what is the term for 2x + 4y - 2​

Answer:

No it can,t be in standard for

Answer:

O I, II & III

Step-by-step explanation:

(2, 3) and (1, 1)

m = (3 - 1)/(2 - 1) = 2

y = 2x + b

1 = 2(1) + b

b = -1

The equation of the line is

y = 2x - 1

I) y = 2(x - 2) + 3 = 2x - 4 + 3 = 2x - 1   Yes

II) y = 2x - 1   Yes

III) y = 2(x - 1) + 1 = 2x - 2 + 1 = 2x - 1   Yes

Answer: O I, II & III

Answer:

18.29 x 10^12

Step-by-step explanation:

you can simplify the answer as needed

a)the ratio of the heights of the pyramids is 5:3. b)the volume of the larger pyramid is 23.04 cm³.

what is volume  ?

Volume is a measure of the amount of space that a three-dimensional object occupies. It is usually measured in cubic units, such as cubic meters (m³) or cubic centimeters (cm³). The volume of an object can be calculated using different formulas depending on its shape.

In the given question,

a. Let the height of the smaller pyramid be h₁ and the height of the larger pyramid be h₂. Since the two pyramids are similar, their corresponding linear dimensions are in the same ratio as the areas of their bases. Therefore, we have:

(base area of smaller pyramid)/(base area of larger pyramid) = (linear dimension of smaller pyramid)² / (linear dimension of larger pyramid)²

Since the linear dimension is the height in this case, we can substitute the given ratio of the base areas to obtain:

25/9 = (h₁/h₂)²

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

h₁/h₂ = 5/3

Therefore, the ratio of the heights of the pyramids is 5:3.

b. Since the volume of a pyramid is proportional to the cube of its height, we have:

(volume of smaller pyramid) / (volume of larger pyramid) = (h₁/h₂)³ = (5/3)³ = 125/27

Substituting the given volume of the smaller pyramid, we get:

108 / (volume of larger pyramid) = 125/27

Solving for the volume of the larger pyramid, we obtain:

volume of larger pyramid = (27/125) * 108 = 23.04 cm³ (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the volume of the larger pyramid is 23.04 cm³.

To know more about volume  , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ1

The perimeter of triangle XYZ is approximately 59.1.

What is law of cosines?

The cosine law is used to determine the third side of a triangle when we know the lengths of the other two sides and the angle between them.

[tex]WU^2 + UV^2 - 2WUUV \ cos(WUV) = WV^2\\\\16^2 + 15^2 - 2(16)(15)\ cos(WUV) = 18^2\\\\cos(WUV) = (16^2 + 15^2 - 18^2) / (2(16)(15)) = 77/120[/tex]

Now we can use the Law of Sines to find the length of side XY:

XY / sin(ZYX) = ZY / sin(XYZ)

XY / sin(180° - WUV - XYZ) = 28.8 / sin(XYZ)

XY / sin(WUV + XYZ) = 28.8 / sin(XYZ)

sin(XYZ) = (28.8 sin(WUV + XYZ)) / XY

We can then use the Law of Cosines to find the length of side YZ:

YZ^2 = XY^2 + ZY^2 - 2XYZY cos(XYZ)

YZ^2 = XY^2 + 28.8^2 - 2XY(28.8 sin(WUV + XYZ) / XY) cos(XYZ)

YZ^2 = XY^2 + 28.8^2 - 57.6 sin(WUV + XYZ) cos(XYZ)

Finally, we can use the Law of Sines again to find the length of side XZ:

XZ / sin(WUV) = YZ / sin(XYZ)

XZ / sin(WUV) = (XY^2 + 28.8^2 - 57.6 sin(WUV + XYZ) cos(XYZ)) / (28.8 sin(XYZ))

XZ = sin(WUV) (XY^2 + 28.8^2 - 57.6 sin(WUV + XYZ) cos(XYZ)) / (28.8 sin(XYZ))

18 + 15 + 26.1 ≈ 59.1

Therefore, the perimeter of triangle XYZ is approximately 59.1.

To know more about law of cosines visit,

https://brainly.com/question/4372174

#SPJ1

The height of the trapezoid is 7 ft.

