Answers
1. A politician running for re-election who is already in office is known as an incumbent.
2. Over 80% of the time, incumbents win re-election to the House and Senate, with a relatively high percentage of incumbents doing so.
3. The high percentage of re-election for incumbents is due to several factors. He has a track record, name recognition and fundraising advantage. Additionally, incumbents have the power to use their position to aid residents, which has the potential to boost their popularity and make it more difficult for competitors to win voters.
4.The graph shows that incumbents invest more money in their election campaigns than challengers. Incumbents typically spend $3,000, while challengers typically spend $2,800.
5. Candidates had several options for raising money for their election campaigns, including contributions from private citizens, PACs, and party organizations. Although it is less frequent, candidates can also finance their campaigns with their own money.
Learn more about incumbents, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31478528
#SPJ1
Related Questions
What was the strategy the allies used after the US joined WWII?
Answers
Answer:
the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers
Explanation: After the United States joined World War II, the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers. This strategy involved a combination of military, economic, and political tactics.
Militarily, the Allies used a combination of ground, naval, and air forces to launch attacks on Axis territories from multiple directions. This involved coordinated offensives in different theaters of the war, including Europe, Africa, and Asia. The Allies used their superior resources and firepower to gradually push back Axis forces, liberating occupied territories and advancing towards the heartlands of Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Economically, the Allies implemented a range of measures to weaken the Axis powers. The United States, as the leading economic power, provided significant economic aid to the Allies, including supplies, weapons, and money. This helped sustain the war effort and allowed the Allies to out-produce the Axis in terms of arms and resources. The Allies also implemented economic blockades and trade restrictions to disrupt Axis supply lines and limit their access to critical resources.
Politically, the Allies worked to build and maintain a coalition of nations united against the Axis powers. This involved diplomacy, propaganda, and intelligence efforts to gain the support of neutral nations and undermine Axis influence. The Allies also worked to coordinate their military efforts and minimize conflicts between their own forces, which was not always easy given their different strategic priorities and national interests.
Overall, the Allies' strategy after the US joined WWII was to use their combined military, economic, and political resources to wear down the Axis powers and ultimately defeat them. While this strategy took time and required significant sacrifices, it ultimately succeeded in achieving the Allies' objectives and bringing an end to the war.
A combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force was used to erode Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas. What are some examples of these different tactics?
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
Various tactics were employed by the United States to undermine Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas during the 19th century. These tactics included a combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force. Some examples of these tactics are:
Manifest Destiny: The belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States was destined to expand across the North American continent, played a significant role in justifying the erosion of Mexican rights and social structures. This attitude led to widespread support for American expansion into Mexican territories, often at the expense of the Mexican people.
Economic pressure: American settlers and entrepreneurs moved into Mexican territories, such as California and Texas, and established businesses and farms. This influx of American economic activity undermined the local Mexican economy and displaced Mexican landowners. Additionally, the increasing economic dependence on the United States made it more difficult for Mexico to maintain control over these regions.
Land policies and dispossession: American land policies in newly acquired territories, like the implementation of the Homestead Act, often favored American settlers over Mexican landholders. These policies led to the dispossession of Mexican landowners and further eroded their rights and social structures.
Brute force and military action: The United States engaged in military actions, such as the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), to forcefully annex Mexican territories, including California and Texas. The war and subsequent Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo resulted in the loss of a substantial portion of Mexico's territory and further weakened its influence in the region.
Racism and discrimination: American settlers often held racist attitudes towards Mexicans and other non-white groups. This led to discrimination and violence against Mexican communities, further eroding their rights and social structures. For example, the lynching of Mexicans in Texas by Anglo-American vigilantes was not uncommon during this period.
Assimilation and Americanization: American authorities and settlers promoted the assimilation of Mexican populations into American society, often at the expense of their cultural identity and social structures. This process, sometimes referred to as "Americanization," involved the imposition of American customs, language, and values on Mexican communities.
These tactics, which combined attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force, significantly impacted Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas, leading to the long-lasting marginalization of Mexican-American communities in these regions.
In a market economy, supply and demand work together to: A. increase economic Scarcity. OB. lower profits for businesses. C. set the prices of goods. D. Create business competition.
