Ось повна синтаксичний аналіз речення:
І старе прислів'я правдиве: тоді є щастя і комфорт, коли у вас є власний дах, а під чужим не шукайте добра (Б. Грінченко).
Частини речення:
- Підмет: [Старе прислів'я]
- Сказується: [правдиве]
- Означення підмета: [старе]
- Пряма мова: [тоді є щастя і комфорт, коли у вас є власний дах, а під чужим не шукайте добра (Б. Грінченко)]
- Прикметникова фраза, яка модифікує підмет: [старе]
- Прийменникова фраза, яка модифікує підмет: [прислів'я]
- Сполучник: [і]
Частини мови:
І [Сполучник] старе [Прикметник] прислів'я [Іменник] правдиве [Прикметник] : [Двокрапка] тоді [Прислівник] є [Дієслово] щастя [Іменник] і [Сполучник] комфорт [Іменник] , [Кома] коли [Сполучник] у вас [Займенник] є [Дієслово] власний [Прикметник] дах [Іменник] , [Кома] а [Сполучник] під [Прийменник] чужим [Займенник] не [Прислівник] шукайте [Дієслово] добра [Прикметник] (Б [Ім'я] . [Крапка] Грінченко [Ім'я] ) [Крапка]
Діаграма:
Прислів'я
|
__________________________________________
| | | | |
І старе прислів'я правдиве :
| | | | |
| | | | |
_______ | | | |
| | | | | |
щастя комфорт коли є власний добра
| | / \ / \ / \
| | у вас власний чужим не шукайте
| | | | | |
| | тоді | під (Б. Грінченко)
| | | Грінченко чужим |
| | | | шукайте для
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
тоді є у вас власний під (Б. Грінченко)
Аналіз:
Це складне речення з двома незалежними підрядними реченнями, з'єднаними сполучником 'і', і двокрапкою, яка відокремлює підмет від прямої мови в першому підрядному реченні. Підметом є 'Старе прислів'я', а сказується 'правдиве'. Пряма мова - це складна іменникова фраза, що складається з підрядного речення 'тоді є щастя і комфорт, коли у вас є власний дах' та підрядного речення 'а під чужим не шукайте добра (Б. Грінченко)'. Перше підрядне речення модифікується прикметниковою фразою 'старе' та прийменниковою фразою 'прислів'я'. Друге підрядне речення з'єднане з першим за допомогою сполучника 'і', і складається з двох прийменникових фраз 'під чужим' та 'для добра', та дієслівної фрази 'не шукайте'. Речення передає ідею того, що мати власний дах приносить щастя та комфорт, а шукати добро під чужим дахом не радиться.
2. Elisabeth is giving a speech about cancelling student loan debt to an audience that is not fully in support of the idea. What's an important question she can ask herself to figure out what persuasive angle to take?
Is this topic appropriate?
Is the topic age or gender specific?
Why should these people believe what I'm saying?
Is this topic appropriate?
An important question that Elizabeth can ask is "Why should these people believe what I'm saying?".
What question should Elizabeth ask?Although some questions such as is this topic appropriate? are important they do not focus on the persuasive angle. Instead Elizabeth can ask herself "Why should these people believe what I'm saying?".
By asking this question, Elisabeth can gain a better understanding of her audience's perspective and tailor her argument in a way that addresses their specific concerns and objections, making her speech more persuasive and effective.
Learn more about questions in https://brainly.com/question/31278601
#SPJ1
Observing, collecting data, surveying, and making inferences are all examples of an attempt to:
a. learn about your audience
b. analyze diversity
c. make presentational adaptations
d. None of the above.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Observing, collecting data, surveying, and making inferences are all examples of an attempt to:None of the above.
What is making inferenceObserving, collecting data, surveying, and making inferences are examples of research methods used to gather information and gain a better understanding of a particular topic or issue.
These methods can be used in various fields such as social sciences, natural sciences, and business to make informed decisions and draw conclusions based on evidence.
Read more on inferences here:https://brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Think of a conflict that you were involved in at work or in a group recently. Describe the situation and discuss how the conflict was resolved. How would you characterize the approach that was used to resolve the conflict according to what you have learned in this chapter? Now talk about how the situation could have been handled better using any appropriate approach discussed in this chapter/class. Remember to focus on communication in your response.
Recently, I was active on a group project with my associates, and we had a disagreement about the direction of the project. Some of us cherished to focus on individual aspect, while others desired to emphasize a various area.
What is the conflict?We stopped having a heated controversy that led to few hurt feelings and pressure within the group.To resolve the conflict, we decided to relax and cool off for a short period. Afterward, we reconvened and took turns expressing our views and concerns while actively hearing to each added. We also made an work to find common ground and suggest a compromise that satisfied everyone.
However, I believe the situation could have happened handled better by utilizing a more structured approach like the ethical negotiation method examined in class.
Learn more about conflict from
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ1
The Gracchi brothers proposed to alleviate social and economic stress by granting government lands to the landless strengthening the legislative power of the Senate abolishing slavery forming state-owned farming collectives. O O O O
The Gracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, proposals included:
Granting government lands to the landlessStrengthening the legislative power of the SenateWhat did the Gracchi brothers propose?The Gracchi brothers, projected an agricultural correct limiting land ownership to 125 hectares per national or 250 hectares per family, and allocating the freed-up land to the weakest Romans, usually free of charge.
A trio which contained Tiberius' brother, Gaius Gracchus, was responsible for having done enacting the law. Tiberius Gracchus' attempt to answer Rome's problems was by concentrating on the decline of the small grower and he proposed a law that would do over public land to landless Romans.
Learn more about social and economic stress from
https://brainly.com/question/26725354
#SPJ1
discuss two ways you would evaluate the outcomes of the campaign
Answer:
Explanation:
To evaluate the outcomes of a campaign, there are various methods that one can use. Here are two possible ways to evaluate the outcomes of a campaign:
Analyze the data: One of the most reliable ways to evaluate the outcomes of a campaign is to analyze the data. You can start by determining what metrics are most relevant to the campaign, such as website traffic, social media engagement, conversions, or sales. Once you have determined the relevant metrics, you can use analytics tools to track and analyze the data. By analyzing the data, you can determine how effective the campaign has been in achieving its objectives and whether it has met the expected targets.
Conduct surveys or feedback sessions: Another way to evaluate the outcomes of a campaign is to conduct surveys or feedback sessions. You can ask participants or customers for their feedback on the campaign, such as what they liked, what they didn't like, and whether the campaign influenced their behaviour. You can also ask open-ended questions to gather more detailed feedback. By gathering feedback from participants or customers, you can gain insights into the campaign's strengths and weaknesses and make improvements for future campaigns.
Overall, evaluating the outcomes of a campaign is crucial to understanding its effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement. By using a combination of data analysis and feedback gathering, you can get a comprehensive view of the campaign's impact and make informed decisions for future marketing efforts.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST