what is 1/10 of 1.65

Answer:

To calculate Shannon's new net worth after paying off her credit card, we need to subtract the credit card balance from her total liabilities, and then subtract the result from her net worth:

New liabilities = $15,997 - $7,698 = $8,299

New net worth = $872.17 - $8,299 = -$7,426.83

Based on these calculations, Shannon's new net worth would be -$7,426.83 after paying off her credit card. This indicates that her liabilities still exceed her assets, and she would need to continue working towards reducing her debt and increasing her net worth over time.

To know more about liabilities refer here

https://brainly.com/question/18484315#

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]x = \$2.06[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Representing the price of one juice bottle as x, we can construct the equation:

[tex]15x + \$1.93 = \$32.83[/tex]

From here, we can solve for x.

↓ subtracting $1.93 from both sides

[tex]15x = \$32.83 - \$1.93[/tex]

[tex]15x = \$30.90[/tex]

↓ dividing both sides by 15

[tex]\boxed{x = \$2.06}[/tex]

Answer:

jackie has 4carrot and 5 tomato worth 25$

Answer:

C. (11,-21)

Step-by-step explanation:

Elimination

2x+y=1....(1)

2x+3y=-41....(2)

You can eliminate x in this case. (2)-(1)

2y=-42

y=-21.....(3)

You can substitute (3) in (1)

2x-21=1

2x-21+21=1+21

2x=22

x=11

Final answer: (11, -21)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the distribution is approximately normal, we can use the empirical rule to estimate the mean and standard deviation.

According to the empirical rule:

Approximately 68% of the data falls within 1 standard deviation of the mean

Approximately 95% of the data falls within 2 standard deviations of the mean

Approximately 99.7% of the data falls within 3 standard deviations of the mean

From the information given in the problem, we know that:

10% of women are less than 60.8 inches tall

10% of women are more than 67.6 inches tall

So, we can estimate the mean height as the midpoint between 60.8 and 67.6:

mean = (60.8 + 67.6) / 2 = 64.2 inches

We also know that 80% of women are between 60.8 and 67.6 inches tall. Since this is approximately 1 standard deviation from the mean (on either side), we can estimate the standard deviation as:

standard deviation = (67.6 - 64.2) / 1 = 3.4 inches

Therefore, the mean height is approximately 64.2 inches and the standard deviation is approximately 3.4 inches.

Answer:

$432.18

Step-by-step explanation:

First year

$1800

-  540

$1260

Second year

$1260

-   378

$882

Third year

$882

- 264.60

$617.40

Fourth year

$617.40

-185.22

$432.18

A) The null hypothesis (H0) is that there has been no change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there has been a change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census

B) At a 95% confidence level, the critical value for a two-tailed test is ±1.96.

A) The null hypothesis (H0) is that there has been no change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census, i.e., the current prevalence of HIV is still 7.5%. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there has been a change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census, i.e., the current prevalence of HIV is different from 7.5%.

B) To test the hypothesis, we can use a z-test for proportions. The test statistic can be calculated as:

z = (p - p0) / [tex]\sqrt{(p0(1-p0)/n)}[/tex]

where p is the sample proportion of HIV positive cases, p0 is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis, and n is the sample size.

In this case, p = 468 / 4706 = 0.099, p0 = 0.075, and n = 4706. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

z = (0.099 - 0.075) / [tex]\sqrt{0.075(1-0.075)/4706}[/tex] = 8.80

At a 95% confidence level, the critical value for a two-tailed test is ±1.96. Since the calculated z-value (8.80) is much larger than the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is strong evidence to suggest that the prevalence of HIV has changed since the last census. In other words, the prevalence of HIV is different from 7.5%.

To learn more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

To solve the inequality -1/2x ≥ 17, we can start by isolating x on one side of the inequality.

Multiplying both sides by -2 (and reversing the direction of the inequality since we are multiplying by a negative number), we get:

x ≤ -34

So the solution to the inequality is x ≤ -34.