Answers
Answer:
A is the answer
Explanation:
because in economy the supply of goods and what the consumer need in the market is the increase in economy scarcity
Why do many historians question the claim that Betsy Ross made the first flag for the country during the American revolution? Explain two reasons, I will give 700 points
Answers
Explanation:
Many historians question the claim that Betsy Ross made the first flag for the country during the American Revolution for two main reasons:
Lack of evidence: There is no historical evidence or documentation to support the claim that Betsy Ross made the first American flag. The story of Betsy Ross making the first flag was first told by her grandson, William Canby, nearly a century after the supposed event. Canby’s account was based on family oral tradition and was not supported by any contemporary records or eyewitness accounts.
Inconsistencies with historical facts: The story of Betsy Ross making the first flag contains several inconsistencies with known historical facts. For example, the design of the flag was not fixed until later than 1776 or 1777, and there are several paintings from that time period that depict flags with six-pointed stars rather than five-pointed stars. Additionally, there are records of other seamstresses in Philadelphia who were making flags during the Revolutionary War.
Due to these reasons, many historians consider the story of Betsy Ross making the first American flag to be a legend rather than a historical fact.
please help me with this history question i’ll give you brainlist and points
Answers
Answer: Choice B
Explanation: During the Chinese civil war, the communists and nationalist parties in China temporarily stopped fighting to work together in the fight against invading Japanese forces. This temporary truce was known as the Second United Front, and it lasted from 1937 to 1945. The Chinese saw the Japanese invasion as a greater threat to their country than the internal conflict between the two parties, so they put aside their differences to fight against the common enemy. After the defeat of Japan in 1945, the civil war resumed, and the communists eventually emerged as the victors in 1949.
explain one cultural or economic development in the late twentieth century that would explain Bartons argument about the “impending decline of the west” in the second paragraph?
Answers
In his argument about the "impending decline of the West," Barton may have been referring to the rise of economic and cultural globalization in the late twentieth century. Globalization, which refers to the increasing interconnectedness of economies, cultures, and societies around the world, has been a major trend in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As countries and regions become more integrated, the balance of economic and political power has shifted away from the West and towards other regions, such as Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. This shift in power has led some to argue that the West is losing its dominance and that its economic and cultural influence is declining.
Barton's argument may also have been influenced by the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, which marked a significant geopolitical shift in the world order. The West, led by the United States and its allies, had long been engaged in a struggle against the Soviet Union and its communist ideology. With the end of the Cold War, the West was no longer united by a common enemy, and its position in the world became less clear.
In addition, the rise of new technologies and new economic models in the late twentieth century may have contributed to Barton's argument about the decline of the West. For example, the rise of the internet and digital technology has made it easier for businesses and individuals to connect across borders, while new economic models such as outsourcing and offshoring have led to the transfer of jobs and wealth from the West to other regions.
Overall, the rise of economic and cultural globalization, the end of the Cold War, and the rise of new technologies and economic models may have contributed to Barton's argument about the decline of the West in the late twentieth century.
according to this map, which two groups of people were settled on lands to the WEST of the thirteen british coloniee
Answers
Answer:
French
Indians
Explanation:
Correct me if I'm wrong!!
Why do you think the United States "secretly" removed missiles from Turkey and Italy, yet publicly declared to never invade Cuba? Why not make the missile deal public?
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
Because the negotiations that brought the Cuban crisis to a conclusion were part of a series of covert conversations between Bobby Kennedy and Soviet Ambassador Dobrynin that included a verbal agreement not just to remove the Jupiter missiles from Turkey, but also not to invade Cuba.
can someone help me on this , and sure not if there correct
Answers
The terms that do not belong in the Gilded Age and the correct eras are :
Manhattan project - World War II Détente - Cold War New Deal - Great Depression Civil Service Reform - Progressive era Zimmermann Telegram - World War I What happened in the Gilded Age ?The Gilded Age spanned the 1870s to the 1890s in American history, characterized by swift industrialization and urban expansion coupled with a notable surge in the economy.
Amidst this economic prosperity were corrupt practices promoted at large alongside social inequality. The era witnessed affluent industrialists including Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller amassing growing fortunes while the labor class experienced destitution with scant access to better occupational prospects, meagre income and poor working conditions.
Find out more on the Gilded Age at https://brainly.com/question/28145617
#SPJ1
six reason how the berlin conference reached to conclusion
Answers
Answer:
Here are six reasons how the Berlin Conference reached its conclusions:
Division of Africa: The primary objective of the Berlin Conference was to divide Africa into territories that would be controlled by European powers. This was achieved through negotiations between the attending countries, where they agreed on the boundaries of the territories they would claim.
Recognition of territorial claims: The Conference recognized the territorial claims of European powers in Africa, as long as they had effective occupation and administration of the territory. This led to the formalization of colonial rule in Africa.
Free trade: The Conference agreed on the principles of free trade in the Congo Basin and the Niger and Congo rivers. This was intended to promote commerce and economic development in these regions.
Humanitarian concerns: The Conference recognized the need to address the humanitarian concerns of the African population, including the suppression of the slave trade and the promotion of human rights. However, these concerns were largely overshadowed by the interests of the European powers.
Colonial administration: The Conference established rules for the administration of colonial territories, including the provision of infrastructure, education, and healthcare. However, these rules were often not enforced and colonial administration was frequently exploitative.
International recognition: The conclusions reached at the Berlin Conference were recognized internationally, and other countries who wished to establish colonies in Africa were expected to abide by them. This led to the formalization of European colonial rule in Africa and the exploitation of its resources for the benefit of European powers.
Explanation:
The four largest Japanese islands are Honshu, skikoku, kyushu and
Answers
Answer:
Okinawa Island
Explanation:
If you examine a map you can tell that the largest islands in order are:
1. Honshu
2. Kyushu
3. Shikoku
4. Okinawa Island.
Hope it helps!
Which of the following was planned and discussed openly to help countries have confidence in its fairness?
Treaty of Versailles
League of Nations
United Nations
Yalta Conference
Answers
Answer:
United Nations
Explanation:
Brainliest please!
According to the Declaration of Independence, when a government abuses its power, the people have the right to create a new government.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
This statement is true. The Declaration of Independence states that when a government becomes destructive to the people's rights, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and to institute a new government.
Explanation:
The Aztec empire collapsed because it:
Answers
{ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - }
The overthrow of the Aztec Empire by Cortez and his expedition rests on three factors: The fragility of that empire, the tactical advantages of Spanish technology, and smallpox.
===============================================
Why were the Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful?
They harmed local businesses' revenue.
They appealed to the business owners' morality.
They won the support of the President.
They appealed to religious feelings.
Answers
Answer:
The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of nonviolent protests that took place in 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina, where a group of African American college students sat at a segregated lunch counter at a local Woolworth's store and refused to leave until they were served. The sit-ins were successful for several reasons:
Nonviolent protest: The students were committed to nonviolent protest, and their peaceful actions made it difficult for the authorities to use force against them without risking public condemnation.
Persistence: The students continued their sit-ins day after day, despite facing harassment, threats, and physical violence. This persistence kept the issue of segregation in the forefront of public attention and created pressure for change.
Media coverage: The sit-ins attracted significant media attention, both locally and nationally, which helped to raise awareness of the issue of segregation and put pressure on local businesses and authorities to take action.
Community support: The sit-ins were widely supported by the African American community in Greensboro, as well as by sympathetic white allies. This support helped to sustain the protests and put pressure on local authorities and businesses to change their policies.
Economic impact: The sit-ins had a significant economic impact on the targeted businesses, as the protesters encouraged a boycott of the stores. This economic pressure helped to convince the stores to change their policies and desegregate their lunch counters.
Overall, the Greensboro Sit-Ins were successful because of the students' commitment to nonviolence, their persistence in the face of opposition, the media coverage they received, the support of the community, and the economic pressure they exerted.
Explanation:
They appealed to the business owners' morality were the reason why Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful. Correct option is 2.
The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of nonviolent protests that began on February 1, 1960, when four African American college students sat at a segregated Woolworth's lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina. They refused to leave until they were served, sparking a larger movement of sit-ins across the country.
The success of the Greensboro Sit-Ins can be attributed to several factors:
Nonviolent and Peaceful Approach: The protesters adhered to nonviolent tactics, inspired by the principles of civil disobedience advocated by leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. Their peaceful and disciplined behavior garnered sympathy and support from many Americans who were disturbed by the blatant injustice of racial segregation.
Moral Appeal: The sit-in participants demonstrated tremendous courage and dignity, sitting quietly at the lunch counter despite facing hostility and threats. Their actions highlighted the moral injustice of segregation and appealed to the conscience of business owners and the public.
