Answer: French Guiana
Explanation: Is located in South America, and covers an area of approximately 83,534 square kilometers (32,253 square miles)
Which best describes alexis de tocqueville?
he was french
Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political philosopher, historian, and writer.
He was born in Paris, France, on July 29, 1805, and died on April 16, 1859. Tocqueville is best known for his works on democracy and the political system in the United States.
In 1831, Tocqueville and his friend Gustave de Beaumont traveled to the United States to study the American prison system, but they also used their time to observe American society and politics. Their observations led Tocqueville to write his most famous work, "Democracy in America," which was published in two volumes in 1835 and 1840. In this work, Tocqueville analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of American democracy and predicted that democracy would become the dominant form of government in the world.
Tocqueville was also a supporter of liberal democracy, individualism, and the rule of law. He believed that democracy needed to be balanced by individual rights and the protection of minorities. Tocqueville's ideas and writings had a significant influence on political philosophy and the development of democratic institutions around the world.
In conclusion, Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political philosopher, historian, and writer who is best known for his work on democracy in America. He was a supporter of liberal democracy, individualism, and the rule of law, and his ideas and writings had a significant impact on political philosophy and the development of democratic institutions worldwide.
To learn more about Alexis de Tocqueville, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1495723
#SPJ11
Please help. In his 1913 piece, What is Progress?, what does Woodrow Wilson say his problem is with Declaration of Independence and Constitution as political guides? What are some of the arguments against his view?
Woodrow Wilson criticized the Declaration of Independence and Constitution for being outdated, while opponents argued that they were timeless and adaptable.
In his 1913 piece "What is Progress?", Woodrow Wilson criticized the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as political guides. He argued that they were outdated and unable to address the problems of modern society. He contended that these documents were designed to serve the interests of white, male property owners and did not take into account the changing social and economic realities of the 20th century.
Wilson argued that society had become more complex and that new methods of organization and cooperation were necessary to address the problems of the day. He suggested that a new vision of progress was needed, one that focused on cooperation, rather than competition, and that emphasized the role of the state in promoting the general welfare.
However, some scholars and historians have criticized Wilson's view. They argue that the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are timeless and continue to provide a solid foundation for American political thought and practice. They contend that the principles of individual rights and limited government have served as a check on government power and have provided a framework for democratic governance.
Furthermore, some have argued that Wilson's view fails to recognize the importance of the American political tradition, which has evolved over time to reflect changing social and economic conditions. They argue that American democracy is not static, but rather, is a dynamic system that is capable of adapting to new challenges and opportunities.
In conclusion, while Wilson's criticism of the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution may have been valid in some respects, many scholars and historians have challenged his view and argue that these documents continue to serve as important political guides in American society.
To learn more about Woodrow Wilson refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29888956
#SPJ11
Which situation is an example of a person using technology initially designed for the military?
A person using GPS technology, which was initially designed for military purposes, is an example of using technology designed for the military. GPS, or Global Positioning System, was developed by the United States Department of Defense for military use in the 1970s.
There are several examples of people using technology initially designed for the military in their everyday lives. One such example is the internet, which was developed by the US Department of Defense's Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) to enable communication between military installations.
However, the internet has since evolved into a global network of computers, connecting billions of people worldwide.
Another example is the microwave oven, which was invented during World War II as a radar system for military purposes. However, after the war, the technology was adapted for use in cooking and is now a common household appliance.
Similarly, the satellite technology used for military purposes, such as reconnaissance and surveillance, is now used in everyday life for communication, navigation, and weather forecasting.
Thus, using GPS to navigate, streaming movies on the internet, and cooking food in a microwave oven are all examples of people using technology initially designed for military purposes in their daily lives.
To know more about GPS technology refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/6905079
#SPJ11
Before the war began, the US military included about___
troops.
After war was declared, the size of the military___
Between 1939 and 1943,___ about
troops joined the military.
✓new
Answer:
Before the war began, the US military included about
✔ five hundred thousand
troops.
After war was declared, the size of the military
✔ sharply increased
.
Between 1939 and 1943, about
✔ 9 million
new troops joined the military.
