During times of social upheaval, criminologists have found that normally law-abiding citizens may be more likely to commit crimes such as looting. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.
This is because the desperation and chaos of large events can lead people to feel like they have no other option but to break the law in order to survive. While murder, arson, and child abuse are all serious crimes, they are less likely to be committed by someone who is typically law-abiding.
Looting, on the other hand, is a crime that may be more tempting for someone who is struggling to get by during a time of social unrest. This is because looting can provide a quick way to obtain resources and goods that may be otherwise unavailable.
However, it is important to note that not everyone who experiences social upheaval will resort to crime and that there are always alternatives to breaking the law.
To learn more about social upheaval, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28663388
#SPJ11
The Sixth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution guarantees that defendants have the right to a public and speedy trial, as well as to:
Answer:
Explanation:
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that defendants have the right to a public and speedy trial, as well as the following rights:
The right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against them.
The right to confront witnesses against them and to obtain witnesses in their favour.
The right to have the assistance of counsel for their defence.
These rights are designed to ensure that defendants receive a fair and impartial trial and are able to effectively defend themselves against criminal charges.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that defendants have the right to a public and speedy trial, as well as to:
An impartial jury, To be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, To confront witnesses against them, To have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in their favor, andTo have the assistance of counsel for their defense.The Sixth Amendment is a crucial component of the U.S. Constitution and justice system, as it protects the rights of defendants in criminal cases. In addition to the right to a public and speedy trial, it ensures that defendants have the right to be informed of the charges against them, the right to confront witnesses who testify against them, and the right to compel witnesses to testify on their behalf.
The amendment also guarantees the right to a fair and impartial jury, and the right to legal counsel, even if the defendant cannot afford an attorney. These rights are essential to ensuring that defendants are treated fairly and justly in the criminal justice system.
Learn more about Sixth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/539935
#SPJ11
what are the two hemispheres of law? if you do not remember, lippman gives a description of them on page 252 of the kindle edition. how are the two hemispheres portrayed in the film? what hemisphere would you put jan schlichtmann law firm into, the lawyers representing beatrice foods and w. r. grace and company? do you see prejudicial behaviors?
The two hemispheres of law northern and southern hemispheres of Earth are separated into two regions.
Schlichtmann defaulted on some loans and ran off to Hawaii. Despite having families to support, Conway and Crowley were just as disillusioned with the legal system. Scurrying to salvage the company they had almost lost, they hunkered down. They have yet to overcome all of Woburn's financial difficulties twelve years later.
Schlichtmann was awarded approximately $8 million by Grace for the families of the injured, but after his share of the settlement was reduced by the costs of the trial and investigation, he was left with so little that he declared bankruptcy. His regulation practice imploded, and his vehicle was repossessed.
A preconceived judgment, opinion, or attitude directed toward particular individuals based on their membership in a particular group is known as prejudice. It is a collection of mentalities that encourages, causes or justifies discrimination.
To learn more about hemispheres of law here
https://brainly.com/question/4215508
#SPJ4
Nakoya, a college student, stops to shop at a local ?yard sale? and sees a very nice mountain bike priced at $600. Needing a cheap form of transportation, Nakoya begins negotiating with the bike?s owner, Monica. After a few minutes of bargaining, Monica agrees to sell her bike to Nakoya for $520. They shake hands, and Nakoya leaves the yard sale, promising to return with her checkbook to pay for and pick up the bike. Nakoya never returns. Monica sues Nakoya in small claims court for breach of contract
Nakoya, a college student, encountered a mountain bike at a local yard sale, which was priced at $600. As she needed an affordable mode of transportation, she negotiated with Monica, the bike's owner.
They agreed on a final price of $520, shook hands, and Nakoya left, assuring she would return with her checkbook to complete the transaction. However, Nakoya failed to return, prompting Monica to sue her in small claims court for breach of contract.
This case involves an oral agreement, which can be legally binding, but the lack of a written contract might complicate matters. In small claims court, Monica will need to provide evidence that the agreement took place and demonstrate Nakoya's breach to pursue damages.
To know more about oral agreement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23877329
#SPJ11
Reporters are protected from retaliation under which law.
Reporters are protected from retaliation under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects freedom of the press, as well as various federal and state laws.