To graph the solution, we can draw a number line and mark -34 on it. Then we shade all the values of x that are less than or equal to -34. This can be represented by a closed circle at -34 and a shaded line to the left of -34, indicating that any value of x in that range satisfies the inequality.

Here is a graph of the solution:

```

<=====(●)-----------------------

     -34

```

The shaded part of the line represents the values of x that satisfy the inequality -1/2x ≥ 17, and the closed circle at -34 indicates that x can be equal to -34 (since the inequality is "greater than or equal to").

Using Newton's method, the root of the equation cos(x) = x correct to six decimal places is approximately 0.739085.

To solve the equation cos(x) = x, we can use Newton's method, which involves repeatedly applying an iterative formula to approximate the root of the equation. We first rewrite the equation in the form f(x) = cos(x) - x = 0 and find its derivative f'(x) = -sin(x) - 1.

The iterative formula for Newton's method is given by xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn). Applying this formula, we get xn+1 = xn + cos(xn) - xn sin(xn) + 1.

To start the iteration, we need to guess a suitable value for x1. From the graph of y = cos(x) and y = x, we can see that they intersect at a point whose x-coordinate is slightly less than 1. Therefore, we take x1 = 1 as a convenient first approximation.

Using a calculator in radian mode, we can apply the iterative formula to obtain the following approximations:

x2 ≈ 0.75036387

x3 ≈ 0.73911289

x4 ≈ 0.73908513

x5 ≈ 0.73908513

Since x4 and x5 agree to six decimal places, we can conclude that the root of the equation cos(x) = x correct to six decimal places is approximately 0.739085.

For more questions like Equation click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/16663279

#SPJ11

To find the car's average velocity between t=4 and t=10, we need to use the formula:

average velocity = (change in displacement) / (change in time)

Since we are only given the velocity function, we need to first find the displacement function by integrating the velocity function:

displacement = ∫(1t^(1/2) + 4) dt

displacement = (2/3)t^(3/2) + 4t + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Since we are only interested in the change in displacement between t=4 and t=10, we can ignore the constant of integration.

change in displacement = [(2/3)10^(3/2) + 4(10)] - [(2/3)4^(3/2) + 4(4)]

change in displacement = 28.147 - 14.265

change in displacement = 13.882

Now we can use the formula for average velocity:

average velocity = (change in displacement) / (change in time)

average velocity = 13.882 / (10 - 4)

average velocity = 1.98 m/s

Therefore, the car's average velocity between t=4 and t=10 is 1.98 m/s.

Learn more about average velocity,

https://brainly.com/question/24824545

#SPJ11

The statement "La tangente de 60° es igual al triple de la tangente de 20°" is not true.

To solve the problem "La tangente de 60° es igual al triple de la tangente de 20°," follow these steps:

Step 1: Write down the equation based on the problem statement:
tan(60°) = 3 * tan(20°)

Step 2: Find the tangent values for the given angles:
tan(60°) = √3
tan(20°) = 0.36397 (approximate value)

Step 3: Plug the tangent values into the equation and check if the statement is true:
√3 = 3 * 0.36397

Step 4: Calculate the right side of the equation:
3 * 0.36397 = 1.09191 (approximate value)

Step 5: Compare the two values:
√3 ≈ 1.73205 (approximate value)

Since 1.73205 ≠ 1.09191, the statement "La tangente de 60° es igual al triple de la tangente de 20°" is not true.

To know more about tangent refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19064965

#SPJ11

Unfortunately, this integral doesn't have a simple closed-form solution. However, you can use numerical methods or software like Wolfram Alpha or a graphing calculator to approximate the value of the integral.

We have:

y = t and ds = sqrt(9t^4 + 1) dt

So, the line integral becomes:

∫C y^3 ds = ∫0^5 (t^3)(sqrt(9t^4 + 1)) dt

Using the substitution u = 9t^4 + 1, we get du/dt = 36t^3, which means dt = du/36t^3. Also, when t = 0, u = 1 and when t = 5, u = 1126.

