Which line from The Glass Menagerie leaves matters uncertain about Tom for readers?

TOM: "All right, I will! The more you shout about my selfishness to me the quicker I'll go, and I won't go to the movies!"

TOM: "First it turned to wine and then it turned to beer and then it turned to whisky. I knew it was whisky it finally turned into because he needed somebody to come up out of the audience to help him, and I came up—both shows!"

TOM: "For sixty-five dollars a month I give up all that I dream of doing and being ever! And you say self—self's all I ever think of."

AMANDA: "It seems extremely peculiar that you wouldn't know your best friend was going to be married!"

Answer:

A good summary must be short, and must include details of what you read without spoiling it for others.

Answer:

True, because themes are supposed to be worldwide statements that can relate to any situation. No matter what genre you are reading, you can always find things that have similar meanings.

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Frequently, it is true that the same theme appears in different genres. An example is in the genre of horror and tragedy, the theme of love can appear.

Answer:

I wear a Medium

Explanation:

We're specifying that it is YOU (the subject) who wears a Medium. A sentence- in simple terms- is a subject-predicate. "I" being the subject.

Hope this helps!

23 year -old- man who lives in florida with his wife jane and just got married and had no children, they are taking a honey moon to florida. once they arrived at florida they decided they needed to go back to florida and fly to Pakistan. instead its was there 25 year old daughters birthday and scene it was the color purple it was to late to go to the park in the afternoon so they arrived shortly to class and went to Jurassic park at the schools pumpkin patch.

Answer:

she likes the clothes she bought

i want to read that book too

I dont need it because i have a new living room

Im have lunch at 12.30 every day

my favourite films are action films. I love them.

Jack doesn't like the jeans he got- theyre very big

Do you know my friend John?

Explanation:

Answer: Answers below :

1. She likes

2. I want

3. I don't need

4. I have

5. I love

6. Doesn't like

7. Do you know

Explanation: hope iit is correct . Please give brainliest .Thanks .

Answer:

An over exaggeration that is not actually possible in real life

Explanation:

exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.

Hope this helps C:

~Chiena

We can see that the similarity in Miller using the comparison between the use of the Devil and the fight against Communism reveals:

The way that witch trial was used to prosecute people those days, the same way that people that confessed to support Communism were prosecuted. It was a plot to eradicate Communism in America.

The larger point that Miller is making about “diabolism” in society is that people that use diabolism should be eradicated from the society.

Diabolism refers to the way things are done or carried with the help of the devil. In other words, diabolism talks among devilish and demonic way of doing things.

We see that Miller showed in his book "The Crucible" how diabolism needed to be eradicated in society.

Learn more about The Crucible on https://brainly.com/question/936016

the right answer is stubborn

Answer:

Odin

Explanation:

On their wedding day an old man which was Odin in disguise entered the hall

Please mark me as the brainliest

A, Conceited would be your answer

It makes it negative because the word conceited is commonly used as a insult

Answer:

in my view it is

Answer:

In Hess v. Indiana (1973), the Court applied Brandenburg and said that before an individual's speech could fall under the unprotected category of incitement to imminent lawless action, the speech must lead to “imminent disorder.”

Explanation:

The Court interpreted Brandenburg in Hess v. Indiana (1973), holding that the speech must cause "imminent disruption" in order for it to come under the unprotected category of incitement to imminent unlawful action.

Fighting words are phrases that are meant to stir up hostility or violence in their intended audience. Depending on the jurisdiction, fighting words have different legal definitions, freedoms, and restrictions.

Fighting words are those that are meant to incite violence, potentially excluding them from First Amendment free speech protection. When Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire was decided in 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court first described them as remarks that "by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to instigate an instant breach of the peace."

To learn more about fighting words refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/27149871

#SPJ2

Answer:

In short, globalization allows for religions previously isolated from one another to now have regular and unavoidable contact. As a result, globalization brings to the light the fact that since religions have similar values, not one of them is “correct” and, therefore, can be changed. Globalization give for regular contact, religion gets in the sphere of argument in which religion proves to become more anxious towards them as being world religions. Globalization also provides a culture of pluralism, meaning religions that overlapping but distinctive ethics and interests interact with one another. The basic tenets of globalisation stand against religious parochialism. By diminishing the barriers between different cultures, globalisation lands religion in a quagmire of conflicts which reinforce social identities as some do not accept the new realities and turn to religion to rediscover their own identity. In this context, the globalization of religion can be understood as a process of realignment in this global religious situation, a process which involves the following three facets: First, it implies the inevitable transformation of individual religious organizations; second, it can be expected that new characteristics. The results indicate that globalisation is a contributing factor to the increase in restrictions on religious freedom, with this partly being explained by the perceived threat communities feel when they are exposed to members of other religions. Restrictions on religious freedom are on the rise.