Explanation:
Compare Roosevelt's speech with the excerpt from Churchill's speech to the House of Commons, which you read in Lesson 1. How do the two speeches address similar themes and concepts? Roosevelt and Churchill called for the unification of America and Great Britain and victory through force. This was to be achieved through an immediate invasion of Europe. Roosevelt and Churchill both argue that peace is worth any cost. the two leaders encourage pursuit of non-violent means to persuade their enemies to give up their evil schemes. Roosevelt and Churchill both draw on themes of freedom and democracy. The two men will not be satisfied until every nation has a democratic government. Roosevelt and Churchill both address the necessity to fight against tyranny. While Churchill’s goal is to engage war until tyranny is defeated, Roosevelt’s aim is to help other countries fighting against tyranny. Both Churchill and Roosevelt stress the importance of a nation united for this common purpose.
Answer:
Explanation:
Roosevelt's speech, delivered in 1942 to the US Congress, focused on the need for the US to join forces with Great Britain and other Allied powers to defeat the Axis powers in WWII. Roosevelt emphasized the importance of a strong military and industrial base, the need for the US to provide aid to other nations fighting against tyranny, and the ultimate goal of creating a peaceful world order based on democracy and freedom.
Churchill's speech, on the other hand, was delivered in 1940 to the House of Commons and focused on the immediate threat of a German invasion of Great Britain. Churchill's speech was a call to arms, urging the British people to fight against the Nazi threat with all their might, and promising that victory would ultimately be theirs. Churchill used strong and inspiring language, emphasizing the need for courage and determination in the face of overwhelming odds.
While there are some similarities between the two speeches, such as the importance of unity and the fight against tyranny, the contexts and emphases of the speeches are different. It is important to accurately analyze and compare historical speeches in order to gain a deeper understanding of the events and ideas of the time.
Researchers america at the time what were the labor practices in early america colonization including enslaved persons and indentured persons
Early American colonial labor practices included the use of indentured servants and slaves as of 1607. European immigrants in North America turned to enslaved Africans during the 17th century as a more affordable and plentiful labor supply.
The division of labor by gender and race was extreme in colonial America. Beyond custom and culture, marriage was one of the main ways that labor acquired its racial and gendered characteristics. A wife's legal identity was merged with her husband's at marriage.
Similar to the South, enslaved males were typically made to perform manual labor or farm work. While women in the South frequently worked in agriculture, enslaved women were frequently made to work as domestic servants.
To learn more about colonial labor, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4172729
#SPJ4
A ducks mass at birth is 0.05 kilograms. the duck gains approximately 0.042 kilograms each week. after how many weeks is the ducks mass 0.890 kilograms?
Answer:
To find out after how many weeks the duck's mass reaches 0.890 kilograms, we can set up an equation and solve for the number of weeks.
Let's assume the number of weeks is represented by "w."
Given:
The initial mass of the duck (at birth) = 0.05 kilograms
Mass gained per week = 0.042 kilograms
The equation can be set up as follows:
0.05 + 0.042w = 0.890
To solve for "w," we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. First, let's subtract 0.05 from both sides:
0.042w = 0.890 - 0.05
0.042w = 0.84
Now, divide both sides of the equation by 0.042:
w = 0.84 / 0.042
w ≈ 20
Therefore, after approximately 20 weeks, the duck's mass will reach 0.890 kilograms.
What did Nazis do to isolate Jews from society?
Answer: The goal of Nazi propaganda was to demonize Jews and to create a climate of hostility and indifference toward their plight. On Kristallnacht—the Night of Broken
Explanation:
sad days
Based on your understanding of the Two Cradle Theory of Civilization (Chapter 2), what would you identify as the most significant goals of African Americans after the abolition of slavery in the United States to ensure "survival within a harsh environment"?
According to the Two Cradle Theory of Civilization, African Americans sought to achieve economic and social progress after the abolition of slavery in the United States. The most significant goals were to secure economic opportunities and to build strong communities that would allow for survival within a harsh environment.
The Two Cradle Theory of Civilization posits that there were two main centers of civilization: the European cradle and the African cradle. The European cradle was characterized by technological advancement, social organization, and economic power, while the African cradle was characterized by communal values, a close relationship with nature, and spirituality.
