the hippies and the New Left, which had a significant impact on popular culture.
Overall, the counterculture movements of the 1960s and 1970s represented a significant challenge to the status quo, both politically and socially. Although some of the goals of these movements were not fully achieved, they had a profound impact on American society and culture, and their influence can still be felt today.
One part of Ulysses S. Grant's plan to defeat the Confederacy was to:
O A. destroy railways by capturing Atlanta.
OB. close the port of Mobile, Alabama.
OC. seize land in Tennessee and Kentucky.
OD. launch surprise attacks against Lee.
The strategy was rather straightforward. The Confederates would be relentlessly attacked from all sides until they were out of soldiers and supplies and had no choice but to surrender. Grant was aware of his advantage because he had more soldiers, weapons, food, and supplies.
What cause is the Confederacy defending?The Confederate States of America, sometimes known as the Confederate States or the Confederacy, was an unofficial herrenvolk republic in the Southern United States that existed from February 8, 1861, until May 9, 1865. The Confederates established a clearly anti-democratic, pro-slavery, and white supremacist nation-state based on the idea that not all men are created equally. Confederate soldiers fought to establish a distinct and independent nation based on what they dubbed "Southern institutions," the most important of which was the institution of slavery. Six additional states—Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas—separated after South Carolina, and four more—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina—threatened to do the same. The Confederate States of America was finally composed of these eleven states.To learn more about Confederacy, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/951920
Chap 11--A World in Flames
FUE
Okto
ANSONA
lav Butter
romaint-
DO SO
HESSE
PEST
Huld of bf P36
elin
Answer: Fue
Explanation:
What evidence is there that by the 1980s people in the Soviet Union were not as well off as Americans
Gorbachev's glasnost and perestroika reforms were fueled by the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, which eventually led to the collapse of the Soviet system and spiraled out of control.
What transpired in the 1980s between the US and the USSR?The relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union underwent significant change from 1981 to 1991. The Cold War quickly came to an end, almost entirely peacefully and on U.S. terms, and during these years, the threat of a nuclear war between the superpowers diminished.
The slow process of democratization that eventually destabilized Communist control and contributed to the Soviet Union's demise was initiated by Gorbachev's decision to allow elections with a multi-party system and establish a presidency for the Soviet Union.
To learn more about Chernobyl visit :
https://brainly.com/question/10116000
#SPJ1