Answer:
To encourage an international money system
Explanation:
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an investment from a party in one country into a business or corporation in another country with the intention of establishing a lasting interest. Lasting interest differentiates FDI from foreign portfolio investments, where investors passively hold securities from a foreign country.
who was the first president of Norway
Answer:
Den første statsministeren i var
Who was the King of England who separated from the Catholic Church and began the Church of England?
Answer:
I didn't know because I'm not from england
After gaining their independence, the countries that made up French Indochina:
• A. became the center of Southeast Asian culture.
• B. joined together to form a powerful empire.
c. became close allies of the United States.
• D. suffered through wars and economic decline.
After gaining their independence, the countries that made up French Indochina suffered through wars and economic decline.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. suffered through wars and economic decline.
What nations make up French Indochina?The French fought a losing battle to maintain authority over Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the late 1940s. Nationalist uprisings against French colonial control started to have an impact despite financial support from the US.
What is the current name of French Indochina?Later, the French colony in Indochina (present-day Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos) took the phrase as its name, and the entire region of Indochina is now commonly referred to as the Indochinese Peninsula or Mainland Southeast Asia.
To know more about French Indochina visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27935599
#SPJ1
What is communism
a political party based on democratic rule
an idea for dividing farmland
a Russian political idea
an extreme version of socialism
Communism is extreme version of socialism that advocates for classless society where all property is publicly owned, and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
What is a property?Property generally refers to something that is owned or possessed by an individual, group, or organization. It can take many forms, such as real estate, personal possessions, intellectual property, and financial assets. Property rights refer to the legal and social entitlements that protect individuals' ability to use and dispose of their property as they see fit, subject to certain limitations and obligations. The concept of property is central to economic systems and plays a crucial role in shaping social relations and power dynamics. The ownership and control of property can be a source of wealth, status, and influence, but can also lead to conflict and inequality.
To learn more about property, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23587215
#SPJ1
5 differences between hitler and stalin
1. How did Arkansans contribute to the war? (1 point)
O Military leaders went above and beyond their call of duty.
O They supplied the German army with ammunition and army supplies.
O They fought against communist Russia.
O Military leaders spied on British intelligence.
The Arkansans contribute to the war :
Military leaders went above and beyond their call of duty.Contribution of the Arkansans to the warDuring World War II, many Arkansans served in the military and made significant contributions to the war effort. Some of the most notable military leaders from Arkansas include General Douglas MacArthur, who commanded American forces in the Pacific Theater, and General William O. Darby, who founded and led the elite Ranger units known as Darby's Rangers.
In addition to military service, many Arkansans also contributed to the war effort through homefront efforts such as working in war industries, participating in scrap drives, and purchasing war bonds. Arkansas was home to several military bases and training facilities, including Camp Robinson and Fort Chaffee, which trained thousands of soldiers during the war.
Learn more about Arkansans at:
https://brainly.com/question/16065615
#SPJ1
Use the detail in the chart to determine the theme of the story
The story's central idea is that "If someone believes in you, you can start believing in yourself."
How can I tell if a narrative has a theme?Reading the three top sentences and drawing the topic that corresponds to all three will help us determine the story's main subject. Using this technique, we might conclude that Isaiah's confidence is the story's main subject.We must consider the overall theme of each statement as well as the conclusion of each statement to determine which one captures the entirety of the context offered in the statements. When Isaiah saw his father had confidence in him in this situation, he overcame his fear and presented the man.Therefore,
The encompassing statement that sums up all the subjects covered is:
"If someone has faith in you, you can start to have faith in yourself."
To learn more about text themes, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1673952
2. (Contextualization, Corroboration) What might Document C and Document D both suggest about why some Senators opposed the Treaty of versaly
The proposed League of Nations would contravene American sovereignty and Congress's ability to declare war in accordance with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
What is the Versailles Treaty?One of the most problematic armistice agreements in recorded history is the Treaty of Versailles. Germany and the other Central Powers were required to take full responsibility for World War I under the terms of the so-called "war guilt" article of the treaty. Understand to the conditions of the treaty, Germany was required to pay compensation, disarm, relinquish territory, and give up all of its foreign possessions.
