Decision on whether or not to have mandatory minimums requires jurisdictions which may choose to implement them for certain crimes while leaving the discretion of the judge intact for others.
Should the law dictate sentences for crimes?There are arguments for or against the idea of mandatory minimum sentences for crimes. Some think that having set sentence for a specific crime takes away the discretion of judges to take into account individual circumstances and result in unjust or disproportionate sentences.
But, some think that they provide consistency and predictability in sentencing which can promote fairness and help deter crime. So, the decision on whether or not to have mandatory minimums requires jurisdictions which may choose to implement them for certain crimes while leaving the discretion of the judge intact for other.
Read more about post-trial phase
brainly.com/question/20334928
#SPJ1
What are some of the benefits of citizenship? (Multiple choice)
-freedom to work
-guaranteed payments from the government
-reduced taxes
-right to vote
-exemption from serving in the military
Answer:1,4,5
Explanation:
How does the relationship between the federal government and state
governments differ from the relationship between state and local
governments?
A. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments gives one type of government more power than the
other.
B. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments can produce conflict between the two sides.
C. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments involves sharing some responsibilities.
D. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.