Answer:
Explanation:
The answer is "All of these rights are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights."
All of the options listed are rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to someone who is accused of a crime. The right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, the right to a trial by a jury of peers is guaranteed by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments, protection from being tried twice for the same crime is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment is guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment.
Therefore, all of these rights are important protections for individuals who are accused of a crime, and they are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution through the Bill of Rights.
Please help me solve this question for my Humanites class upon a selected artwork I choose.
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes. Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miró had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction. Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Question:
Medium
What is this work constructed from? What type of materials are used?
Answer:
The Farm is an oil painting on canvas, a traditional medium used widely by artists during the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century. Oil painting involves mixing pigments with oil to create paint, which is then applied to a prepared canvas surface. In this case, Miró would have mixed pigments with linseed oil, the most commonly used oil for oil painting, to create the colors used in the painting. He would have also employed a brush, likely of a variety of sizes, to create the detailed and nuanced forms found in the painting.
Indian law defines English as a "subsidiary official language.
If is used in government, business, education, and national communication. About 41 percent of the population speaks Hindi, the country's most widely spoken language.
People who do not share a common first language generally communicate in either Hindi or English. Linguistic tensions sometimes arise because speakers of India's other languages often feel marginalized by the dominance of Hindi.
The excerpt above could be titled as which of the following?
A description of the government system in India
0
Impacts of British colonialism in India
O
Advantages of living in India
Reasons for Hindu colonization of India
The excerpt above could be titled as - B. Impacts of British colonialism in India.
The reason for this is-
English is referred to in Indian law as a "subsidiary official language."It is utilized in business, government, education, and interstate communication.Hindi or English are typically used to communicate by those who do not have a common first language.Also, this is because the British governed India for approximately 200 years. Indian culture is still clearly influenced by them.
Hence, the correct answer is B. Impacts of British colonialism in India.
Colonialism?Control by one power over a dependent region or population is what is meant by colonialism. It happens when one country conquers another, subjugates its people, and exploits them, frequently while imposing its own language and cultural norms.
To know more about Colonization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ1
I will give you 20 point if you can help me with these three questions in the picture below relating to the quotes.
According to the question, there are quotes by Chief Seattle and Meriwether Lewis about America.
The answer to questions based on the quotations are-
1. According to Chief Seattle-
White Americans do not concerned about the customs and values associated with land. They just utilize the property to further their own personal interests.He portrayed them as strangers who arrived at night, took what they wanted, and then left.According to Meriwether-
He describes Americans as uncivilized people.He mentioned that , he is setting foot on a land on which no civilized person has ever came upon.2. The two perspectives are similar in the way due to the fact that Meriwether and Chief Seattle thought poorly of Americans and their disregard for morals.
The difference in the perspective among them was Chief Seattle talks about their disregard for their land.
Whereas, Meriwether refers to Americans as uncivilized.
3.Chief Seattle and Meriwether both referred to the native population as being nasty in the quotations that had to do with the Declaration of Independence.
The doctrine of "Manifest Destiny" held that white Americans had been given a divine mandate to colonize the whole North American continent.
So, they both warned about what was going to happen to America.
To know more about Manifest Destiny visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11669373
#SPJ1
Which sentence in this excerpt from Susan B. Anthony’s “On Women’s Right to Vote” reveals the purpose of the speech? Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny. The preamble of the Federal Constitution says: "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people - women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government - the ballot.
Answer: It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
Explanation: She says it shall be my work this evening to prove to you...
1. Many presidents in American history have faced constitutional questions related to their powers, policies, or conduct. Presidents Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush all faced such constitutional issues during their administrations. Describe the constitutional questions in each situation below.
President: Situation:
Ronald Reagan Iran Contra Affair
Bill Clinton Impeachment
George W. Bush Use of executive privilege
Patriot Act
Iraq War
What was the constitutional issue(s) involved?
2. Write a brief essay explaining which constitutional issue described above you think was most serious for the country’s well-being and why.
The constitutional issues faced by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush during their administrations were as follows:
Ronald Reagan: Iran Contra Affair - This was a scandal in which the Reagan administration secretly sold arms to Iran, which was under an arms embargo, and used the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The issue involved questions about the president's power to conduct foreign policy and whether the administration had violated the law.
