As it is stated that, Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Madison's Federal Negative cannot be supported, as it gives absolute power to the congress to veto any law passed by the states.
What is Madison's Federal Negative ?James Madison of Virg had suggested including federal negative in the new constitution, which would provide Congress the power to veto any law passed by a state legislature. He considered this as a critical bulwark against unchecked power of the states.
Concerns behind the federal negative were,
1. It would allow Congress to dominate the states as slaves.
2. Dictatorship of large states over smaller ones.
Thus, federal negative cannot be supported as it leads to absolute power to the congress over smaller states.
For further information on the Federal Negative, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4053236
#SPJ1
Which of these six goals do you think is the most important goal for a society to achieve?
1. economic system
2. traditional economy
3. command economy
4. market economy
5. free market economy
6. economic planning
Economic stability is the most crucial goal for a society to achieve. It implies that people have the resources they require to live healthy lives.
Affordability of housing; employment that pays a living wage; employment supports such as worker protections, paid sick leave, and child care; and access to reliable transportation are all factors influencing economic stability.
Economic stability enables people to gain access to essential resources such as financial resources, quality housing and food, and a job that pays a stable, living wage.
A society is a long-lasting and cooperative social group whose members have developed organized patterns of relationships through interaction with one another.
To know more about economic stability, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1315045
#SPJ1
Discuss the theories political scientists have developed to describe where power lies in
American politics and how it is utilized to affect government.
Answer:
Over the years, political analysts have tended to split over how the American political system operates. This split involves three theoretical systems: pluralism, hyper-pluralism, and the power elite; the arguments of which have evolved into three branches of disagreement. The disagreements centre around which theory best describes what is going on in American politics.
Pluralism, the first branch in this debate, is well represented by French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville’s insights into the vitality of early American politics. Convinced that France was moving towards social equality similar to American democracy, de Tocqueville toured the United States in the 1830s to analyze democracy as a political potential. There, he was struck by how well developed the principle of association—a proto form of pluralism—was among average Americans. At the time, American politics was marked by a rich diversity of organized associations and interest groups vying with each other to see that their respective wishes were translated into government policy. (3) Pluralism is a theoretical approach that emphasizes how ordinary Americans are free to start or join any of these groups and that organized interests struggle with each other on a level playing field. In other words, no one set of interests is likely to dominate public policy—at least not for very long, because the many losers will temporarily put aside their differences to collaborate to influence policy. The pluralist argument is bolstered by the number and variety of interest groups and by the fact that interests in one category—business, for example—often struggle with each other and fail to put up a monolithic front vis labour or environmental groups.
The second theoretical approach, hyper-pluralism, argues that America was at some point characterized by pluralism, but over time it transformed into something less healthy: an out-of-control hyper-pluralist polity. This approach is voiced by political scientists who argue that hyper-pluralism suggests that the government has essentially been captured by the demands of interest groups. And rather than arbitrating the struggle between organized interests, the government tries to put into effect the wishes of them all to the detriment of the country. Political scientist Theodore Lowi called this pathological process interest-group liberalism, which is often used interchangeably with the hyper-pluralism label. (4) These theorists point to the contradictory nature of government policy—for example, spending money to subsidize fossil fuel extraction while at the same time passing regulations to limit carbon emissions—as evidence that there isn’t a competition going on as envisioned by pluralism. The hyper-pluralism system more closely resembles a free-for-all.