To achieve economic and social progress, African Americans after the abolition of slavery sought to secure economic opportunities through education, entrepreneurship, and land ownership. They also sought to build strong communities that would provide support and protection in the face of discrimination and violence. This included the establishment of churches, schools, and mutual aid societies, as well as the development of cultural institutions that celebrated African American heritage and identity.
To know more about Civilization, click here
https://brainly.com/question/2681639
#SPJ1
Which three statements describe Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev?
1. They were responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings.
2. They claimed to want revenge for attacks on Muslims.
3. They killed a police officer while stealing his car.
4. They were both killed in a shootout with police.
5. They were part of a major terrorist organization
The three statements that describe Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are:
They were responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings.
They claimed to want revenge for attacks on Muslims.
They killed a police officer while stealing his car.
Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were two brothers who were responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15, 2013. The bombings killed three people and injured hundreds more. The Tsarnaev brothers, who were originally from Chechnya, claimed that they were motivated by a desire to avenge the deaths of Muslims who had been killed by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This statement highlights their belief in violent extremism and retaliation against the United States.
During their attempt to flee, the Tsarnaev brothers killed an MIT police officer, Sean Collier, and later engaged in a shootout with police in Watertown, Massachusetts. Tamerlan was killed during the shootout, while Dzhokhar was eventually captured and put on trial.
While the Tsarnaev brothers claimed to be acting on behalf of a larger terrorist organization, there is no evidence to suggest that they were part of any such organization. Instead, they are believed to have acted independently in planning and executing the Boston Marathon bombings.
The Tsarnaev brothers' actions highlight the dangers of violent extremism and the potential for individuals to carry out attacks without the support of a larger organization. The Boston Marathon bombings were a tragic reminder of the need for increased vigilance and security measures to prevent future attacks.
The Tsarnaev brothers' case also highlighted the importance of effective law enforcement and intelligence gathering in identifying and stopping individuals who may be planning violent attacks.
To learn more about Tamerlan refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/472242
#SPJ11
according to martin luther, what quality was the path to salvation? multiple choice question. obedience to the pope revolution faith good works
Answer:
Faith
Explanation:
Power is inherited through a bloodline but a constitution limits the monarchs power when is the vocal word
Power is inherited through a bloodline in a monarchy system, but the extent of that power is limited by a constitution. This means that while the monarch may hold a position of authority, they are also subject to certain laws and regulations that restrict their actions.
The vocal word for this arrangement is a "constitutional monarchy." In such a system, the monarch's role is largely symbolic, and they may act as a figurehead or ambassador for the country.
However, their ability to make decisions and enforce laws is typically constrained by a constitution or other governing document that outlines the scope of their authority. This helps to ensure that the monarch does not abuse their power or act in a manner that is contrary to the best interests of the country and its citizens.
To know more about monarchy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30711729
#SPJ11
contrast the reasons for US involvement in lebanon,grenada,and south africa.
The US intervened in Lebanon to bring about stability, in Grenada to overthrow a Marxist regime, and in South Africa to engage in diplomatic and anti-apartheid activities.
The US invaded Grenada for what reason?The US government justified its invasion of Grenada as a measure to defend its residents, particularly medical students. Action was required, according to Deputy Secretary of State Kenneth W. Dam, to "resolve" what Organization of American States (O.A.S.) Article 28 of its charter calls for.
What two occurrences in Lebanon led to the US pulling out its troops?However, by 1984, President Ronald Reagan had ordered the withdrawal of American Marines from Lebanon due to terrorist attacks, a lack of diplomatic success, and congressional resistance.
To know more about Marxist regime visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27770102
#SPJ1
5. How did the Dutch and British influence Enlightenment thought?
6. What opinion did Enlightenment thinkers have about slavery?
7. What views did Enlightenment thinkers have about progress? How did that affect their views of different societies?
8. How did Enlightenment thought impact production and distribution?
9. How did the Enlightenment help or hurt working-class people?
The Dutch and British influence on Enlightenment thought was significant. Enlightenment thinkers were generally critical of slavery and were among the first to call for its abolition.
