why do you suppose the author uses a flashback to reveal details about Farquhar how does this impact the story

Eugenics played a significant role in the spread and institutionalization of Jim Crow laws in the United States at the turn of the 20th century. Eugenics is a pseudo-scientific theory that promotes the idea of "racial purity" and seeks to improve the genetic quality of a population by encouraging the reproduction of those deemed to have desirable traits while discouraging the reproduction of those deemed to have undesirable traits. This theory was used to justify discriminatory policies and laws against minority groups, particularly African Americans.

At the turn of the 20th century, eugenicists advocated for the sterilization of individuals deemed to have "undesirable" traits, including those with mental illness, disabilities, and criminal tendencies. Many of these eugenicists believed that African Americans were inherently inferior and therefore should be prevented from reproducing in order to improve the genetic quality of the American population. This belief was used to justify the implementation of Jim Crow laws, which institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans in many areas of public life.

For example, eugenicists argued that African Americans were more prone to criminal behavior and therefore should be subject to harsher punishment and surveillance. This belief was used to justify the creation of separate and unequal justice systems for African Americans, such as the convict lease system in which African American prisoners were leased out to work on plantations and other businesses. Eugenicists also argued that African Americans were more prone to disease and therefore should be separated from the rest of the population to prevent the spread of illness. This belief was used to justify the segregation of schools, hospitals, and other public facilities.

Overall, eugenics played a significant role in the spread and institutionalization of Jim Crow laws in the United States at the turn of the 20th century. The theory was used to justify discriminatory policies and laws against African Americans and other minority groups, perpetuating a legacy of racism and discrimination that continues to impact American society today.

According to Malcolm X, white Americans are to blame for crime and poverty in black neighborhoods. Option B

Malcolm X believed that the root causes of crime and poverty in black neighborhoods were systemic racism and oppression perpetuated by white Americans.

He argued that the U.S. Senate, the Supreme Court, and other institutions upheld and enforced laws and policies that discriminated against black people and kept them in a cycle of poverty.

Malcolm X also placed blame on black individuals who failed to support each other, calling for unity and collective action in the fight against racism and poverty. He saw these issues as interconnected and argued that they could only be addressed through a radical restructuring of society that prioritized justice and equality for all people.

Overall, Malcolm X saw crime and poverty in black neighborhoods as symptoms of a larger problem of systemic racism and oppression, and called for a comprehensive approach to addressing these issues. So Option B is correct .

For more question on poverty visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28468793

#SPJ11

Question:

How were the Allies able to defeat the Axis in World War II?

Answer:

The military production of the Allies far exceeded the production of the Axis

The coastal cultures north of California were the Pacific Northwest Coast cultures. These included various Native American groups such as the Tlingit, Haida, Nuu-chah-nulth, Kwakwaka'wakw, and Coast Salish, among others. These cultures were known for their sophisticated art, including totem poles and intricate basketry, as well as their fishing and whaling practices. They also had complex social structures and often engaged in trade and diplomacy with neighboring groups.

Answer:

Yes,

Explanation:

On March 21, 1990, Namibia-the last colony in Africa-achieved independence

The objective and subject matter of a documentary and a feature film differ from one another. In contrast to feature films, which attempt to entertain audiences, documentaries aim to educate, inform.

A feature film typically uses actors to tell a story, but a documentary typically uses actual people in real life events. Of course, actors sometimes act out "reenactments" in documentaries, and "clips of genuine events" are sometimes used in movies.

Real life serves as the foundation of all documentaries. They can only accurately depict non-fictional, real-world events. Yet, fictional stories are frequently told in narrative films.

To know more about documentary visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28216484

#SPJ1

All three foreign policy objectives are interrelated and important in their own right. However, the priority of one goal over the others is determined by the circumstances and challenges that the United States is facing at the time.

The three foreign policy objectives of the United States are:

Learn more about foreign policy here: https://brainly.com/question/9909886

#SPJ1

The statement "Rocks change from one type to another" correctly describes a feature of the rock cycle. The rock cycle is a continuous process of transformation in which rocks are constantly changing from one type to another over time, through various geological processes such as weathering, erosion, melting, cooling, and solidification. This process involves the transformation of different types of rocks, including igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks, into other types, which can then be further transformed. The rock cycle does not follow a specific order and different rock groups are related to one another through the processes of the cycle.