Bill Clinton: Impeachment - This was a political crisis in which President Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives for perjury and obstruction of justice related to his affair with Monica Lewinsky. The issue involved questions about the president's conduct in office and whether he had abused his power.
George W. Bush: Use of executive privilege - This was a controversy over the Bush administration's use of executive privilege to withhold information from Congress during investigations into the firing of U.S. attorneys and the use of warrantless wiretapping by the National Security Agency. The issue involved questions about the president's power to keep information confidential and whether he had overstepped his authority.
George W. Bush: Patriot Act and Iraq War - These were controversial policies implemented by the Bush administration in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act expanded the government's surveillance and law enforcement powers, while the Iraq War was a military conflict launched on the premise of finding weapons of mass destruction. The issues involved questions about the president's power to protect national security and whether these policies were necessary and effective.
In my opinion, the most serious constitutional issue described above for the country's well-being was the Patriot Act and the associated expansion of the government's surveillance and law enforcement powers. While the desire to protect national security is understandable, the erosion of civil liberties and privacy rights can have significant negative consequences for society. The use of these powers has been controversial and has raised concerns about government overreach and abuse of power. In a democracy, it is important to balance national security with individual rights and freedoms, and I believe that the expansion of government surveillance and law enforcement powers under the Patriot Act was a significant challenge to this balance.
How were the Allies able to defeat the Axis in World War II?
Question:
How were the Allies able to defeat the Axis in World War II?
Answer:
The military production of the Allies far exceeded the production of the Axis
Frederick Douglass
a. spent the whole time he was enslaved doing plantation field work.
b. argued that knowledge was essential to achieving freedom from slavery.
c. was freed by his enslaver.
d. believed resistance to slavery was futile.
e. opposed the women’s rights movement.
The third option, in which it is argued that knowledge was necessary to free oneself from slavery, is entirely correct.
What details about his time as a slave has Douglas revealed?Slavery. In the years before the American Civil War, Frederick Douglass vehemently argued against slavery in his writings, speeches, and articles. He tried to show that it was cruel, strange, unnatural, immoral, and unjust.Frederick Douglass exchanged pieces of bread for literacy lessons when he was still a young slave boy in Baltimore. White neighbourhood children who could read and write but had no access to food served as his teachers. At age 20, he fled to New York and began a new life as an activist and orator against slavery.
To know about Frederick Douglas visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1910366
#SPJ1
Which quotation from source 3 best explains how standard oil used the strategy of vertical integration?
The best quotation that explains how Standard Oil used the strategy of vertical integration is "Standard Oil aimed to control every aspect of the industry from oil drilling to marketing or creating subsidiary companies at every stage of production".
This quotation highlights Standard Oil's approach of owning and controlling every step of the oil production process, from exploration and drilling to transportation and marketing. The company's ultimate goal was to eliminate competition and maximize profits by vertically integrating the entire industry.
Standard Oil's vertical integration strategy enabled the company to achieve economies of scale and reduce costs by eliminating middlemen and coordinating production processes.
By owning and controlling every aspect of the industry, Standard Oil could also set prices and production levels to its advantage, effectively squeezing out smaller competitors.
The company's aggressive acquisition of rival firms and creation of subsidiaries also helped to expand its market share and influence, solidifying its dominance in the industry.
Overall, the quotation from source 3 emphasizes the extent to which Standard Oil used vertical integration to achieve its monopolistic power in the oil industry.
By controlling every aspect of production, the company was able to maintain its dominance for many years until it was eventually broken up by antitrust legislation.
For more question on Standard Oil visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14061271
#SPJ11
Note :
The search engine cannot find the details about source 3.
PLS HURRY TIMED!!! Why does the word “reaction” describe the Renaissance?
It caused change, and that is a reaction.
Many traditional ideas were challenged, sparking controversies.
Other cultures responded by increasing hostilities against Europe.
No one was sure about the nature of reality or the fate of the Catholic Church.
The word "reaction" does not accurately describe the Renaissance. The Renaissance was a period of great cultural, artistic, and intellectual achievement that occurred in Europe between the 14th and 17th centuries. It is characterized by a renewed interest in the classical arts and sciences, as well as a flowering of creativity and innovation in literature, art, music, and philosophy.