One such federal law is the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), which protects federal employees who disclose information that they reasonably believe constitutes evidence of a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or gross mismanagement, waste of funds, abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
In addition, the Privacy Protection Act (PPA) provides limited protection against searches and seizures of journalists' materials, including notes and photographs, in connection with criminal investigations.
Finally, some states have their own shield laws, which protect journalists from being forced to reveal their sources or unpublished information in court proceedings.
It is important to note that the exact protections offered by these laws may vary depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction involved.
To learn more about Reporters here
https://brainly.com/question/27937774
#SPJ4
Online contracts: carlos sees offer for 2 free tickets to basketball game online. he quickly hits the 'i accept' button. after reading the fine print, he realizes that by accepting the offer, he signed up for a 1 year subscription, which he must pay for upon receipt. is carlos bound by the agreement?
(yes) or (no)
Yes, Carlos is bound by the agreement by hitting the 'I accept' button he entered in a legally binding contract.
A legally binding agreement is a pact between two or more parties in which they make a commitment to do or refrain from doing something. It may be expressed verbally, in writing or inferred from the actions of the parties. A valid agreement must contain a number of essential components, including an offer, acceptance, consideration, the parties legal capacity, and a legitimate purpose.
Even if he did not read the fine print by clicking the "I accept" button he entered into a legally binding contract with the company selling the tickets. Before accepting an online offer, it is typically taken for granted that the person has read and comprehended the terms and conditions.
It is crucial to thoroughly read and comprehend any agreement before agreeing to its terms whether online or in person.
Learn more about binding contract at:
brainly.com/question/30750666
#SPJ4
Based on your reading of the following statement from the Department of Defense, what steps do you suppose the government is taking to make certain private contractors do not exceed their authority?
Top officials from the Defense and State departments today signed a joint memorandum that will increase coordination between American military forces, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and private security contractors in Iraq. The document broadly defines how future use of force, movement, and reporting of incidents by security contractors in Iraq will be more closely coordinated with U.S. government entities. “We think this is a very good and strong memorandum of agreement between our two departments and should vastly improve the coordination and control of private security contractors operating in Iraq,” Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said today.
With regard to legal accountability of private contractors, Whitman said, the memo reaffirms the departments’ commitment to work with Congress toward legislation that will “facilitate legal accountability” under U.S. law. Whitman said many of the provisions outlined in the memorandum already are in practice, but they will be further “operationalized” by officials at Multinational Force Iraq.
A. The Department of Defense recognizes the need to establish legal boundaries that assure private contractors do not exceed their authority.
B. With a few years, it is likely that private contractors will replace enlisted soldiers on the battlefield.
C. Corporate security forces are taking on an increasingly significant and legally appropriate role in modern warfare.
D. Contractors will not be used following the cessation of hostilities in Iraq.
Answer: It’s A
Explanation: I had it for edge.
To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
The quote "To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" suggests that those who prohibit criticism hold power and authority over society, emphasizing the importance of free speech for promoting accountability.
The quote "To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" implies that the people or institutions that prohibit criticism or dissent are the ones who hold power and authority over society. In other words, those who have the ability to silence opposing views and maintain control over the narrative are the ones in charge, rather than those who hold official titles or positions.
This quote highlights the importance of free speech and the need for open discourse in order to challenge authority and promote accountability. It is often attributed to Voltaire, but the origin of the quote is actually unclear.
To know more about rules, here
https://brainly.com/question/14452856
#SPJ4
--The complete question is, What is the meaning behind the quote "To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"?--
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (October 11, 2018)
decision and reasoning
The celebrated Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido was a momentous United States Supreme Court case which was determined on October 11th, 2018 regarding the comprehension of the venerable Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (October 11, 2018) decision and reasoning for the decision.Two firefighters, John Guido and Dennis Rankin, who were both more than 40-years old, formalized an action against this particular governmental division of the state of Arizona asserting that they had been dismissed due to their age unlawfully in negation of the established ADEA.
However, the District ardently contended that it ought not be subject to the ADEA's edicts since it employed fewer than 20 personnel.
Read more on Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido here https://brainly.com/question/26174453
#SPJ1
complete question
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (October 11, 2018) decision and reasoning for the decision.