Japan has undergone significant changes throughout its history, and these changes have had a profound impact on its people and culture. Some of the key ways that Japan has changed its people include:

Modernization: Japan underwent a period of rapid modernization during the Meiji Restoration in the late 19th century. This included adopting Western-style institutions and technologies, such as railroads, telegraph lines, and a modern legal system. This modernization had a significant impact on Japanese society and culture, as it transformed the country from a feudal society to a modern industrialized nation.

World War II: Japan's involvement in World War II had a profound impact on its people, both during the war and in its aftermath. The war brought widespread destruction and suffering, and many Japanese people were forced to confront the brutal realities of war and imperialism. In the postwar era, Japan underwent significant social and cultural changes, including a shift towards a more pacifist and democratic society.

Overall, Japan's history of modernization, war, economic growth, and demographic change has had a profound impact on its people, shaping their attitudes, beliefs, and values, and transforming the country's society and culture.

In overturning their previous decision, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the idea of "separate but equal" violated the "equal protection"   clause in the 14th Amendment. Thus the correct option is A

To overturn a presidential veto, a 2/3 majority vote (66%) is needed by Congress. Thus the correct option is C.

An "equal protection" clause is a crucial component that protects people from discrimination based on their race, gender, religion, and other characteristics According to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

The president of the United States has the right to veto legislation passed by Congress. If a bill is vetoed by the president, it can still become law if Congress votes to override the veto. A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required.

Learn more about Supreme Court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/10739091

#SPJ1

The given statement "Each archetype in the heroic monomyth is exemplified by different entities representing the culture the myth originated from: one role, represented in many different ways," is true because  the hero's journey is a universal narrative pattern that is expressed differently across different cultures.

The heroic monomyth, also known as the hero's journey, is a common narrative pattern found in myths, legends, and stories from cultures around the world. This pattern typically involves a hero who embarks on a journey, faces various challenges and obstacles, and ultimately achieves a goal or triumphs over evil.

The archetypes, or universal character types, that appear in the hero's journey are often represented in different ways across different cultures. For example, the mentor archetype may be represented by a wise old wizard in one culture and a spiritual guide in another.

Additionally, different cultures may have their own unique archetypes that are not present in other cultures' hero's journeys. For instance, in Japanese folklore, there is the archetype of the oni, a demon-like creature that represents the villain or antagonist.

In summary, The archetypes that appear in the hero's journey are often represented in unique and culturally-specific ways.

For more question on archetype visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17910653

#SPJ11

Answer:

experimental theater is the answer

A clear and concise structure is evident in the specified excerpt from the American with Disabilities Act.

The opening statement outlines its primary objective, which is to ensure individuals with disabilities have an equal opportunity to participate fully in society.

Subsequently, it proceeds with definitive descriptions of key terms such as disability and public entities, providing unambiguous interpretations of the ADA.

Note that  the excerpt's coherence and sequencing impart straightforwardness and accessibility to its purpose and significant definitions.

Learn more about American with disabilities act at:

https://brainly.com/question/2561827

#SPJ1

The excerpt above could be titled as - B. Impacts of British colonialism in India.

The reason for this is-

Also, this is because the British governed India for approximately 200 years. Indian culture is still clearly influenced by them.

Hence, the correct answer is B. Impacts of British colonialism in India.

Control by one power over a dependent region or population is what is meant by colonialism. It happens when one country conquers another, subjugates its people, and exploits them, frequently while imposing its own language and cultural norms.

To know more about Colonization visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30900919

#SPJ1

The constitutional issues faced by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush during their administrations were as follows:

Ronald Reagan: Iran Contra Affair - This was a scandal in which the Reagan administration secretly sold arms to Iran, which was under an arms embargo, and used the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The issue involved questions about the president's power to conduct foreign policy and whether the administration had violated the law.

Bill Clinton: Impeachment - This was a political crisis in which President Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives for perjury and obstruction of justice related to his affair with Monica Lewinsky. The issue involved questions about the president's conduct in office and whether he had abused his power.

George W. Bush: Use of executive privilege - This was a controversy over the Bush administration's use of executive privilege to withhold information from Congress during investigations into the firing of U.S. attorneys and the use of warrantless wiretapping by the National Security Agency. The issue involved questions about the president's power to keep information confidential and whether he had overstepped his authority.

George W. Bush: Patriot Act and Iraq War - These were controversial policies implemented by the Bush administration in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act expanded the government's surveillance and law enforcement powers, while the Iraq War was a military conflict launched on the premise of finding weapons of mass destruction. The issues involved questions about the president's power to protect national security and whether these policies were necessary and effective.