Option (a) is partially correct, as the Renaissance did cause change, but this alone does not make it a reaction. Option (c) is not accurate, as the Renaissance did not lead to an increase in hostilities against Europe. Option (d) is also incorrect, as the Renaissance did not cause uncertainty about the nature of reality or the fate of the Catholic Church.
Option (b) is the most accurate answer. Many traditional ideas were indeed challenged during the Renaissance, leading to controversies and debates about the nature of art, religion, science, and politics. For example, the Renaissance saw a revival of humanism, which emphasized the importance of human potential and individuality, as opposed to the medieval emphasis on religion and tradition. The Renaissance also saw the rise of new scientific and philosophical ideas that challenged traditional beliefs, such as the heliocentric model of the solar system proposed by Copernicus. These challenges to tradition and convention led to a period of great creativity and innovation, but also to social and intellectual tensions that were part of the Renaissance's legacy.
INTERPRET THE EVIDENCE
1. What roles does the National Security Council believe the Soviet Union plays in the spread of communism (Document 24.1)? What are the council's suggestions for containing communism in Asia?
2. What is Kim Il-sung asking of the Soviet Union, and why (Document 24.2)? How does Kim envision the international Communist movement? Why do you think he tells Shtykov he will meet with Mao if he cannot meet with Stalin?
3. According to Truman (Document 24.3), in what ways were MacArthur's recommendations for fighting the war at odds with the reasons for being in Korea in the first place? How did he characterize MacArthur's actions?
4. Why did MacArthur accuse Truman of appeasing China (Document 24.4)? In what ways does MacArthur's speech highlight the differences between the political and military goals of the Korean War?
5. Why would Herbert Block's cartoon (Document 24.5) depict Secretary of Defense George Marshall instead of President Truman? What parts of the world appear on each globe, and what do these differences signify? Why does MacArthur's globe have a button on it?
PUT IT IN CONTEXT
1. Why were MacArthur's actions considered a threat to the civilian leadership of the military?
2. What about the conflict in Korea turned it into a large-scale war in the early stages of the Cold War?
1. During the Cold War, the National Security Council (NSC) of the United States likely believed that the Soviet Union played a key role in spreading communism globally, including in Asia. The NSC may have seen the Soviet Union as supporting and promoting communist movements and governments in other countries, with the goal of expanding Soviet influence and undermining the interests of the United States and its allies. The NSC's suggestions for containing communism in Asia may have included diplomatic, economic, and military measures to counter Soviet-backed communist movements and governments in the region, such as providing military aid to anti-communist forces, implementing economic sanctions, and diplomatic efforts to isolate and confront communist regimes.
2. Kim Il-sung, the leader of North Korea, may have sought support from the Soviet Union for his country's communist regime. He may have requested military and economic aid from the Soviet Union to strengthen his government and maintain its control over North Korea. Kim Il-sung may have envisioned the international communist movement as a global force working towards the spread of communism and the overthrow of capitalist governments, with the Soviet Union as a key ally and supporter. He may have expressed a willingness to meet with Mao, the leader of China, if he could not meet with Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union, to seek support from other communist powers.
3. Truman, who was the President of the United States during the Korean War, may have believed that MacArthur's recommendations for fighting the war were at odds with the original reasons for U.S. involvement in Korea. MacArthur may have advocated for more aggressive military actions, such as expanding the war into China or using nuclear weapons, which Truman may have seen as risking a wider conflict and undermining the limited goals of the U.S. intervention in Korea. Truman may have characterized MacArthur's actions as insubordinate or as exceeding his authority as a military commander, and potentially undermining civilian control over the military, which is a fundamental principle of democratic governance.
4. MacArthur, who was a U.S. military commander during the Korean War, may have accused Truman of appeasing China by not taking more aggressive military actions against Chinese forces that were supporting North Korea. MacArthur may have believed that a more forceful approach was necessary to defeat the communist forces in Korea and prevent their expansion. MacArthur's speech may have highlighted the differences between the political goal of containing communism and the military goal of defeating communist forces on the battlefield, with MacArthur advocating for a more military-focused strategy.
5. Herbert Block's cartoon, without specific knowledge of the cartoon in question, may have depicted Secretary of Defense George Marshall instead of President Truman because Marshall was a prominent figure in the U.S. government and military at the time, and may have been associated with the decision-making related to the Korean War. The parts of the world depicted on each globe and the differences in these depictions may have represented the differing perspectives or priorities of Marshall and Truman towards the Korean War and global events. The button on MacArthur's globe may represent a reference to the potential use of nuclear weapons, as MacArthur had advocated for their use in the Korean War.