To know about Versailles treaties visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1800157
#SPJ1
(Contextualization, Corroboration) What might Document C and Document Dboth suggest about why some Senators opposed the Treaty of Versailles?
Why were their diseases in medival towns?
Paleoanthropologists can often tell if a fossil primate was bipedal from the bones of the skull
alone--specifically the position of the foramen magnum. What about the position of the
foramen magnum would indicate bipedalism? (no more than 2 sentences).
The foramen magnum is centrally located in humans and faces directly downward, indicating the human body to be vertically aligned for bipedalism.
In chimpanzees and other apes, the foramen magnum is located at the rear of the skull, where the spinal cord exits at a little angle.
In order to maintain head balance atop the cervical spinal column during bipedalism and the adoption of orthograde trunk postures, the anterior location of the human foramen magnum is sometimes seen as an adaptation.
Why are paleoanthropologists significant?Paleoanthropology is important because it investigates the origins of human behaviour.
It investigates how prehistoric humans' actions allowed them to endure while their related species perished.
To know more about Paleoanthropologists visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4997054
#SPJ1
Question 2 of 10
Harriet Tubman violated the Fugitive Slave Act by:
A. sending antislavery mail to the South.
B. supporting the Compromise of 1850.
C. publishing stories of enslaved people.
D. leading enslaved people to freedom.
Answer: It's D!
Explanation: Just took it :)
What you have learned about communication?
Answer:
Explanation:
Communication is Learned Most people are born with the capacity and ability to communicate, but everyone communicates differently. This is because communication is learned rather than innate. As you have already seen, communication patterns are relative to context and culture.
How did the teenagers of the 1950s differ from those of previous eras?
- They sought to emulate the consumer choices their parents made.
- They were more likely to stay in school longer.
- They entered the adult workforce earlier.
- They had more disposable income.
If the government decides to set a price floor on minimum wage at $11, how many workers will be unemployed?
Group of answer choices
A) 200
B) 300
C) 400
D) 500
Answer:
I'm sorry, I cannot determine the answer as it would depend on other factors such as the current market conditions, the number of jobs available, and the demand for labor in particular industries. Additionally, economic models used to predict unemployment rates resulting from a minimum wage increase often have varying results and may not always accurately predict the outcome.
Conservative social critics accused the documentary series An American Family of symbolizing which of the following?
- the spread of permissive parenting
- the breakdown of marriages
- the negative effects of patriarchal culture
- the rise in drug use
Reagan’s economic policy favored lowering taxes on producer, so that there would be more _, lowering the price of goods lowering the price of goods demand.
A) demand
B) options
C) supply
D) teachers
Answer: I think it might be C
Explanation:
why do we need a equal rights amendment
Answer:
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would guarantee equal rights for all citizens regardless of their sex or gender. Here are some reasons why proponents believe that the ERA is needed:
It would provide constitutional protection against sex discrimination: While there are existing laws that prohibit sex discrimination, they can be changed or repealed by lawmakers or courts. A constitutional amendment would provide a more durable protection against sex discrimination.
It would help address persistent gender inequalities: Despite significant progress over the past century, gender inequalities persist in areas such as pay, employment, and education. The ERA would provide a stronger legal framework for addressing these inequalities.
It would provide clarity on legal standards for sex discrimination: Currently, the legal standards for determining whether sex discrimination has occurred are not always clear. The ERA would provide a clear legal standard that would apply to all cases of sex discrimination.
What happened to Emmett Till's killers?
They fled to another state.
They were executed.
They were acquitted.
They were sentenced to prison.
The killers of Emmett Till were acquitted. The choice C is correct. The all-white, all-male jury thought for about an hour prior absolving Bryant and Milam, everything being equal.
What happened to the Emmett Till case's key players?On August 29, 1955, the white men who murdered Emmett Till, Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam, were apprehended. In September of that year, they were put on trial for the murder of Till.