The third approach is called elite theory, which is the theoretical perspective used in this text. Elite theorists hold that the many-interests-on-a-level-playing-field vision of the pluralists and the interest-group-chaos scenario of the hyper-pluralists fail to accurately show what is going on: that a relatively small and wealthy class of individuals—the power elite—essentially gets its way. (5) According to this theory, the power elite are either the decision-makers or they so influence the decision-makers that the elites get their way most of the time. The elite theory highlights the power of organized business and military interests combined with society’s affluent strata and points to many government policies that lavish benefits onto them. Moreover, business interests create interlocking and overlapping connections that reinforce their position and allow them to control the political system—witness the exclusive and overlapping memberships of corporate boards, foundation boards, trustee positions for public and private universities, and corporate media ownership. The fact that elites have disproportionate power and seek to continue their dominance is not new. As political essayist Noam Chomsky wrote, “Right through American history, there’s been an ongoing clash between pressure for more freedom and democracy coming from below and efforts at elite control and domination coming from above.”
which of the following was a code name associated with the Allied invasion of Italy
Operation Mincemeat was the code name associated with the Allied invasion of Italy.
The British war drama Operation Mincemeat, which will be released in 2021, is directed by John Madden. The book by Ben Macintyre about the British Operation Mincemeat during World War II served as its inspiration. The cast of the film includes Jason Isaacs, Johnny Flynn, Penelope Wilton, Kelly Macdonald, Matthew Macfadyen, and Colin Firth.
Operation Mincemeat, a highly unusual instance of Allied strategic deception during World War II, was designed to draw attention away from the German Armed Forces' preparations for the Allies' arrival on the island of Sicily in 1943. They tricked the German and Italian high commands into thinking they were going to attack Sardinia and Greece instead of Sicily in 1943.
To know more about Operation Mincemeat refer to: https://brainly.com/question/9970479
#SPJ9
which outcomes did the glorious, american, and french revolutions have in common? check all that apply.
The outcomes that are common in both the American and French revolutions are options (1) and (2) i.e, the establishment of a more democratic government and the drafting of a document to protect civil liberties.
The rise of a more democratic government. The Glorious Revolution was an attempt to uphold laws and liberties and respond to popular demands, but it did not lead to the foundation of a democratic government. While the French Revolution established many democratic elements, such as universal civil and political rights, the American Revolution established a democratic government.
The drafting of a law to protect civil freedoms. The Glorious Revolution led to the creation of the Bill of Rights in 1689. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen was written in response to the French Revolution, while the United States (US) Constitution was written in response to the American Revolution.
To know more about American Revolution refer to: https://brainly.com/question/1536954
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
which outcomes did the glorious, American, and french revolutions have in common? check all that apply. 1. the establishment of a more democratic government 2. the drafting of a document to protect to protect civil liberties 3. the creation of a constitutional monarchy 4. the creation of a democratic republic 5. the end of violence and turmoil
5. In at least one paragraph, summarize the outcomes for the Indigenous after Columbus landed in the Caribbean.
When Columbus came to the Caribbean the Natives were completely taken advantage of when they offered to help the Spanish. Since Columbus couldn't find any gold after making his men search for months. He took the Natives as slaves thinking they could lead him to the gold. He took 500 Natives captive to take back to Spain and only 200 survived the harsh conditions at sea. Even after Columbus, the Europeans caused complete genocide of the Natives. I got all this info from Howard Zinn's A Young People's History of the United States. *It is really hard to fit all the things that happened so I left out a lot of details.* It's a really good book 10/10 recommend it.
At the decisive battle of Yorktown
George Washington crossed the Delaware.
The British were trapped by land and sea
The French Navy did not play an important role.
The French pledge to support the colonists for the first time.
Previous
At the decisive battle of Yorktown, the British were trapped by land and sea.
The correct option is B.
The joint Franco-American land and maritime battle known as the Siege of Yorktown trapped a sizable British army on a peninsula at Yorktown, and ultimately led to its capitulation. The siege essentially brought a stop to the American Revolution's military activities.
Beginning on September 28, 1781, and ending on October 19, 1781, at Yorktown, the siege of Yorktown, also known as the Battle of Yorktown, was a decisive battle.
The surrender at Yorktown, or the German battle (due to the presence of Germans in all three armies), was a decisive victory by a combined force of the American Continental Army troops led by General George Washington and Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, and French Army troops led by Comte de Rochambeau over British Army.