Describe the American judicial systems (civil, criminal, and juvenile), their jurisdiction, development and structure.
Analyze the function and dynamics of the courtroom work group.
Identify judicial processes from pretrial to appeal.
Describe the significant Constitutional Amendments, doctrines, and other sources of law in the American judicial system.
Discuss constitutional freedoms and rights of citizens and explain how an ethical criminal justice system and participatory citizenship protects those freedoms and rights
Demonstrate knowledge of the three major areas of America’s criminal justice system (Police, Courts, & Corrections)
Analyze a criminal case and understand its relevance to protected freedoms and rights.
Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental elements of criminal law.
The concept of the courtroom workgroup was introduced in 1977. It was a radical departure from the public’s view of justice in the courts. In this project, students will complete a 5-page research paper that analyzes the effects of the courtroom work group on the criminal justice system.
The structure of your paper should have a good introduction that presents the topic of the paper and a good thesis statement.
The paper will describe and identify the American judicial system and specifically identify the participants and their roles.
The paper will discuss the traditional role of the courts in light of the Constitutional amendments and laws that grant power to the courts and the traditional theory of justice through the courts.
The paper will define the courtroom workgroup, its participants, and analyze the goals of the group.
The paper will compare and contrast the workgroup goals to the traditional goals of justice through the courts and discuss whether justice is truly being served through the machinations of the workgroup.
The paper has a strong conclusion, summarizing the paper and giving an opinion regarding the overall theme.
The American judicial system is divided into three main categories: civil, criminal, and juvenile.
How does the American judicial system work?The civil judicial system deals primarily with legal disputes arising between several persons, groups, or companies. These controversies could embody contracts, assets, torts, as well as other qualified issues.
Conversely, the criminal judicial system encompasses offenses against the state or community. This might include activities such as robbery, homicide, aggression, and even narcotics peddling. Both federal and state tribunals fall under the rubric of criminal courts.
Additionally, the juvenile judicial system is specially tailored to manage cases that connect to juveniles being charged with a crime or in need of guidance and security. Faculties of the juvenile justice arena vary from state to state; yet normally cover individuals younger than 18 years of age.
Countless leading principles, historically and juridically, have epitomized the maturation of the United States' judiciary. A structure for government courthouses was ingrained within the US Constitution whereas state constitutions established what became known as state tribunals.
Find out more on the juvenile judicial system at https://brainly.com/question/28945484
#SPJ1
Explain with example that no job is inferior to any other
To demonstrate that no job is inferior to any other, let's consider two different jobs: a doctor and a janitor. Each job contributes to society in its own unique way, and all are essential for maintaining the well-being of our communities.
A doctor is responsible for diagnosing illnesses, prescribing medications, and providing medical care to patients. Their job is crucial to maintaining the health and well-being of society. On the other hand, a janitor is responsible for maintaining cleanliness, sanitation, and safety in public places like hospitals, schools, and offices.
While some may argue that a doctor's job is superior due to their extensive education and the critical nature of their role, it's essential to recognize the importance of a janitor's work as well. Without janitors, public places would become unsanitary, leading to the spread of diseases and a decline in overall public health. In this sense, the janitor's role is just as vital to maintaining a healthy society as the doctor's role.
Learn more about no job is inferior to any other: https://brainly.com/question/18831347.
#SPJ11
Which presidential action was based on article i of the u. S. Constitution?.
Article I of the U.S. Constitution outlines the powers and duties of the legislative branch of the government, which is the Congress. Therefore, any presidential action that is based on Article I of the U.S.
Constitution would likely involve the president's interaction with Congress.
One example of a presidential action based on Article I is the veto power granted to the President in Section 7 of Article I. The President may veto a bill passed by Congress, which means that the bill will not become law unless Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Other presidential actions based on Article I could include signing a bill into law or requesting legislation from Congress.
To learn more about u. S. Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
What benefit does active monitoring have over passive monitoring?
The offender is responsible for checking in with their probation officer.
The probation officer can locate the offender at any time using GPS.
There is less need for expensive electronic devices than there is in passive monitoring.
The offender must spend the nights and weekend in a real prison.
NO LINKS OMG
The benefit that active monitoring has over passive monitoring is that the probation officer can locate the offender at any time using GPS. So option B is correct.