Media Attention: The sit-ins attracted significant media coverage, both local and national. Television and newspapers showcased images and stories of peaceful demonstrators being denied service simply because of their race. This media exposure brought the issue of racial segregation to the forefront of public consciousness and put pressure on businesses and local authorities to address the situation.
Solidarity and Widespread Participation: The Greensboro Sit-Ins inspired similar protests in other cities and towns across the United States. The movement gained momentum as more people joined in, creating a sense of solidarity and a powerful collective voice demanding change.
Support from the Black Community: The sit-ins received strong support from the local African American community, civil rights organizations, and religious leaders. Their unity and determination added strength to the movement.
In conclusion, the Greensboro Sit-Ins were successful because they appealed to the morality of business owners and the public at large. By peacefully confronting the injustice of segregation and showcasing the courage and determination of the protesters, the sit-ins brought attention to the issue and played a significant role in the broader civil rights movement, leading to the eventual desegregation of public facilities in the United States.
To know more about Greensboro Sit-Ins :
https://brainly.com/question/363060
#SPJ2
Slave cultures
a. were entirely American and retained no African cultural elements.
b. were based on the same fundamental ideas and culture as their masters’ culture.
c. were entirely African and did not embrace any American elements.
d. are lost to history, as no evidence of them has survived.
e. were semi-independent and centered on family and church.
Answers
Which of the following is true of general elections?
Question 8 options:
a)
Ads rarely focus on political party.
b)
They do not depend on visibility as much as primary elections do.
c)
They have a higher turnout than primary elections do.
d)
They have very similar strategies to primary elections.
Answers
The true statement about general elections is that they have a higher turnout than primary elections do. The Option C.
Do general elections have higher turnout than primary elections?Yes, the general elections have a higher turnout because they are the final stage in the electoral process where voters choose their representatives for public office but primary elections are preliminary contests within political party to select a candidate for the general election.
Therefore, its tend to attract a wider range of voters such as those who may not be registered with a political party or who may not have participated in the primary election. In addition, its also receive more media coverage from political campaigns which can also help to drive up voter turnout.
Read more about general elections
brainly.com/question/25815264
#SPJ1
research the New Deal programs put in place by FDR and the government. What were at least FIVE of the programs that were developed by the New Deal programs and what did they do? You can do this in chart form…but you need to be specific!!!! Include what the benefit of each was!!!
Answers
Answer:
Here are five New Deal programs and their objectives:
Program Name Objective Benefits
Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Provide jobs to young, unemployed men to work on conservation projects Reduced unemployment; improved infrastructure; increased environmental awareness
Works Progress Administration (WPA) Create jobs for unemployed Americans in various public works projects Provided jobs; improved infrastructure; created public art; supported cultural programs
Social Security Act (SSA) Provide retirement and disability benefits to American workers Established a social safety net; helped protect seniors from poverty
National Recovery Administration (NRA) Regulate industry and establish fair business practices Improved working conditions; established minimum wage and maximum hours
Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) Help farmers by reducing crop production and stabilizing crop prices Increased agricultural stability; supported farmers and rural communities
Explanation:
What is your best guess as to how John Locke would have thought about how colonies should operate and how he should be run to benefit the homeland empire country? If a country was going to have a colony, how should the monarch treat that colony (in terms of rights, protections, respect, quality of life, etc)?
Answers
In terms of how colonies should operate and be run, Locke believed in limited government and individual freedom. He argued that colonies should be allowed to govern themselves to a certain extent, and that the colonists should have representation in the government that governed them. He also believed that the monarch should respect the natural rights of the colonists, including their property rights and the right to participate in government.
In terms of how the monarch should treat the colony, Locke believed that the colony should be treated with respect and given protections under the law. He argued that the colonists should have the same rights and protections as citizens of the homeland empire country, and that the monarch had a responsibility to ensure that the quality of life in the colony was good.
Overall, John Locke believed in individual freedom and limited government, and he argued that colonies should be allowed to govern themselves to a certain extent. He believed that the monarch had a responsibility to protect the natural rights of the colonists and to ensure that they were treated with respect and given protections under the law.
please help me with this history question i’ll give you brainlist
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: African natives were never huge fans of Europeans barging in, and they often rebelled.
Which statement is TRUE about Shays'
Rebellion?