Contextual information:
1.MacArthur's actions during the Korean War were considered a threat to the civilian leadership of the military because he publicly expressed disagreements with the U.S. government's policy and advocated for more aggressive military actions, including potentially expanding the war into China or using nuclear weapons. This was seen as a challenge to the authority of civilian
Which position makes more sense: unilateralism or multilateralism. Explain Why?
Since greater trade and economic progress have led to shared wealth and stability, multilateralism makes more sense than unilateralism.
This is due to the fact that it acknowledges how interdependent countries are in a worldwide society. Countries will be able to deal with problems like climate change, pandemics, and security concerns more successfully by cooperating through organizations and agreements than by acting independently.
However, unilateralism runs the danger of alienating friends, escalating conflict, and eroding international collaboration. Therefore, the advantages of multilateralism, including increased trade and economic growth, may result in shared wealth and stability.
Learn more about multilateralism here:
https://brainly.com/question/237212
#SPJ1
How did transcendentalism contriubte to the spirit of reform
Is this statement true or false?
John Brown inflicted violence against non-combatant slave holders.
-True
-False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
John Brown led an armed raid on the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in 1859, with the intention of sparking a slave rebellion. During the raid, Brown and his followers killed several people, including non-combatant slaveholders, and were eventually captured and executed for their actions.
6.06 war on the bank
Based on Andrew Jackson's perspective, he would have opposed establishment of a national bank and so, opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
What was the Andrew Jackson's perspective on the cases?The McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to define the scope of the legislative power that Congress had and how it related to legislatures power. He would opposed establishment of national bank and hence would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
Gibbons v. Ogden was case where Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce should be granted to the Congress. President Jackson would have opposed the ruling which said expanded Congress's power to cover interstate commerce.
Read more about McCulloch v. Maryland
brainly.com/question/729429
#SPJ1
Help please I really need help please
is about Women's equality but I need to follow all the instructions please
here are the instructions in the picture
The Cult of True Womanhood, also known as The Cult of Domesticity, emerged in the mid-19th century as part of the rise of the middle class in the United States.
The Cult of True WomanhoodThe ideal woman was viewed as a pious, pure, submissive, and domestic figure who centered her life around her family and home. This ideology reflected the changing economic and social landscape of the time, as the industrial revolution spurred new opportunities for women to work outside of the home and challenged traditional gender roles.
The inculcation of the cult of morality in middle class women reflected a desire to maintain social order and stability in the face of these changes. Women were expected to fulfill their "proper sphere" by controlling their behavior and maintaining their purity through sexual abstinence before marriage. Submission to men, particularly their fathers and husbands, was seen as a virtue and reinforced through religious teachings. The domesticity of women was emphasized, with women expected to create a perfect home environment through domestic tasks such as needlework, housework, and flower arranging.
The Cult of True Womanhood had significant implications for women's equality, as it reinforced traditional gender roles and limited opportunities for women outside of the home. Women who did not conform to this ideal were stigmatized and marginalized, while men continued to hold positions of power and authority in society. Despite these challenges, women throughout history have fought to challenge and overcome these limitations, paving the way for greater equality and opportunities for future generations of women.
Read more on women equality here:https://brainly.com/question/3256128
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not a current world conflict caused by racial tensions?
A.Hutus and Tutsis
B.suffrage
C.Shia and Sunni
D.apartheid
Answer:
b. suffrage
Explanation:
Suffrage is not a current world conflict caused by racial tensions. Suffrage refers to the right to vote in political elections, and while issues related to voting rights can sometimes be related to racial tensions, they are not typically considered a "world conflict" in the same sense as the other examples listed.
please help me with this history question i’ll give you brainlist !!
Answer:
the six day war is your answer I think
how important is it to consider the irony of colonialism and empeire
Answer:
It is crucial to consider the irony of colonialism and empire because it highlights the inherent contradictions and injustices of these systems. Colonialism and empire were built on the idea of Western superiority and the exploitation of other cultures and peoples, often through violence and oppression. However, this idea of superiority was not only unfounded, but it also ignored the rich history, knowledge, and diversity of the colonized peoples.
Moreover, the irony of colonialism and empire is that they claimed to bring civilization, progress, and modernity to the "uncivilized" and "backward" peoples, while in reality, they disrupted and destroyed indigenous cultures, economies, and social systems. Colonizers often erased or suppressed local languages, religions, and customs and imposed their own values, norms, and institutions.
By recognizing the irony of colonialism and empire, we can challenge the dominant narratives and perspectives that have justified and glorified these systems and instead, acknowledge the complex and diverse experiences of those who were colonized and oppressed. We can also work towards a more equitable and just society that values diversity, multiculturalism, and respect for all peoples and cultures.
Explanation:
What did Lincoln hope to do about voting after the Civil War?
OA. Extend voting to Native Americans living in the West
OB. Stop all Southern men from ever voting again
OC. Limit voting to a small portion of African Americans
OD. Introduce a bill in Congress on women's right to vote
Lincoln's goals for voting after the Civil War were primarily focused on granting suffrage to African American men. Hence option A is correct.
Lincoln's believed that granting them the right to vote would help them achieve equal rights and protection under the law. In fact, he pushed for the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibited the denial of voting rights based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
While Lincoln did not specifically address Native American voting rights or advocate for disenfranchising Southern white men, his efforts towards extending suffrage to African American men were significant and helped pave the way for expanded voting rights in the United States.
As for women's voting rights, Lincoln did not live to see the passage of the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote. However, his advocacy for African American suffrage helped lay the groundwork for later movements towards women's suffrage.
Learn more about voting after the Civil War here
https://brainly.com/question/5012017
#SPJ1
Anti-federalists would likely have been supportive of nationwide mask and vaccine mandates.
True or False and why?
Will mark brainliest. :)
the given statement "Anti-federalists would likely have been supportive of nationwide mask and vaccine mandates."is false because Anti-federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution.
They believed that the federal government should have limited powers and that individual liberties should be protected.
Mandating masks and vaccines on a nationwide level would be seen by anti-federalists as an overreach of federal power. They would argue that this is a decision that should be left up to the individual states to decide.
Anti-federalists would likely support the idea of individual choice when it comes to healthcare decisions and would be wary of a centralized authority imposing such mandates.
Moreover, anti-federalists were skeptical of the federal government's ability to effectively carry out such mandates and would be concerned about potential abuses of power. They would prefer that state governments have the ability to tailor policies to the specific needs of their constituents.
In conclusion, anti-federalists would not be supportive of nationwide mask and vaccine mandates because they would view such mandates as an infringement on individual liberties and an overreach of federal power.
For more question on Anti-federalists visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28737049
#SPJ11
please help me with history i’ll give you brainlist
Answer:
A. Reunifying India and Pakistan
Chichen Itza is most closely associated with -
O A. Great Zimbabwe
B. The Mayans
O C. Timbuktu
O D. The Incan Empire
Answer: B
Explanation: Chichen Itza is most closely associated with the mayans
Multiple governments around the globe used
to sway public opinion to support their war efforts during World War I,
Yes, multiple governments around the globe used propaganda to sway public opinion and support their war efforts during World War I.
Governments on both sides of the conflict used propaganda techniques to dehumanize the enemy, promote nationalistic fervor, and encourage citizens to support the war effort through various means, such as buying war bonds or enlisting in the military.
Propaganda was disseminated through various mediums, including posters, films, newspapers, and speeches. Governments employed skilled artists, writers, and filmmakers to create persuasive propaganda that appealed to people's emotions and prejudices. Some of the most famous propaganda posters from World War I were produced by the United States and British governments, while Germany was also known for its effective use of propaganda during the war.
To know more about governments here
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
Please help me with this page 50 points
What is the theory of delegate representation?
Question 27 options:
a)
Elected officials vote as their constituents want them to
b)
The basis of the three branches of government
c)
Incumbency is the strongest predictor of getting elected
d)
The parliamentary system
Answer:
Explanation:
a) Elected officials vote as their constituents want them to
The theory of delegate representation is a political theory that holds that elected officials should strive to represent the views and interests of their constituents. In this view, representatives are considered "delegates" of the people who elected them, and they should act as proxies for their constituents' interests when they vote on legislation or take other official actions.