The active analysis is proactive and enables you to spot issues before they happen. Passive monitoring, on the other hand, is reactive and takes time to identify problems.
Active monitoring refers to monitoring health and safety practices in the workplace prior to incidents, accidents, or ill health. Reactive monitoring refers to monitoring incidents, accidents, and ill health as performance indicators to identify areas of improvement.
To learn more about GPS, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28100366
#SPJ12
Question 13
Which liberty limiting principle has been most fittingly applied to the issue of hate speech (even if you
disagree)?
Legal Paternalism
Legal Moralism
The Harm Principle
The Offense Principle
Under the tort of nuisance doctrine, are the neighbors justified in their complaint?
Under the tort of nuisance doctrine, the neighbours may be justified in their complaint if certain conditions are met. The tort of nuisance involves an unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of one's property and can be either a public or private nuisance.
To determine if the neighbours are justified in their complaint, consider the following factors:
1. Type of nuisance: Determine whether it is a public nuisance (affecting a large number of people) or a private nuisance (specifically affecting the complainant).
2. Unreasonableness: Assess if the interference is unreasonable, taking into account the nature, frequency, duration, and severity of the interference, as well as the surrounding environment.
3. Balancing interests: Weigh the interests of the complainant against the interests of the defendant. If the interference is minor and the defendant's activities are of significant importance, the complaint may not be justified.
4. Legal remedies: If the neighbours are indeed experiencing a nuisance, they may seek legal remedies such as an injunction to stop the activity or monetary damages for the harm suffered.
In conclusion, under the tort of nuisance doctrine, the neighbours may be justified in their complaint if there is an unreasonable interference with their property, and the other factors discussed above are taken into account.
Learn more about public and private nuisance: https://brainly.com/question/17751112.
#SPJ11
Who does Chief Justice Rehnquist say should be responsible for addressing the social problems of our
country?
Answer:
Through the popularly elected branches (not the unelected judiciary).
1. civil law may handle a court case involving ( point ) obattery. oassault . first - degree murder . onegligence . 2 . a defendant may be on trial in a criminal law court room if he or she is accused of ( 1 point ) onegligence . odrafting a faulty contract . orape . oneglecting alimony payments .
Civil law may handle a court case involving negligence, battery, assault, and first-degree murder.
These are a few illustrations of civil wrongs, also known as torts, which cause harm or injury to another person or their property. If a defendant is charged with assault, the case may be heard in a criminal law court. Non-consensual contact is a serious criminal offense that is typically prosecuted in criminal court.
Falsely drafting a contract or failing to make alimony payments are not crimes and are typically dealt with in civil court or through an alternative dispute resolution process like mediation or arbitration.
Learn more about Civil law at:
brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ4
Analysis of legal signs of genocide. distinguish between genocide and crimes against humanity
The legal signs of genocide, as defined by the United Nations Genocide Convention, include the intentional and systematic destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. This can manifest in a variety of ways, including killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, refer to a broader category of atrocities committed against a civilian population. This can include acts such as murder, enslavement, torture, sexual violence, and forced displacement. Unlike genocide, crimes against humanity do not require an intent to destroy a specific group but rather are defined by the widespread and systematic nature of the attacks.
In summary, while both genocide and crimes against humanity involve serious violations of human rights and international law, genocide is distinguished by its specific targeting of a particular group for destruction, whereas crimes against humanity are defined by their widespread and systematic nature.
To know more about What is genocide- https://brainly.com/question/23582099
#SPJ11
The legal signs of genocide involve intentionally and systematically destroying a particular racial, ethnic, religious, or national group. According to the United Nations Genocide Convention, genocide includes acts such as killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions designed to bring about the group's physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births, and forcibly transferring children to another group.
Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, encompass a broader range of acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. These acts include murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution, enforced disappearances, and other inhumane acts. While genocide targets explicitly a particular group intending to destroy it, crimes against humanity can be committed against any civilian population without the requirement of a specific intent to annihilate a particular group.
To distinguish between genocide and crimes against humanity, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the acts committed and the targeted population.
2. Determine if there is a specific intent to destroy a particular group (genocide) or if the acts are part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population (crimes against humanity).