Explanation:

Answer:

C: Interrogative Sentence

Explanation:

Not A: It's a phrase, and this is a sentence. The difference is a phrase doesn't make sense outside of the sentence it's in and doesn't have punctuation that ends a sentence. An adverbial phrase adds meaning to what is talked about in the sentence, like "during the week," "earlier today," and so on.

Not B: At this point, the type of sentence is based on the punctuation. It needs to have an exclamation mark at the end to be exclamatory.

Not D: C is right, so it's not this.

C is right: If it has a question mark, it is interrogative. An interrogation is asking a question, so that's where it comes from.

Answer:

sadistic

query

coerce

allude

elite

alleged

immunity

affirm

impair

essence

Explanation:

1. falls in line with being evil

2. another way of saying "ask"

3. also means "force," which fits the blank

4. allude to means "hint at" or "suggest," which is very much a match

5. The luxury described matches being "elite"

6. only one that fits subject-verb agreement; the word makes sense, too

7. Means the kids are "safe from"

8. Matches subject-verb agreement; only one left that makes sense

9. Impair means "mess up"

10. Only one left and it makes the most sense

Answer:

An unequal power relationship is the basic component of a power structure. The person with superior power, either due to trust or to technology access or superior knowledge, does not necessarily have superior ethical judgement, just because they are trusted, technologically enabled, or better educated.

Explanation:

Which word would best replace captive in the sentence below?

Answer:

B. fascinated

Answer:

he likes that

-this explains that a person likes something

he like that

-is defining a person

hope this helped :)

Answer:

he likes that

Explanation:

likes - present tense

liked - past tense

Answer:

I believe the best age for anyone to start using social media is around 15-16. A child under the age of 13 will most likely be easily influenced by things they see since they are still developing their views and opportunities on the world and themselves. Younger teens 13 or 14 will most likely also be influenced but also pressured by social media. Social media can cause stress or pressure for those who are still young and developing. Around 15 or a little older is a great age to start because it is a good way to start giving freedom to young adults. 15, 16 or 17 years old for the most part have discovered their personality and have a higher level of common sense and critical thinking.

Explanation: E2020

I believe that the appropriate age to allow children and young adults to use social media is 13 years old.

This age restriction is consistent with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in the United States, which aims to protect children's online privacy and safety. At 13, most children have developed a level of digital literacy and maturity to navigate social media responsibly. Furthermore, social media can offer educational and creative opportunities for young users.

However, a counterclaim might argue for a lower age, arguing that children can benefit from early exposure to technology. To address this, it is crucial to consider the potential risks of social media, such as cyberbullying and privacy concerns. By setting the age at 13, we strike a balance between enabling positive experiences and safeguarding the well-being of young users.

To know more about social media, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/30108223

#SPJ2

The main idea in Anthony's speech is that women should be given the right to vote just as the men do.

It should be noted that a speech simply means a formal address that's given about a particular issue.

In this case, the main idea in Anthony's speech is that women should be given the right to vote just as the men do. She also stated that countries that denied women the right to vote are oligarchies.

Learn more about speech on:

https://brainly.com/question/25887038

#SPJ1

Answer:

A set of beliefs about the superiority of one racial or ethnic group compared to another is racism.

Answer:It gives us the space to try new things and be creative buster.

Explanation:

Hope that helped idiot><

Answer:

Worried, because of Billy Taupe

The correct answer is:

1. My little brother wants to be an actor.(Here in the given sentence, it has been asked to mention the finite and non-finite verb, 'to be' is finite and 'wants' is an infinitive verb)

2. She worked hard to p. the test.(Here in the given sentence, it has been asked to mention the finite and non-finite verb, 'to' is finite and (p) is an infinitive verb)

3. I couldn't solve the problem.(Here in the given sentence, it has been asked to mention the finite and non-finite verb, 'couldn't' is finite and 'solve' is an infinitive verb)

Note:- An non-finite verb is has a preposition before it. (p) denotes passed.

Answer:

focus on individual experience, an idealization of women, and an embrace of isolation and melancholy.

Answer:

donnow

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

yan lng po Alam ko

Answer:

the answer is d

Explanation:

i know lots of USA's history