The FBI and the Department of Justice of the United States reopened the investigation in 2004 with the goal of locating potential accomplices. Even though no criminal charges were brought, the case was reopened after Carolyn Bryant Donham, Roy Bryant's ex-wife and the one who orchestrated Till's murder, was mentioned in a 2017 book as retracting her testimony that the boy had made sexual advances on her. After that, she told the FBI that she hadn't changed her mind, and the case was closed again in 2021 without any new charges being filed.
To learn more about Emmett visit :
https://brainly.com/question/1428491
#SPJ1
How did nativists use fake science?
O A. To get more immigrants to become American citizens
OB. To prove that immigrants could become good Americans
OC. To show that men and women were equal
OD. To try to prove that whites were the strongest race
The nativists use "scientific ideas" C: To try to prove that whites were the strongest race.
What kind of bogus science did nativists use?The nationalists are the citizens of that nation. In search of better work and a better living, immigrants move from one country to another. They have always loved to think of themselves as superior to immigrants. Immigrants, they claimed, could never integrate into American religions, languages, or society. And if they invaded America, they would obliterate the nation.
Scientifically speaking, nativists said that whites are the strongest race and that there are only a few races that are weaker than others. So, they ought to receive greater treatment than others.
To know more about nativists, refer to;
https://brainly.com/question/14050159
#SPJ1
The segment you just read refers to something
called the right of revolution. Why would this have
been important to the authors of the Declaration of
Independence?
Give your answer in at least one complete
sentence.
The Declaration of Independence included revolutionary law because it gave the settlers' intentions to overthrow Britain legal standing.
Because it promotes people's intents to oppose an unfair government, this portion was crucial. Instead than repressing their citizens or abusing their authority, governments should operate in the best interests of their citizens. The Declaration's authors granted citizens the right of disobedience and self-defense by including revolutionary laws.
What does the Declaration of Independence contain?
They assigned Jefferson the duty of drafting a report with three components. An overview of the philosophy of natural law and the function of government. List of grievances against the British king, as well as the British Declaration of Independence.
The Declaration's primary goal, which is to affirm the settlers' revolutionary rights, is stated in the first sentence. To put it another way, "to describe what separates them." Congress was required to substantiate the cause's validity.
To know more about revolutionary law, click the below link
brainly.com/question/29510262
#SPJ9
Helppppp, Which was an innovation of the Romans?
A. The arch
B. The lonic column
C. The Doric column
D. The mosaic
Answer:
The innovation of the Romans was the arch. The arch was used in many structures such as aqueducts, bridges, and amphitheaters. It allowed the Romans to build larger structures and span greater distances than ever before
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
i think it is the arch if i can remember right.
If the United States had not added these three territories, how much
larger would Mexico be today?
How much land did the US take from Mexico?
This treaty, signed on February 2, 1848, ended the war between the United States and Mexico. By its terms, Mexico ceded 55 percent of its territory, including the present-day states California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming.
i am very confused. please help.
1) What factors led to the Magna Carta and what was its significance?
2) What factors led to the emergence of Spain as the most powerful European monarchy in the end of the Middle Ages?
Answer:
The Magna Carta was a result of tensions between King John and his barons over issues such as taxation and the king's abuse of power. Its significance lies in its establishment of the principle that everyone, including the king, is subject to the law, and in laying the foundation for modern constitutional government.
Spain's unification under the marriage of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile in 1469 played a significant role in the emergence of Spain as the most powerful European monarchy. Additionally, Spain's discovery and colonization of the New World provided them with immense wealth and resources, further solidifying their power.
Explanation:
1)The Magna Carta was a result of King John's tyrannical rule and excessive taxation. Its significance lies in establishing the principle that everyone, including the king, is subject to the law and in the protection of individual rights.
2)The marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella united Spain, the Reconquista expelled the Moors, and overseas exploration led to vast territories and riches, making Spain the most powerful European monarchy.
The Magna Carta is a historical document that was signed in 1215 in England. It is considered one of the most important legal documents in history as it established the principle that everyone, including the king, was subject to the law. The Magna Carta contained clauses that protected individual liberties, such as the right to a fair trial, protection against arbitrary imprisonment, and the right to due process. It also established the principle that could only be levied with the consent of the governed. Although the Magna Carta was initially intended as a peace treaty between King John and his barons, it has since been seen as a symbol of liberty and justice, and has influenced the development of constitutional law in many countries around the world.