To learn more about battle of Yorktown, refer
https://brainly.com/question/2415859
#SPJ1
Under Enlightenment philosophy, it was acceptable to revolt against a government if that government breaks the social contract of protecting its citizens.
True or False
Indeed, it is TRUE that under Enlightenment philosophy, it was acceptable to revolt against a government if that government breaks the social contract of protecting its citizens.
What was Englightenment philosophy?Enlightenment philosophy, which gained acceptance during the Middle Age, emphasized:
The value of human happinessThe pursuit of knowledge through reasoningLiberty and progressConstitutional governmentsThe separation of Church and state.What is the social contract?The social contract theory refers to an implicit understanding that both the ruler and the ruled have some rights and duties to each other.
With the social contract, the government must be accountable to the citizens. If a government fails to comply with the social contract of accountability and responsibility, citizens can overthrow it.
Thus, it is TRUE that under Enlightenment philosophy, it was acceptable to revolt against a government if that government breaks the social contract of protecting its citizens.
Learn more about Enlightenment and Social Contract at https://brainly.com/question/9531645 and https://brainly.com/question/1462261
#SPJ1
How did the new york colony shape ideas about america?
Answer:
New York was important in light of its area and status as a port of business and exchange. This Clam Island was allowed to Skipper Robert Needham by the pilgrim Legislative head of New York, Richard Nicholls. New York assumed a vital political and key part during the American Transformation. Somewhere in the range of 1892 and 1954, a large number of workers showed up in New York Harbor and went through Ellis Island on their excursion to becoming U.S residents. It is assessed that up to 40 percent of Americans can follow no less than one precursor to that port of passage. New York City, the biggest city in the state, is home to the New York Stock Trade and is a significant global financial focus.
frontier areas in which settlers and native americans vied for control, with neither side able to establish clear dominance, are described as .
Answer:
middle grounds
Explanation:
Why were the new immigrants, who came to america in the late 1800s, discriminated against more than earlier immigrants?.
The new immigrants, who came to America in the late 1800s, discriminated against more than earlier immigrants because the citizen though that they were different.
How were immigrants discriminated against in the US during the 1800s?The new immigrants were known to have been stereotyped as well as discriminated against.
Note that a lot of immigrants suffered verbal as well as physical abuse because they were tagged "different."
Therefore, large-scale immigration make a lot of social tensions, it also made a new vitality in the cities as well as states in which the immigrants were known to have settled.
Hence, The new immigrants, who came to America in the late 1800s, discriminated against more than earlier immigrants because the citizen though that they were different.
Learn more about immigrants from
https://brainly.com/question/5139857
#SPJ1
What does
inhospitable mean?
Answer:
(of an environment) harsh and difficult to live in
Or
(of a person) unfriendly and unwelcoming towards people
Explanation:
Example of. a sentence:The Inhospitable landscape
Hope it helps
Colonist of North America what do European want to do
The Americas were seen by Europeans as a vast wilderness with huge economic possibilities. But many millions of humans had already colonised the Americas hundreds of years ago.
To explore this enormous new area, many European missions travelled across the Atlantic Ocean (see Americas, early exploration of the). When Columbus arrived,Indigenous peoples were not seen as landowners by the Europeans who sought to colonise the Americas and take over their wealth. They perceived Native Americans as savages or primitives who would benefit from the spread of European culture and religion.
To Learn more about history of North America, Click the links
https://brainly.com/question/11361308
https://brainly.com/question/10635870
#SPJ9
whogave georgia more land after the french and indian war
King George the III was the one that gave George more land after the French and the Indian war.
What was the French and Indian war?
This was the term that was also used to refer to the seven years war. This was the war that took place between the French people and Great Britain. The war ended at the time with the treaty of Paris.
In this war, the British side ended up being the victorious side in the war and as a result, the King had to make a proclamation in the year 1763, this extended the boundaries of Georgia to St. Marys River in the Southern boundary.