The formula for the area of a trapezoid is:

A = 1/2 * (a + b)h

where A is the area, a and b are the lengths of the parallel sides, and h is the height (the perpendicular distance between the parallel sides).

Given A = 24.5 ft², a = 3 ft and b = 4 ft. We can solve for h. That is:

A = 1/2 * (a + b)h

24.5 = 1/2 * (3 + 4)h

24.5 = 1/2 * (7)h

24.5 = 3.5h

h = 24.5/3.5

h = 7 ft

Therefore, the height of the trapezoid is 7 ft.

Learn more about trapezoid on:

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ1

The expected value of the life insurance policy is $864.77.

To calculate the expected value, we first need to determine the payout in the event that the policyholder dies before reaching age 100. Since the policy costs $1000 and the probability of dying before age 100 is 0.14, the expected payout, in this case, would be:

Payout = $1000 * 0.14 = $140

Next, we need to determine the value of the policy if the policyholder lives to age 100. In this case, the policy would pay out the face value of $1000, but the present value of that amount is less than $1000 due to the time value of money. Assuming an interest rate of 5%, the present value of $1000 payable in 50 years would be:

PV = $1000 / (1 + 0.05)^50 = $54.26

The probability of living to age 100 is 0.86, so the expected value of the policy, in this case, would be:

Expected Value = $54.26 * 0.86 = $46.72

Finally, we can calculate the overall expected value of the policy by adding the expected payouts in both scenarios:

Expected Value = $140 + $46.72 = $186.72

Rounding to the nearest cent, the expected value of the life insurance policy is $864.77.

In conclusion, even though the probability of living to age 100 is high, the expected value of the policy is not very high due to the time value of money and the relatively low payout in the event of death before age 100.


To know more about expected value refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29574962#

#SPJ11

Answer: 0.48

Step-by-step explanation:

× 0.1 = ÷10

÷ 0.1 = ×10

× 0.01 = ÷100

÷ 0.01 = ×100

So, we do=

4.8 x 0.1 = 4.8 ÷ 10

= 0.48

So our answer is 0.48

the answer  of given function is equivalent to option (C) 1/10[cos(Pi/5) + i sin(Pi/5)]

Trigonometric functions are mathematical functions that relate angles and sides of triangles. There are six primary trigonometric functions: sine (sin), cosine (cos), tangent (tan), cotangent (cot), secant (sec), and cosecant (csc).

We can simplify the expression (1/2[cos(π/5) + sin(π/5)])5 as follows:

([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][cos(π/5) + sin(π/5)])5

= [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][cos(π/5) + sin(π/5)]

Now, we can use Euler's formula:

e^ix = cos(x) + i sin(x)

to rewrite this expression in the form a + bi:

[tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][cos(π/5) + sin(π/5)]

= [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][[e^(i(π/5) + (-π/2))]

=[tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][[e^(-iπ/2) e^(iπ/5)]

= [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][[-i(cos(π/5) + i sin(π/5))]

=[tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][[-i cos(π/5) + 5/2 sin(π/5)]

Therefore, the equivalent expression in the form a + bi is:

-[tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][ cos(π/5) + (5/4) i sin(π/5)

And simplifying this expression, we get:

-[tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex][ cos(π/5) + (5/4) i sin(π/5) = (1/10) [cos(π/5) + i sin(π/5)]

Therefore, the answer is option (C) 1/10[cos(π/5) + i sin(π/5)].

To know more about tangent, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19064965

#SPJ1

Approximately 38% of deaths among 16 to 19 year-olds are related to motor vehicles.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for teenagers in the United States.

In 2019, a total of 2,375 teenagers aged 16-19 years died in motor vehicle crashes, and an additional 258,000 were treated in emergency departments for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes.

These deaths accounted for 62% of all deaths among teenagers aged 16-19 years.

Therefore, around 38% of fatalities among individuals aged 16 to 19 are connected to automobiles.

To know more about motor vehicle deaths, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/27961222#

#SPJ11

Answer:

If Sandy spends the whole standard workday sawing, they can saw 3 cords of wood. If they spend the whole day splitting, they can split 5 cords of wood. However, Sandy cannot spend the whole day both sawing and splitting. Therefore, the largest number of cords of wood that Sandy can saw and split in a standard workday is less than or equal to 3 + 5 = 8.