Learn more about Magna Carta here:
https://brainly.com/question/549211
#SPJ1
How did the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (the Nazi Party) explain Germany’s loss in World War I to the public? Who did the party blame for the loss?
The National Socialist German Workers’ Party—also known as the Nazi Party—was the far-right racist and antisemitic political party led by Adolf Hitler. The Nazi Party came to power in Germany in 1933. It controlled all aspects of German life and persecuted German Jews. Its power only ended when Germany lost World War II.
The Nazi party attributed Germany's economic woes and sense of national humiliation on the Treaty of Versailles, which put an end to the conflict and imposed severe reparations on Germany.
The party also alleged that Jewish and communist forces had worked to sabotage Germany's war effort, in addition to the intelligence and security officials who had signed the treaty. The Nazi Party's excuse for Germany's defeat in World War I was built on the "stab in the back" myth, or the idea that Germany had not truly been wiped out on the battlefield but had instead been betrayed by its own people. This deception helped the Nazi Party advance its political goals by inflaming the anger and hate of the German people. The party also used propaganda to spread the idea that Germany had been subjected to unfair treatment by the international community and that a grand conspiracy had been launched against them in order to defeat them in World War I.
To learn more about nazi party refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/24040193
#SPJ1
pls help! How did many Western imperialist countries attempt to justify colonialism? A. They claimed that they were recapturing their traditional homelands. B. They claimed that their colonies had previously been uninhabited. C. They claimed that they were helping other civilizations advance. D. They claimed that leaders of their colonies had sought their help.
Answer:
Explanation:
C. They claimed that they were helping other civilizations advance.
At the Kitchen Debate, ______.
a. Vice President Nixon argued that American technology had freed women from the drudgery of household labor
b. Vice President Nixon argued that capitalism meant that Americans were the healthiest people on the planet
c. Soviet Premier Khrushchev argued that Soviet agricultural productivity meant that it was the world's kitchen
d. Soviet Premier Khrushchev argued that communism meant the Soviet people were free from hunger
Which best describes the reaction of other Southern states to South Carolina’s secession?
Many more Southern states seceded from the Union after South Carolina did so on December 20, 1860. Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas all seceded after Mississippi on January 9, 1861.
Under Jefferson Davis as its leader, these states established the Confederate States of America. Later on, the Confederate also included Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Not many Southern states, though, followed South Carolina's example and declared secession right away. Other states, like Kentucky, Missouri, and Maryland, had sympathisers for both the Union and the Confederacy, but they eventually chose to stay in the Union. While other states, like Delaware and West Virginia, broke away from Virginia during the war, they remained committed to the Union.
Ultimately, other Southern states had a varied response to South Carolina's decision to secede, with some joining the Confederacy immediately and others staying in the Union or being torn between their allegiances.
To learn more about South Carolina’s
https://brainly.com/question/15838053
#SPJ1
As a result of US and international involvement in the conflict in Bosnia,
Bosnia’s ethnic relations grew worse.
Serbia signed a peace agreement.
Serbia refused to accept terms of peace.
Bosnia’s Muslim population returned.
As a result of US and international involvement in the conflict in Bosnia, Bosnia’s ethnic relations grew worse.
What effects did Bosnia's ethnic strife have?Over 100,000 people (80% of them Bosniak) had died by 1995 as a result of horrific atrocities committed by Bosnian Serb forces throughout the course of the following several years against Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) and Croatian civilians.
Tens of thousands of people are thought to have died and between 1.0 and 1.3 million people were relocated during the ethnic cleansing. The majority of the ethnic cleansing campaigns were carried out by Serb troops, and Bosniaks made up the majority of the victims.
To know more about Bosnia’s, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/539956
#SPJ1
Why did many people leave England and go to America in the 1600s?
Answer:
The most well-known motivation for individuals leaving England to settle in America was to avoid religious persecution in England by fundamentalists known as Puritans. A number of wealthy people opted to leave England and live in America in order to increase their profits by investing their money as capital in a booming economy.