In my opinion, the most serious constitutional issue described above for the country's well-being was the Patriot Act and the associated expansion of the government's surveillance and law enforcement powers. While the desire to protect national security is understandable, the erosion of civil liberties and privacy rights can have significant negative consequences for society. The use of these powers has been controversial and has raised concerns about government overreach and abuse of power. In a democracy, it is important to balance national security with individual rights and freedoms, and I believe that the expansion of government surveillance and law enforcement powers under the Patriot Act was a significant challenge to this balance.

The reasons for the rise of imperialism are as follows.

Commercial Revolution: Production significantly increased as a result of the industrial revolution in European nations. National security: .In terms of nationalism.. Power dynamics:. Discovery of new routes: .Population expansion:. Anarchy in the State:

Imperialism is the practice, ideology, or attitude of extending or preserving power, especially through expansionism, using both hard force (economic and military strength) and soft power (cultural and diplomatic power), establishing or maintaining a . National security hegemony, and creating or maintaining a more or less formal empire.

One prominent, frequently synonymous, but distinct form of imperialism has been colonialism, which concentrates imperialism on the more or less formal distinction between metropolitan and colonial life, people, and lands

Learn more about imperialism, from :

brainly.com/question/1225474

#SPJ1

What happened to the Amish family that lost another child? CNN about 15 years ago, an Amish family in the raster US was hit by an unexplainable tendency.

There should be proper support for the children in the development of education and welfare of the state in the later 1680s James 11 courted the dissenters in the hope that they would support religious toleration for Roman Catholics and protestants. there will the full support from the government for development of the education.

we want to make a case for the children for medical that can stand up to heavy use but are also not too heavy. also, education plays a major role every citizen should make sure that every child gets proper education to develop the child.

to know more details about child rights ;  

https://brainly.in/question/44323170

Wisconsin v. Jonas Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), is the case in which the United States Supreme Court determined that Amish children could not be forced to attend school past the eighth grade.

The fundamental right of parents to religious freedom was determined to outweigh the state's interest in educating their children. The case is frequently cited as support for parents' right to educate their children in settings other than traditional private or public schools.

3 Amish students from three various families decided to drop out of New Glarus High School with in New Glarus, Wisconsin, public school at the end of eighth grade due to their parents' religious beliefs.

To know  about religious freedom visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29783580

#SPJ1

Answer:

"Has Putin's war failed?" is an article that analyzes the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It argues that while Russia has not achieved all of its goals in Ukraine, it has succeeded in destabilizing the country and maintaining a level of influence. Russia's goals in Ukraine include maintaining a buffer zone between itself and NATO, preventing Ukraine from joining the EU, and keeping Ukraine within its sphere of influence. The article suggests that Russia's ultimate goal is to create a new international order that includes a more prominent role for Russia.

Answer:

It is crucial to consider the irony of colonialism and empire because it highlights the inherent contradictions and injustices of these systems. Colonialism and empire were built on the idea of Western superiority and the exploitation of other cultures and peoples, often through violence and oppression. However, this idea of superiority was not only unfounded, but it also ignored the rich history, knowledge, and diversity of the colonized peoples.

Moreover, the irony of colonialism and empire is that they claimed to bring civilization, progress, and modernity to the "uncivilized" and "backward" peoples, while in reality, they disrupted and destroyed indigenous cultures, economies, and social systems. Colonizers often erased or suppressed local languages, religions, and customs and imposed their own values, norms, and institutions.

By recognizing the irony of colonialism and empire, we can challenge the dominant narratives and perspectives that have justified and glorified these systems and instead, acknowledge the complex and diverse experiences of those who were colonized and oppressed. We can also work towards a more equitable and just society that values diversity, multiculturalism, and respect for all peoples and cultures.

Explanation:

There were several reasons why the theory of evolution was not readily accepted when it was first proposed by Charles Darwin in the 19th century. Here are three possible theories:

Religious and philosophical opposition: The theory of evolution was controversial because it challenged traditional religious beliefs about the origins of life and humanity. Many people believed that God had created the world and all its creatures in their present form, and they saw the idea of evolution as incompatible with their faith. In addition, some philosophers and intellectuals argued that evolution was a flawed or incomplete theory that could not fully explain the complexity of life.

Lack of evidence: When Darwin first proposed his theory, there was limited scientific evidence to support it. Many scientists were skeptical of the idea because it was difficult to test and there were few fossils or other evidence to confirm the existence of transitional species. It was only later, as more evidence was discovered and new techniques for studying genetics and biology were developed, that the theory of evolution became widely accepted.