A. The federal government decided to intervene.
B. The federal army was created to stop the rebellion.
C. The state was NOT able to gather together a militia
due to lack of funds.
D. The British army broke up the raid.
Answers
Answer:
C. The state was NOT able to gather together a militia due to lack of funds.
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
President Nixon authorized the CIA to undermine ______ democratically elected leader Salvador Allende, setting the stage for brutal dictator Augusto Pinochet to take power.
a. Chile's
b. Brazil's
c. Argentina's
d. Columbia's
Answers
Once tensions with the Soviet Union and China eased, Nixon's foreign policy entailed choosing allies based on practical rather than ideological considerations. Criticized both by conservatives for abandoning the fight against communism and by liberals for supporting autocratic regimes, Kissinger continued to support quiet interventions and covert operations to prop up any government that seemed friendly to an immediate American interest. The United States relied on regional allies such as Iran, Israel, Zaire, South Africa, and Japan to help stop the spread of communism but did not interfere in the domestic affairs of friendly nations. When a socialist government came to power in Chile in 1970, however, Nixon's new posture was tested. Fearing communism's spread to the rest of Latin America, Nixon authorized the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to help undermine the democratically elected regime of Salvador Allende and had Kissinger funnel arms to Allende's opponents. Three years later, Augusto Pinochet seized power in Chile in a military coup. Pinochet's brutal dictatorship would last for two decades, far longer than the U.S. administration that had helped bring it about.
Why do
you think some Abolitionists
started their own
newspapers?
Answers
Answer: The abolitionist movement began as a more organized, radical, and immediate effort to end slavery than earlier campaigns. It officially emerged around 1830. Historians believe ideas set forth during the religious movement known as the Second Great Awakening inspired abolitionists to rise up against slavery
Explanation:
Abolitionist newspapers played a vital role in the crusade to end slavery in the United States. The articles carried in these newspapers educated readers about the evils of the institution of slavery and helped to turn public opinion in northern states against it.
What factors propelled George McGovern to be the Democratic Party's nominee in the 1972 presidential election?
- He was considered a moderate centrist in the party.
- George Wallace was unable to continue his campaign after facing an assassination attempt.
- Edmund Muskie's campaign had been sabotaged by Nixon re-election operatives.
- The twenty-sixth Amendment had lowered the voting age to 18.
Answers
- The twenty-sixth Amendment had lowered the voting age to 18.
The Democrats had grounds for optimism as well, especially when the Twenty-sixth Amendment lowered the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen in 1970 Nixon tried to appeal to these new voters by narrowing and then ending the draft, but Democrats hoped twenty-one to eighteen in that an influx of young men and women into the political process would favor a liberal and more idealistic alternative to the president. Young, idealistic voters did, in fact, play a significant role in the campaign, but mostly in helping to pick the Democratic nominee, a development that wound up playing into the incumbent’s hands.
From Nixon's perspective, the more liberal an opponent, the better, since a left-leaning Democratic nominee would enable him to claim the center and sharpen his message about cultural values. Nixon's campaign organization, the Committee to Re-elect the President (officially abbreviated as CRP, but derided by critics with the acronym CREEP), sought to undermine the candidacies of more centrist Democratic hopefuls, especially the presumed frontrunner, Maine senator Edmund Muskie. In the New Hampshire primary, Nixon operatives phoned voters at uncivilized hours, pretending to be Muskie campaign volunteers from Harlem. CRP also forged a letter to a New Hampshire newspaper reporting that a Muskie staffer had used the term Canuck to disparage Americans of French-Canadian descent. When Muskie's margin of victory in New Hampshire fell far short of expectations, many Democrats began looking elsewhere for a candidate. Liberal South Dakota senator George McGovern was well positioned to benefit from Muskie's problems, more democratic nomination rules, and the Iwenty-sixth Amendment. With Wallace drawing conservative votes away from centrist candidates earlier in the campaign, McGovern was able to secure the nomination.
Who is someone who you think has made America a better place, like Martin Luther
King, Jr? How do you think we should honor this person?
Please someone :(
Answers
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is someone who I think has made America a better place, like Martin Luther King, Jr. In the 1970s, Ginsburg oversaw the influential American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project.
Throughout her career as a Supreme Court justice, Ginsburg worked to advance women's rights and gender equality. She was also renowned for her vociferous dissents, which influenced both legal and public discourse. Continue promoting gender equality and giving aid to groups that enhance women's rights as a way to honor her legacy. Ginsburg headed the significant American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project in the 1970s.
Learn more about Ruth Bader Ginsburg here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774518
#SPJ1
Question 2 of 10 The Soviet Union and the United States nearly went to war with each other in 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet missiles on the island of Cuba. This event, called the Cuban Missile Crisis, was resolved peacefully after several days of negotiations between U.S. and Soviet leaders. Which approach would a military historian take to study the Cuban Missile Crisis? A. Explain why the negotiations that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis were successful о B. Describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba ← PREVIOUS
Answers
Answer: The answer should probably be answer A: Explain why the negotiations that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis were successful
Hope this helps! :)
Your assignment, you need to explain what was the Cold War and then explain the key events that were a part of the origins of it. Explain each in detail, include context, people involved, and HOW EACH CONTRIBUTED TO THE COLD WAR. Yes, that last part is important!
Answers
The Cold War was a period of intense diplomatic, political, and military rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted from 1945 to 1991.
It was characterized by an ideological divide between capitalist and communist states, and the two superpowers were unable to find common ground on a wide range of issues. Key events that contributed to the Cold War include the end of World War II, the formation of NATO and the Soviet-dominated Warsaw Pact, the Korean War, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War, and the Space Race.
Each event helped to further cement the divide between the two superpowers and contributed to the deepening of the Cold War. The Cold War was ultimately marked by a nuclear arms race, superpower interventions in proxy wars, and economic competition.
To know more about Cold War , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ1
President Nixon's Revised Philadelphia Plan was an early milestone for ______.
a. early childhood education
b. affirmative action
c. the pro-choice movement
d. LGBTQ rights
Answers
Civil rights issues proved trickier, as Nixon sought to pursue racial equality while still shoring up his position among Southern whites and blue-collar white workers. Rather than championing integration, Nixon offered economic encouragements to Black Americans by supporting minority-owned businesses and employment initiatives. His administration expanded a program to push companies that contracted with the federal government to employ Black and Hispanic workers. In 1969 Nixon's Revised Philadelphia Plan, which set goals for minority hiring by federal building contractors in Philadelphia marked an early milestone in the history of affirmative action. However, when the white workers he was trying to woo began protesting the plan, Nixon was quick to make the hiring guidelines voluntary.
Which of the following is considered non-excludable?
Question 37 options:
a)
particularized benefits
b)
a collective good
c)
political institution
d)
a private good
Answers
Answer: Non-excludable goods are public goods that cannot be used by a specific person or group of people.
Explanation:
A collective good is considered non-excludable. So the correct answer is b) a collective good
A collective good, also known as a public good, is considered non-excludable. Non-excludability means that individuals cannot be effectively excluded from using the good or benefiting from it, regardless of whether they have contributed to its provision or not. In other words, once the collective good is provided, everyone in the community can access and enjoy its benefits. Examples of collective goods include clean air, national defense, public parks, and street lighting.
To know more about collective good:
https://brainly.com/question/31214959
#SPJ2
How did the velvet revolution affect the Soviet Union fall
Answers
The Velvet Revolution was a non-violent political revolution that took place in Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) in 1989, which played a significant role in the fall of the Soviet Union.
The Velvet Revolution was a series of protests and demonstrations that were organized by Czechoslovak citizens demanding greater political and economic freedoms. The protests gained momentum throughout the country and eventually led to the resignation of the Communist government in Czechoslovakia.
The fall of the Communist government in Czechoslovakia was seen as a significant victory for the pro-democracy movement in Eastern Europe and served as an inspiration for other countries in the region. The events in Czechoslovakia paved the way for the peaceful transition to democracy in many other former Soviet bloc countries, such as Poland, Hungary, and East Germany.
The collapse of the Soviet Union was a complex process that was influenced by a variety of factors, including economic, political, and social changes. The Velvet Revolution played a role in this process by demonstrating that change was possible through peaceful means and by inspiring other countries to follow the example of Czechoslovakia.
White this answer may provide helpful information regarding your assignment, it is important to remember that using it verbatim could be seen as plagiarism. To avoid this, it is best to cite your sources and use your own words to ensure a better answer.
~~~Harsha~~~