Under the theory of delegate representation, elected officials are expected to take their constituents' interests into account when making decisions, even if those decisions go against their own personal beliefs or the interests of powerful groups or individuals.
This theory stands in contrast to the theory of trustee representation, which holds that elected officials should act as "trustees" of the public interest and use their own judgment to make decisions, even if those decisions go against the preferences of their constituents.
Overall, the theory of delegate representation is an important concept in democratic governance, as it places a strong emphasis on the role of citizen participation and representation in shaping policy decisions.
summary of Has Putin's war failed and what does Russia want from Ukraine
Answer:
"Has Putin's war failed?" is an article that analyzes the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It argues that while Russia has not achieved all of its goals in Ukraine, it has succeeded in destabilizing the country and maintaining a level of influence. Russia's goals in Ukraine include maintaining a buffer zone between itself and NATO, preventing Ukraine from joining the EU, and keeping Ukraine within its sphere of influence. The article suggests that Russia's ultimate goal is to create a new international order that includes a more prominent role for Russia.
Please help me solve this question for my Humanites class upon a selected artwork choose.
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes.
Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miro had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction.
Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Website:
https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.69660.html
Question:
Western or Non-western Humanities Classification
Based on the social, historical, and cultural contexts: Would you classify this work as Western or Non-Western? Based on your research and observations, provide reasons and evidence supporting your classification claim.
Based on the social, historical, and cultural contexts, I would classify Joan Miro's painting, The Farm, as a Western artwork.
The painting was created in 1921 when John Miro was living in Paris, France, which was a major center of artistic innovation in the Western world. The painting also shows clear influences from the cubist movement.
The Farm may be inspired by a specific location in Catalonia, its style, techniques, and historical context align it more closely with Western art movements of the early 20th century. Therefore, I would classify it as a Western artwork.
Learn more about Joan Miro here:
https://brainly.com/question/14395425
#SPJ1
Along the coast north of California were the what coast cultures
The coastal cultures north of California were the Pacific Northwest Coast cultures. These included various Native American groups such as the Tlingit, Haida, Nuu-chah-nulth, Kwakwaka'wakw, and Coast Salish, among others. These cultures were known for their sophisticated art, including totem poles and intricate basketry, as well as their fishing and whaling practices. They also had complex social structures and often engaged in trade and diplomacy with neighboring groups.
Laissez-faire economics and antitrust acts were:
© A. unlikely to be supported by the same person.
B. hallmarks of the Populist Party platform.
O c. vocally supported by the robber barons.
• D. designed to rein in businesses that grew too large.
Option (d), Antitrust laws and laissez-faire economics were created to control out-of-control corporate growth.
What effects on the economy did laissez-faire have?Businesses operate with more flexibility under a free-market economy because there are fewer government prohibitions that would complicate doing business. In this environment, businesses are more inclined to take risks and make economic investments.
Antitrust laws are intended to control what.Antitrust laws are the regulations that regulate the market and how it operates. The objectives of these laws are to prevent monopolies and to reduce unfair commercial practices. Although the antitrust laws have been around for more than a century, their primary objective has remained the same: to protect the market's competitive environment for the benefit of consumers by making sure that businesses have strong incentives to operate profitably, keep costs down, and uphold high standards of quality.
Learn more about Antitrust laws: https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ1
One way that Florida limits the governor's judicial powers is by
A. requiring the approval of two members of the cabinet whenever the governor exercises the powers of clemency.
B. requiring that the lieutenant governor approve pardons recommended by the governor.
C. allowing the governor to appoint members of The Board of Pardons and Paroles.
D. calling for a senate vote to approve any use of the governor's clemency powers.
Florida limits the governor's judicial powers by requiring the approval of two members of the cabinet whenever the governor exercises the powers of clemency. The correct option is A.
Clemency is the power given to a governor to grant pardons, reduce a sentence, or commute a sentence. In Florida, the governor's powers of clemency are limited by requiring the approval of two members of the cabinet, which includes the attorney general, the chief financial officer, and the commissioner of agriculture, whenever the governor exercises these powers. This process is known as the Board of Executive Clemency.
This requirement ensures that the governor does not have unchecked power when it comes to clemency and that there is a system of checks and balances in place. The governor cannot simply grant clemency on their own; they must have the support of at least two other cabinet members.
The correct option is A.
To know more about judicial powers, click here
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ1