The explanation of the characters in the given narration is the girl is one who seems to be in an asylum due to her comment about the scattered trees in the asylum.
The boy, on the other hand, Matthew seems to be a person that is not very excited to be where he is and talking to the girl as at some point he confesses that he feels dizzy, such as the period when he was tricked to enter a rollercoaster.
What is a Narration?This refers to the storytelling that is done with the aid of a narrator in order to advance a plot.
Hence, we can see that The explanation of the characters in the given narration is the girl is one who seems to be in an asylum due to her comment about the scattered trees in the asylum.
The boy, on the other hand, Matthew seems to be a person that is not very excited to be where he is and talking to the girl as at some point he confesses that he feels dizzy, such as the period when he was tricked to enter a rollercoaster.
Read more about narration here:
https://brainly.com/question/75925
#SPJ1
How the organization funded
From Ray Bradbury's A Sound of Thunder: Identify the steps in the chain of causes and effects that Travis says would occur if a time traveler accidentally killed even one mouse. Do you think his theory might really be accurate? Explain.
Travis explains that killing one single mouse could mean the destruction of even billions of other life forms in a chain of causes and effects, as seen below.
A mouse is killed.There will be not future families coming from this mouse.Foxes may die from lack of mice.Lions may starve from lack of foxes.Insects, vultures, and other life forms end up thrown into chaos and destruction because that one mouse died.What happens in "A Sound of Thunder"?In Ray Bradbury's "A Sound of Thunder," people are able to travel in time. The main character, Eckels, pays a time traveling company to take him back to a time when he can hunt dinosaurs. The guide who accompanies Eckels, Travis, explains that he is not allowed to shoot anything besides what he tells him to shoot.
When Eckels asks why, Travis begins a long explanation on how the future can be altered if one single mouse is killed in the past. The chain of causes and effects Travis comes up with is the following:
A mouse is killed.There will be not future families coming from this mouse.Foxes may die from lack of mice.Lions may starve from lack of foxes.Insects, vultures, and other life forms end up thrown into chaos and destruction because that one mouse died.In the end, Eckels does change the future by killing a butterfly.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about "A Sound of Thunder" here:
https://brainly.com/question/28276425
#SPJ1
what literary styles does the author employ to facilitate a relationship between the characters and the reader? life of pi
The author's literary style could be described as both casual and lyrical, and has the first person narrative style.
Yann Martel's Life of Pi is about the story of a young boy's survival journey aboard a lifeboat over a period of months and confined along with a Bengal tiger. The writing the author used was considered to be both casual and lyrical which is hard to pull off together. The writing style basically means the way the author chooses to tell his story through word choice, sentence structure, and voice to fit into the purpose of the story, martel choose for going with uncomplicated and casual language to order to tell the story, and the word choice is straightforward and simple.
Secondly, he chose the omniscient narrator, in order the narrate the novel, the omniscient narrator knows and tells the inner thoughts of the story's characters, which is also called the first person narrative style which is different from second person narrator, where the narrator writes to a person or people, sometimes even to the reader.
To know more about literary style refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/1377623?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
what does the quote
"Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror"
mean
Quote "It was then that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terrorism." Meaning: He finally realized that his life was ultimately over. He realized the amazing hunting skills of General Zharov.
The definition of a Quote is a word or phrase taken from another person, a work of literature, or the asking price of something. An example of a quote is when you take a passage from Shakespeare and repeat it exactly as it is written, without changing a single word. Citation means to repeat exactly what a speaker or author has said.
A quotation is also a phrase or statement that is repeated in this way. Citation means to cite something as evidence. Quotations have several different meanings as verbs and nouns. A noun citation refers to a group of words taken and repeated from a text or speech by someone other than the original author or speaker. A direct citation is an exact statement of the author or speaker. Direct quotations are enclosed in quotation marks. Citation is when you use the exact word in a source. You should put quotation marks around words that do not belong to you and indicate where they come from.
Learn more about Quote here:
https://brainly.com/question/2762082
#SPJ9
and mr. hyde.about a week has passed, and i am now finishing this statement under the influence of the last of the old powders. this, then, is the last time, short of a miracle, that henry jekyll can think his own thoughts or see his own face (now how sadly altered!) in the glass.which theme best connects to this excerpt?human beings learn from nature.silence is a powerful tool.evil can never truly hide itself.strength comes from trials.
"Evil can never truly hide itself" is the theme that best connects to this excerpt.
For any literature, the theme is the central idea. It can also be thought of as a moral or learning. Only after thorough understanding of the literary work can one identify its theme.
The given excerpt is from "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde". It revolves around a scientist Dr. Jekyll who creates an extraordinary potion that can separate two sides of his personality, one good and one evil. Due to this potion, his evil side is created. This evil side is Mr. Hyde.
Mr. Hyde is evil and is taking control over Dr. Jekyll. Thus, it is clear that no matter how much an evil person deceives others and tries to hide, some day or the other their true nature is revealed.
To read a summary of "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/21279975
Part b which detail best supports the answer to part a? life contracts and death is expected
Answer:
the correct answer is nunya
Explanation:
nunya is the correct answer nunya business
According to Quindlen, how have other countries often handled deep ethnic divisions? Make sure to include line# and page# you found the information on.
According to Quindlen, how have other countries often handled deep ethnic divisions is that the Other countries have often handled deep ethnic divisions by separating to become new countries with a new name.
What is Ethnic groups?Ethnic groups can be described as the term that is used in describing the group into the subgroups or tribes, which could turn out to be separate ethnic groups themselves with some period of time which could be as a result of the endogamy or physical isolation .
In this case it should be noted that According to Quindlen, how have other countries often handled deep ethnic divisions is that the Other countries have often handled deep ethnic divisions by separating to become new countries with a new name.
Learn more about ethnic divisions at:
https://brainly.com/question/25012115
#SPJ1
what page did who had been an ardent expectant woman—almost a bride—was a cold, solitary girl again; her life was pale; her prospects were desolate come from
Jane Eyre is the Novel by Charlotte Brontë who wrote under the name of Currer Bell. The novel was a hit as it talked about a lot of evils of the Victorian Age.
The lines, "who had been an ardent expectant woman—almost a bride—was a cold, solitary girl again; her life was pale; her prospects were desolate " comes in chapter twenty- six of the novel.
The context of these lines is the marriage of Rochester and Jane Eyre which was canceled because she discovers that he is already married and his wife is a madwoman.
His wife killed her brother and had temper issues. To control her he has to keep her in the attic away from everyone.
To learn more about Jane Eyre here:
https://brainly.com/question/26106897
#SPJ4
Identify if the sentence is a simple, compound, complex, or compound-complex?
Sarah had homework, but she also had a piano lesson
The sentence given in question "Sarah had homework, but she also had a piano lesson" is a example of compound sentences.
What is compound sentence?
Multiple independent clauses or sentences are combined to form compound sentences. Independent clauses, or clauses that can be alone as separate sentences, are the key in this situation. A compound sentence essentially combines several separate sentences which are connected into one.
Because they frequently contain a coordinating conjunction, also known as a FANBOYS (For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, and So) word, compound sentences are simple to spot. Though, a conjunction is not necessary when using a semicolon to join two clauses in complex sentences.
An example of compound sentences similar to the sentence in the question is given below:
I have a pet iguana. His name is Tony.
Vampires Dairies is my favorite television show, but I also don't like True Blood.
To get more information about compound sentence, go to URL
https://brainly.com/question/13779006
#SPJ9
She gave me a curious look. "Just how do you picture
your school in Washington, P.A.?" she asked.
Well, I knew exactly what it would be like, so I told her:
I'd be an American in a class with nothing but Americans
in it. When we fought the American Revolution, we'd all
fight on the same side. When we sang "My country 'tis of
thee," we'd yell our heads off. We'd all be the same. I
would belong.
-Homesick,
Jean Fritz
What are the narrator's expectations of living in
America and going to an American school?
O She expects that everyone will get along.
O She expects that everyone will fight constantly.
O She expects to be the only patriotic student.
She expects to be the best stúdent in the class.
The narrator's expectations of living in America and going to an American school is that A. She expects that everyone will get along.
What was the story about?This fictitious autobiography recounts the endearing tale of a young girl growing up in a foreign environment. Jean Fritz was in China in the thick of political instability while other girls her age were enjoying their youth in America.
Ten-year-old Jean Fritz is a resident of China. She is shy, brave, and devoted. She didn't sing the British anthem, demonstrating her allegiance to America. Jean Fritz exhibited exceptional bravery by refusing to say the promise despite knowing that she might face consequences.
It should be noted that narrator's expectations of living in America and going to an American school is that she expects that everyone will get along.
In conclusion, the correct option is A.
Learn more about narrator on:
https://brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
What noise drives the ghost offstage in hamlet
Answer:
rooster crow
Explanation:
McCarthyism was...
a. Named after Senator Joseph McCarthy
b. Came from the fear of hidden Communists in America
c. Led to the interrogation of directors, authors, and other media professionals
Answer:
It might be C!
Explanation:
Identify the tone of the opening paragraph. ( Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin )
Kate Chopin creates a bright and optimistic tone in “The Story of an Hour” in order to create the illusion of a positive ending.
The tone of “ The Story of an Hour ” is ironic and, ultimately, pessimistic. Throughout the story, dimmed and cheerful language is paired in an ironic and indeed disturbing way. This, in turn, corresponds with Louise's equivocal response to her hubby, Brently, death in a road accident. Kate Chopin's short piece" The Story of an Hour" is about a sickly woman who compactly believes her hubby is dead and imagines a whole new life of freedom for herself. The tone in literature refers to the author's station toward a certain content. Through specific word choices, the author reveals their passions and opinions to the anthology, conveying the author's intentions behind the textbook.
Learn more about Kate Chopin here: https://brainly.com/question/11826802
#SPJ1
5 points
Which quote most supports why Lourdes will not look at Enrique on her last day?
"The boy does not understand."
O "She understands, as only a mother can, the terror she is about to inflict, the ache Enrique will feel, and finally the emptiness."
"They have a bleak future. He and Belky are not likely to finish grade school. Lourdes cannot afford uniforms or pencils. Her husband is gone. A good job is out of the
question."
"They live on the outskirts of Tegucigalpa, in Honduras. She can barely afford food for him and his sister, Belky, who is seven."
The quote that most supports why Lourdes will not look at Enrique on her last day is this:
"She understands, as only a mother can, the terror she is about to inflict, the ache Enrique will feel, and finally the emptiness."Why could Lourdes not look at Enrique?Lourdes was unable to look at Enrique because she knew the pains that her child was about to face. Eye communication is a common way that people tend to speak to each other.
In the text, we can see that Lourdes was not able to look into the eyes of Enrique because she felt some guilt about the impending terror that Enrique was about to say. This is why we can conclude that the third option is correct.
Learn more about Lourdes and Enrique ehre:
https://brainly.com/question/27112063
#SPJ1
what does the the word “poor” make you think of?
Answer:
the word poor make me think of all the people out there who doesn't have money or food which is sad to alot of people who respects others
Answer:
The word "Poor" makes me think of two definitions. 1. Poor as of poor status financially ; 2. As well as poor or bad circumstances ; 3. poor misjudgment! Hope this helps!
in lines 185-189 beowulf instructs his audience there is no need then to lament for long or lay out my body and gives further instructions what does he want to be done with his belongings if he dies and why.
It is TRUE that in lines 185-189 Beowulf instructs his audience there is no need then to lament for long or lay out my body and gives further instructions what does he want to be done with his belongings if he dies and why.
What does Beowulf make the above preparations?As Beowulf prepares to fight Grendel's Mother, he indifferently gives instructions on what to do peradventure he dies.
See textual evidence below:
"Beowulf, who is "indifferent to death," prepares for battle by wearing armor and arming himself with weapons (1442). Unferth lends him Hrunting, the big and seasoned blade that has never failed in combat.
Beowulf speaks out, begging Hrothgar to look after the Geats and deliver his property to Hygelac if he is murdered. He also leaves Unferth his own sword."
Beowulf is divided by three major themes. The need of defining identity, contradictions between the heroic code and other value systems, and the distinction between a good warrior and a good ruler are among these issues.
Learn more about Beowulf:
https://brainly.com/question/995011
#SPJ1
True or False?
In lines 185-189 Beowulf instructs his audience there is no need then to lament for long or lay out my body and gives further instructions what does he want to be done with his belongings if he dies and why.
Reading Response Coming of Age in the Dawnland from 1491 Describe two interesting or unexpected details from Mann's description of pre-Columbian Native America. Explain why they were surprising, citing specific passages in your response.
Two interesting details of Mann's description of pre-Columbian Native America are that there was a very large population of natives and that this population was economically and socially well organized.
Why are these facts interesting?Because they show how different pre-Columbian Native America is from what we imagined.Because it shows how Europeans distorted the reality of the American continent.Over the years, we were taught that America was a region of savages, before the arrival of Europeans, as the natives were uncivilized beings, without education, organization, or knowledge and they were in isolated parts of the continent.
Mann's research shows that this was not true, but it points out that the natives were scattered across the continent and were extremely numerous. Furthermore, Mann shows that they were organized, had an effective political structure, and was a very functional social organization.
Learn more about Mann's research on pre-Columbian Native America:
https://brainly.com/question/25800832
#SPJ1
Determine whether the underlined conjunctions in the following sentence are coordinating or correlative by choosing the letters A (coordinating) or B
(correlative).
The money is real, but it has been shredded.
Ο Α. Α
OB. B
The underlined sentence - the money is real, but it has been shredded, is a coordinating conjunction. Therefore, A is the correct response.
What are coordinating and correlative conjunctions?A coordinating conjunction is a type of conjunction that connects to independent clauses or two independent statements with the help of but, and commas.
Correlative conjunction is the type of conjunction that connects two phrases or sentences that are of the same part of the speech. For example - Either..or, Neither..nor, Not only..but also.
Hence, the correct response is option A.
To know more about coordinating and correlative conjunctions, refer to - https://brainly.com/question/3685906
#SPJ1
Answer: it’s A
Explanation: I got it right
If it will inevitably rain, rain is _[blank].
Which option completes the sentence correctly?
O unavoidable
O unlikely
O required
O possible
Answer:
If it will inevitably rain, rain is unavoidable.
Explanation:
Definition: "Certain to happen and unable to be avoided or prevented."
Definition: "as is certain to happen; unavoidably."
Example: "inevitably some details are already out of date"
Read the excerpt from a short story. The beach teemed with tourists from boardwalk to shore. A canopy of colorful umbrellas covered the sand. Each was preoccupied with his own happy task, and none noticed the figure as it emerged from the surf. Its skin was blistered and raw, and it lumbered awkwardly in the foam. Its hideous eyes hungrily appraised the masses. How does the excerpt exemplify the ideas king describes in danse macabre?.
The second answer option demonstrates how the passage epitomises King's views in ''danse macabre'' is by offering a "unique and powerful spectacle" to the mind's eyes.
King uses a lot of description in his writing, which enables him to provide a lot of specifics about everything that is happening.
The reader can create numerous mental images from this description and visualise every aspect of the scene.
When the narrator describes the man's physical appearance, this descriptive force is much more potent. The author now uses images to further the reader's ability to imagine.
Her anxiety rose as she heard a knock on the door, which was too small to admit anyone.
Following this series of events leads the reader to the forbidden door through the author's description.
Learn more about ''danse macabre'':
https://brainly.com/question/26146410
#SPJ4
The complete question is ''The beach teemed with tourists from boardwalk to shore. A canopy of colorful umbrellas covered the sand. Each was preoccupied with his own happy task, and none noticed the figure as it emerged from the surf. Its skin was blistered and raw, and it lumbered awkwardly in the foam. Its hideous eyes hungrily appraised the masses.
How does the excerpt exemplify the ideas King describes in "Danse Macabre"?
a. It allows readers to approach a “forbidden door.”
b. It provides a “single powerful spectacle” for the imagination’s eye.
c. It forces readers to “grapple” with their own mortality.
d. It introduces an unlikely “dancing partner.”
Is Hitchcock successful in the development of his purpose and perspective in “Let ’Em Play God”? In defending your position, note the figurative language and/or rhetorical appeals he uses to help his purpose emerge. Also, be sure to explain whether or not he provided relevant reasons that support his perspective about what creates suspense.
We can conclude the following about the text and Hitchcock's part in it:
Hitchcock was successful in his development of purpose in the text. He clearly explained what he meant by letting the audience play god. He used vivid illustrations and rhetorical questions to help the reader understand the point. Solid reasons were also provided to explain what it meant to let the audience play God.What was the author's purpose?The author's purpose in this text is to help the reader know that suspense is the same as letting the audience play God. He explained why letting the audience play God is important.
He used vivid examples of the recent drama he filmed and how he let the audience play God. Rhetorical questions were also asked to help readers understand how they can let the audience play God.
Learn more about “Let ’Em Play God” here:
https://brainly.com/question/28420845
#SPJ1
select the sentence that advances the plot and creates tension in the excerpt the majority of the guests
The sentence that advances the plot and creates tension in the excerpt is 'If you mean that in earnest,' said the young man, 'I'll take the bet, but I would stay not five but fifteen years.''.Thus the correct option is B.
What is the plot?A plot of the story tells the reader or audience about what happens in the story by connecting one event with another. This plot is associated with the central idea and helps in clear understanding.
The subject is conducted in the form of a debate with hypothetical situations and is focused on the death sentence and life in prison as capital punishment.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about the Plot, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18885252
#SPJ4
The complete question is
Read the excerpt from "The Bet" by Anton Chekov and answer the question.
[1] It was a dark autumn night. The old banker was walking up and down his study and remembering how, fifteen years before, he had given a party one autumn evening. There had been many clever men there, and there had been interesting conversations. Among other things they had talked of capital punishment. The majority of the guests, among whom were many journalists and intellectual men, disapproved of the death penalty. They considered that form of punishment out of date, immoral, and unsuitable for Christian States. In the opinion of some of them the death penalty ought to be replaced everywhere by imprisonment for life. "I don't agree with you," said their host the banker. "I have not tried either the death penalty or imprisonment for life, but if one may judge a priori, the death penalty is more moral and more humane than imprisonment for life. Capital punishment kills a man at once, but lifelong imprisonment kills him slowly. Which executioner is the more humane, he who kills you in a few minutes or he who drags the life out of you in the course of many years?"
[2] "Both are equally immoral," observed one of the guests, "for they both have the same object—to take away life. The State is not God. It has not the right to take away what it cannot restore when it wants to."
[3] Among the guests was a young lawyer, a young man of five-and-twenty. When he was asked his opinion, he said:
[4] "The death sentence and the life sentence are equally immoral, but if I had to choose between the death penalty and imprisonment for life, I would certainly choose the second. To live anyhow is better than not at all."
[5] A lively discussion arose. The banker, who was younger and more nervous in those days, was suddenly carried away by excitement; he struck the table with his fist and shouted at the young man:
[6] "It's not true! I'll bet you two million you wouldn't stay in solitary confinement for five years."
[7] "If you mean that in earnest," said the young man, "I'll take the bet, but I would stay not five but fifteen years."
[8] "Fifteen? Done!" cried the banker. "Gentlemen, I stake two million!"
Select the sentence that advances the plot and creates tension in the excerpt.
A) "The majority of the guests, among whom were many journalists and intellectual men, disapproved of the death penalty." (Paragraph 1)
B) "'If you mean that in earnest,' said the young man, 'I'll take the bet, but I would stay not five but fifteen years.'" (Paragraph 7)
C)"'Both are equally immoral,' observed one of the guests, 'for they both have the same object—to take away life.'" (Paragraph 2)
D)"A lively discussion arose." (Paragraph 5)
List the supporting materials you might use for an essay on one of the following topics:
1) Why people often don’t help in a crisis.
2) Popular misconceptions about freedom of speech.
3) Comic strips that have educational value.
4) Why modern products are often shoddily constructed.
Answer:
1 and 2
Explanation:
James grilled burgers, and Patrick made
a salad.
Answer:
i guess Patrick made a salad and James grilled burgers then
I'm a middle schooler and I need help cuz this is due today
Eleven chose her hiding place carefully and it took me nearly an hour to find her. And is used for connecting complete thoughts. Option D is an appropriate response.
What is a connecting complete thought?
A complete sentence conveys a complete thought and has a subject and verb.
Coordinating conjunctions are used to connect two complete thoughts in a sentence. It can be remembered by the acronym FANBOYS which refers to For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, and So.
And can be used in the following ways: as a conjunction for joining two words, phrases, or clauses.
Eleven chose her hiding place carefully, and it took me nearly an hour to find her. And is used in the sentence for connecting complete thoughts.
Hence, option D is an appropriate response.
To learn more about conjunctions
https://brainly.com/question/13365338
#SPJ1
how does rhyming in O CAPTAIN! MY CAPTAIN! create emphasis on certain words
The initial couplets of the first two stanzas create a joyful atmosphere, which contrasts with the abbreviated next lines to highlight the poet's disappointment in the captain's passing.
What are couplets?A pair of grammatically and semantically self-contained end-rhymed lines of verse. A couplet can be run-on (or open), where the first line's meaning carries over to the second, or it can be formal (or closed), where each of the two lines is end-stopped (this is called enjambment).
In poetry, a couplet is two consecutive lines with the same meter. Typically, a couplet is made up of two lines that follow each other, rhyme, and have the same meter.
To learn more about couplets from the given link:
brainly.com/question/18935755
#SPJ9
Discussing the Impact of Historical Events in American Literature.
Thesis: The authors of American literature were naturally Englishmen who thought and wrote in a colonial manner. While some writers emphasized the colonists' attachment to the British monarchy, others emphasized the ideological divisions that prompted them to flee their own country. The American Revolution highlighted the widening contrasts between American and British political ideologies.
Supportive statements: The colonists were inspired by a number of very successful political writers, including Thomas Paine and Benjamin Franklin, as they came to the conclusion that revolution was unavoidable. Poetry was used as a tool throughout the American Revolution to express the ideas of both the loyalists and the Continentals. Satires on the Revolutionary War were successful propaganda and eventually focused on other facets of the American landscape. In the years following the American Revolution, authors in the country were urged to create authentically native literature. Multiple writers—William Cullen Bryant, Washington Irving, James Fenimore Cooper, and Edgar Allan Poe—started a significant literary revolution that lasted for half century.
Record at least 8 questions based on these and its supportive statements as well as the responses to these questions.
Some research questions that can be formulated based on the given thesis and supporting details are:
How different was American literature from British literature?How effective was the use of satire in American colonists' propaganda?How did previous writers influence American writers?Why was there an emphasis on the use of authentic native literature?From the given text, it is clearly stated that the authors of American literature were naturally Englishmen who thought and wrote in a colonial manner and thus, the American writers had to take over to get freedom and independence from the British King.
What is a Narration?This refers to the storytelling that is done with the aid of a narrator in order to advance a plot
Hence, we can see that Some research questions that can be formulated based on the given thesis and supporting details are:
How different was American literature from British literature?How effective was the use of satire in American colonists' propaganda?How did previous writers influence American writers?Why was there an emphasis on the use of authentic native literature?From the given text, it is clearly stated that the authors of American literature were naturally Englishmen who thought and wrote in a colonial manner and thus, the American writers had to take over to get freedom and independence from the British King.
Read more about narration here:
https://brainly.com/question/1934766
#SPJ1
How does the author use characterization to develop the personal qualities of herself (Amy Tan) in “Two Kinds?”
Rewrite this question in an easier way
(Rewrite the question into another question that is easier to understand)
ASP 50
Hello! Please read these theories on How the Native Americans Migrated. Choose one and tell me why you agree with it.
First Theory
Archeologists have thought they knew how ancient humans arrived on the American continent
for about the past 50 years. As of 2008, genetic findings are suggesting that a single population
of modern humans migrated from southern Siberia toward the land mass known as the Bering
Land Bridge as early as 30,000 years ago, and crossed over to the Americas by 16,500 years ago.
Archaeological evidence shows that by 15,000 years ago, humans had made it south of the
Canadian ice sheets. As the ice caps in Canada began to melt, a path southward emerged.
Archeologists call these people Clovis, after some stone tools from the era were found near
Clovis, New Mexico in the 1920’s and 1930’s . This may be the earliest migration the scientists
have uncovered but it certainly isn’t the only one.
Second Theory
From the 1930’s all the way to the 1990’s. The Clovis people were thought to be the only
migration theory. In 1997, archeologists made a discovery of an archaeological site in Monte
Verde, Chile, dating back to 14,500 years ago - a full millennium older than what was previously
thought to be the first people in the new world, and indicating they settled much further south
than expected. These new finding sparked much debate about the first humans migrating to the
Americas. Many new questions were asked. Did they in fact come across the Bering Land
Bridge? Could they have arrived in South America via a different route?
Intense criticism also rained down on competing theories of how people arrived, such as the idea
that early Americans might have skirted the coastline in boats, avoiding the Bering land bridge
entirely. “I was once warned not to write about coastal migration in my dissertation. My adviser
said I would ruin my career,” says Jon Erlandson, an archaeologist at the University of Oregon in
Eugene.
Third Theory
The Third theory is viewed as the more radical theory. This theory claims it is possible that the
first Americans didn't cross the Bering Land Bridge at all and didn't travel by foot, but rather by
boat across the Atlantic Ocean. Though the evidence for this theory is minimal, proponents argue
that the artifacts were developed by an earlier and still more ancient European group, known as
the Solutrean culture. This style bears an uncanny resemblance to that of the Clovis tools found
in the United States, which could suggest that humans may have entered America from the east
over a route that has been dubbed the Atlantic Maritime route. This theory looks at writing and
language of the time. Many scientists claim the people of the time had similar characteristics to
tribes in Australia and Southeast Asia. Support for this idea is found partially in the discovery of
a 9,500-year-old skeleton in Washington State. Dubbed the "Kennewick Man," the skeleton
bears a strong physical resemblance to the Japanese Ainu people, suggesting that a pan-Pacific
journey via boat might have brought the first Americans to our shores.
According to me, I agree with the first theory, the Bering land bridge.
Several theories exist among scientists and archaeologists about the history of Aboriginal peoples in the Americas. The Bering land bridge migration concept is by far the oldest and most commonly accepted of these theories. According to this theory, mankind were able to move from Siberia to Alaska across land during the last ice age (about 50,000-10,000 BPE).Evidence suggests that sea levels were significantly lower than they are now for up to 100,000 years, and the Bering Strait — the body of water that separates Siberia and Alaska — was an open plain of land and glaciers (which scholars call Beringia). As many as four major migrations are considered to have happened over the land bridge during a millennium, around 10,000-14,000 BPE.The broad uniformity of the North American Clovis civilization, named after the archaeological location in New Mexico where it was initially discovered, is the strongest supporting evidence for the Bering land bridge theory.Thus this is the correct theory according to me.
To learn more about Bering land bridge, refer: https://brainly.com/question/17393905
#SPJ1
Help if you can please help