1. The Dutch and British had a long history of trading and colonizing, which exposed them to a wide variety of cultures and ideas. This, combined with their commitment to religious tolerance and their flourishing merchant class, created an environment of open-mindedness and intellectual curiosity.
2. They argued that all humans were equal and had the right to freedom. Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu and Voltaire wrote extensively about the evils of slavery, and their arguments helped to shape European public opinion on the issue.
3. Enlightenment thinkers believed that progress was possible and inevitable. They argued that through the application of reason, science, and technology, people could improve their lives and the world around them.
4. Enlightenment thought also impacted production and distribution. Enlightenment thinkers argued for more efficient and organized methods of production, as well as for more equal distribution of resources.
5. The Enlightenment had both positive and negative impacts on working-class people. On the positive side, it brought about new ideas that questioned the traditional social order and provided a platform for people to challenge the existing institutions.
To learn more about Enlightenment thought link is here
brainly.com/question/24895807
#SPJ4
The program to recruit mexican agricultural workers during world war ii was the ________. the program to recruit mexican agricultural workers during world war ii was the ________. brazzos program maquiladora program campesino program bracero program
The program to recruit Mexican agricultural workers during world war ii was the Bracero Program
The United States government recruited farmworkers known as "braceros" from Mexico, but they were paid meagre pay and endured housing discrimination. During World War II, the Bracero Program was a set of agreements amongst the United States and Mexico that permitted Mexican laborers to enter the US to work on railways and farms.
Over two million Mexican workers arrived in the country as a result of the program, which ran until the year 1964. It was a project designed to address the gap in agriculture caused by World War II. The programme safeguarded farmers from prejudice and allowed Mexicans to labour in respectable circumstances on American fields without being subjected to military conscription.
Read more about Bracero Program on:
https://brainly.com/question/25829549
#SPJ4
5Place the following events in sequence. A) St. Patrick establishes churches in Ireland; B) St. Patrick is kidnapped by raiders; C) St. Patrick changes his name AB, A, Cincorrect answer BA, C, Bincorrect answer CC, B, Aincorrect answer DB, C, A
The correct sequence of events is B, C, A. St. Patrick was kidnapped by raiders, which caused him to change his name.
After he changed his name, he established churches in Ireland. This sequence of events shows how St. Patrick's life experiences led him to become an influential figure in Christianity in Ireland.
He was able to use his experiences to spread the message of Christianity, leading to the establishment of churches in Ireland. It is also important to note that St. Patrick's life was not easy, and his courage in the face of adversity is an example for us all.
To know more about Christianity , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ4
PLEASE HELP
(who ever answers all gets brainliest)
1-Describe two facts about Abraham Lincoln’s background that likely influenced or biased his point of view.
2-Describe two facts about Jefferson Davis’s background that likely influenced or biased his point of view.
3-Supporters of the Union looked to Article VI of the Constitution for support for their argument. Read the excerpt from Article VI and then choose and defend a point of view regarding whether the Constitution corroborates (supports) a view that the Union is permanent.
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. "
Two facts about Jefferson Davis's background that likely influenced or biased his point of view are his upbringing in the South and his military experience. Born in Kentucky and raised in Mississippi, Davis was exposed to Southern culture and values, which included support for states' rights and the institution of slavery.
This regional upbringing likely shaped his perspective on the supremacy of the Constitution and federal laws.
Additionally, his military experience, both at West Point and during the Mexican-American War, might have reinforced his belief in strong central authority while also emphasizing the importance of individual states' rights in the context of the overall nation.
These two aspects of his background contributed to the development of his views on the relationship between the federal government and individual states.
To know more about slavery, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/9331183#
#SPJ11
Answer: Abraham Lincoln was against slavery and wanted to do whatever he could to end it. A reason for this is because he believed that slavery was morally wrong and that Black people should have the same rights as white people with him saying "All me are created equal," said Lincoln. These thoughts of his would eventually get him killed after the Emancipation Proclamation was put into law he was killed almost three months later.
Explanation: gotchu
Who led the most successful jump band, the tympani five, which started recording in 1939?.
Louis Jordan led the most successful jump band, the Tympany Five, which started recording in 1939.
Louis Jordan was an American musician and bandleader who formed the Tympany Five in the late 1930s. The group became known for its high-energy, uptempo music that combined elements of jazz, blues, and swing. Jordan's innovative approach to music, which emphasized the use of horns, rhythm, and call-and-response vocals, helped to define the jump blues genre and influenced many other musicians in the years that followed.
The Tympany Five went on to record a number of hit songs, including "Ain't Nobody Here But Us Chickens" and "Choo Choo Ch'Boogie," and Jordan himself became one of the most popular and influential musicians of his time. His legacy continues to be felt in the worlds of jazz, blues, and popular music to this day.
To know more about Tympany Five, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/15461322
#SPJ4
Korea Short Writing Prompt Review the following documents. How do these two accounts reflect certain points of view? Which source is more reliable and why? Explain your answer, supporting it with reasons and evidence from the documents
The given documents provide two different accounts of Korea, reflecting different points of view. The first document is a travel diary written by a British traveler in the 19th century, describing his experience of Korea during his visit. The second document is an article from a Korean news outlet, written in the 21st century, providing a perspective on the country's current situation.
know more about Korea here: https://brainly.com/question/1169602
#SPJ11
Choose two groups of people that were described in the article. How was their experience of the event similar? How was it different? Write a response that compares the perspectives of two groups of people using details from the article
In the article, two groups of people that were described were the protesters and the police officers. Their experience of the event was similar in that both groups were present at the rally and were impacted by the tensions and emotions that were present. However, their experiences were different in terms of their goals and actions.
The protesters were there to voice their dissent against a controversial policy, while the police officers were there to maintain order and ensure public safety. The protesters were expressing their freedom of speech and assembly, while the police officers were tasked with protecting that right while also preventing any violent or disruptive behavior.
Additionally, the protesters were likely feeling empowered by the support and solidarity of fellow demonstrators, while the police officers were likely feeling the weight of their responsibility and the potential for danger in the situation. These different perspectives could contribute to the tension and conflict between the two groups.
Overall, while both the protesters and police officers were present at the same event, their motivations and experiences were quite different. The protesters were fighting for change, while the police officers were working to maintain stability and order. Understanding these different perspectives is important in creating a peaceful and productive dialogue between opposing groups.
What police system was endorsed by the state about the holy land in 1092 ce
The police system endorsed by the state in the Holy Land in 1092 CE was the medieval feudal system.
In the medieval feudal system, the state granted land to lords who in turn provided military service and protection to the king. The lords governed their territories, ensuring law and order through their knights and vassals.
This system was efficient in maintaining peace and security in the Holy Land, as the lords and knights had a vested interest in protecting their landholdings. The feudal system also helped in consolidating political power, as the king could rely on the loyalty of his nobles in times of war or conflict.
While this system had its flaws, such as potential for abuse by the lords, it played a significant role in organizing the administration and policing of the Holy Land during the 11th century.
To know more about feudal system click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1597635#
#SPJ11
During the Middle Ages, what institution was the center of musical life?
The church
The castle
O The king's court
The merchant's living room
Answer:
During the Middle Ages, the institution that was the center of musical life was the church. Music played an important role in religious ceremonies and worship, and many of the most important composers and musicians of the time were associated with the church. Monks and other religious figures were responsible for preserving and transmitting musical traditions, and many of the earliest notated musical works were chants and hymns used in religious services. The church also played a significant role in the development of musical notation, which allowed for the more precise recording and transmission of musical works. Overall, the church was a key institution in the development and dissemination of music during the Middle Ages.
Explanation:
How did German laws impact the Jewish population during the 1930
German laws during the 1930s had a devastating impact on the Jewish population. Beginning in 1933 with the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, Jewish people were systematically excluded from many professions and stripped of their citizenship rights.
The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 further restricted their civil liberties, prohibiting Jews from marrying non-Jewish Germans, attending schools and universities, and owning businesses. These laws led to widespread persecution, violence, and eventually, the genocide of six million Jews during the Holocaust.
The impact of German laws on the Jewish population was catastrophic, leaving a lasting legacy of trauma and loss.
To know more about citizenship rights, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14160229#
#SPJ11
compare Capitalism and Socialism and contrast Capitalism and Communism. Please include two pieces of evidence for each economic system.