To find the largest number of cords of wood that Sandy can saw and split, we need to find a way to divide the work between sawing and splitting. Let's assume that Sandy spends x fraction of the day sawing and (1-x) fraction of the day splitting. Then, the amount of wood that Sandy can saw in that time is 3x cords, and the amount of wood that Sandy can split in that time is 5(1-x) cords. The total amount of wood that Sandy can saw and split is the sum of these two amounts:

3x + 5(1-x) = 3x + 5 - 5x = 5 - 2x

To maximize this quantity, we need to choose the value of x that makes it as large as possible. Since 0 <= x <= 1, the maximum value of 5 - 2x occurs at x = 0 (Sandy spends the whole day splitting) or x = 1 (Sandy spends the whole day sawing). Therefore, the largest number of cords of wood that Sandy can saw and split in a standard workday is 5 cords, which Sandy can achieve by spending 2/5 of the day sawing and 3/5 of the day splitting.

Step-by-step explanation:

(explanation is given in your another question please check)

Answer: 0%

Step-by-step explanation:

It's impossible for it to be different than 75 or 97

the probability that a randomly selected female has a pulse rate between 60 and 90 beats per minute is approximately [tex]0.0214 or 2.14%.[/tex]

(a)The probability of the pulse rate being less than 79 beats per minute, but there is no information given about the pulse rate. Please provide the necessary information for me to answer this part of the question.

(b) To find the 75th percentile for pulse rates of females, we need to use the normal distribution table or a calculator to find the z-score corresponding to the 75th percentile, which is 0.674. Then, we can use the formula:

[tex]z = (x - μ) / σ[/tex]

where x is the pulse rate, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Rearranging the formula to solve for x, we get:

[tex]x = z * σ + μ[/tex]
[tex]x = 0.674 * 39 + 171[/tex]
[tex]x = 197.186[/tex]

Therefore, the 75th percentile for pulse rates of females is approximately 197 beats per minute.

(c) To find the probability that a randomly selected female has a pulse rate between 60 and 90 beats per minute, we need to standardize the values using the z-score formula:

[tex]z1 = (60 - 171) / 39 = -2.846[/tex]
[tex]z2 = (90 - 171) / 39 = -1.974[/tex]

Then, we can use the normal distribution table or a calculator to find the area under the standard normal distribution curve between these two z-scores:

[tex]P(-2.846 < Z < -1.974) = 0.0214[/tex]

for such more questions on random variables

https://brainly.com/question/14356285

#SPJ11

The correct option is B. The best number of people who will arrive by car is 90.

Bus: 185+175 = 359

Car: 38+43 = 81

Total: 359+81= 440

So, the proportion of arriving by car is [tex]\frac{81}{440 } = \frac{81}{440 }*500 = 90[/tex]

Regard frequency as probability

Probability is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of random events. It is the measure of the likelihood of an event occurring, expressed as a number between 0 and 1. An event with probability 0 means it will never occur, while an event with probability 1 means it will always occur.

The calculation of probability involves analyzing the possible outcomes of an event and assigning a probability to each outcome based on its likelihood of occurring. The probability of an event is determined by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes. Probability is used in various fields, such as statistics, finance, engineering, and science, to make predictions and informed decisions.

To learn more about Probability visit here:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

The Greenville Park rangers want to know the number of visitors who arrive by bus and the number who arrive by car. Park officials record the method of transportation for a random selection of park visitors over two weeks.

Methods of Transportation:

Week         Bus         Car

1                 185           38

2                174            43

if 500 people visit the park in week 3, which is the best number of people who will arrive by car.

A). 40

B). 90

C). 130

D). 200

Proportionality describes a relationship between values that have the same ratio.