Substituting these values and simplifying, we get:

∫C y^3 ds = (1/36) ∫1^1126 (u-1/4)(1/2) du
= (1/72) [(u-1)^2 u^(1/2)]_1^1126
= (1/72) [(1125)^2 (1126^(1/2)) - (1)^2 (1^(1/2))]

= 3555.89 (approx)

Therefore, the line integral is approximately equal to 3555.89.
To evaluate the line integral along the curve C with the given parameterization x = t^3 and y = t for 0 ≤ t ≤ 5, we need to find the integral of y^3ds. First, we need to find the derivative of the parameterization with respect to t:

dx/dt = 3t^2
dy/dt = 1

Now, we can find the differential arc length ds, which is given by the formula:

ds = √((dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2) dt

ds = √((3t^2)^2 + (1)^2) dt
ds = √(9t^4 + 1) dt

Next, substitute the parameterization of y in terms of t (y = t) into the integral:

∫(y^3 ds) = ∫(t^3 √(9t^4 + 1)) dt, with limits 0 to 5.

Now, evaluate the integral:

∫(t^3 √(9t^4 + 1)) dt from 0 to 5.

To learn more about integral visit;

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The conditional probability that she tosses two heads, given she has tossed one head already is: 1/3

Conditional probability is defined as the likelihood of an event or outcome occurring, based on the occurrence of a previous event or outcome. Conditional probability is calculated by multiplying the probability of the preceding event by the updated probability of the succeeding, or conditional, event.

We are given that she has two coins.

She has tossed one head already

Let A be the event that two heads result and B the event that there is at least one head.

If S denote the sample space, then S={(H,H),(H,T)(T,H)(T,T)}

A={(H,H)}

B={(H,H),(H,T)(T,H)}

So, A∩B = {H,H}

P(B)= 3/4

P(A∩B)= 1/4

​

Hence P(A∣B) = P(A∩B)/P(B)

P(A∣B) = (1/4)/(3/4)

​= 1/3

Read more about Conditional probability at: https://brainly.com/question/23382435

#SPJ1

The corresponding values for the triangle in the larger circle are;

1. Perimeter of Δ BSH = 71.4 cm

2. The measure of ∠SBH = 102°.

3.  The area of Δ BSH = 41.54 cm²

4. The length of the circumference of circle B = 52.275 cm

1. The ratio of the perimeters of similar triangles is equal to the ratio of their corresponding sides. Since OB/OA = 4.25, we have:

Perimeter(Δ BSH) = Perimeter(Δ ARG) × 4.25

Perimeter(Δ BSH) = 16.8 cm × 4.25 = 71.4 cm

2. Since the triangles are similar, their corresponding angles are congruent. Therefore, ∠SBH = ∠RAG = 102°.

3. The ratio of the areas of similar triangles is equal to the square of the ratio of their corresponding sides. Since OB/OA = 4.25, we have:

Area(Δ BSH) = Area(Δ ARG) × (4.25)²

Area(Δ BSH) = 2.3 cm² × (4.25)² = 2.3 cm² × 18.0625 = 41.54 cm²

4. The ratio of the circumferences of similar circles is equal to the ratio of their radii or diameters. Since OB/OA = 4.25, we have:

Circumference(circle B) = Circumference(circle A) × 4.25

Circumference(circle B) = 12.3 cm × 4.25 = 52.275 cm

The above answers are in response to the following questions below;

Dante created the following measurements and calculations:

He then made the following measurements and calculations:

He calculated the ratio OB = 4.25.

                                      OA

He measured the perimeter of Δ ARG, and found it to be 16.8 cm.

He measured ∠RAG = 102°.

He calculated the area of Δ ARG, and found it to be 2.3 cm2.

He calculated the circumference of circle A, and found it to be approximately 12.3 cm.

He would now like to calculate corresponding values for the triangle in the larger circle, and he needs your help.

Calculate the following, using your knowledge that all circles are similar, along with the data already collected by Noah..