Capitalism and socialism are two economic systems that have different approaches to resource allocation, ownership, and control.
One of the key differences between capitalism and socialism is the ownership of the means of production. In capitalism, individuals and corporations own the means of production, and they are free to operate in the market without interference from the state.
socialism advocates for the collective ownership and control of resources. The state is responsible for ensuring that resources are distributed equally among all members of society, and individuals have equal access to education, healthcare, & other public services.
One piece of evidence for socialism is the success of countries like Sweden and Denmark, which have developed strong welfare states with high levels of social & economic equality.
communism has also been associated with authoritarianism & the suppression of individual freedoms, as seen in the Soviet Union & North Korea.
Capitalism, on the other hand, has been criticized for creating economic inequality & promoting a culture of greed and materialism. In contrast, socialism has been criticized for stifling innovation and entrepreneurship and creating a culture of dependency on the state.
To know more about Capitalism-
brainly.com/question/28218484
#SPJ1
What is the main role of the grand jury?
Answer:
Explanation:
Grand juries are sometimes referred to as undertaking investigative and accusatory tasks, although their main job is to evaluate if there is reason to think that one or more people committed a specific Federal criminal within the district court's jurisdiction.
Summarize the argument that harriet and her husband make as to why they deserve to be free.
Harriet and her husband argue that they deserve to be free based on their natural rights as human beings, the immorality of slavery, and their potential contributions to society as free citizens.
In their argument, Harriet and her husband emphasize that, as human beings, they possess natural rights that should not be violated, including the right to liberty. They assert that slavery is an inherently immoral institution that denies them these fundamental rights.
By highlighting their skills, talents, and potential, they contend that they could contribute more effectively to society if allowed to live as free citizens. They also appeal to the compassion and empathy of their audience, sharing personal stories and experiences to illustrate the inhumanity and cruelty of slavery.
In essence, Harriet and her husband call for their freedom based on principles of justice, morality, and the potential for a better future for themselves and their community.
To know more about morality click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1420034#
#SPJ11
Question 2 of 10
What is one major problem created by globalization?
A. Military conflicts between powerful nations have increased.
B. It has become more difficult to get products made in other
countries.
C. An increase in international shipping has led to more pollution.
D. Fewer workers are able to get an education related to their jobs.
Answer:
D or B
Explanation:
High Investment Costs
Globalization presents challenges for multinational corporations in terms of capital investment and leadership. Setting up a business in a new country, especially a developing country, requires substantial upfront capital. The needed infrastructure may not be in place.
What are ways the end of the cold war affected the united states? two correct answers.
The end of the cold war affected the United States in two main ways.
Firstly, it resulted in a significant reduction in military spending and helped the country to focus on other priorities such as domestic issues like healthcare and education. Secondly, the end of the cold war led to a shift in US foreign policy, with a greater emphasis on promoting democracy and human rights around the world.1. Economic changes: With the end of the Cold War, the United States experienced a reduction in defense spending, as the arms race with the Soviet Union was no longer necessary. This allowed for a reallocation of resources towards domestic and social programs, which led to economic growth in the 1990s.know more about cold war here: https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ11
Who was targeted and denounced by the red guards? why did the red guards denounce these people? what methods did the red guards use?.
During the Cultural Revolution in China, the Red Guards targeted and denounced a wide range of people, including intellectuals, artists, government officials, and anyone deemed to be a "bourgeois" or a "capitalist roader." The Red Guards denounced these individuals because they were seen as representing the old, traditional order and as opposing the socialist revolution.
The Red Guards were student groups formed during the Cultural Revolution in China (1966-1976) who were tasked with promoting and defending Mao Zedong's socialist ideology. They were encouraged to denounce anyone who was seen as opposing Mao's vision of a socialist society, which included anyone who was seen as being part of the old, traditional order.
The Red Guards targeted intellectuals, artists, government officials, and other individuals who they believed represented the old order or who were critical of Mao's policies. They also targeted anyone who was seen as promoting or practicing capitalism or other "bourgeois" values.
To know more about Red Guards, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/3235372
#SPJ4
What policy was the court killing that made Roosevelt do this (what was his plan for the Great
Depression)?