3. Analyze the legal signs of genocide, such as the systematic nature of the acts and the specific methods used to destroy the group.
4. Compare the acts and intentions to the definitions of genocide and crimes against humanity under international law.
In conclusion, the main difference between genocide and crimes against humanity lies in the specific intent to destroy a particular group in the case of genocide. In contrast, crimes against humanity involve a broader range of acts against any civilian population. By analyzing the legal signs and the intentions behind the actions, it is possible to distinguish between these two grave international crimes.
To learn more about genocide, visit: https://brainly.com/question/4266491
#SPJ11
Discuss the notion of Ubuntu with reference to transformative constitutionalism,case law,and jurisprudence in your answer.
Ubuntu is a phrase that comes from the Bantu languages of southern Africa and is frequently translated as "humanity towards others." It is a philosophical idea that places a strong emphasis on the connectivity of all people as well as the value of kindness, empathy, and community.
Ubuntu has become a key value and principle in the creation of a new constitutional order that is based on social justice, human dignity, and the advancement of the common good in the context of transformative constitutionalism.
Ubuntu has been acknowledged as a fundamental value in South African legal doctrine for interpreting and applying the Constitution. The Constitutional Court ruled in the historic case of S v. Makwanyane that the death penalty was unconstitutional since it contravened the ideal of Ubuntu,
To know more about constitutionalism visit :
https://brainly.com/question/4278982
#SPJ4
malicious shrinkers referes to losses that occur while companies
Malicious shrinkers refers to losses that occur while companies are in the process of shipping products to customers, and the products shrink in size or weight due to deliberate tampering or theft.
What is malicious shrinkers?This can result in the company delivering less product than was originally intended, leading to financial losses and potential harm to customer relationships. The term "malicious shrinkage" is often used to distinguish this type of loss from other forms of shrinkage, such as accidental damage or spoilage.
Malicious shrinkage is a common problem in industries where high-value or easily sellable products are shipped, such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, or luxury goods.
Learn more about malicious shrinkers at https://brainly.com/question/31579800
#SPJ1
Explain the responsibility of a principal who aids another in taking drugs as described in People v. Hopkins
In People v. Hopkins, the responsibility of a principal who aids another in taking drugs is outlined. A principal is someone who directly participates in or aids and abets the commission of a crime. In this case, the principal who assists another individual in taking drugs is held responsible for the consequences and actions associated with drug use.
The principal can be held liable if they knowingly provide, encourage, or facilitate drug use, even if they do not actively take the drugs themselves. This can include providing the drugs, supplying a location for drug use, or giving advice on how to take the drugs. The principal's liability is based on their involvement and intention to contribute to the criminal act.
In summary, a principal who aids another in taking drugs, as described in People v. Hopkins, holds significant responsibility for the crime. They can be held accountable for any harm or consequences that arise from drug use based on their knowledge, involvement, and intention to contribute to the criminal act.
To learn more about drugs, visit: https://brainly.com/question/30392650
#SPJ11
Collaboration between government and public entities in south africa
Collaboration between the government and public entities in South Africa is essential for the effective and efficient delivery of services to citizens. This collaboration also promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance.
One of the key benefits of collaboration is the pooling of resources and expertise, which can lead to better service delivery outcomes. This can include infrastructure development, healthcare, education, and other essential services.
The government and public entities also work together to address social and economic challenges, such as poverty, unemployment, and inequality.
Effective collaboration requires strong partnerships and communication between the government and public entities. It is important to establish clear roles and responsibilities, set shared goals and objectives, and measure progress and impact.
By working together, the government and public entities can achieve their common goals and deliver better outcomes for citizens.
To know more about government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15077883
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT one of the types of sanctions traditionally (i.e. commonly, imposed at least a few times annually) imposed upon individuals convicted of a criminal offense in the U.S. criminal justice system.
Question 8 options:
Imprisonment
Capital Punishment
Monetary Fines
Corporal punishment
Where do laws regulating PRIVATE
discrimination come from?
please answer
Which of the following psychological factors impact the reliability of eyewitness testimony?
Anxiety
Eyesight
Perception
Sensory overload
What types of illicit drugs are most likely to result in an ED visit?