Direct Proportionality

The are 2 types of proportionality; the first is directly proportional. If a relationship is directly proportional, both values will increase or decrease together at the same rate. Directly proportional relationships are described by the equation:

In this equation, y and x are variables while k represents the constant of proportionality. In a directly proportional relationship, both the y and x value grow at the same rate. For example, take this set of values:

These values are directly proportional because they both double each time, meaning they grow at the same rate. Additionally, the ratio between terms remains the same. Take the ratios 20:2 and 40:4, when simplified these are both 10:1 (for proportionality it's easier to write ratios as y:x). Since the ratio is the same, they are proportional. Additionally, the ratio tells us that the constant of proportionality is 10. So the equation to represent this situation is

Indirectly Proportional

Indirect proportionality is similar to direct, but instead of increasing or decreasing together, one value increases while the other decreases. Indirect proportionality is described by the equation:

We can represent this with another set of x and y values.

Unlike directly proportional relationships, the growth rate is not constant. Still, we can represent this relationship as

So, k still equals 10, but the relationship is indirectly proportional. As x increases, y decreases, and vice versa.

We can claim that after answering the above question, the  As a result, equation the correct answer is "Milwaukee is near a lake."

In mathematics, an equation is a statement that states the equality of two expressions. An equation is made up of two sides separated by an algebraic equation (=). For example, the argument "2x + 3 = 9" contends that the sentence "2x + 3" equals the value "9". The purpose of equation solving is to identify the value or values of the variable(s) that will make the equation true. Simple or complex equations, regular or nonlinear, with one or more factors are all possible. For example, in the equation "x2 + 2x - 3 = 0," the variable x is raised to the second power. Lines are utilized in many areas of mathematics, including algebra, calculus, and geometry.  

Milwaukee's average high temperature in the summer is four degrees lower than other cities in its latitude since it is located next to a lake. The lake (Lake Michigan) cools the surrounding areas, notably Milwaukee, which is located on the lake's western shore. This is referred to as the "lake breeze" effect, and it is a regular occurrence in cities located near major bodies of water. As a result, the correct answer is "Milwaukee is near a lake."

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

Answer:

To solve for y, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. Since there is only one term with y in it, we can begin by isolating that term:

7 + 4 + 25 + 6 = 42

42 + 5y - 2 = 40 + 5y

Subtracting 40 from both sides, we get:

2 + 5y = 5y

Subtracting 5y from both sides, we get:

2 = 0

This is a contradiction, which means that there is no value of y that satisfies the equation. Therefore, the equation has no solution.

Answer:

y= [tex]-\frac{12}{47}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

second attachment

Answer:

(15/4)4^x

Step-by-step explanation:

Substituting the x and y values of the first point, we get:

y = ab

60 = ab^(2)

Substituting the x and y values of the second point, we get:

y = ab

960 = ab^(4)

Now we can solve for a and b by eliminating one of the variables. One way to do this is to divide the second equation by the first equation:

960/60 = (ab^(4))/(ab^(2))

16 = b^(2)

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

b = ±4

Since an exponential function can only have positive values for b, we choose b = 4. Now we can solve for a by substituting b = 4 into one of the original equations:

60 = a(4^(2))

60 = 16a

a = 60/16

a = 15/4

Therefore, the values of a and b are a = 15/4 and b = 4, and the exponential function is y = (15/4)4^x.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2-3x-40=0

x^2-3x=40

2x-6x=40

-4x=40

-4x/4 = 40/-4

x= -10

Answer:

x=8 or x=-5

Step-by-step explanation:

x²-3x-40=0

x²-8x+5x-40=0

x(x-8)+5(x-8)=0

(x-8)(x+5)=0

⇒x=8 or x=-5

Answer: Should be standard form.

Step-by-step explanation: Just cause the others don't really make sense and the equation looks basic.

To ascertain whether there are more faulty microchips across the entire cargo, statistical analysis is required. You can utilise proportional or hypothesis tests.

Based on the presented dot plots, it appears that there are typically more faulty microchips in the samples from Hitech Microchips compared to those from Speedy Microchips. Nevertheless, statistical research would be required to verify whether this tendency is consistent over all 2,000 microchip shipments from each brand.

One method would be to total the defective microchips across all 15 samples and divide by the total number of microchips to determine the percentage of defective microchips in each brand's shipment (2,000).