Political and social factors: The theory of evolution was also controversial because it had implications for social and political issues of the time. Some people feared that the theory could be used to justify racism or eugenics (the idea that certain groups of people are inherently superior to others). Others saw evolution as a threat to the social order and traditional values, and they opposed it for ideological reasons.

Answer:

Explanation:

a) Elected officials vote as their constituents want them to

The theory of delegate representation is a political theory that holds that elected officials should strive to represent the views and interests of their constituents. In this view, representatives are considered "delegates" of the people who elected them, and they should act as proxies for their constituents' interests when they vote on legislation or take other official actions.

Under the theory of delegate representation, elected officials are expected to take their constituents' interests into account when making decisions, even if those decisions go against their own personal beliefs or the interests of powerful groups or individuals.

This theory stands in contrast to the theory of trustee representation, which holds that elected officials should act as "trustees" of the public interest and use their own judgment to make decisions, even if those decisions go against the preferences of their constituents.

Overall, the theory of delegate representation is an important concept in democratic governance, as it places a strong emphasis on the role of citizen participation and representation in shaping policy decisions.

Yes, multiple governments around the globe used propaganda to sway public opinion and support their war efforts during World War I.

Governments on both sides of the conflict used propaganda techniques to dehumanize the enemy, promote nationalistic fervor, and encourage citizens to support the war effort through various means, such as buying war bonds or enlisting in the military.

Propaganda was disseminated through various mediums, including posters, films, newspapers, and speeches. Governments employed skilled artists, writers, and filmmakers to create persuasive propaganda that appealed to people's emotions and prejudices. Some of the most famous propaganda posters from World War I were produced by the United States and British governments, while Germany was also known for its effective use of propaganda during the war.

To know more about  governments here

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ1

Answer:

Their work included setting up shelters for people who were homeless, a family tracing service, running soup kitchens, helping people living in the slums and setting up rescue homes for women fleeing domestic abuse and prostitution.

Answer: It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.

Explanation: She says it shall be my work this evening to prove to you...

the given statement "Anti-federalists would likely have been supportive of nationwide mask and vaccine mandates."is false because Anti-federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution.

They believed that the federal government should have limited powers and that individual liberties should be protected.

Mandating masks and vaccines on a nationwide level would be seen by anti-federalists as an overreach of federal power. They would argue that this is a decision that should be left up to the individual states to decide.

Anti-federalists would likely support the idea of individual choice when it comes to healthcare decisions and would be wary of a centralized authority imposing such mandates.

Moreover, anti-federalists were skeptical of the federal government's ability to effectively carry out such mandates and would be concerned about potential abuses of power. They would prefer that state governments have the ability to tailor policies to the specific needs of their constituents.

In conclusion, anti-federalists would not be supportive of nationwide mask and vaccine mandates because they would view such mandates as an infringement on individual liberties and an overreach of federal power.

For more question on Anti-federalists visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28737049

#SPJ11

Lincoln's goals for voting after the Civil War were primarily focused on granting suffrage to African American men. Hence option A is correct.

Lincoln's believed that granting them the right to vote would help them achieve equal rights and protection under the law. In fact, he pushed for the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibited the denial of voting rights based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

While Lincoln did not specifically address Native American voting rights or advocate for disenfranchising Southern white men, his efforts towards extending suffrage to African American men were significant and helped pave the way for expanded voting rights in the United States.

As for women's voting rights, Lincoln did not live to see the passage of the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote. However, his advocacy for African American suffrage helped lay the groundwork for later movements towards women's suffrage.

Learn more about voting after the Civil War here

https://brainly.com/question/5012017

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

A. could order private businesses to follow the law as it was stated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, so businesses couldn't discriminate.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Option (d), Antitrust laws and laissez-faire economics were created to control out-of-control corporate growth.

Businesses operate with more flexibility under a free-market economy because there are fewer government prohibitions that would complicate doing business. In this environment, businesses are more inclined to take risks and make economic investments.

Antitrust laws are the regulations that regulate the market and how it operates. The objectives of these laws are to prevent monopolies and to reduce unfair commercial practices. Although the antitrust laws have been around for more than a century, their primary objective has remained the same: to protect the market's competitive environment for the benefit of consumers by making sure that businesses have strong incentives to operate profitably, keep costs down, and uphold high standards of quality.

Learn more about Antitrust laws: https://brainly.com/question/29588193

#SPJ1

Answer:

True

Explanation:

John Brown led an armed raid on the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in 1859, with the intention of sparking a slave rebellion. During the raid, Brown and his followers killed several people, including non-combatant slaveholders, and were eventually captured and executed for their actions.