The types of illicit drugs that are most likely to result in an ED visit include:
OpioidsMethamphetamineSynthetic cannabinoidsWhat drugs result in an ED visit ?Opioids, including prescription opioids and heroin, are the most commonly reported drugs associated with ED visits. Opioid overdose can cause respiratory depression, decreased level of consciousness, and coma.
Methamphetamine is a powerful stimulant drug that can cause a variety of adverse effects, including hyperthermia, seizures, and psychosis. Synthetic cannabinoids are a type of synthetic drug that can produce effects similar to marijuana. However, these drugs can cause more severe adverse effects, such as seizures, agitation, and psychosis, which can lead to ED visits.
Find out more on ED visits at https://brainly.com/question/28525814
#SPJ1
Cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine are the most common illicit drugs that result in emergency department (ED) visits in the United States.
The Types of illicit drugs that most likely to Result in an ED visit?According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the most common illicit drugs that result in emergency department (ED) visits in the United States are cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine.
Other drugs that can result in ED visits include synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones (also known as "bath salts"), and prescription opioids. The reasons for ED visits vary but can include overdoses, adverse reactions, and injuries related to drug use.
It's important to note that illicit drug use can have serious and potentially life-threatening consequences, and seeking help from medical professionals and support services is crucial for those struggling with addiction.
Learn more about illicit drugs on:
https://brainly.com/question/15271242
#SPJ1
--Game Riddle--
DETECTIVE TIME!
> Do not cheating and Do not lookup/searching in any website <
> u can use/say ( "use the hint" ) <
how to play:
3 question to answer and u got a scores. I'm gonna count the scores if ur answer right, but if ur answer carelessly I'm not gonna count ur scores and disqualified ( perm-report ), I hope u enjoyed! :>
(warning: may contain offensive language)
1. Accused of stealing the farmer’s chickens, Jack is locked up in an empty room in the local jail. His cell has a dirt floor and is completely void of any accessories except for a shovel. There is a window overlooking the hills outside. Jack is determined to break out and prove his innocence, but the window is too high to reach.
How can he escape?
Note: that digging a tunnel is not a feasible option because the ground beneath the dirt is rock hard. Jack doesn’t have the energy to dig through it as he is deprived of food and water.
2. An elderly woman lived alone in her house by the suburbs. She rarely left the house and knew only a few people. One Friday morning, the mailman called out for the woman but didn’t receive a prompt answer as usual. Upon peeking in through the window, the mailman realized that the woman was murdered. The police investigated the house and found Tuesday’s newspaper by the dead body. Also, by the door outside, there were three unopened bottles of milk, one of which had gone bad.
The police arrested the killer the very next day. How did they figure out so quickly?
3. A renowned chemist is found dead in his lab. There is no clear evidence except a piece of paper lying by the body. The paper is blank other than the name of five elements scrawled across it hastily:
• Nickel
• Carbon
• Oxygen
• Lanthanum
• Sulfur
The guard reported that three people visited the chemist that day – his sister, Lanaya, his colleague, Nicolas, and his wife, Teresa.
The criminal was arrested immediately. Who was it?
I hope u enjoyed! :>
Questions by imaginationYTB ( Me :> )
Jack can use the shovel to create a pile of dirt underneath the window, allowing him to climb up and escape through the window.
The police realized that since the newspaper found near the woman's body was from Tuesday, and the milk bottles outside were unopened except for one, which had gone bad, it must mean that the woman was already dead on Tuesday and the killer had been entering the house to take the milk bottles each day. This narrowed down the list of suspects to the people who knew the woman's routine.
The killer was Lanaya, the chemist's sister. The first letter of each element on the paper spells out "NicolAS", indicating that Nicolas was involved in some way. But since sulfur is spelled with a U in the US, and "Sulphur" with a PH in the UK, it is clear that the paper was written by someone from the UK - which Lanaya was. Additionally, the other elements are related to cosmetics, which Lanaya was known to work in.
To know more about shovel visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2614468
#SPJ11
What system did merchants in the early centuries use to make commercial
transactions easier?
o a. law merchant
b. the bulk sales act
o c. contract law
o d. the ucc
a is the answer
The Law Merchant, also known as lex mercatoria, was a system of law developed by merchants to govern their commercial transactions in the Middle Ages. It provided a framework of rules and customs that facilitated trade and helped resolve disputes.