Read more on the French and Indian war here
https://brainly.com/question/913617
#SPJ1
How are natural resources related to a country’s economy?
Answer:
Natural resources contribute to a country's economy because without resources you have to buy resources, so you are then dependent on other countries. You start to lose labor and people to the workforce of other countries while begging for more resources.
how long after the civil war was revels elected to congress?
In January 1870 he was elected to the U.S. Senate to take the seat vacated by Albert G. Brown in 1861 . Revels took his oath only five years after the Civil War.
When did Revels officially become a United States senator ?
In 1870, Mississippi's Hiram Revels was elected as the nation's first African American senator. Revels, who was born in North Carolina in 1827, attended Knox College in Illinois before working as a clergyman at Baltimore, Maryland's African Methodist Episcopal Church. During the Civil War, he organized two black regiments and participated in the Mississippi Battle of Vicksburg. He was appointed by the Mississippi state legislature to fill a vacancy in the U.S. Senate during the period of Reconstruction, and he soon rose to prominence as a vocal opponent of racial segregation. Even though Revels's year-long tenure in the Senate was brief, he made history for African Americans in Congress.
To learn more about Mississippi's Hiram Revels checkout the link below : https://brainly.com/question/3228638
#SPJ9
Submit an analysis of the duel between Burr and Hamilton.
You might want to consider the following questions, but you are not limited to them: What was the purpose of dueling during the years of the Early Republic? Why was this considered an honorable way to settle a dispute? Are you surprised by the list of respectable and influential men who participated in dueling? Is there a modern equivalent to dueling?
This assignment should be at least 200 words
Dueling was a common way to end feuds during the Early Republic. However, it was a violent way to end disputes because usually one of the two contenders was killed.
What is a duel?A duel is a term that refers to a type of combat in which two people face each other as a result of an enmity born of an offense taken as such by one of the two parties or by both, or for any other cause.
What was the purpose of dueling during the Early Republic?The purpose of dueling during the Early Republic was to end feuds between two individuals. In these duels one of the contenders ended up dead while the other emerged victorious.
Why was this considered an honorable way to settle a dispute?This was considered an honorable way of resolving disputes because the two enemies would face each other and only the one with better skills would win.
Are you surprised by the list of respectable and influential men who participated in duels?I'm not surprised because it was a conventional way to end feuds at the time. Additionally, it is reasonable to think that many of the influential characters participated in these duels due to the fact that honor and power were being disputed during the Early Republic.
Is there a modern equivalent to dueling?The only equivalent to mourning that exists in modernity is a judicial dispute, in which one person sues another for having caused damage. There can also be sporting matches between two contenders to test their skills and training.
Learn more about Early Republic in: https://brainly.com/question/16049813
#SPJ1
Which of the following with Alexander Hamilton support?
HELPPPPPOOP
A) promoting agriculture as the most important economic activity within the United States
B) reducing the power of the central government
C) promoting manufacturing and commerce to improve the economy
D) Aiding France during the French revolution
Answer:
C.promoting manufacturing and commerce to improve the economy
a strong central government led by a vigorous executive branch, a strong commercial economy, support for manufacturing, and a strong national defence.
What woman discovered radium and polonium?
What was the name of Blackbeard / Edward Teach's ship?
In what year did the Battle of Hastings take place?
Bosnia and Herzegovina was part of what former European country?
Who was the first explorer to sail around the world?
Answer: 1. Marie Curie
2. Queen Anne's Revenge.
3. 1066
4. Yugoslavia
5. Ferdinand Magellan
Explanation:
The map shows tribal lands in Washington that are recognized by the federal government.
Which statement best sums up the information on the map?
There are hundreds of tribal lands in Washington.
Tribal lands are scattered across Washington.
Most tribal lands are near the Pacific Ocean.
Tribal lands occupy about half of Washington’s land.
The answer for the following question is Most tribal lands are near the Pacific Ocean.