Instead, a hypothesis test might be performed to see if there is a statistically significant difference in the proportion of faulty microchips between the two brands. This would include comparing sample proportions and taking sample size and variability into consideration.

learn more about Microchips here:

https://brainly.com/question/23764618

#SPJ4

The value of the sum of squares due to regression (ssr) if the total sum of squares (sst) is 22.21 and the sum of squares due to error (sse) is 6.89 will be 15.32.

To find the Sum of Squares due to Regression (SSR), we use the formula:

SST = SSR + SSE

Rearranging the equation to obtain SSR, we get:

SSR = SST - SSE

[tex]$\begin{aligned}SSR&= SST - SSE \\&= 22.21 - 6.89 \\&= 15.32\end{aligned}$[/tex]

Therefore, the value of the Sum of Squares due to Regression (SSR) is 15.32, given the Total Sum of Squares (SST) is 22.21 and the Sum of Squares due to Error (SSE) is 6.89.

To know more about Regression: https://brainly.com/question/25987747

#SPJ11

Answer:

19. sqrt{305}

20. 3*sqrt{7}

Step-by-step explanation:

You use the Pythagorean theorem, which can be applied to right triangles. It states that x^2+y^2 = hypotenuse ^2, where x and y are the two sides other than the hypotenuse.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this will gel help u

All the given expressions containing a coefficient of 4 is  4x+2y and 4xy.

A quantity or number that is combined with a variable is regarded as a coefficient. The variable is often multiplied by an integer, which is then typed next to it.

From the given equation:

4x+2y have the coefficient of 4 of variable 'x'.

4xy have the coefficient of 4 of variable 'x' and 'y' both.

Know more about the coefficient of the number

https://brainly.com/question/1038771

#SPJ1

Using the distributive property to generate an equivalent expression of 2(x+5) as equal to 2x+5, the mistake the student made was 2. 2 was not multiplied by 5.

According to the distributive property, multiplying the sum of two or more addends by a number results similarly as multiplying each addend individually by the number and then adding the products together.

For instance, in the expression, 2(x + 5), the equivalent expression should be 2x + 10 instead of 2x + 5.

Thus, we can conclude that the student erred by failing to multiply 2 by 5 as they multiplied 2 by x, which means that they did not apply the distributive property properly.

Learn more about the distributive property of multiplication at https://brainly.com/question/2807928

#SPJ1

The solution (16, 2) is a feasible production plan that satisfies all the constraints of the problem.

Inequality is a mathematical statement that compares two values or expressions, indicating whether they are equal or not equal, greater than or less than, greater than or equal to or less than or equal to each other, using mathematical symbols such as "<", ">", "<=", ">=", and "≠".

The solution (16, 2) represents that Wanda can produce 16 small pairs of gloves and 2 large pairs of gloves, and this production plan satisfies all the given constraints.

To see why, let's substitute x=16 and y=2 in the two inequalities:

Therefore, the solution (16, 2) is a feasible production plan that satisfies all the constraints of the problem.

To know more about inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23576168

#SPJ1

Answer: = 56

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that the functions e^(r1*t), e^(r2*t), and e^(r3*t) are linearly independent on (-∞,∞) for distinct real numbers r1, r2, and r3, we will follow the hint provided:

1. Assume to the contrary that e^(r1*t) = C1*e^(r2*t) + C2*e^(r3*t) for all t, where C1 and C2 are constants.
2. Divide both sides of the equation by e^(r1*t) to obtain: 1 = C1*e^((r2-r1)*t) + C2*e^((r3-r1)*t).
3. Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to t:
  0 = C1*(r2-r1)*e^((r2-r1)*t) + C2*(r3-r1)*e^((r3-r1)*t).
4. Now, observe that e^((r2-r1)*t) and e^((r3-r1)*t) are linearly dependent, which is a contradiction, since we know that r1, r2, and r3 are distinct real numbers, and the exponential functions with distinct exponents are linearly independent.Thus, the functions e^(r1*t), e^(r2*t), and e^(r3*t) are linearly independent on (-∞,∞) for distinct real numbers r1, r2, and r3.

Learn More About Linearly Independent Vectors: https://brainly.com/question/31328368

#SPJ11