5. Find the perimeter of Δ BSH.

6. Find the measure of ∠SBH.

7. Find the area of Δ BSH.

8. Find the length of the circumference of circle B.

Find more exercises on calculation values of the triangle in the larger circle;

https://brainly.com/question/20358049

#SPJ1

The correct order of the compounds in the medicine from least to greatest is: C, B, D, A.

To order the compounds in the medicine from least to greatest, we need to compare their amounts.

First, we can compare compounds A and C. Compound A has an amount of 0.6 milligrams, which is greater than the amount of compound C, which is only 0.08 milligrams. Therefore, we know that compound C is the smallest amount in the medicine.

Next, we can compare compounds B and D. Compound B has an amount of 0.402 milligrams, which is smaller than the amount of compound D, which is 0.46 milligrams. Therefore, we know that compound B is the second smallest amount in the medicine.

Finally, we can compare compounds A and D. Compound A has an amount of 0.6 milligrams, which is greater than the amount of compound D, which is only 0.46 milligrams. Therefore, we know that compound D is the third smallest amount in the medicine.

Therefore, the correct order of the compounds in the medicine from least to greatest is: C, B, D, A.

It's important to note that the amount of each compound in the medicine may have different effects on the patient's health, and that the order of the compounds from least to greatest may not necessarily reflect their importance or efficacy in treating a particular condition. The ordering of the compounds is simply a matter of comparing their relative amounts in the medicine.

To learn more about compounds here:

https://brainly.com/question/30217944

#SPJ4

The population in this study is the jars of marinara sauce produced at the Barilla plant in Ames, IA.

The population in this study refers to all jars of marinara sauce produced at the Barilla plant in Ames, IA in the last week. It represents the entire set of jars that the quality assurance engineer could potentially sample from.

The population mean is stated as 26.2 ounces, indicating the average amount of sauce per jar for the entire population. The population standard deviation is given as 0.04 ounces, representing the variability in the amount of sauce across all jars produced.

The quality assurance engineer randomly selected a sample of 34 jars from this population and found the mean amount of sauce per jar to be 26.197 ounces.

Learn more about marinara sauce

brainly.com/question/28741039

#SPJ11

Gabby does not have any fabric left, as she used more fabric than she had to start with.

How much fabric does Gabby have left after using 3215 yards, and what is the estimate?

Based on the information given, Gabby started with 578 yards of fabric and used 3215 yards of fabric. To estimate the amount of fabric Gabby has left, we need to subtract the amount of fabric used from the starting amount of fabric:

578 yards - 3215 yards = -2637 yards

Since the result is a negative number, it doesn't make sense in this context. It's possible that there was a mistake in the numbers given, or Gabby used more fabric than she had to start with.

Without further information or clarification, we cannot estimate the amount of fabric Gabby has left.

To estimate the amount of fabric Gabby has left, we can subtract the amount of fabric she used from the amount of fabric she had initially.

So, to find the estimate for the amount of fabric Gabby has left, we can perform the following calculation:

Estimate for the amount of fabric Gabby has left = 578 yards (initial amount) - 3215 yards (amount used)

Estimate for the amount of fabric Gabby has left = -2637 yards

However, the result is negative, which means that Gabby doesn't have any fabric left, and she needs to purchase an additional 2637 yards to make up for the shortfall.

Therefore, the estimate for the amount of fabric Gabby has left is 0 yards (she needs to purchase more fabric to continue her work).

The correct answer of estimation for each expression is 269,900, 220,251.7, 240,220.1 and 250,268.1.

270,349.6 - 112.8 = 270,236.8

To estimate, we can round 270,349.6 to 270,000 and round 112.8 to 100. Subtracting 100 from 270,000 gives us 269,900. Therefore, the estimated answer is 269,900.

220,173.3 + 78.4 = 220,251.7

To estimate, we can round 220,173.3 to 220,000 and round 78.4 to 80. Adding 80 to 220,000 gives us 220,080. Therefore, the estimated answer is 220,080.

240,817.2 - 597.1 = 240,220.1

To estimate, we can round 240,817.2 to 240,000 and round 597.1 to 600. Subtracting 600 from 240,000 gives us 239,400. Therefore, the estimated answer is 239,400.