The Tribal lands include the any federally recognized Indian tribe's the reservation, pueblo, or the colony, including the former reservations in the Oklahoma, the Alaska the Native regions, Hawaiian Home Lands, or the Indian Allotments. The Pacific Ocean is the body of the salt water extending from the Antarctic region in the south to the Arctic in the north and then lying between the continents of the Asia and the Australia on the west and the North America and the South America on the east. the Tribal lands means that all lands within the exterior boundaries of any Indian reservation and all the dependent of that particular communities.
To know more about Tribal lands visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1758295
#SPJ1
Why is ethnicity cited as the decisive factor for determining the religion of peoples in Eastern Europe during the Reformation?
Explanation:
Religion is one of the ethnic "descriptors" — critical factors that may be observed to identify ethnicity. Religion is one of the factors that help define culture, and thus ethnicity. There are cultures in which the religious identity is a primary defining factor. In many cultures it does not matter.
How is terrorism different from other forms of warfare? Be sure to provide examples of economic, physical, political, or
according to the documentary film in the lecture, george uno, buddy uno’s father, was arrested during the war
Answer:
Buddy Uno was working for the Japanese government and military.
Explanation:
The ruler has complete power and not overthrown if people
unhappy. True or false
Answer:
false
Explanation:
The Social Contract allows for citizens to pick and overthrow the ruler. The government should be based to the citizens according to the Social Contract.
Answer the prompt below by utilizing the ACE format.
What would John Locke advised the colonists to do?
HELP!!!
Why did some churches begin to oppose revivalist preaching?
Answer:
They felt threatened by evangelists
Explanation:
At first most churches welcomed the revival and renewed spiritual interest it generated. However as time went on Negative responses arose to the great awakening
explain why france and britain engaged in their great contest for north america and why britain won.
Answer:
They wanted dominance in colonial power and the resources that they had in North America. Britain won because of their navy setup across the Atlantic which didn't allow the French to send military reinforcements and supplies.
Explanation:
The federal government has a number of agencies that protect consumers. Select all
of the agencies that protect consumers.
1The Consumer Product Safety Commission
2The Federal Trade Commission
3The Food and Drug Administration
4The Internet Crime Complaint Center
The federal government has a number of agencies that protect consumers. (2)The Federal Trade Commission FTC protects consumers.
The Federal Trade Commission is an independent agency of the United States government whose top charge is the enforcement of civil antitrust law and the creation of consumer protection. The FTC shares governance over civil antitrust enforcement with the Department of Justice antitrust division. The FTC's charge is to guard the public from deceptive or illegal business practices and from illegal styles of competition through law enforcement, advocacy, exploration, and education. Our work to cover consumers and promote competition touches the profitable life of every American. The FTC( Federal Trade Commission) is a United States civil nonsupervisory agency designed to cover and help anticompetitive, deceptive, or illegal business practices.
Learn more about Federal Trade Commission here: https://brainly.com/question/4716509
#SPJ1
Warden line was a disaster for moshoeshoe
Answer: je suis totalement d'accord
Explanation:
What did the assyrian and persian empires have in common? how were they different?.
The Assyrian and Persian empires are similar in that they both had
an efficient communication system that made it easier for them to
manage the empire.
How were the Assyrian and Persian empires different?
One of the most noticeable differences was that the Assyrians took a more brutal approach to conquer, whereas the Persians took a more enlightened and tolerant approach.
When the two military systems are compared, it is clear that the Assyrians were a more hostile group than the Persians.
The Assyrians were obsessed with war, and as a result, many casualties occurred, eventually leading to their demise.
Because of the numerous casualties, their numbers began to dwindle, and outsiders saw this as an opportunity to attack and take over.
In the end, they were so weak that they were defeated by the people of Babylon and no longer existed as an independent state.
To learn more about Assyrian and Persian, refer
to https://brainly.com/question/25670011
#SPJ4
a free society leads to a more dynamic innovative and prosperous society true or false