Option A is correct
The Law Merchant, also known as the lex mercatoria or mercantile law, refers to a body of legal principles and customs that governed commerce and trade in Europe during the medieval period. It was a set of commercial rules and practices that emerged in response to the growing trade and commerce in Europe, particularly in the Mediterranean region, and was largely developed by merchants themselves rather than by rulers or lawmakers.
The Law Merchant was based on the principles of fairness, equity, and good faith, and it provided a framework for resolving disputes among merchants from different regions and countries. It was characterized by flexibility, informality, and a preference for practical solutions rather than formal legal procedures. The Law Merchant was largely unwritten and was transmitted orally and through practical experience.
Option A is correct
To know more about Law Merchant, here
https://brainly.com/question/29311564
#SPJ4
When the U.S. Constitution is not clear, how do we interpret the meaning?
Answer:
make me brainalist and keep smiling dude
Explanation:
There are seven widely accepted methods of interpretation that shed light on the meaning of the Constitution.
Text.Text.History.Text.History.Tradition.Text.History.Tradition.Precedent.Text.History.Tradition.Precedent.Structure.Text.History.Tradition.Precedent.Structure.Prudence/ Consequences.Text.History.Tradition.Precedent.Structure.Prudence/ Consequences.Natural Law/ MoralityAnswer:
Public Interpretation of Constitutional AmbiguityThe Justices of the Supreme Court are responsible for interpreting the meanings of all the. laws within the Constitution and for applying those interpretations to cases in which.
According to Philippine Constitution of 1973, what are the duties and obligations of a Filipino citizen? List down the duties and obligations and write your interpretation. 3-5 sentences each. Section 1. It shall be the duty of the citizen to be loyal to the Republic and to honor the Philippine flag, to defend the State and contribute to its development and welfare, to uphold the Constitution and obey the laws, and to cooperate with the duly constituted authorities in the attainment and preservation of a just and orderly society. Section 2. The rights of the individual impose upon him the correlative duty to exercise them responsibly and with due regard for the rights of others. Section 3. It shall be the duty of every citizen to engage in gainful work to assure himself and his family a life worthy of human dignity. Section 4. It shall be the obligation of every citizen qualified to vote to register and cast his vote
According to the Philippine Constitution of 1973, Filipino citizens have various duties and obligations. It is their duty to be loyal to the Republic, respect and honor the Philippine flag, and defend the State.
Additionally, they are expected to contribute to the country's development and welfare, comply with the Constitution and laws, and collaborate with the authorities to ensure a fair and organized society. Secondly, individual rights come with the responsibility to exercise them responsibly while respecting others' rights.
Citizens must engage in gainful work to guarantee their family a life with human dignity. Lastly, it is the obligation of every qualified citizen to register and cast their vote during elections.
In summary, the Filipino citizen's duties and obligations are geared towards promoting loyalty, responsibility, and respect for the rule of law, a productive and stable life, and active participation in the country's governance.
To know more about Philippine flag visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24411261
#SPJ11
The word process as it applies to communications means ""an activity"".
Answer:
Explanation:
The word process as it applies to communications can refer to the series of steps or actions involved in creating, transmitting, and receiving a message. In this sense, it can be seen as an activity or a set of activities that are performed to achieve a particular outcome in communication. The process of communication can be broken down into various stages, including encoding, transmitting, receiving, and decoding, with each stage involving its own set of activities and processes. So, while the process of communication can be seen as an activity, it also encompasses a broader set of actions and steps involved in the communication process as a whole.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The word "process" as it applies to communications encompasses more than just "an activity,"
This is because as the word "process" refers to a systematic series of actions or steps taken to achieve a particular outcome in communication, such as encoding, transmitting, decoding, and receiving information through various channels and media.
In communication, the process involves not only the exchange of information but also the interpretation and understanding of messages by both the sender and the receiver, which can be influenced by factors such as language barriers, cultural differences, and noise or interference in the communication channel.
Therefore, the word "process" in communication implies a more complex and multifaceted concept than simply "an activity," highlighting the importance of understanding the various components and stages involved in successful communication.
Learn more about communication: https://brainly.com/question/28153246
#SPJ11