250,108.8 + 159.3 = 250,268.1

To estimate, we can round 250,108.8 to 250,000 and round 159.3 to 160. Adding 160 to 250,000 gives us 250,160. Therefore, the estimated answer is 250,160.

To know more about estimation:

https://brainly.com/question/30562297

#SPJ4

Antonio and lizeth's adjusted gross income is $85,988.

To find their adjusted gross income, we need to start with their total income and subtract any adjustments.

Total income:

Combined income: $83,366

Interest income: $1,200

Rental income: $4,922

Total income before adjustments: $89,488

Adjustments:

Reduce income by $3,500

Adjusted gross income:

$89,488 - $3,500 = $85,988

Therefore, their adjusted gross income is $85,988.

Learn more about gross income:

brainly.com/question/30583857

#SPJ4

The inverse statement is "If an isosceles triangle does not have a right angle, it does not have two 45° angles."

The given statement is:

"If an isosceles triangle has a right angle, it has two 45° angles."

The inverse of this statement can be found by negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion and then reversing their order. The negation of the hypothesis is "An isosceles triangle does not have a right angle," and the negation of the conclusion is "It does not have two 45° angles."

Thus, the inverse statement is:

"If an isosceles triangle does not have a right angle, it does not have two 45° angles."

This statement asserts that if an isosceles triangle does not have a right angle, then it cannot have two 45° angles. In other words, if an isosceles triangle has only one 45° angle, it cannot have a right angle.

The inverse statement is logically equivalent to the original statement, and they are both true because they are both examples of the contrapositive of the conditional statement "If an isosceles triangle has two 45° angles, then it has a right angle."

To learn more about triangle click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30481399

#SPJ1

The area of the stop sign, given the length of one side and the apothem, would be 308. 8 square inches.

To find the area of a regular octagon, we can use the formula:

Area = ( Perimeter × Apothem ) / 2

Initially, we must determine the perimeter of the octagon. Since it is a regular octagon all sides have an identical length. There are 8 sides with length equal to 8 inches; therefore the perimeter is:

= 8 x 8

= 64 inches

The area is;

Area = ( Perimeter × Apothem ) / 2

Area = ( 64 inches × 9.65 inches ) / 2

Area = 617. 6 square inches / 2

Area = 308.8 square inches

Find out more on area at https://brainly.com/question/30784929

#SPJ1

Min still needs 175 centimeters of ribbon to make 100 name tags with ribbons attached to them.

To help Min with her name tags, we first need to determine the total amount of ribbon needed for 100 name tags. Each name tag requires 5 centimeters of ribbon, so for 100 name tags, we can calculate the total requirement as follows:

Total ribbon needed = (Number of name tags) x (Ribbon per name tag) = 100 x 5 = 500 centimeters

Min has 3.25 meters of ribbon, which we need to convert to centimeters to compare with the total requirement:

3.25 meters = 3.25 x 100 = 325 centimeters

Now, we can find out how many more centimeters of ribbon Min needs by subtracting the available ribbon from the total requirement:

Additional ribbon needed = Total ribbon needed - Available ribbon = 500 - 325 = 175 centimeters

So, Min still needs 175 centimeters of ribbon to make 100 name tags with ribbons attached to them.

To know more about total requirement, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28769670#

#SPJ11

Brianna can buy up to 5 books without spending more than her gift certificate amount.

We can set up the inequality: 9x + 5 <= 50. where x is the number of books Brianna can buy. To solve for x, we can start by subtracting 5 from both sides of the inequality: 9x <= 45

Divide both sides by 9: x <= 5. The inequality 9x + 5 <= 50 represents the fact that the total cost of Brianna's order (the cost of the books plus the shipping charge) should not exceed the amount of her gift certificate, which is $50.

We subtracted 5 from both sides to isolate the term 9x and then divided by 9 to solve for x, which represents the number of books she can buy. The solution, x <= 5, indicates that Brianna can buy up to 5 books without going over her gift certificate amount.

Learn more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/17675534

#SPJ4

y=(x+3)^2-1

have a good day :)

Answer: F(x) = (x + 3)^2 - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the two angles in the ratio of 4:13 "x" and "y".

We know that the sum of all three angles in a triangle is always 180 degrees.

So, we can set up an equation:

10 + x + y = 180

We also know that x and y are in a ratio of 4:13, which means we can write:

x = 4k

y = 13k

where "k" is a constant that we need to find.

Substituting these expressions for x and y into the equation, we get:

10 + 4k + 13k = 180

17k = 170

k = 10

Now we can find the values of x and y:

x = 4k = 4(10) = 40

y = 13k = 13(10) = 130

Therefore, the measures of the two angles in the ratio of 4:13 are 40 degrees and 130 degrees, respectively.

After 16 years, compounded yearly, Lizzie will have $5,995.68 for college in Option A and $5,789.95 in Option B, rounded to the nearest dollar.

For Option A, the interest rate is 3% compounded yearly. Using the formula for compound interest, we have:

FV = PV x (1 + r)ⁿ

where FV is the future value, PV is the present value, r is the annual interest rate as a decimal, and n is the number of years. Plugging in the values, we get:

FV = $3000 x (1 + 0.03)¹⁶ = $5,995.68

For Option B, the interest rate is 2% compounded quarterly. We need to convert the annual interest rate to a quarterly rate by dividing it by 4. Then we use the formula:

FV = PV x (1 + r/n)^(n x t)

where r/n is the quarterly interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the total number of years. Plugging in the values, we get:

FV = $3000 x (1 + 0.02/4)^(4 x 16) = $5,789.95

Therefore, Lizzie will have $5,995.68 for college in Option A and $5,789.95 in Option B, rounded to the nearest dollar.

To know more about compounded, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20406888#

#SPJ11

We can use the distance formula to find the distance between two points in a coordinate plane:

d = √[(x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)²]

where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the two points, and d is the distance between them.

Using the given coordinates of the two points, we have:

x1 = -2, y1 = 7

x2 = -5, y2 = 9

Substituting these values into the distance formula, we get:

d = √[(-5 - (-2))² + (9 - 7)²]

d = √[(-3)² + 2²]

d = √(9 + 4)

d = √13

Therefore, the distance between the points (-2, 7) and (-5, 9) is approximately √13 units. We can also approximate this value as 3.61 units (rounded to two decimal places).

The probability of the die landing on a vowel is 1 in 5, or 20%.

In this game, the 20-sided die has the letters A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, and W. To calculate the probability of the die landing on a vowel, we need to identify the vowels present on the die and then determine the probability.

The vowels on this die are A, E, I, and O. There are 4 vowels out of the 20 possible outcomes, so the probability of landing on a vowel can be calculated by dividing the number of successful outcomes (vowels) by the total number of possible outcomes (20 sides).

Probability = (Number of Vowels) / (Total Sides)
Probability = 4 / 20

Now, simplify the fraction:

Probability = 1 / 5

The probability of the die landing on a vowel is 1 in 5, or 20%.

To know more about probability, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/23935887#

#SPJ11

Answer:

what integer?

Step-by-step explanation:

more detail please?

To understand how to approach problems involving similar triangles, parallel lines, and proportional parts.

When you have two similar triangles, their corresponding sides are proportional. This means that the ratio between the sides of one triangle is the same as the ratio between the sides of the other triangle.

If you have parallel lines cut by a transversal, corresponding angles will be congruent, which can help establish similarity between triangles.

For example, if you have two similar triangles ABC and DEF, where AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF, then you can use these ratios to solve for unknown side lengths or other values.

To answer questions 1-16, identify the given information and determine whether the triangles are similar. If they are, use the proportional relationships to solve for the unknowns.

To learn more about triangles, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

How do you solve these problems on Unit 6: similar triangles homework 5: parallel lines and proportional parts?

7. X-5/6 = 14/2x+3

16. X-7/35 = 4/x-3